Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Loreal: The Biggest Cosmetic Comapany
Loreal: The Biggest Cosmetic Comapany
Submitted By
(Jatin Sukhija)
(BBA (General) – Semester –VI)
Enrl.No:0581241708
DELHI INSTITUTE OF RURAL DEVELOPMENT
NANGLI PUNA, DELHI -36
Declaration
I here by declare that the major project report , entitled “Loreal: The
biggest cosmetic comapany”, is based on my original study and has not
been submitted earlier for award of ant degree or diploma to any
institute or university.
Enrl.no: 0581241708
Countersigned
Supervisor
Director
1. Title page
2.Declaration
3.Acknowledgement
4.Contents
5.Introduction
6.L’ORÉAL brands
7.Strategic analysis
11.Conclusions/ Recommendations
Introduction
L’Oréal got its start in the hair-color business, but the company
soon branched out into other cleansing and beauty products.
L’Oréal currently markets over 500 brands and many thousands
of individual products in all sectors of the beauty business: hair
color, permanents, hair styling, body and skin care, cleansers,
makeup and fragrances. The company's products are found in a
wide variety of distribution channels, from hair salons and
perfumeries to hyper - and supermarkets, health/beauty outlets,
pharmacies and direct mail.
L’Oréal has five worldwide research and development centers:
two in France: Aulnay and Chevilly; one in the U.S.: Clark, New
Jersey; one in Japan: Kawasaki, Kanagawa Prefecture ; and in
2005, one was established in Shanghai, China. A future facility
in the US will be in Berkeley Heights, New Jersey .
From 1988 to 1989, L'Oréal controlled the film company
Paravision, whose properties included the Filmation and De
Laurentiis libraries. StudioCanal acquired the Paravision
properties in 1994.
L’Oréal purchased Synthélabo in 1973 to pursue its ambitions
in the pharmaceutical field. Synthélabo merged with Sanofi in
1999 to become Sanofi-Synthélabo. Sanofi-Synthélabo merged
with Aventis in 2004 to become Sanofi-Aventis.
On 17 March 2006, L'Oréal purchased cosmetics company The
Body Shop for £652 million.
The company has recently faced discrimination lawsuits in
France related to the hiring of spokesmodels and Institutional
racism. In the UK, L'Oréal has faced widespread condemnation
from OFCOM regarding truth in their advertising and marketing
campaigns concerning the product performance of one of their
mascara brands.
A book by Monica Waitzfelder, published in French as L'Oréal a
pris ma maison and in English as L'Oréal stole my house!,
details how L'Oréal, a company claimed to be anti-Semitic by
the author, took over the Waitzfelder home in the German city
of Karlsruhe (after the Nazis had engineered the removal of the
family) to make it its German headquarters. [citation needed]
L'Oréal's famous advertising slogan is "Because I'm worth it". In
the mid 2000s, this was replaced by "Because you're worth it".
In late 2009, the slogan was changed again to "Because we're
worth it" following motivation analysis and work into consumer
psychology of Dr. Maxim Titorenko. The shift to "we" was made
to create stronger consumer involvement in L'Oréal philosophy
and lifestyle and provide more consumer satisfaction with
L'Oréal products. L'Oréal also owns a Hair and Body products
line for kids called L'Oréal Kids, the slogan for which is
"Because we're worth it too".
Protest group Naturewatch states that L'Oréal continues to test
new ingredients on animals. [5] The company states that no
animal testing for finished products has taken place since 1989
and that L'Oreal has invested significantly in alternative
methods for chemical safety testing, [6], though they implicitly
acknowledge that they continue to perform animal testing of
ingredients.[7]
Following L'Oréal's purchase of The Body Shop, who continue
to be against animal testing, The Body Shop founder
Dame Anita Roddick was forced to defend herself against
allegations of abandoning her principles over L'Oréal's track
record on animal testing. She declared that her belief in the
power of cosmetics to enhance female beauty was greater than
any concern over animal testing. As a result, calls were made
for shoppers to boycott The Body Shop.[8]
In 1987, L'Oréal and 3 Suisses founded Le Club des Créateurs
de Beauté specializing in mail order sales of cosmetic products.
February 2011: L'Oreal will has the largest factory in
the Jababeka Industrial Park, Cikarang , Indonesia with total
investment of US$50 million and it will be ready in October
2011. The production will be absorbed 25 percent by domestic
market and the rest will be exported. In 2010 significant growth
occurred at Indonesia with 61 percent increase of unit sales or
28 percent of net sales.[9]
[edit]Business
L'Oréal Paris hair gel. Note thePiet Mondrian-esque design.
