Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Ubc - 1973 - A5 - 7 A43
Ubc - 1973 - A5 - 7 A43
Ubc - 1973 - A5 - 7 A43
by
JO ANN ALBERS
i n the School
of
Nursing
r e q u i r e d standard
April, 1973
In presenting this thesis i n p a r t i a l fulfilment of the requirements for
written permission.
ii
o
ABSTRACT
f o l l o w up c a r e .
justed or w e l l adjusted,
three the g r e a t e s t n e e d .
hemodialysis patient.
A r e l i a b i l i t y t e s t i n g u s i n g f o u r p a i r s o f nurses to
iii
IV
i n d i c a t i n g the p a t i e n t r a t i n g p r o v i d e d by the t o o l is
76 pages
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
and Kay O l h e i s e r .
and guidance.
v
TABLE OP CONTENTS
Page
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS y
LIST OF FIGURES ix
CHAPTER
Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
Assumptions 9
Definitions i . 10
L i m i t a t i o n s o f the Study 10
III. METHODOLOGY 27
Overview . . 27
Sample 27
C o n s t r u c t i o n o f the P r e l i m i n a r y T o o l . . . 28
The R a t i n g Scale 35
vi
vii
CHAPTER Page
Validation 36
Pre-Test . 36
R e l i a b i l i t y Testing 36
V a l i d i t y Testing 37
R e l i a b i l i t y Testing 37
A n a l y s i s o f R e s u l t s o f Assessment . . . . . 40
IMPLICATIONS .49
Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . 49
Conclusions . . . . . . • • • • • 51
Research I m p l i c a t i o n s . • 52
BIBLIOGRAPHY 53
APPENDICES 59
A. Nursing Assessment Form f o r Maintenance
Home Hemodialysis P a t i e n t 60
B. Nurses' Questionnaire . 68
Schedule 70
D. V a l i d a t i o n Form 72
E. I n s t r u c t i o n s to Nurses P a r t i c i p a t i n g
i n the R e l i a b i l i t y T e s t i n g 74
LIST OF TABLES
TABLE Page
li Well Adjusted P a t i e n t . . . . . 31
2A P o o r l y Adjusted P a t i e n t 31
3A P a i r e d Nurses Scores of F u n c t i o n i n g
L e v e l of P a t i e n t and D i f f e r e n c e s i n
Nurse Scores 38
4i S t a t i s t i c a l Treatment 39
viii
LIST OF FIGURES
FIGURE Page
l; Nurse A Scores 42
2, Nurse B Scores 43
3. Mean Scores 44
ix
CHAPTER I
I. INTRODUCTION
dialysis patient.
1
J. J . A b e l , L . G . Rowntree, and B. B, T u r n e r , "on
the Removal o f D i f f u s i b l e Substances from C i r c u l a t i n g Blood
by Means o f D i a l y s i s , " T r a n s a c t i o n s A s s o c i a t i o n American
Physicians, 1913* PP» 28 - 51.
2
W. F . K o l f f , " F i r s t x d i n i c a l Experience with the
A r t i f i c i a l K i d n e y , " Annals o f I n t e r n a l M e d i c i n e , v o l . L X I I ,
(1965). P . 608.
3
B e l d i n g H , S c r i b n e r , e t a l . , "The Treatment o f
Chronic Uremia by Means o f I n t e r m i t t e n t Hemodialysis 1 A P r e -
l i m i n a r y R e p o r t , " T r a n s a c t i o n s American S o c i e t y f o r A r t i f i c i a l
I n t e r n a l Organs, v o l . V I , (I960), p . 114
1
2
4
Wayne Quinton, David D i l l a r d , and B e l d i n g S c r i b n e r ,
" C a n n u l a t i o n o f Blood V e s s e l s f o r Prolonged H e m o d i a l y s i s , "
T r a n s a c t i o n American S o c i e t y f o r A r t i f i c i a l I n t e r n a l Organs,
vol. VI, (I960), p. 104.
