Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 3

PETROLEUM SOCIETY PAPER 2008-127

Optimization of Displacement Efficiency


in a CO2 Flooding Reservoir
Under Uncertainty
S. CHEN, H. LI, D. YANG
Petroleum Technology Research Centre (PTRC), University of Regina

This paper is accepted for the Proceedings of the Canadian International Petroleum Conference/SPE Gas Technology Symposium
2008 Joint Conference (the Petroleum Society’s 59th Annual Technical Meeting), Calgary, Alberta, Canada, 17-19 June 2008. This
paper will be considered for publication in Petroleum Society journals. Publication rights are reserved. This is a pre-print and
subject to correction.

EXTENDED ABSTRACT

Abstract algorithm, while well rates of the injectors and the flowing
bottomhole pressures for the producers are chosen as the
CO2 flooding can enhance oil recovery by up to 8-16% of controlling variables. In addition, corresponding modifications
the original oil in place and might be suitable for about 80% of have been made to accelerate the convergence speed of the
oil reservoirs worldwide. In addition to miscibility, genetic algorithm. A field case is used to demonstrate the
displacement efficiency is another factor that needs to be successful application of the newly developed technique. It has
optimized for achieving high oil recovery. Although many also been found that the genetic algorithm combined with the
techniques have been made available for production geostatistical technique can be used to optimize the
optimization in the upstream oil and gas industry, it is still a displacement efficiency under uncertainty in a CO2 flooding
challenging task to optimize reservoir performance in the reservoir.
presence of physical and/or financial uncertainties. In this
paper, a new technique is developed to optimize the
displacement efficiency in a CO2 flooding reservoir under Introduction
uncertainty. More specifically, potential uncertainties
influencing reservoir performance are analyzed and assessed Enhanced oil recovery (EOR) plays an increasingly
by using the geostatistical technique. This enables us to important role in the petroleum industry. Among the various
integrate the available information within a unified and EOR processes, CO2 flooding is considered as the most
consistent framework and to generate multiple geological promising and practical process since it not only significantly
realizations accounting for uncertainty and spatial variability. increases oil recovery, but also considerably reduces
Subsequently, the net present value (NPV) is selected as the greenhouse gas emissions by sequestrating CO2 into the
objective function to be optimized by using the genetic depleted reservoirs. In practice, CO2 flooding performance can
be greatly affected by the reservoir heterogeneity, which can other reservoir parameters. In the past several decades, the
severely reduce the displacement efficiency, result in early CO2 geostatistical techniques have become increasingly important in
breakthrough at the producers, and thus, leave a large amount of the effort to build complex reservoir models, which can meet
bypassed oil in the reservoir. Thus, it is of fundamental and the demands imposed by the needs for improving reservoir
practical importance to optimize production performance of a management, reservoir simulation, production prediction and
CO2 flooding reservoir. optimization. As for geostatistical reservoir characterization, it
The main objective of production optimization in a CO2 is a common practice to generate a large number of realizations
flooding reservoir is to monitor and control the propagation of of the reservoir model to assess the uncertainty in reservoir
the flood front, delay CO2 breakthrough at the producers, and description and performance prediction.
thus, increase the oil recovery and/or the net present value In this study, the conditional geostatistical technique is first
(NPV). Such optimization is made possible by adjusting a set of used to generate multiple equiprobable reservoir models. Then,
controlling variables (e.g., flow rates and/or flowing bottomhole assisted history matching is conducted to reduce the uncertainty
pressures)1. After an oil reservoir is put into production, it will of the reservoir petrophysical parameters. Finally, production
be converted from a static system into a dynamic system. Such optimization is carried out based on each of the history-matched
a system can be treated as a black box, to which injection fluids models to quantify the uncertainty of the optimal production
including gas and water are considered as the inputs and from performance.
which the production fluids are treated as the outputs. Changing
flow rate and/or bottomhole pressure of the well in turn changes
the dynamic state of the system (i.e., reservoir pressure and Production Optimization
fluid saturation distribution). These changes will subsequently
affect the cumulative production and then the oil recovery
and/or NPV. Principles of determining constraints
In general, a field-scale production optimization problem
often encounters a complex reservoir model, production and As for production optimization process, a crucial issue is to
facilities-related constraints, and certain number of unknowns. generate the proper controlling variables (i.e., injector rates and
These factors have made the production optimization process flowing bottomhole pressures for producers) so that the genetic
through rate and front control very complicated and time- algorithm can be used to determine the optimum production
consuming. Thus, the production optimization applications to scenario for a CO2 flooding process. The following are the
date have been mostly limited to small problems. Besides, principles utilized to generate the proper variables.
production optimization process in a CO2 flooding reservoir Producers: For a CO2 flooding reservoir, the flowing
also requires integration of the geological properties, production bottomhole pressure for each producer needs to be maintained
strategies and economic evaluation, which makes the process at or higher than the minimum miscibility pressure (MMP) for
even more complex because parameters such as permeability ensuring miscibility between CO2 and crude oil in the reservoir.
distribution, oil price and fluid saturation distribution are Production and facilities-related constraints should also be met
uncertain. These uncertainties can be caused by measurement in order to obtain steady production. Then, based on the flowing
errors (especially for factors such as relative permeability), bottomhole pressure for each producer, the corresponding
upscaling errors and measurement at only a few clustered production rates can be firstly determined according to the
locations. It is still largely unexplored and remains to be a inflow performance relationship (IPR) curve.
challenging task to optimize reservoir performance in CO2 Injectors: The total injector rate can be generated to maintain
flooding reservoirs, especially under practical field conditions the injection-production ratio to be in the range of 1.0 to 1.2.
and physical and/or financial uncertainties. Flow rate for each injector can then be determined on the basis
In this paper, a new technique is proposed for implementing of the formation fracturing pressure, the total injection rate,
field-scale production optimization in a CO2 flooding reservoir injectivity of the injector and the injection-production balance
under uncertainty. The genetic algorithm is used as an with the surrounding producers.
optimization engine to optimize the reservoir performance,
while the geostatistical technique is employed to account for the Objective function
uncertainty. More specifically, the geostatistical technique is The purpose of this study is to optimize displacement
first utilized to integrate the available information within a efficiency of a CO2 flooding process. More specifically, the
unified and consistent framework and to generate multiple objective is to maximize the NPV of the CO2 flooding process,
geological realizations accounting for uncertainty and spatial which can be calculated by,
variability. History matching is then conducted to update each n
CI t − COt
of the geostatistically generated reservoir models. The NPV is NPV = ∑ − CPc
t =1 (1 + i ) t .
selected as the objective function, while the flow rates of the
injectors and the flowing bottomhole pressures of the producers where n is the number of evaluation years; i is the discount rate,
are chosen as the controlling variables. Certain principles are which is equal to 0.12; CIt is the net profit due to the production
also developed to provide proper selection of the injection rates increase, $; COt is the net disbursement due to injection
and flowing bottomhole pressures. A field case is finally augmentation, $; and CPc is the cost for changing the lifting
presented and analyzed to demonstrate the successful methods, $.
application of the newly developed technique.