[edit]Corporate governance
[edit]Board of directors
Current members of the board of directors of L’Oréal are: Jean-
Paul Agon, Francisco Basco, Werner Bauer, Liliane
Bettencourt, Françoise Bettencourt Meyers, Peter Brabeck-
Letmathe, Charles-Henri Filippi, Xavier Fontanet, Bernard
Kasriel, Marc Lacharrière, Jean-Pierre Meyers, Lindsay Owen-
Jones, Franck Riboud, Annette Roux and Louis Schweitzer.
[edit]Management committee
The management committee includes:
Jean-Paul Agon, Chief Executive Officer
Frederic Roze, Chief Executive Officer, L’Oréal USA
Béatrice Dautresme, EVP of Corporate Communications
Jean-François Grollier, EVP of Research and Development
Christian Mulliez, EVP of Finances
Jean-Jacques Lebel, President of Consumer Products
Nicolas Hieronimus, President of Professional Products
Geoff Skingsley, EVP of Human Resources
Marc Menesguen, President of Luxury Products
[edit]Stockholders
As at year end 2009: [2]
Breakdown of share ownership: 31.0% by
the Bettencourt family, 29.8% by Nestlé, 2.4% treasury shares,
and the remaining 36.8% is public
[edit]Sales, profits, etc.
In 2003, L’Oréal announced its 19th consecutive year of
double-digit growth. Its consolidated sales was €14.029 bn and
net profit was €1.653 bn. 96.7% of sales derived from cosmetic
activities and 2.5% from dermatological activities. L’Oréal has
operations in over 130 countries, employing 50,500 people,
24% of which work in France. 3.3% of consolidated sales is
invested in research and development, which accounts for
2,900 of its employees. In 2003, it applied for 515 patents. It
operates 42 manufacturing plants throughout the world, which
employ 14,000 people.
Cosmetics sales by division breakdown: 54.8% from consumer
products at €7.506 bn, 25.1% from luxury products at €3.441
bn, 13.9% from professional products at €1.9 bn, and 5.5%
from active cosmetics at €0.749 bn.
Cosmetic sales by geographic zone breakdown: 52.7%
from Western Europe at €7.221 bn, 27.6% from North
America at €3.784 bn, 19.7% from rest of the world at €2.699
bn.
In 2007, L’Oréal was ranked 353 in the Fortune Global 500 .
[10]
The company had earned $2,585 million on sales of $19,811
million. There were 60,850 employees. [10]
[edit]Joint ventures and minority interests
L’Oréal holds 10.41% of the shares of Sanofi-Aventis, the
world's number 3 and Europe's number 1 pharmaceutical
company. The Laboratoires Innéov is a joint venture in
nutritional cosmetics between L’Oréal and Nestlé; they draw on
L’Oréal's knowledge in the fields of nutrition and food safety.
Galderma is another joint venture in dermatology between
L'Oréal and Nestlé.
[edit]Community involvement and awards
In 2008, L'Oréal was named Europe's top business employer by
The European Student Barometer, [11] a survey conducted
by Trendence that covers 20 European countries and
incorporates the responses of over 91,000 students.
The L'Oréal-UNESCO Awards for Women in Science was
established to improve the position of women in science by
recognizing outstanding women researchers who have
contributed to scientific progress.
The awards are a result of a partnership between the French
cosmetics company L'Oréal and the United Nations
Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO)
and carry a grant of $100,000 USD for each laureate. [1]
The same partnership awards the UNESCO-L'Oréal
International Fellowships, providing up to $40,000 USD in
funding over two years to fifteen young women scientists
engaged in exemplary and promising research projects. [12]
L'Oréal organizes every year the L'Oréal Brandstorm, an
acknowledged business game for students in 43 countries. The
game is related to marketing and has a first prize of $10,000, a
second prize of $5,000 and a third prize of $2500.
[edit]Claims of racial discrimination in advertising, and other
litigation
On August 11, 2005, the Supreme Court of California ruled that
former L'Oréal sales manager Elyse Yanowitz had adequately
pleaded a cause of action for retaliatory termination under
the California Fair Employment and Housing Act , and remanded
the case for trial. [13] The case arose out of a 1997 incident in
which Jack Wiswall, then the general manager for designer
fragrances, allegedly told Yanowitz to fire a dark-skinned sales
associate despite the associate's good performance. When
Yanowitz refused, Wiswall pointed to a "sexy" blonde-haired
woman and said, "God damn it, get me one that looks like that."