5
R. A . B a i l l o d , et a l . , " O v e r n i g h t Hemodialysis i n
the Home," Proceedings o f the European D i a l y s i s and T r a n s p l a n t
A s s o c i a t i o n , v o l . I I . ( 1 9 6 5 ) . P . 9 9 ; K . C u r t i s , e t a l . . "Hemo-
d i a l y s i s i n the Home," T r a n s a c t i o n s American S o c i e t y f o r
A r t i f i c i a l I n t e r n a l Organs, v o l . X I . ( 1 9 6 5 ) . P . 7 s Joseph W.
Eshback, et a l . , "Unattended Overnight Home H e m o d i a l y s i s , "
T r a n s a c t i o n s American S o c i e t y f o r A r t i f i c i a l I n t e r n a l Organs,
v o l . X I I , ( 1 9 6 6 ) , p . 3 4 6 ; C . C L . Hampers, J . P . M e r r i l l and
E . Cameron, " H e m o d i a l y s i s i n the Home - A Family A f f a i r , "
T r a n s a c t i o n s American S o c i e t y f o r A r t i f i c i a l I n t e r n a l Organs,
v o l . X I , ( 1 9 6 5 ) , p . 3I J . P . Pendros and Terrance P o l l a r d ,
" E i g h t Years Experience with a Community D i a l y s i s C e n t e r , "
T r a n s a c t i o n s American S o c i e t y f o r A r t i f i c i a l I n t e r n a l Organs,
vol. XVI, (1970), p. 77. '
6
C. R. B l a g g , et a l . , "Home D i a l y s i s : S i x Years
E x p e r i e n c e , " New England J o u r n a l o f M e d i c i n e , v o l . CCXXCIII,
(November, 1 9 7 0 ) , p p . 1 1 2 6 - 1131.
3
confidence f o r the p a t i e n t , (3) g r e a t e r freedom to schedule
miles away,
7
P h i l i p W. Shambraugh, et a l ; , "Hemodialysis i n
the Home - Emotional Impact on the Spouse," T r a n s a c t i o n s
American S o c i e t y f o r A r t i f i c i a l I n t e r n a l Organs, v o l . X I I I ,
(1967), p p ; 41 - 4 5 .
8
Computer P r i n t - O u t N a t i o n a l D i a l y s i s R e g i s t r y ,
Research T r i a n g l e Park, North C a r o l i n a , January, 19?2.
9
C. B l a g g , "Need f o r Home F o l l o w Up C a r e , " Un-
p u b l i s h e d Report to Kidney Disease A d v i s o r y Committee,
Washington-Alaska Regional Medical Program, 1972.
4
11
Dorothy Smith, Manual f o r the Use of the Nursing
H i s t o r y T o o l . C o l l e g e of N u r s i n g , U n i v e r s i t y o f F l o r i d a ,
G a i n s v i l l e , F l o r i d a , 1 9 7 1 » P« 1»
12
R. Faye McCain, " N u r s i n g by Assessment Not I n t u -
i t i o n , " American J o u r n a l of N u r s i n g , v o l i LXV, n o . 4, ( A p r i l ,
1965), vTTT.
13
_.;Donna Zimmerman and C a r o l , G o h r k e , "The Goal D i r -
ected N u r s i n g Approachi I t Does Work," American J o u r n a l of
N u r s i n g , v o l . LXX, n o . 2, (February, 1970), p . 106.
5
s t r a t e d t h a t assessment based s o l e l y on i n t u i t i o n c a r r i e d
p s y c h o l o g i c a l and p h y s i o l o g i c a l areas.
14
Dolores E . L i t t l e and D o r i s C a r n e v a l i , Nursing
Care P l a n n i n g , P h i l a d e l p h i a : J . B . L i p p i n c o t t Company,
1969, P. 6 5 .
6
Specific Objectives
r e l i a b i l i t y and v a l i d i t y .
15
L , Brand and N , I . Komorita, " A d a p t i n g to Long
Term H e m o d i a l y s i s , " American J o u r n a l o f N u r s i n g , v o l , LXVI,
n o . 8, (August, 1966), p . 1781,
16
B e t t y M. Stewart, "Hemodialysis i n the Hornet The
Value o f House C a l l s by T r a i n i n g P e r s o n n e l , " Nursing C l i n i c s
of North America, v o l . IV, (September, 1969). p . 432,
7
family.
