This document discusses different sources of morality, including etiquette, law, and religion. It distinguishes morality from these other concepts. Etiquette refers to social customs and conventions, while law codifies morality but is not always moral. Religion has greatly influenced morality but faces issues like moral dilemmas not being clearly addressed and not knowing for certain what gods want. The document argues we must use reason and critical thinking to develop our own authentic sense of moral judgment, rather than assuming other institutions have definitively established morality.
This document discusses different sources of morality, including etiquette, law, and religion. It distinguishes morality from these other concepts. Etiquette refers to social customs and conventions, while law codifies morality but is not always moral. Religion has greatly influenced morality but faces issues like moral dilemmas not being clearly addressed and not knowing for certain what gods want. The document argues we must use reason and critical thinking to develop our own authentic sense of moral judgment, rather than assuming other institutions have definitively established morality.
This document discusses different sources of morality, including etiquette, law, and religion. It distinguishes morality from these other concepts. Etiquette refers to social customs and conventions, while law codifies morality but is not always moral. Religion has greatly influenced morality but faces issues like moral dilemmas not being clearly addressed and not knowing for certain what gods want. The document argues we must use reason and critical thinking to develop our own authentic sense of moral judgment, rather than assuming other institutions have definitively established morality.
Other Normative Subjects Prepared by Raphaella Elaine Miranda Objectives: 1 Identify different sources of morality;
Distinguish morality from its commonly
2 assumed sources: Etiquette; Law; and Religion
Ethically reexamine one's own moral
3 standard. Regulators of Human Conduct
Etiquette Law Religion
Morality and Etiquette Etiquette – "set of rules or customs that determine the accepted behavior in a particular social group." (Evangelista and Mabaquiao, 2020) More culture-based and arbitrary than morality Violations of these etiquette guidelines doesn't make a person immoral but can lead him to be considered as impolite or uncivilized Examples: Slurping while eating is considered ill-mannered in some cultures Communicating informally in a professional setting is considered rude Morality and Etiquette According to Shaw (2002), following social etiquette can mask social issues Example: Racial segregation practices Prohibiting women from driving The relationship between etiquette and morality is once a certain form of etiquette has been adopted by a certain culture, it becomes the basis of morality Morality and Law The presumption of law is that it is based on morality It codifies morality through punitive measures Law is not always moral or just Examples: Breaking traffic laws in cases of medical emergencies Immunity for whistleblowers Legalization of abortion Morality and Religion Religion has been the greatest influencer of morality "Do the gods love goodness because it 1 is good, or is it good because the gods love it? Morality and Religion Problems with with equating religion and morality: General and imprecise: does not address specific moral dilemmas Example: Dictum of "Thou shall not kill" gives rise to problems about: Death penalty Legalization of abortion Euthanasia of people in vegetative states Morality and Religion We can't be sure about what Gods wants us to do. Example: Religion has different views on certain topics, such as: marriage worship practices Morality and Religion Human rationality necessitates that we follow our reason: following Kant's motto, "Sapere aude!" Example of church practices that are now considered problematic: Persecution of heretics Crusades and inquisitions Anti-homosexual sentiments Stance against artificial contraception Does that mean that we shouldn't follow the moral teachings of these institutions?
No. It just means that we
have to be critical about them so that we can have an authentic sense of moral judgment. References Evangelista, Francis Julius N. and Mabaquiao, Napoleon M. Ethics: Theories and Application. Mandaluyong City: Anvil Publishing Inc., 2020
Shaw, William H. Social and Personal Ethics.
4th Edition. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth, 2002. And we're done! Thanks for listening.