Wiswall retired as president of the luxury products division of
L'Oréal USA at the end of 2006.
In May 2007, L'Oréal was one of several cosmetic
manufacturers ordered by the Therapeutic Goods
Administration in Australia to withdraw advertising regarding
the wrinkle removal capabilities of their products. [14]
In July 2007, the Garnier division and an external employment
agency were fined €30,000 for recruitment practices that
intentionally excluded non-white women from promoting its
shampoo, "Fructis Style". [15] L'Oréal is reported as saying the
decision was "incomprehensible", [16] and would challenge the
measure in court.
In July 2007, the British Advertising Standards
Authority attacked L'Oréal for a television advert on its
“Telescopic” mascara, featuring Penélope Cruz, stating "it will
make your eyelashes 60% longer." In fact, it only made the
lashes look 60% bigger, by separating and thickening at the
roots and by thickening the tips of the lashes. They also failed
to state that the model was wearing false eyelashes.[17]
[edit]Brands
Brands are generally categorized by their targeted markets,
such as the mass, professional, luxury, and active cosmetics
markets. Garnier - L'Oreal's product, reached the top 100
brands of The Brand Trust Report published by Trust Research
Advisory in India. Garnier was ranked in the 61st position in the
list of Most Trusted brands of India.
[edit]Head office
L’ORÉAL brands
Consumer Brands:
• L'ORÉAL Paris
• Garnier
• SoftSheen-Carson
• Maybelline New York
• Le Club de Createurs
Professional Products:
• Kérastase
• L'ORÉAL Professional
• Matrix
• Redken
Strategy Analysis of L'Oreal
We will:
Continue to increase, develop and formalise our business
exchanges with suppliers:
Increase coverage of business reviews to all categories
and regions,
Measure progress against specific environmental and SD
KPIs,
Conduct a supplier satisfaction survey to identify critical
issues and areas of improvement,
Ensure ongoing feedback to suppliers following
Invitations to Tender.
Continue promoting internal awareness of sustainable
development issues among purchasing teams:
Organise specific workshops on SD across the categories
and regions,
Continue training buyers on good purchasing practices
(Purchasing Strategy & Practices training) to achieve a rate of
90%.
Carbon Disclosure Project (CDP) Supply Chain:
Monitor progress of the 26 first suppliers of L’Oréal that
are participating in the CDP Supply Leadership Project,
Integrate new suppliers into the CDP Supply Leadership
Project, from Latin America and Asia.
Encourage suppliers to achieve FSC certification and reduce
their packaging and energy consumption,
Continue the social audits programme with the objective of 400
audits in 2010,
Pursue the deployment and further development of the "L’Oréal
Buy & Care"programme,
Increase the visibility of supplier innovations and facilitate
access to L’Oréal decision-makers in Research & Innovation and
marketing.
General Direction
L’Oréal Group
14, rue Royale
75008 Paris
Further to your request and in our capacity as Statutory Auditor of the
L’Oréal Group, we have performed a review designed to enable us to
express moderate assurance on the procedures used to compile certain
social data published in the L’Oréal Group sustainable development
report and identified by the sign ( ).
These procedures, together with the data published in the Group
sustainable development report, were prepared under the responsibility
of the Human Resources Executive Management in accordance with the
Group's internal reporting standards. These standards are available on
the Group's website.
Our responsibility is to express a conclusion on the procedures for
compiling the selected social data, based on our review.
Nature and scope of our work
We performed the work according to The Compagnie Nationale des
Commissaires aux Comptes (CNCC) professional doctrine related to this
review.
We performed the work described below in order to obtain moderate
assurance as to whether procedures used to compile the selected social
data are free of material misstatement. A higher level of assurance
would have required more extensive procedures. Moreover, our review
is not intended to express, and we do not express, a conclusion on the
accuracy of the figures published.
We performed the following work:
At headquarters level:
For each of the areas reviewed, we met with various representatives
from the departments listed below responsible for organizing the
reporting procedures as well as for the consolidation of social data at
Group level: the Labor Relations Department, HR Information
Systems Department, Corporate HR Support Services, Corporate
Learning for Development Department.