17
Nancy Gaspard, "The Family o f the P a t i e n t with
Long Term I l l n e s s , " N u r s i n g C l i n i c s o f North America, v o l ,
V, n o . 1, (March, 1970), p . 80.
18
C. B l a g g , "Need f o r Home Follow Up C a r e , " Un-
p u b l i s h e d Report to Kidney Disease A d v i s o r y Committee,
Washington-Alaska R e g i o n a l M e d i c a l Program, 1972.
8
need f o r e f f i c i e n t and inexpensive methods o f d e t e r m i n i n g
might be established.
describe the e f f e c t s o f h e m o d i a l y s i s on s o c i a l f u n c t i o n i n g .
19
M. Meldrun, J . Wolfram and M. R u b i n i , "The
Impact of Chronic Hemodialysis Upon the Socio-economics
of a Veteran P a t i e n t G r o u p , " J o u r n a l o f Chronic D i s e a s e s
v o l . XXI, (1968), p p ; 37 - 52.
problems.
R e f e r r i n g to d i a l y s i s patients, Cummings s t a t e d
IV. ASSUMPTIONS
20
M y r t l e A y d e l o t t e , " N u r s i n g Care o f P a t i e n t s Under>
going H e m o d i a l y s i s : A Study R e p o r t , " Unpublished Report
presented to the T h i r d Annual Veterans A d m i n i s t r a t i o n
Workshop o f Chronic H e m o d i a l y s i s , Chicago, A p r i l , 1967.
21
Jonathan Cummings, H e m o d i a l y s i s : The P r e s s u r e s
and How P a t i e n t s Respond," American J o u r n a l of N u r s i n g ,
v o l . LXX, n o . 1, (February, 1970), p . 76.
and, (3) assessment with the use o f a t o o l a l l o w s more
V. DEFINITIONS
Patient
home h e m o d i a l y s i s p a t i e n t .
r e c e i v e p e r i o d i c h e m o d i a l y s i s to s u s t a i n l i f e and who
services o f a medical a s s i s t a n t .
Nurse
Needs
a s s i s t a n c e to meet.
T h i s study i s s u b j e c t to the f o l l o w i n g l i m i t a t i o n s :
a v e r y s i m i l a r p h i l o s o p h y and orientation.
CHAPTER II
problems.
1
J e r r y Pendras and G e r a l d S t i n s o n , The Hemodialysis
Manual, S e a t t l e , (1969). p p . 1 - 4$ Constantme Hampers and
Eugene Schupak, Long Term H e m o d i a l y s i s . New Yorkt Grune and
S t r a t t o n , 1967, p p . 70 - 146.
2
C. M. Compty, D. McDade and M. Kaye, "Anemia and
I r o n Requirements of P a t i e n t s T r e a t e d by Maintenance Hemo-
d i a l y s i s , " T r a n s a c t i o n s American S o c i e t y f o r A r t i f i c i a l
I n t e r n a l Organs, v o l ; XIV. (1968), p p . 426 - 432.
12
13
dietary absorption of i r o n i s insufficient. Therefore, iron
fusions;
c e r t a i n i n h i b i t o r s o f bone c a l c i f i c a t i o n c i r c u l a t i n g i n the
3
A , Blumberg and K . G i g e r , L e t t e r to the E d i t o r r e .
H e p a t i t i s and H e m o d i a l y s i s , New England J o u r n a l o f M e d i c i n e ,
v o l ; CCXXCIII, n o . 1 2 , (September 1 7 , 1 9 7 0 ) , pp, 6 5 7 - 6 5 8 .
5
H , Tenckhoff, R . H , Jebsen, and J . C . Honet, "The
E f f e c t o f Long Term D i a l y s i s Treatment on the Course o f
Uremic Neuropathy," T r a n s a c t i o n s American S o c i e t y f o r
A r t i f i c i a l I n t e r n a l " Organs, v o l . X I I I . (1967). pp; 58 - 6 l .
6
G. O n e s t i , e t a l . , " B i l a t e r a l Nephrectomy f o r
C o n t r o l o f H y p e r t e n s i o n i n U r e m i a , " T r a n s a c t i o n s American
S o c i e t y f o r A r t i f i c i a l I n t e r n a l Organs, v o l i XIV, (1968).
