Project No: 8

Foundation Engineering
CE 408
Arvind Mehta (180004005)
Chaitali Kishor Patil (180004007)

Building : Ratlam_Dispensary
No. of
floors Floor height Slab thickness Layer Layer Layer
= (m) = (mm) = thickness = thickness = thickness =
5 3.1 120 S1- 5 m S2- 15 m S3- 17 m
Fig: Centerline diagram (TOP VIEW)

Fig: TOP
VIEW of
Ratlam
Dispensary
in STAAD
Pro
 Fig: FRONT VIEW of Ratlam Dispensary in STAAD Pro

Load Calculation :

A. Dead Load
IS 875 Part 1
1. Wall Load
a) Wall height = 3.1m - 0.120 m = 2.98 m
b) Area = 0.150 m * 2.98 m = 0.447 m2
c) Unit wt of brick = 20 kN/m3
d) Wall load per metre = 0.447 * 20 = 8.94 kN/m (-Y)
e) For walls with window/ door = 70 % of 8.94 kN/m = 6.258 kN/m (-Y)
2. Parapet Wall Load
a) Height = 1m
b) Wall width = 0.150 m
c) Unit weight of brick = 20 kN/m3
d) Load per metre = 20 * 1 * 0.150 = 3 kN/m (-Y)
3. Floor Load
a) Pressure on floor = 25 kN/m3 * 0.120m = 3 kN/m2 (-Y)
b) Pressure on roof = 25 kN/m3 * 0.120m = 3 kN/m2 (-Y)
4. Floor Finish Load
a) According to IS 875 Part1
b) Intensity = 1kN/m2
c) We can decide not to finish the roof.
B. Live Load
IS 875 part 2
1. Floor Load
a) Hospital → Institutional Building
b) Wards/ rooms → 2 kN/m2 distributed pressure intensity.
c) Corridors → 4 kN/m2 distributed pressure intensity.
 2. Roof Load
a) Assume Roof to be inaccessible
b) Thus 0.75 kN/m2 distributed pressure intensity.

Analysis Results:

Soil properties:
1) S1 layer
c=0 Φ = 30 ϒ = 20 kN/m3 Es = 24 Mpa μ = 0.2

2) S2 layer
c= 25 kN/m2 φ= 20 ϒ= 18 kN/m3 Es= 57 Mpa μ= 0.35

3) S3 layer
c= 15 kN/m2 φ= 35 ϒ= 18 kN/m3 Es= 48 Mpa μ= 0.3

Beam Column Size:

1) COLUMN MKD. SIZE (Meter) = C1 = 0.40 X 0.40

2) BEAM MKD. SIZE (Meter) = All beams = 0.40 X 0.60
Foundation Designs:
1. Isolated Footing
● constructed for a single column
● pad foundation
● square or rectangle
2. Combined Footing
● when two or more columns are close enough
● Their isolated footings overlap each other
● rectangle

Other Calculations:

Please follow attached excel sheet

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1L4u5f1Tl2QwdA2jICDjt5KWcrLUDgyhbo8BRX
n1oHtw/edit?usp=sharing

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1L4u5f1Tl2QwdA2jICDjt5KWcrLUDgyhbo8BRX
n1oHtw/edit#gid=0

CResult:
Conclusion:
Problem while we applied isolated footing is that footings overlapped. Hence Combined
footing is preferred over isolated.We designed for the footings.

Since isolated footings overlapped, we designed combined footing, which is more

economical.

Reference:
Youtube video- https://youtu.be/s8-Xp3FOYPQ

Ratlam ESIC Dispencry-Model.pdf

PDF