Based on interviews with these representatives and reviews of
documents (Group consolidation manuals and subsidiary reporting
schedules), we obtained assurance as to the:
existence of instructions concerning definitions of the
data to be compiled and the related calculation methods;
existence of reporting and consolidation procedures;
consistency of the data published with the scope set for
such data;
due and proper inclusion of the social data obtained from
the reporting systems in the consolidation packages, assessed on
a test basis.
Our work was based on the following indicators: total cost of the
retirement programmes, % of countries which complete local social
security and mandatory programmes, number of employees per
gender, data taken from the management database of executives'
profiles and careers (nationalities, number of executives by gender,
number of women amongst the management committee for
instance), number of employees and executive staff trained, amount
allocated to the WPS program, number of employees'
representatives, absenteeism rate.
At subsidiary level:
Additional tests were carried out to ensure the understanding and
correct application of Group reporting procedures by the
subsidiaries. These tests were carried out at country consolidation
level, on a selection of five countries (Denmark, Finland, Norway,
Sweden, and Spain) and in respect of the aforementioned indicators,
except for the two specific indicators related to retirement (total cost
of the retirement programmes, % of countries which complete local
social security and mandatory programmes) performed for all
countries at headquarters level.
Our work was based on interviews with the individuals responsible
for reporting at country level as well as with other people involved in
the data collection and reporting procedures.
The tests involved assessing:
the understanding and application of Group data
definitions and data collection procedures at country and
subsidiary level;
the consolidation procedures at country level and
exhaustiveness of the scope;
the existence and appropriateness of internal control
procedures at country level with a view to ensuring compliance
with such procedures by the subsidiaries.
We were assisted in our work by Sylvain Lambert, Partner in charge
of our Sustainable Development Practice.
Review
L’Oreal received a score of 58 out of a possible 100 in the latest (2008)
Climate Counts Scorecard. Climate Counts is a non-profit website based
in New Hampshire that was founded by Stonyfield Farm Organics (85%
owned by Groupe Danone).
L’OREAL’S PERFORMANCE
L’Oreal has a relatively strong record on climate change, tying for
second place among the six companies in the "Household Products"
sector reviewed by Climate Counts. According to my method (see
below), L’Oreal deserves a rating of 58/20 = 2.9.
Climate Counts has this to say about L’Oreal:
“STRIDING – The best Climate Counts choice. These companies still
have work to do, but they’re beginning to hit their stride.”
“Score: 58. Change from 2007 score: +4.
“Review: 16/22 points. Climate Counts has found that L’Oreal has been
measuring its companywide impact on global warming since 2001.
“Reduce: 35/56 points. Climate Counts has found that L’Oreal has
established clear goals to reduce its energy use and has reduced its
impact on global warming (i.e., its greenhouse gas emissions or climate
footprint).
“Policy Stance: 0/10 points. Climate Counts has found no public
information to suggest that L’Oreal supports public policy that addresses
climate change.
“Report: 6/12 points. Climate Counts has found that L’Oreal has made
some public information available on its companywide efforts to address
global warming.”
PEER PERFORMANCE*
Unilever. Climate Counts Score: 75/100. My rating = 3.75
Procter & Gamble. Climate Counts Score: 69/100. My rating = 69/20 =
3.45
Kimberly-Clark. Climate Counts Score: 58/100. My rating = 58/20 =
2.9
L'Oreal. Climate Counts Score: 58/100. My rating = 58/20 = 2.9
Colgate-Palmolive. Climate Counts Score: 44/100. My rating = 44/20 =
2.2
Avon Products. Climate Counts Score: 29/100. My rating = 29/20 =
1.45
The Clorox Company. Climate Counts Score: 15/100. My rating = 15/20
= 0.75
* I include here some major companies that could be considered peers,
not just those that are categorized in the same sector by Climate Counts.
For example, Climate Counts categorizes Unilever as “Food Products”
and Procter & Gamble as “Household Products,” while both companies
compete directly on personal and household products.
METHODOLOGY
Climate Counts says they “use a 0-to-100 point scale and 22 criteria to
determine if companies have:
• MEASURED their climate “footprint”
• REDUCED their impact on global warming
• SUPPORTED (or suggest intent to block) progressive climate
legislation
• Publicly DISCLOSED their climate actions clearly and
comprehensively
“GreenOrder, a leading sustainability strategy firm, provided strategic
guidance on the Climate Counts program, assisted in the development of
the scoring system, and verified the scoring results for accuracy.”