PP. 361 - 366;
15
7
the treatment should be i n c r e a s e d i n frequency o r d u r a t i o n .
the S e a t t l e program•
7
Constantine Hampers and Eugene Schupak, Long Term
H e m o d i a l y s i s , New Yorkj Grune and S t r a t t o n , 1967» P P ; a o "
81.
8
J e r r y Pendras and G . S t i n s o n , The Hemodialysis
Manual. S e a t t l e , 1969, S e c t i o n X I i ; p ; li
9
C . F . Gutch and Martha S t o n e r , Review of Hemodialysis
f o r Nurses and D i a l y s i s P e r s o n n e l . S a i n t L o u i s t The C . V .
Mosby Company, 1971, p i 151•
P h y s i o l o g i c a l Problems Related to the D i a l y s i s Procedure
d i s e q u i l i b r i u m syndrome, h y p e r t e n s i o n , o r a n x i e t y ; cardiac
10
J e r r y Pendras and G . S t i n s o n , The Hemodialysis
Manual, S e a t t l e , 1969. S e c t i o n : X .
17
tiesi
Problems w i t h C i r c u l a t i o n Access
punctures to o b t a i n c i r c u l a t i o n a c c e s s ;
11
J e r r y Pendras and G. S t i n s o n , The Hemodialysis
Manual. S e a t t l e , 19&9, S e c t i o n V I .
12
Martha Read and Mary M o l l i s o n , " E x t e r n a l A r t e r i o -
venous S h u n t s , " American J o u r n a l o f N u r s i n g , v o l ; L X X I I , n o .
1, (January, 1972), ppi 81 - 85;
conclusions. "Although the subcutaneous arterial-venous
PATIENT
13
A . Achad, a t a l . , "Subcutaneous A r t e r i a l - V e n o u s
F i s t u l a i n Home H e m o d i a l y s i s , " T r a n s a c t i o n s American
S o c i e t y f o r A r t i f i c i a l I n t e r n a l " O r g a n s , v o l ; XVI. (1970),
p p ; 280 - 283;
14
E i l e e n Shea, e t a l « , "Hemodialysis f o r Chronic
Renal F a i l u r e - P s y c h o l o g i c a l C o n s i d e r a t i o n s , " Annals o f
I n t e r n a l M e d i c i n e , v o l . L X I I I , n o ; 3, (March, 1965), p p ;
558 - 563.
19
15
dialysis i n a community d i a l y s i s c e n t e r i n 1965. They
in 1967 to be r e l a t i v e l y l i t t l e d i s t u r b e d , as a whole, by
as m e d i c a l s u p e r v i s i o n and a d v i c e .
15 \5
Robert G . Wright, P . Sand and G . L i v i n g s t o n , "Psycho
l o g i c a l S t r e s s During Hemodialysis f o r Chronic Renal F a i l u r e , "
Annals o f I n t e r n a l M e d i c i n e , v o l ; LXIV, (March, 1966), p p i
611 - 621;
1.6
C h a r l e s Norton, " C h r o n i c Hemodialysis as a M e d i c a l
and S o c i a l E x p e r i m e n t , " Annals o f I n t e r n a l M e d i c i n e ; , v o l . LXVI
(June, 1967), p p i 1267 - 1276.
17
Harry S. Abram, The P s y c h i a t r i s t , the Treatment o f
Chronic Renal F a i l u r e , and the P r o l o n g a t i o n o f L i f e , "
American J o u r n a l o f P s y c h i a t r y , v o l i CXXIV, n o ; 10, ( A p r i l ,
1968), pp 1351 - 1358;
20
a t t e n t i o n and u n d e r s t a n d i n g ;
18
M, J , Short and W, P . W i l s o n , " R o l e s o f D e n i a l i n
Chronic H e m o d i a l y s i s , " A r c h i v e s o f General P s y c h i a t r y , v o l ,
XX, ( A p r i l , 1969), PP 433 - 437.
