Running Head: QUALITY IMPROVEMENT 1

Quality improvement

Student name

University name

Date
QUALITY IMPROVEMENT 2

Quality improvement

Introduction

The process of reviewing the permits of health care administrations to display their competence

to encounter supervisory requirements and standards that are recognized by a famous

accreditation association [ CITATION Cho181 \l 1033 ]. This process is known as Accreditation.

Accreditation of health care administrations is a valuable arrangement of launching principles to

support diminishing dissimilarities in medical preparation, it helps in eliminating health care that

is unnecessary for the patient, and it also helps the patient in decreasing the budget of health

care. There is accreditation by the Joint Commission that will show the organization’s

devoutness to continuous innovation and quality care.

The accrediting body that will be maximum appropriate for my health care organization

TJC is the most suitable recognizing body for my health care association, the TJC stands for The

Joint Commission. The Joint Commission is a remote, charitable association that recognizes

clinics, entailing hospitals and health care facilities, which bump into the standards that have

been recognized by the Command. The assignment of The Joint Commission is to

uninterruptedly recover the safety and quality of care that the community obtains by

demonstrating health care accreditation besides with services that are connected and services that

upkeep the development of presentation in health care administrations [ CITATION Woo171 \l

1033 ]. Normally, The Joint Commission creates values that healthcare administrations must

encounter to attain accreditation, and by postponement, licensure from the national and become

compensation from the Center for Medicaid and Medicare Services. The Joint Commission is a
QUALITY IMPROVEMENT 3

presentation development association and it makes available statistics to organizations to support

them to achieve acquiescence with the Joint Commission principles. Accreditation by the Joint

Commission accreditation will show my organization’s devoutness to continuous innovation and

quality care. TJC (The Joint Commission) holds health care organizations and curriculums to the

maximum conceivable average. Tracking down accreditation is the choice of maximum health

care administrations in the country. The objective of The Joint Commission is to contribute to

health care administrations repeatedly delivering maximum quality care and establish a principle

of superiority that encourages them to dependably advance their presentation. The Joint

Commission morals focus on presentation development approaches that contribute healthcare

organizations in repeatedly refining the safety and quality of care, which can diminish the low-

quality risk of error or the care [ CITATION Gin18 \l 1033 ]. The Joint Commission

authorization is an indication to patients and providers that an organization proceeds patient

quality and safety care extremely. Patient safety and quality of care are problems that are the

leaders of The Joint Commission standards and initiatives.

Requirements in obtaining accreditation

For obtaining accreditation in The Joint Commission, the health care association must conform

to the Joint Commission’s values. To be attributed, an administration or organization must deal

with an indication that it repeatedly obeys the values that are easily pertinent to the organization

or administration. Accreditation is bestowed to a health care association after the Joint

Commission (TJC) puts the finishing touches to an on-site examination. The decisions of

Accreditation are created on a calculation of acquiescence with The Joint Commission values

besides with other necessities. For the duration of the on-site investigation, The Joint

Commission inspectors evaluate a health care administration’s presentation of meanings in

QUALITY IMPROVEMENT 4

addition to procedures that are intended to repeatedly recover patient consequences [ CITATION

Dav19 \l 1033 ]. This is completed by outlining the care which is provided to individuals,

patients, or inhabitants attended; studying information and documentation that are obtainable by

the association, and observing and interviewing the administration’s employees if there is any

need. According to TJC, accreditation is established to an association that meets the terms with

all principles at the time on which The Joint Commission examiners are carrying out the on-site

examination. The principles recognized by The Joint Commission are the foundation of the

assessment procedure and can support administrations to gauge, evaluate, and improve

presentation. The Joint Commission’s standards have established opportunities for the

presentation of health care administrations that are reasonable, achievable, and survivable.

Accreditation is effective in anticipation of The Joint Commission as it performs the following

full survey, that next survey must be done after every 3 years of the last time and there is no

involuntary regeneration of accreditation. To have continuity in this accreditation further than

this period, an institute needs to verve through an on-site examination and meet the terms with

The Joint Commission’s principles and any other obligation that will be in influence at the period

of the investigation.

Healthcare Quality metrics for a Quality Improvement project

In the health care administration, there is numerous association that aids to monitor and increase

quality and also to increasing consequences of patient’s health care [ CITATION Kil18 \l 1033 ].

For an excellent improvement in the project to extant to the Joint Commission (TJC). Quality

metrics such as patient quality rankings, experience, and outcomes are accessible from the

quarterly data and information of staff “the quality of teamwork donates to patient care quality

(PCQ) and both Patient Care Quality and quality in teamwork has a great role in contributing to
QUALITY IMPROVEMENT 5

performance in hospital excellence”. An excellent development project that has lately been

obtainable to the Joint Commission (TJC) is Mayo Clinic’s Harmless Patient Handling program.