Of the 104 companies on the Climate Counts website, the highest score
is 82 (Nike) and most (67) of the scores are below 50. So there’s a lot of
room for improvement across the board.
In addition to the 0-to-100 point scale, Climate Counts categorizes
companies as “Stuck” (red), “Starting” (yellow) or “Striding” (green).
Climate Counts appears to be considering more than the raw score in
assigning these categories; potential factors include prior performance
and peer performance. For example, Starbucks is labeled as “Striding”
(green) for a score of 49 in the pitiful Food Services sector, whereas Dell
is labeled as merely “Starting” (yellow) for the same score of 49 in the
climate-conscious Electronics sector.
As the methodology for assigning the three Stuck/Starting/Striding
categories was not clear, I decided to ignore them and simply divide the
raw Climate Counts score (0-100) by 20 to create my Citizens Market
rating from 1-5.
In the same month, L'Oreal's Chairman and CEO, Lindsey Owen Jones
(Jones) was honoured with the ‘Best Manager of the Last 20 Years' title
by the French Minister of Finance and Economy, Francis Mer. This
award instituted by the leading French business publication, Challenges,
was in recognition of Jone’s outstanding achievements in transforming
L'Oreal from a French company into a global powerhouse. Jones also
received the prestigious 'Manager of the Year 2002' award from the
French Prime Minister, Jean-Pierre Raffarin. Jones was the first foreign
head of any French company to receive this award, which was sponsored
by the leading French business publication, Le Nouvel Economiste.
These honours were not just a 'cosmetic' eulogy; L'Oreal deserved them,
for it was the only company in its industry to post a double-digit profit
for 18 consecutive years (refer Exhibit 1 for L’Oreal's key financials).
L'Oreal, which had operations in 130 countries in the world, posted a
turnover of € 13.7 billion in 2001. The company recorded a 19.6% and
26% growth in profit in 2001 and 2002 (half-yearly results),
respectively. Commenting on L'Oreal's performance, Jones said, "At
L’Oreal, we are 50,000 people who share the same desire; because it is
not just about business but about a dream we have to realize, perfection."
Known for its diverse mix of brands (from Europe, America, and Asia),
like L'Oreal Paris, Maybelline, Garnier, Soft Sheen Carson, Matfix,
Redken, L'Oreal Professionnel, Vichy, La Roche-Posay, Lancome,
Helena Rubinstein, Biotherm, Kiehl's, Shu Uemura, Armani, Cacharel,
and Ralph Lauren, L'Oreal was the only cosmetics company in the world
to own more than one brand franchise and have a presence in all the
distribution channels of the industry (refer Exhibit C.8.2 for a note on
the global cosmetics industry).
Background
Over the next few years, the company's business expanded considerably.
It started distributing its products through agents and consignments to
the U.S., South America, Russia, and the Far East. L'Oreal soon
emerged as the only cosmetics brand in the world that had products in all
segments of the Industry, that is, Consumer, Luxury, Professional, and
Pharmaceutical. Although the company started as a hair colour
manufacturer, over the decades it had branched out into a wide range of
beauty products such as permanents, styling aids, body and skincare
cosmetics, and cleansers and fragrances over the decades (refer Table 1
for product launches till the mid-1990s and Table 2 for a segment wise
break-up of sales for the year 2002).
During the late 1980s and early 1990s, almost 75% of the company's
sales were in Europe, mainly in France. L'Oreal's image was so closely
tied to Parisian sophistication, it was difficult to market its brands
internationally. Jones thus decided to take a series of concrete steps to
make L'Oreal a globally recognized brand and the leading cosmetics
company in the world. In what proved to be a major advantage later on,
he decided to acquire brands of different origins.
The first thing that L'Oreal did was to move Maybelline's headquarters
to New York, a city known for fast and sophisticated lifestyles.
Commenting on this decision, Jones said, "Memphis just did not quite fit
the sort of profile for finding some of the key people we needed." Then
L'Oreal aggressiveness promoted the US origins of Maybelline by
attaching the tagline 'Urban American Chic' to it. The company also
attached 'New York' to the brand name in order to associate Maybelline
with 'American street smart'.
L'Oreal made sure that each of its brands had its own image and took
care that the image of one product did not overlap with the image of
another product. A cosmetics industry analyst, Marlene Eskin, said;
"That is a big challenge for this company-to add brands, yet keep the
differentiation."