19
A , K, DeNour, "Psychotherapy w i t h P a t i e n t s on
Chronic H e m o d i a l y s i s , " B r i t i s h J o u r n a l o f P s y c h i a t r y , v o l ,
CXVI, (February, 1970), pp 207 - 215;
21
the c h r o n i c home h e m o d i a l y s i s p a t i e n t was found i n the
literature;
p a t i e n t s m e d i c a l l y i n o r d e r to e s t a b l i s h a prognosis. He
20
d i d not attempt a p s y c h o - s o c i a l or r e h a b i l i t a t i o n assessment.
An assessment o f p a t i e n t s i n an i n - h o s p i t a l program
22
E . A . Friedman, e t a l . , " P s y c h o s o c i a l Adjustment
to Maintenance H e m o d i a l y s i s , " New York J o u r n a l of M e d i c i n e ,
v o l i LXX, (March, 1970), p p i 629 - 637.
22
patient, his partner, and nurse to adherence to the medical
23
regimen, t o t a l a c t i v i t y and m o r a l e . She s t u d i e d twenty-
l e v e l o f p h y s i c a l and p h y s i o l o g i c a l f u n c t i o n i n g , S e c t i o n III
23
P a t r i c i a MacElveen, E x p l o r a t i o n o f the Cooperative
T r i a d i n the I n v e s t i g a t i o n of Home D i a l y s i s P a t i e n t Outcomes,
Unpublished D o c t o r a l D i s s e r t a t i o n , U n i v e r s i t y of C o l o r a d o , 1971•
24
V i r g i n i a Bonney and June Rothberg, Nursing
D i a g n o s i s and Therapy: An Instrument f o r E v a l u a t i o n and
Measurement, New York: The N a t i o n a l League f o r N u r s i n g ,
19611
23
25
patients. It i s based on seven b a s i c needst Nourishment,
nurses on e i g h t d i f f e r e n t h o s p i t a l u n i t s r a t e d a t o t a l o f 241
patients,
A y d e l o t t e d e s c r i b e s a t e s t o f p a t i e n t welfare which
25
Mary Edna W i l l i a m s , "The P a t i e n t P r o f i l e , "
Nursing Research, v o l . IX, n o . 3, (Summer, i960), pp. 122
TW.
s p e c i a l a s p e c t s o f independence, p a t i e n t ' s mobility,
26
M y r t l e K i t c h e l l A y d e l o t t e , "The Use of P a t i e n t
Welfare as a C r i t e r i o n Measure," Nursing Research, v o l . X I ,
n o . 1, (Winter, 1962), p p . 10 - lW.
27
Rosemary R i c h and James K . Dent, " P a t i e n t R a t i n g
S c a l e , " Nursing Research, v o l . X I , n o . 1, (Winter, 1962),
pp. 10 - 14.
25
response a c r o s s p a t i e n t s , (5) dimensionality, eg., the degree
28
Herbert Schoening and I v e r I v e r s o n , "Numerical
Scoring of Self-Care E v a l u a t i o n , " Archives of Physical
M e d i c i n e , v o l . XLIX, n o ; 1, (January, 1968), p p . 221 - 229.
been examined to e l u c i d a t e those p h y s i o l o g i c a l and social-
s c o r i n g were e x p l o r e d i
CHAPTER III
METHODOLOGY
I. OVERVIEW
instrument to r a t e p a t i e n t s on t h e i r l e v e l of w e l l being
p a t i e n t s were i n t e r v i e w e d u s i n g a s e m i - s t r u c t u r e d interview
and submitted to a p a n e l o f e x p e r t s f o r v a l i d a t i o n .
u s i n g f o u r p a i r s of nurses a s s e s s i n g f i v e p a t i e n t s each.
II. SAMPLE
27
28
o f age, l i v i n g i n K i n g o r Snohomish C o u n t i e s , E n g l i s h
Seattle, Washington.
Data G a t h e r i n g
V a r i a b l e s e l u c i d a t e d i n the h e m o d i a l y s i s literature
tool.