This quality improvement was initiated because I need to improve the number of patients that are

present in my hospital, this can only happen with the utilization of safe patient handling

equipment which is also known as SPHE. Safe Patients Handling Equipment is castoff for

supplementary explanations than one, this will help in defending patients from injury and falls

and it also helps in preventing health care providers from aching themselves when they transfer

patients from one place to another, and to bound the quantity of indulges obtainable to securely

move one persistent. Safe Patient Handling leadership (SPHL) investigated the best evidence and

practices adjoining the anticipation of life-changing and career-ending injuries that health care

providers and further direct providers are at danger of emerging in the procedure of moving and

lifting patients. This inventiveness was given to the Joint Commission (TJC) with statistics that

was showing a reduction in falls afterward this inventiveness was executed.

Quality Performance’s Financial Impact on the Organization

Health care administrations should be remunerated for the excellence of presentation to

guarantee that superior care is transported. Quality presentation is destined for augmenting

efficiency, effectiveness, and safety and while administrations should suggest this irrespective, it

frequently takings inducement to surety quality [ CITATION Sol18 \l 1033 ]. Even though pay-

for-performance courses are determinations to familiarize innovative encouragements into

healthcare, the fundamental structure of the compensation system previously generates many

incentives of its own. At present, payment for presentation is extra communal by giving

purchasers the quality care that they are acquiring. Payment for performance will not substitute

the current payment arrangement in moreover organization, but it will permit spenders to income
QUALITY IMPROVEMENT 6

into interpretation a set of excellence pointers in accumulation to the volume of provision or the

number of enclosed lives. A popular program continuously joins principles of excellence

development to attain an improved level of presentation and a flourishing system of health care

organizations. For instance, there should be recompensing happenings associated with running

the health of inhabitants, for instance, managing and screening chronically ill patients that have

been traditionally underneath compensated comparative to the mechanical encounter they

posture to the regular physician that is present in offices.

Conclusion

In the end, it is concluded that Accreditation is created on a calculation of acquiescence with The

Joint Commission values besides with other necessities. Accreditation of health care

administrations is a valuable arrangement of launching principles to support diminishing

dissimilarities in medical preparation, it helps in eliminating health care that is unnecessary for

the patient, and it also helps the patient in decreasing the budget of health care. All of the

requirements are briefly explained which will help in obtaining accreditation, all of the quality

and performance metrics are explained briefly which are based on research and experience. With

accreditation on health care, there is a brief explanation of the financial impact on the

organization.
QUALITY IMPROVEMENT 7

References
Choy, K. L., Siu, K. Y., Ho, T. S., Wu, C. H., Lam, H. Y., Tang, V., & Tsang, Y. P. (2018). An

intelligent case-based knowledge management system for quality improvement in nursing

homes. VINE Journal of Information and Knowledge Management Systems. Retrieved

from https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/VJIKMS-01-2017-

0001/full/html

Davies, C., Lyons, C., & Whyte, R. (2019). optimizing nursing time in a daycare unit: Quality

improvement using Lean Six Sigma methodology. International Journal for Quality in

Health Care, 22-28. Retrieved from https://academic.oup.com/intqhc/article-

abstract/31/Supplement_1/22/5607832

Ginsburg, L., Easterbrook, A., Berta, W., Norton, P., Doupe, M., Knopp-Sihota, J., & Wagg, A.

(2018). Implementing frontline worker-led quality improvement in nursing homes:

getting to “how”. The Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety, 526-535.

Retrieved from https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S155372501730394X

Kilbourne, A. M., Beck, K., Spaeth‐Rublee, B., Ramanuj, P., O'Brien, R. W., Tomoyasu, N., &

Pincus, H. A. (2018). Measuring and improving the quality of mental health care: a

global perspective. World Psychiatry, 30-38. Retrieved from

https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/wps.20482

Soltani, Z., Zareie, B., Milani, F. S., & Navimipour, N. J. (2018). The impact of customer

relationship management on the organization's performance. The Journal of High

Technology Management Research, 237-246. Retrieved from

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1047831018300282
QUALITY IMPROVEMENT 8

Woo, K., Milworm, G., & Dowding, D. (2017). Characteristics of quality improvement

champions in nursing homes: a systematic review with implications for evidence‐based

practice. Worldviews on Evidence‐Based Nursing, 440-446. Retrieved from

https://sigmapubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/wvn.12262