One of L'Oreal's most radical experiments was the makeover and re-
launch of the Helena Rubinstein skin care and cosmetics brand.
Originally positioned in the luxury segment, Helena Rubinstein had the
image of a product used by middle aged-women. In 1999, L'Oreal
relaunched the brand and targeted it at a much younger and trendier
audience than the brand's typical luxury customers (middle-aged
women). Now, the target users were women aged between 20-30 years,
living in urban centres like London, Paris, New York, and Tokyo. The
company also opened a Spa 5 in New York to promote the brand (the
first instance of a company attempting to run a retail operation as part of
a promotional package).
Future Prospects
L'Oreal's efforts paid off handsomely. The company posted a profit of €
1464 million for the financial year 2002, as against € 1236 million for
the financial year 2001. Its overall sales grew by 10% in 2002, and much
of this increase was attributed to impressive growth rates achieved in
emerging markets like Asia (of the 21 % increase in sales volume, China
contributed 61 %), Latin America (sales grew by 22% with sales in
Brazil increasing to 50%), and Eastern Europe (sales grew by 30% with
sales in Russia increasing by 61 %).
Industry observers noted that L'Oreal was much ahead of its competitors
in terms of profitability and growth rate. L'Oreal's rival in the luxury
segment, Estee Lauder, had reportedly posted a 22% drop in profits in
August 2002. The company had also announced a cost-cutting
programme. Even Revlon, L'Oreal's competitor in the mass-market
segment, had posted nine consecutive quarterly losses since late-2001.
Not all competitors were in such bad shape though; rival companies like
Beiersdmf (a Germany based company that owns the globally popular
brand Nivea), Avon, and Procter & Gamble had been performing quite
well. However, industry analysts agreed that no other cosmetics player
matched L'Oreal's combination of 'strong brands, global reach, and
narrow product focus'.
In March 2003, L'Oreal ventured into new businesses that were closely
related to its core activities. One such initiative was Laboratoires Inneov,
L'Oreal's joint venture with Nestle. Through Inneov, L'Oreal entered the
market of cosmetic nutritional supplements. Analysts observed that this
would mark the beginning of 'neutraceutical6 development. A research
analyst at Frost and Sullivan (US based leading provider of strategic
market and technical information), commented, "The Inneov business
will draw on both the growing demand for skin products designed to
retain youthfulness and the growing market for dietary supplements."
L'Oreal expected the cosmetics market to grow at 4-5% per annum in the
future. Looking at the future with optimism, Jones said, "No other
consumer products group has grown as quickly as we have. The
prospects for the next three to four years seem promising to me. L'Oreal
has the good fortune of being involved in a business that is a bit less
sensitive than others to economic cycles. When, the economic climate is
bleak, you might put off buying a new car, but you will still buy a tube
of lipstick that lets you 'take a different sort of trip' for a much smaller
price.
In March 2003, the company entered the prestigious list of the world's
fifty most admired companies compiled by leading business magazine,
Fortune, for the first time. This was yet another indicator of the fact that
L'Oreal seemed to be going from strength to strength each year. If the
strategists at the helm of affairs continued focusing on enhancing
stakeholder value year after year, the future would continue to be rosy
for the company that sold millions of women the dream of living a
'beautiful' life.
REFERENCES
STRONG GROWTH
ƒ +5.6% like-for-like
th
advanced in all zones, all channels and all business segments; more
dynamic than the market, it bolstered
2010 was a year of conquests for the group, with several of our
brands achieving spectacular
2010 was also a year of strong profit growth; the actions taken over
the last two years to improve operating
everyone.
nd
his teams have succeeded in opening up new areas for growth and
profitability, which are also paving the
way for the future. The proposal by the Board of Directors to pay a
dividend of 1.80 euro is an expression
* diluted net earnings per share, based on net profit excluding non-
recurring items attributable to the group.
nd
2/15
A – 2010 sales
st
1) Cosmetics sales
PROFESSIONAL PRODUCTS
new salons. More than ever before, the division is asserting its role
as the unchallenged leader in
this channel.
The New Markets are dynamic, with strong growth rates in India,
China, Indonesia, and also in the
CONSUMER PRODUCTS
zones. All the brands are growing, and above all Maybelline which
achieved growth of +13.3% likefor-like.