Nine p a t i e n t s were i n t e r v i e w e d u s i n g a s e m i - s t r u c t u r e d
statements s
" I ' m down i n the dumps sometimes but I t h i n k t h a t ' s
j u s t n a t u r a l when you have something l i k e t h i s ; "
other statementss
produced the f o l l o w i n g l i s t :
31
No; of nurses
who i n c l u d e d
t h i s item (11
Factors Leading to Good P a t i e n t Rating nurses t o t a l )
O p t i m i s t i c and cheerful 8
Determined to l e a r n - h i g h l y motivated 7
Leads a c t i v e l i f e - community i n v o l v e -
ment, o u t s i d e i n t e r e s t 6
Well occupied leisure 3
Adequate dialysis 3
Infrequent backup d i a l y s i s . 1
Works f u l l time 3
Good r e l a t i o n s h i p with h e l p e r -
e x c e l l e n t f a m i l y support 8
No, of nurses
who i n c l u d e d
t h i s item (11
Factors Leading to Poor P a t i e n t Rating nurses t o t a l )
H i s t o r y o f problem w i t h c i r c u l a t i o n
access 3
General m e d i c a l complications 3
F a i l u r e to d i a l y z e or f o l l o w d i e t
a c c o r d i n g to p r e s c r i b e d regimen 5
Does not work 1
No o u t s i d e interests 6
Does not a c t i v e l y participate
i n own care 4
Spouse or h e l p e r r e l a t i o n s h i p poor 7
Anxiety-tension-fear 2
Frequent backup dialysis 2
32
R a t i o n a l e f o r I n c l u s i o n o f and E x c l u s i o n o f Items i n the T o o l
i v e q u a n t i f i c a t i o n of an item o r by a p e r c e p t i o n of the
s t a t e of sexual potency.
c a l l for assistance.
their illness;
patient.
the p a t i e n t h i s p e r c e p t i o n o f h i s a b i l i t y to f u n c t i o n as a
so c h a r a c t e r i s t i c a l l y d i f f e r e n t t h a t t h i s dimension seemed
i n r a t i n g a p a t i e n t w e l l f u n c t i o n i n g were an a t t i t u d i n a l
designed to r a t e the p a t i e n t on t h i s k i n d o f d i m e n s i o n .
p s y c h o l o g i c a l assessment,
A three p o i n t n u m e r i c a l r a t i n g s c a l e was d e v i s e d
with no w e i g h t i n g o f i n d i v i d u a l i t e m s ; A l l measurements
o r f u r t h e r assessment;
36
V. VALIDATION
VI. PRE-TEST
e x p l a i n e d v e r b a l l y as w e l l as i n w r i t i n g to each n u r s e ;
was used.
CHAPTER IV
I. VALIDITY TESTING
to determine t h e i r need f o r f o l l o w up c a r e .
o f the n u r s e s i T h i s was r e g a r d i n g p a r t i c i p a t i o n i n s o c i a l
patient to d e s c r i b e h i s p a r t i c i p a t i o n as o f t e n , occasionally
37
38
The two t a i l e d *fe t e s t was used to t e s t the hypothesis that
1 64 64 0
2 85 80 5
3 52 52 0
i 74 75 -1
4
5 69 73 -4
6 58 58 0
7 65 66 -1
8 106 108 -2
9 66 67 -1
10 80 80 0
11 59 59 0
12 82 83 -1.
13 61 61 0
14 51 51 o •
15 6l 63 -2
16 55 56 -1
17 87 83 4
18 62 ; 62' 0
19 66 67 -1
20 88 89 -1
39
constant.
d e v i a t i o n 5 * W£>-s 1 . 9 2 2 ,
5_ , i s g i v e n by S_ = JL*— = 0.430
4 . = -0.300 = _ 0.698
I n s e r t i n g the above v a l u e s we o b t a i n 0.430
± (190.025) = 2.093
40
The r e s u l t is i l l u s t r a t e d by the f o l l o w i n g :
t e s t s t a t i s t i c = -0.698
2, and 3.
al s t a t u s i n t h i s p a r t i c u l a r group o f patients.
patients.
