The document describes several related accidents and incidents involving loss of visual reference or reduced visibility during approaches:
- In 2013, a Lion Air Boeing 737 continued an approach at Bali despite losing visual reference, hitting the water and breaking up on impact with four serious injuries.
- In 2017, an Air Canada Airbus A320 drifted to the right before touchdown at Toronto, exiting the runway in wet conditions with reduced visibility.
- In 2013, a rushed visual approach by a Saab 340 to Marsh Harbour, Bahamas resulted in a mishandled landing and runway excursion in heavy rain with lost visibility.
- In 2014, an Air Canada Airbus A330 briefly departed the runway edge
The document describes several related accidents and incidents involving loss of visual reference or reduced visibility during approaches:
- In 2013, a Lion Air Boeing 737 continued an approach at Bali despite losing visual reference, hitting the water and breaking up on impact with four serious injuries.
- In 2017, an Air Canada Airbus A320 drifted to the right before touchdown at Toronto, exiting the runway in wet conditions with reduced visibility.
- In 2013, a rushed visual approach by a Saab 340 to Marsh Harbour, Bahamas resulted in a mishandled landing and runway excursion in heavy rain with lost visibility.
- In 2014, an Air Canada Airbus A330 briefly departed the runway edge
The document describes several related accidents and incidents involving loss of visual reference or reduced visibility during approaches:
- In 2013, a Lion Air Boeing 737 continued an approach at Bali despite losing visual reference, hitting the water and breaking up on impact with four serious injuries.
- In 2017, an Air Canada Airbus A320 drifted to the right before touchdown at Toronto, exiting the runway in wet conditions with reduced visibility.
- In 2013, a rushed visual approach by a Saab 340 to Marsh Harbour, Bahamas resulted in a mishandled landing and runway excursion in heavy rain with lost visibility.
- In 2014, an Air Canada Airbus A330 briefly departed the runway edge
The document describes several related accidents and incidents involving loss of visual reference or reduced visibility during approaches:
- In 2013, a Lion Air Boeing 737 continued an approach at Bali despite losing visual reference, hitting the water and breaking up on impact with four serious injuries.
- In 2017, an Air Canada Airbus A320 drifted to the right before touchdown at Toronto, exiting the runway in wet conditions with reduced visibility.
- In 2013, a rushed visual approach by a Saab 340 to Marsh Harbour, Bahamas resulted in a mishandled landing and runway excursion in heavy rain with lost visibility.
- In 2014, an Air Canada Airbus A330 briefly departed the runway edge
On 13 April 2013, a Lion Air Boeing 737-800 flew a day non precision approach to runway 09 at Bali (Denpasar) and continued when the required visual reference was lost below MDA. Despite continued absence of visual reference, the approach was continued until the EGPWS annunciation 'TWENTY', when the aircraft commander called a go around. Almost immediately, the aircraft hit the sea surface to the right of the undershoot area and broke up. All 108 occupants were rescued with only four sustaining serious injury. The Investigation attributed the accident entirely to the actions and inactions of the two pilots. A320, Toronto ON Canada, 2017 On 25 February 2017, an Airbus A320 left the side of the landing runway at Toronto when, for undetermined reasons, the Captain, as Pilot Flying, set up a drift to the right just before touchdown. This was then followed by a lateral runway excursion into wet grass in rain- reduced visibility which continued for 1,650 metres before the aircraft regained the runway and stopped. The Investigation noted that both the absence of runway centreline lighting and the aircraft operator’s policy of not activating the aircraft rain repellent system or applying the alternative hydrophobic windshield coating may have increased the excursion risk. SF34, Marsh Harbour Bahamas, 2013 On 13 June 2013, a rushed and unstable visual approach to Marsh Harbour by a Saab 340B was followed by a mishandled landing and a runway excursion. The Investigation concluded that the way the aircraft had been operated had been contrary to expectations in almost every respect. This had set the scene for the continuation of a visual approach to an attempted landing in circumstances where there had been multiple indications that there was no option but to break off the approach, including a total loss of forward visibility in very heavy rain as the runway neared. A333, Montréal QC Canada, 2014 On 7 October 2014, an Airbus A330-300 failed to maintain the runway centreline as it touched down at Montréal in suddenly reduced forward visibility and part of the left main gear departed the runway edge, paralleling it briefly before returning to it and regaining the centreline as the landing roll was completed. The Investigation attributed the excursion to a delay in corrective action when a sudden change in wind velocity occurred at the same time as degraded visual reference. It was found that the runway should not have been in use in such poor visibility without serviceable lighting. AT75, vicinity Cork Ireland, 2014 On 2 January 2014, the crew of an ATR 72-212A lost forward visibility due to the accumulation of a thick layer of salt deposits on the windshield whilst the aircraft was being radar positioned to an approach at Cork on a track which took it close to and at times over the sea in the presence of strong onshore winds. The Investigation concluded that the prevailing strong winds over and near to the sea in relatively dry air with little visible moisture present had been conducive to high concentrations of salt particles at low levels.