4/15
LUXURY PRODUCTS
Giorgio Armani had a very good year, driven by the success of the
new women’s fragrance
Viktor & Rolf brands are posting strong sales growth. Ralph
Lauren showed outstanding performance
In the New Markets, the division is growing faster than the market:
in Asia, thanks to the dynamism of
ACTIVE COSMETICS
reported figures. All the brands and all the zones achieved growth.
Across the world, the division
ƒ All the zones ended the year with positive growth, and this was
particularly clear in Western Europe.
5/15
Multi-division summary by geographic zone
WESTERN EUROPE
very slightly faster than the market trend, particularly in the United
Kingdom, Germany, Sweden and
NORTH AMERICA
NEW MARKETS
fast as the market. The main driving forces are Asia and Latin
America.
ƒ Asia, Pacific: Over the full year, the group recorded +11.2%
growth in this zone like-for-like, +22.9%
based on reported figures, and +13.2% excluding Japan, like-for-
like. The group is continuing to win
deodorants.
ƒ Africa, Middle East: Sales grew by +4.1% like-for-like and
+13.8% based on reported figures, with
The Body Shop ended the year with like-for-like growth at –1.1%.
Retail sales
2010 was a year of transition for The Body Shop, which completed
its strategic reorganisation.
Above all, The Body Shop is accelerating its expansion into the New
Markets, particularly in Eastern
Europe, Asia, and India where the brand has doubled the number of
its stores. The brand has also
extended its distribution into new channels, such as the Internet and
Travel Retail, to increase its reach and
its visibility.
its profitability.
At the end of 2010, The Body Shop has a total of 2,605 stores.
6/15
Galderma sales
ƒ On December 10
th
its distribution, which now covers the vast majority of U.S. territory.
ƒ On December 13
th
L'Oréal and Nestlé, announced the launch of a bid for the Swedish
company Q-Med, which specialises
th
, in a
statement, that its offer has been extended by 15 days and increased
to SEK 79 per share.
The balance sheet, whose structure was already robust, has been
strengthened, with shareholders’ equity
nd
, 2011
22
nd
th
th
at 0:00 am).
Share capital
Finally, the Board of Directors has set the amount of the share
capital at December 31
st
, 2010:
600,992,585 shares with a par value of 0.20 euro, representing a total
of 120,198,517 euros.
Conclusion
Based on our work, no material misstatement came to our attention that
would cause us to believe that the social data selected and published on
the Group Sustainable Development report has not been prepared in
accordance with the Group's reporting procedures.
Neuilly-sur-Seine, June 4, 2010
Statutory Auditor
PricewaterhouseCoopers Audit
Etienne Boris
Sylvain Lambert, Sustainable Development Practice
L’Oréal India
The L’Oréal Group cares about more than making women
beautiful. Vishal Sahgal, industrial director of the Pune
manufacturing facility, talks to Jayne Alverca about the importance
of promoting sustainable development.
Few consumer brands are better known than those of the L’Oréal Group.
The portfolio of 23 global brands including household names such as
Maybelline, Garnier and Biotherm, as well as the L’Oréal Paris brand
itself, are all at the forefront of their market, whether it be for cosmetics,
skin care, fragrance or hair care.
Headquartered in Paris, L’Oréal has over a hundred years’ experience in
bringing out the best in women of all ages and races. Today, the group
has a presence in 130 countries and its 65,000 employees were behind
sales of €17.5 billion last year.
L’Oréal’s presence in India dates back to 1994. “L’Oréal has a strong
belief in the value of manufacturing close to its markets,” explains
Vishal Sahgal, industrial director of the company’s Pune manufacturing
facility.
However, India did not begin a programme of liberalisation for foreign
companies until the early 1990s, so at first, manufacturing was
undertaken by a sub-contractor. “In 1998 we were finally able to move
into direct production, driven by the belief that no one has more
expertise than L’Oréal in the manufacture of the products that we are
famous for,” he adds.
Sales of L’Oréal products in India have been meteoric. “We not only
give products that are better in terms of quality and safety, we have also
been instrumental in creating new markets. For example, hair
colouration was revolutionised by L’Oréal when we introduced fashion
shades which women had never been used before. Our Colour Naturals
brand is very accessible, costing close to €2, and it offers an
international quality standard that was never available before. Similarly,
we introduced Indian consumers to conditioners for the first time and
they have quickly taken over from traditional hair oils,” he comments.