10 -|
8
Number
7
of
6
Scores
5
2_
,:1
—i—\—!—| ' | i | 1 1
1 1
1 1
\ * I
1 2 3 4 5 6^ 7 8 9 10
Group
F i g u r e 1 Nurse A Scores
Grouped in Interval Size of 1U«4
10 „
6
Number
of 5
Scores
4
2 H
4_J_L_
1 2 3 8 9 10
Group
F i g u r e 2 Nurse B Scores
Grouped i n Interval Size of 14«U
10 -
9 -
8 -
7 „
Number 6 _
of
5 -
Scores
4 _
3 -
2 _
1 -
' I 1M
1
1
I
2 8 9 10
Group
F i g u r e 3 Mean Scores
Grouped In Interval Size of 14.U
this complaint.
patients r a r e l y r e q u i r e d t e c h n i c i a n c o n s u l t a t i o n while
or were s e v e r e l y dissatisfying.
recreational activities.
p a r t o f f a m i l y members.
a b i l i t y to f u n c t i o n i n t h e i r f a m i l y r o l e s , 92 per cent o f
than p r i o r to t h e i r illness.
as t h e i r response to t h i s i t e m .
unacceptable to others.
48
Sleep with
no d i f f i c u l t y x
y
Harmonious
Family X
Relationships
y
Confident
handling X
dialysis
procedure y
Recreational
Activities X
Enjoyed
Often y
Productive
Activity X
Over 6
hours/day y
Per Cent
the mean)
CHAPTER V
I, SUMMARY
were i n c l u d e d .
patients.
b e i n g obtained e c o n o m i c a l l y , q u i c k l y , o b j e c t i v e l y , directly,
w i t h the l e a s t needs.
49
50
of patients.
II. CONCLUSIONS
care p l a n c o u l d be developed;
52
There i s l i t t l e d i f f i c u l t y , however, i n e s t a b l i s h i n g by
T h i s assessment t o o l i s not i n t e n d e d , i n i t s
and e x c l u d i n g n o n - r e l e v a n t i t e m s .
BIBLIOGRAPHY
53
BIBLIOGRAPHY
A. BOOKS
B. PERIODICALS
54
55
Blagg, C . R . , R. 0 . Hickman, J . W, Eschbach, and B. H . S c r i b n e r .
"Home H e m o d i a l y s i s « S i x Years* E x p e r i e n c e , " New
England J o u r n a l of M e d i c i n e , v o l . CCXXCII, (Nov-
ember, 1970), pp 1126 - 1131.
C. UNPUBLISHED REPORTS
Computer P r i n t - O u t N a t i o n a l D i a l y s i s R e g i s t r y , Research
T r i a n g l e Park, North C a r o l i n a , January, 1972.
HEMODIALYSIS PATIENT
59
NURSING ASSESSMENT FORM FOR MAINTENANCE HOME
HEMODIALYSIS PATIENT
I. Physiological Assessment
Pre-dialysis Creatinine
(1) below 80
(2) 80 - 100
(3) over 100
Serum Albumin
C i r c u l a t i o n Access
Subcutaneous F i s t u l a Puncture
60
61
F i s t u l a Flow
E x t e r n a l A-V Shunt
B l e e d i n g Episodes
(1) no b l e e d i n g i n l a s t s i x months
(2) c h r o n i c s m a l l l e a k i n g of b l o o d at e x i t s i t e s or
one to two episodes of moderate blood l e a k i n g
a t e x i t s i t e s or v e r y small hematoma formation
i n the l a s t s i x months
(3) 3 or more moderate blood l e a k i n g episodes or
any severe b l e e d o r l a r g e hematoma formation
i n the l a s t s i x months
C l o t t i n g Episodes
(1) 0 - 1 i n l a s t s i x months
(2) 2 - 4 i n l a s t s i x months
(3) more than 4 or any one which r e s u l t e d in
r e v i s i o n of shunt
Bone S t a t u s
X-Ray Evidence
(1) m i l d to moderate d e m i n e r a l i z a t i o n
(2) severe d e m i n e r a l i z a t i o n
(3) s u b - p e r i o s t e a l e r o s i o n and/or v a s c u l a r c a l c i f i -
c a t i o n p l u s any degree of d e m i n e r a l i z a t i o n
C l i n i c a l Evidence
(1) no bone p a i n
(2) bone p a i n
(3) p a t h o l o g i c a l f r a c t u r e w i t h i n past year
62
1 2 3
Anemia and Cardiac Status
Hematocrit
Cardiac Symptoms
Neuropathy
(1) no n e u r o l o g i c a l symptoms
