Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Activity Guide and Evaluation Rubric - Step 4 Understand IT Negotiations
Activity Guide and Evaluation Rubric - Step 4 Understand IT Negotiations
1. Activity Description
Type of activity: Collaborative
Evaluation moment: Intermediate Unit 3
Highest score of the activity: 90 points
The activity starts on: Monday, The activity ends on:
October 25, 2021 Saturday, November 20, 2021
With this activity, you are expected to achieve the following
learning outcomes:
This course is in English and as it is specified in the Rules and conditions for
course development: “The student must develop the proposed activities on
due time, in English. Contributions in different languages won´t be evaluated”.
Individual
The student must develop the following activities:
1. Each student reads and reviews all of the following references for Unit 3
at the Learning Environment:
1
2. Each student looks deeper into the structure of a “Head of Agreement”
document in a technology negotiation proposed by Mc Manus, J. P. in its
chapter Negotiation and Licensing, the topics described there, are those
which need to be prepared before a negotiation, to have a draft of a possible
contract to commercialize a technology.
3. Post the topic selection in the Discussion forum – Unit 3, according to the
following chart, also, as a group, identify who will be the student in charge
of delivering the final document at the Evaluation Environment:
Each student must respect the other students´ selection, it means for
example, if one student selects Group 3, none of the other four students can
develop the concepts: License options, Option term on license, Right of first
refusal, Scope of license, Exclusivity; they must choose another group of
concepts. In case a second student presents the development related to Group
3, it won´t be evaluated.
Note: If some of your classmates don't chose some topic because he or she
doesn't participate in the forum, the group can present only the groups of
concepts developed for the classmates who have participated in the job. It
means for example if there are only three active students, the document will
have only three topics developed, however, as explained in Activity 1, all
students must read and review all references to have a general understanding
of all topics.
Student name
Group number
Date
Title: Head of agreement structure
Definition and an example of each concept of the “Head of
Agreement document”, according to the selected group
Answer to the question: What is the Head of Agreement document
in a technology negotiation?
Collaborative
The group must develop the following activities:
5. Each student reads and reviews the following reference for Unit 3 at the
Learning Environment
Save the video in YouTube or any other resource to get a public link and
share it in the Discussion Forum – Unit 3. (In case the video cannot be
opened, it cannot be evaluated).
In case you don´t have a software to record videos including your camera,
you can visit the following link and use the free tool to record the screen
online: https://www.apowersoft.es/grabador-de-pantalla-gratis
9. All students in the group read and review the activities developed by the
other members, consolidate all evidences in a PDF and the student selected
in Activity 3, submits it at the Evaluation Environment, according to the
guidelines given below in section Collaborative Work Evidences, naming it
with the following structure:
From guidelines:
PDF format
Page Size: Letter
Font type: Times New Roman
Font size: 12
Line spacing: Double
Page margins: 2.54 cm
Paragraph Alignment: Left-aligned
In each group a single member will be chosen to submit the requested product
in the environment indicated by the teacher.
Before submitting the requested product, students should check that it meets
all the requirements mentioned in this activity guide.
Only the members of the group that participated with contributions during
the time assigned for the activity should be included as authors of the
submitted product.
Please keep in mind that all individual or collaborative written products must
comply with the spelling rules and presentation conditions defined in this activity
guide.
Regarding the use of references, consider that the product of this activity must
comply with APA style.
In any case, make sure you comply with the rules and avoid academic plagiarism.
You can review your written products using the Turnitin tool found in the virtual
campus.
Under the Academic Code of Conduct, the actions that infringe the academic
order, among others, are the following: paragraph e) Plagiarism is to present as
your own work all or part of a written report, task or document of invention
carried out by
another person. It also implies the use of citations or lack of references, or it
includes citations where there is no match between these and the reference and
paragraph f) To reproduce, or copy for profit, educational resources or results of
research products, which have rights reserved for the University. (Acuerdo 029 -
13 de diciembre de 2013, artículo 99)
Second
evaluation High level: The student evidences his understanding of the
criterion: negotiation of technology assets, recording a video
presenting himself a PowerPoint presentation that includes
Define the the problem definitions and some recommendations
problem and according to the business model selected and the concepts
propose solutions studied in this unit, to solve the problem to negotiate
based on the biotechnological products.
studied contents
If your work is at this level, you can get between 45
points and 50 points
This criterion
represents 50 Average level: The student evidences his understanding of
points of the the negotiation of technology assets, recording a video
total of 90 presenting himself the problem and some recommendations
points of the to overcome the problem to negotiate biotechnological
activity. products, but it is missing some guidelines or it includes
some mistaken information that evidences no clear
understanding of the contents studied.