Since 2004, manufacturing for hair care, hair colour and skin care lines
for L’Oréal’s Consumer Products division and Professional Products
division has taken place at Pune. “We need to attract and retain the best
talent in order to grow; and our first location was simply too remote,”
Sahgal explains. “Pune is where all our operations are now based and we
have up to 600 people working for us at any one time.”
Sahgal explains that promoting sustainable development is a
fundamental tenet within all plants and distribution centres that operate
under L’Oreal’s umbrella. Environmental sustainability and corporate
social responsibility (CSR) are the twin pillars that support this broader
aim. Even within the vigorous framework that all L’Oréal manufacturing
centres operate, Sahgal believes that the achievements ofthe
manufacturing facility at Pune are something special. “Our Pune factory
stands out within the group for its environmental achievements,” he
asserts. “The state government of Maharashtra where we are based
awarded the Pune factory first prize in the Excellence in Energy
Management category in 2009 for its various energy conservation
projects.”
Within the L’Oréal Group, the Pune site has won a number of accolades.
“We won the internal award for the best environmental project in 2007
for a project that involved using 320 solar cells, rather than expensive
diesel oil, to heat water for washing in our processes. Two years latter,
we again picked up first prize for a project that uses vermin culture to
convert chemical sludge into useful fertiliser. This led to the proportion
of waste being recovered from the site to increase from 95 per cent to 99
per cent,” he says.
At corporate level, the company’s Indian headquarters in Mumbai has
achieved a rare synergy between its core business, which is beauty and
good citizenship. A project aptly named ‘Beautiful Beginnings’, which
is implemented together with the French NGO Aide et Action, aims to
help girls from marginalised communities who were unable to complete
their normal education to train as beauty therapists and achieve financial
independence. “It is expensive and quite complex to organise so it is
done centrally, but at present ‘Beautiful Beginnings’is operating in
Mumbai, Pune and Hyderabad and it represents wonderful opportunity
for the girls involved,” he says.
L’Oréal also believes that the world needs science and science needs
women. The L’Oréal India For Young Women in Science scholarships
programme, with the support of the Indian National Commission for
Cooperation with UNESCO, has helped young women passionate about
science to achieve their dreams and aspirations of pursuing a career in
science. Established in 2003, it reaches out to deserving female students
from Maharashtra and scholarships worth Rs.250,000 each are given to
five young girls to pursue graduate studies in any scientific field. Thirty-
five scholarships have been awarded to date.
The Pune factory itself has recently picked up another prize, this time
the internal Citizen of the World Award, for its approach to good
citizenship within the community where it is based. “We do not like one-
off donations and look for long term projects which will have a long
term impact in the communities around Pune, where many of our staff
come from,” he explains.
“‘Project Care’, which won us the first prize, is an integrated project that
looks at safety, health and hygiene, the environment and child education,
which we deal with in turn on a quarterly basis with the aim of raising
standards and improving the local quality of life. We rely on a mix of
professional trainers and our own employees from these villages who
feel a huge pride in our work and whose voice is sometimes more
acceptable to local communities than outsiders.”
The project is ongoing and includes facets such as free medical check-
ups for the elderly and a scheme to support schools with redundant
laboratory and IT equipment that still has relevance in the classroom.
The company is also involved in a partnership that will provide two new
classrooms to a local school—at present the children have to study
outside.
On the procurement side, L’Oréal extends its values by insisting on a
very specific vetting process. “Suppliers must pass our stringent quality
requirements and also a Safety and Social Audit. We use external
consultants like Intertech who will monitor for unacceptable practices
such as child labour, ensure that minimum wages are paid and that there
is no requirement for excessive working hours. The government has
labour laws, but not all companies comply. We only want to work with
those that do.”
Meanwhile, Sahgal believes that the factory’s steady expansion creates a
virtuous cycle in the local economy, as at least 50 per cent of staff are
recruited from surrounding villages. “Last year we grew our capacity by
30 per cent and there is still enormous scope for L’Oréal in India. It is
very important that as we grow, we give something back to the society
that has contributed to our success,” he concludes. www.loreal.co.in
Since the company was founded in 1907 by the chemist Eugne
Schueller, scientific research has always been the heart of the L'Oréal
Group's strategy.
The performance, safety and quality of our products rely on this
continuous search for innovative scientific advances.
Unusually for the industry, L'Oréal is one of the few companies able to
carry out all stages of research and development, starting with advanced
research into hair and skin. The Group focuses its work on the following
three sectors:
Conclusion
groups
Recommendations
• Competition analysis
competitive advantages
• Growing competition