Professional Documents
Culture Documents
EFAPP-LAS-5-Macaday and Loveres-ABM-and-GAS-2021-2022
EFAPP-LAS-5-Macaday and Loveres-ABM-and-GAS-2021-2022
EFAPP-LAS-5-Macaday and Loveres-ABM-and-GAS-2021-2022
ANSWER SHEET
LEARNING ACTIVITY SHEET NO. 5
Topic: WRITING THE REACTION PAPER/REVIEW/CRITIQUE
1. T 2. T 3. T 4. F 5. T 6. F 7. F 8, T 9. T 10. F
II. Let’s Practice: Evaluate the movie review (‘Heneral Luna’ Review: Essential viewing)
using the rubric below: 10 points
Criteria VGE 5 GE 4 SE LE 2 N1
3
CONTENT 35%
Main idea is clear ✓
Explanation is comprehensive and sufficient ✓
Explanation has depth ✓
Supporting details are linked to the main idea ✓
Introduction states the title, director, and the main idea ✓
of the reviewed movie
Review presents the summary of the movie ✓
Review presents the different perspectives of the issues ✓
raised
Review clearly points outs the weaknesses of the movie ✓
Explanations and opinions are supported by evidence ✓
Ideas are presented convincingly ✓
Conclusion states the overall impression of the work ✓
Sub total 30.55
%
ORGANIZATION 25%
Review uses an organizational pattern and structure ✓
appropriate for the genre
Cohesive devices are effectively used ✓
Ideas are organized well ✓
Flow of ideas are smooth and easy to read ✓
Sub total 22.5%
STYLE 20%
Review showcases the writer’s voice ✓
Review uses a variety of sentences ✓
Review eliminates sexist language ✓
Review uses language appropriate to the context ✓
1
Review eliminates wordiness ✓
Sub total 18.4%
Summary of your general evaluation, use the table below. Give 3 for each: 30 points
Criteria Evaluation
Good features of the review: (3) The review provides others, mostly readers, with information about
several characters as well as the background of the film Heneral Luna.
What is most fascinating about Tarog’s Heneral Luna is that it does not
place its intent ahead of its craft. The film is beautiful to gaze at. The
score made by Tarog is subtle during moments when the drama does
not require distracting melodies, but hauntingly intense at the high
points.
The film is plotted precisely, never really focusing on the larger aspects
of history but on the smaller stories that perfectly construct a hard-
hitting picture of a revolution built on suspicion and dissent.
Bad features of the review: (3) Ambiguity is not typically regarded as a virtue when it comes to
historical films about national heroes. Most of the films that have
tackled our history past have a definite agenda of feeding their viewers
with a very general emotion of pride for one’s country.
Heneral Luna, while precise in its storytelling and in its depiction of the
major players of the revolution, evokes ambiguous emotions about a
nation that has been revealed to be built on a rickety foundation of
questionable motives and personalities.
2
Revisions needed: (3) When it comes to historical films about national heroes, confusion is
not often considered as a virtue. Most films that have dealt with our
country's history have a clear objective of instilling in their audiences a
broad sense of patriotism.
We thought that to critique a movie is to criticize We learned that writing a reaction paper the
it and say bad reviews. We thought that to write a main focus is our thoughts, feelings, and
reaction paper is to only say what we feel. We rationalizations about what's discussed in the
thought that writing a review, critique, and original text. We learned that we need state
reaction does not need to be formal. our opinion or judgement and support it.
Also we learned that critique writing is
important because in order to write a good
critique you need to critically read.