Case Study
Geostatistical Technique and
Uncertainty Analysis Field background
Successful implementation of various EOR methods requires The Pubei Oilfield is located in the west of the Taibei
accurate description of the reservoir models which mainly concave in the Turpan-Hami basin, China. The reservoir
include an accurate determination of porosity, permeability and formation is integrated and well-connected with an undeveloped
fracturing system. The average depth of the reservoir is 3436 m, optimization process, the genetic algorithm and the uncertainty
while the original reservoir pressure is in the range of 37.5 to analysis will be presented in the subsequent full paper.
38.5 MPa. Reservoir temperature is 94ºC and the average
permeability is 110.5 md. Reservoir fluid is characterized as a
typical volatile oil with low density (0.803g/cm3), low viscosity Conclusions
(0.4 mPa·s), high formation volume factor (2.929), high content
of the light-ends (57.16 mol%) and high saturation pressure In this paper, a new and pragmatic technique is developed to
(31.14 MPa). The MMP between the reservoir oil and CO2 is optimize reservoir performance in CO2 flooding reservoirs
calculated to be 33.0 MPa by using the WinProp software under physical and/or financial uncertainties. The geostatistical
(CMG, Version 2007.10). technique is utilized to analyze and assess potential
uncertainties influencing reservoir performance. Principles for
Constraints of flow rates for injectors and generating the controlling variables (i.e., injection rates and
flowing bottomhole pressures for producers) are proposed. Then,
flowing bottomhole pressures for producers the genetic algorithm is employed as the optimization engine
Producers: The formation pressure for the Pubei Oilfield has and is proved to be suitable for handling the production
been maintained at 35.0 MPa. Since the MMP is 33.0 MPa, two optimization problems.
flowing bottomhole pressures are respectively selected for
producers which are 33.0 MPa and 34.0 MPa to ensure that
miscibility is always achieved between CO2 and crude oil in the Acknowledgments
reservoir.
Injectors: Water alternating gas (WAG) process is utilized in The authors acknowledge a Discovery Grant from the
this case study and the water-gas ratio is equal to 1.0. Based on Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council (NSERC)
the principles mentioned previously, three flow rates for each of Canada and a research fund from the Petroleum Technology
injector are preliminarily determined. For example, the injection Research Centre (PTRC) to D. Yang.
rate candidates for CO2 in well PB 2-4 are selected to be 40000,
43000, and 50000 m3/d. NOMENCLATURE
i = discount rate, which is equal to 0.12
Uncertainty analysis t = index of the year
The uncertainty analysis will be provided in the full paper. CIt = net profit due to the production increase, $
Cop = cost for the production operation, $
COt = net disbursement due to injection
Results and Discussion augmentation, $
Partial results have been obtained for the optimization CPc = cost for changing the lifting methods, $
process, which show that the oil recovery after optimization is NPV = net present value, $
increased by about 3%. More results and discussion will be
provided in the full paper.
Partial results for the genetic algorithm calculation are shown REFERENCES
in Figure 1. The children number per generation is 50 and
totally 20 generations are included in the calculation. It can be 1. Alhuthali, A.H., Oyerinde, D., and Datta-Gupta, A.
seen that the genetic algorithm is capable of handling the Optimal Waterflood Management Using Rate Control;
production optimization problems well. During each test, the SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering, Vol. 10, No.
genetic algorithm can be used to find, at least, a good enough 5, pp. 539-551, October 2007.
solution if the optimum solution for the optimization problem
can not be achieved. More results and discussion on the
70.5

70.0
Oil recovery (%)

69.5

69.0

68.5

68.0

67.5
0 200 400 600 800 1000

Children index
Figure 1 Oil recovery obtained by using genetic algorithm.

You might also like