This document summarizes an electricity pricing model that calculates optimal prices and capacity based on demand functions and cost of capacity. It shows the output for two scenarios: 1) with larger negative demand coefficients, prices and capacity decrease while profit decreases; 2) with larger positive demand coefficients, prices and capacity increase while profit increases.
Original Description:
asd asd asd a fg dfhdfgh fhjdgj dfgh ef grtg erg sfgsdfb bnbserge fgbsdfgbdfghdgh fgh
This document summarizes an electricity pricing model that calculates optimal prices and capacity based on demand functions and cost of capacity. It shows the output for two scenarios: 1) with larger negative demand coefficients, prices and capacity decrease while profit decreases; 2) with larger positive demand coefficients, prices and capacity increase while profit increases.
This document summarizes an electricity pricing model that calculates optimal prices and capacity based on demand functions and cost of capacity. It shows the output for two scenarios: 1) with larger negative demand coefficients, prices and capacity decrease while profit decreases; 2) with larger positive demand coefficients, prices and capacity increase while profit increases.
2 3 Input data Range names used: 4 Coefficients of demand functions Capacity =Model!$B$15 5 Constant On-peak price Off-peak price Common_Capacity =Model!$B$21:$C$21 6 On-peak demand 2.253 -0.017 0.003 Demands =Model!$B$19:$C$19 7 Off-peak demand 1.142 0.005 -0.020 Prices =Model!$B$13:$C$13 8 Profit =Model!$B$26 9 Cost of capacity/mWh $75 10 11 Decisions 12 On-peak Off-peak 13 Price per mWh $106.10 $53.19 14 The prices The prices decrease, decrease, capacity capacity decreases, decreases, andand profit decreases. profit decreases. Evidently, Evidently, the the larger larger negative negative 15 Capacity (millions of mWh) 0.609 numbers in numbers in the the demand demandfunctions functions induce induce the the 16 company to company to have havelower lower prices prices to tokeep keep from from 17 Constraints on demand (in millions of mWh) hurting demand hurting demand forfor the the products. products. The The net net 18 On-peak Off-peak effect isis somewhat effect somewhat lower lower demand demand and and much much less revenue less revenueand andprofit. profit. 19 Demand 0.609 0.609 20 <= <= 21 Capacity 0.609 0.609 22 23 Monetary summary ($ millions) 24 Revenue 96.974 25 Cost of capacity 45.658 26 Profit 51.315 A B C D E F G H I 1 Electricity pricing model 2 3 Input data Range names used: 4 Coefficients of demand functions Capacity =Model!$B$15 5 Constant On-peak price Off-peak price Common_Capacity =Model!$B$21:$C$21 6 On-peak demand 2.253 -0.013 0.005 Demands =Model!$B$19:$C$19 7 Off-peak demand 1.142 0.007 -0.015 Prices =Model!$B$13:$C$13 8 Profit =Model!$B$26 9 Cost of capacity/mWh $75 10 11 Decisions 12 On-peak Off-peak 13 Price per mWh $156.09 $100.54 14 The prices The prices increase, increase, capacity capacity increases, increases, and and profit increases. profit increases. Evidently, Evidently, the the larger larger positive positive 15 Capacity (millions of mWh) 0.727 numbers in in the the demand demand functions functions induce induce the the numbers 16 company to company to have havehigher higher prices prices to to create create more more 17 Constraints on demand (in millions of mWh) demandfor demand for the the opposite opposite products. products. The The net net 18 effect isis somewhat effect somewhat higher higher demand demandfor for both both On-peak Off-peak products and and much much more morerevenue revenue and and profit. profit. products 19 Demand 0.727 0.727 20 <= <= 21 Capacity 0.727 0.727 22 23 Monetary summary ($ millions) 24 Revenue 186.449 25 Cost of capacity 54.489 26 Profit 131.960 A B C D E F G H I 1 Electricity pricing model 2 3 Input data Range names used: 4 Coefficients of demand functions Capacity =Model!$B$15 5 Constant On-peak price Off-peak price Common_Capacity =Model!$B$21:$C$21 6 On-peak demand 2.253 -0.017 0.005 Demands =Model!$B$19:$C$19 7 Off-peak demand 1.142 0.007 -0.020 Prices =Model!$B$13:$C$13 8 Profit =Model!$B$26 9 Cost of capacity/mWh $75 10 11 Decisions 12 On-peak Off-peak 13 Price per mWh $113.70 $64.71 14 Theeffect The effectofofmore morenegative negativecoefficients coefficients appearsto appears todominate dominatethe theeffect effectof ofmore more 15 Capacity (millions of mWh) 0.644 positivecoefficients. positive coefficients.The Theresults resultsare are 16 much like in part much like in part a.a. 17 Constraints on demand (in millions of mWh) 18 On-peak Off-peak 19 Demand 0.644 0.644 20 <= <= 21 Capacity 0.644 0.644 22 23 Monetary summary ($ millions) 24 Revenue 114.838 25 Cost of capacity 48.276 26 Profit 66.562
Project Report On "ANALYTICAL STUDY OF IMPACT OF FOREIGN INSTITUTIONAL INVESTORS (FIIS) ON EXCHANGE RATE AND VALUE OF INDIAN NATIONAL RUPEE (INR) IN TERMS OF VOLATILITY"