(2) numbness i n f e e t
(3) i n t e r f e r e n c e with walking
Sexual Functioning
Menstrual Cycle
2
Sleep Patterns
(1) no d i f f i c u l t y s l e e p i n g
(2) some or moderate d i f f i c u l t y s l e e p i n g
(3) severe d i f f i c u l t y s l e e p i n g so t h a t f u n c t i o n s
p o o r l y next day
Miscellaneous Symptoms
Itching
(1) absent
(2) moderate
(3) severe
Nausea a n d / o r Vomiting
(1) rarely
(2) moderately often
(3) severe and troublesome
Headache
(1) m i l d to moderate and occurs r a r e l y
(2) moderate to severe occurs o c c a s i o n a l l y
(3) severe and occurs o f t e n
D i z z i n e s s or F e e l i n g s o f D i s e q u i l i b r i u m
(1) absent
(2) o c c a s i o n a l
(3) o f t e n
Muscle Cramps
(1) rarely
(2) intermittently
(3) often
C o n s t i p a t i o n o r D i a r r h e a ( c i r c l e one or both)
(1) ,.; r a r e l y
(2) i n t e r m i t t e n t l y
(3) o f t e n
C h i l l s and Fever
(1) rarely
(2) intermittently
(3) often
64
Machine m a l f u n c t i o n R e q u i r i n g T e c h n i c i a n c o n s u l t a t i o n
(1) r a r e l y necessary
(2) o f t e n but l e s s than 25% o f the time
(3) over 25% of the time
(1) r a r e
(2) occurs but l e s s than 25% o f time
(3) over 25% o f the time
Feel Frustrated over T e c h n i c a l Problems
(1) only r a r e l y
(2) moderately o f t e n
(3) most o f the time
(1) very c o n f i d e n t
(2) c o n f i d e n t most of the time but somewhat
uneasy on o c c a s i o n
(3) uneasy most of the time
Present Work L e v e l is
Enjoy R e c r e a t i o n a l A c t i v i t i e s
(1) often
(2) occasionally
(3) rarely
65
(1) yes
(2) about h a l f the time
( 3 ) no
Which o f These Statements Best Describe Your Own
Feelings?
P a r t i c i p a t e i n S o c i a l o r Community O r g a n i z a t i o n s and
' Activities
Family R e l a t i o n s h i p s are
(1) yes
(2) not always
(3) no
Which o f these Statements Most D e s c r i b e s Your F e e l i n g s
About Your S i t u a t i o n
In General I F i n d My L i f e
(1) s a t i s f y i n g
(2) l e s s than s a t i s f y i n g
(3) v e r y d i s s a t i s f y i n g
APPENDIX B
NURSES* QUESTIONNAIRE
68
NURSES' QUESTIONNAIRE
The purpose of t h i s e x e r c i s e i s to e l i c i t i n f o r -
mation from those who work c l o s e l y with d i a l y s i s p a t i e n t s
r e g a r d i n g t h e i r reasons f o r p l a c i n g a p a t i e n t i n the c a t e -
g o r i e s o f f u n c t i o n i n g w e l l or f u n c t i o n i n g p o o r l y . Try to
t h i n k o f those t h i n g s which are r e a l l y the most important
i n f o r m u l a t i n g your o p i n i o n ; These can i n c l u d e medical
r e a s o n s , s o c i a l or p s y c h o l o g i c a l reasons or a n y t h i n g which
you t h i n k s u b s t a n t i a l l y c o n t r i b u t e s to the p a t i e n t s b e i n g
p l a c e d i n the c a t e g o r y .
69
APPENDIX C
70
SBMI-STRUCTURED PATIENT INTERVIEW SCHBDULB
General I n t r o d u c t i o n
what i s r e a l l y important t o : y o u .
Questions
circles, etc.
71
APPENDIX D
VALIDATION FORM
72
VALIDATION FORM
I agree
I d i s a g r e e f o r the f o l l o w i n g r e a s o n s :
Signature:
73
APPENDIX E
as showing h i s r e l a t i v e l e v e l o f functioning.
rating.
i s i o n on the category.
response the p o o r e r i
75
76
The h i g h e s t t o t a l score should r e f l e c t the
need.