Data Extraction Form

Title of Review Abstractor Date

Authors of Article Being Reviewed Title of Article

         
Li Cheng , Janet W H Sit , Kai-Chow Choi , Sek-Ying Chair , Xiaomei Li , Yuning
Wu , Junhong Long, Meihua Tao Effectiveness of a patient-centred, empowerment-based
intervention programme among patients with poorly
controlled type 2 diabetes: A randomised controlled trial

Name of Journal and Year Volume (Number) Pages

International Journal of Nursing Studies 79 43-51

Description of Study (Content of Table 1)

Design Year Subjects Sample Size

Prospective multi-centre, single blind, March 2018 Adult patients with poorly 242
Randomized controlled trial controlled type 2 diabetes
[HbA1c ≥7.5% in the recent six
months] were recruited from
two tertiary hospitals in Xi’an
city, China
Intervention Control Outcomes Measured Others
n=121 n=121 HbA1c
Self-management behaviors
Received a 6-week patient-centered, Received health education classes
empowerment based program and post-discharge follow-up

Assessment of Bias

Poor randomization Concealed allocation Dropouts Intention-to-treat

Low risk  Low risk  Low risk  Low risk
 High risk High risk High risk High risk
Unclear Unclear Unclear Unclear

Co-intervention Blinding of investigator Blinding of participant Other source

 Low risk __Low risk  Low risk Low risk
High risk  High risk __High risk High risk
Unclear Unclear Unclear Unclear

Results

Continuous Outcome Intervention group Control group Intervention group Control group

Pre-Intervention Post-Intervention

Mean SD Mean SD Mean SD Mean SD

HbA1c

Self-management
behaviors
 Dichotomous Patient- Control Patient-centered Control
centered Intervention
Outcome
Intervention

Adverse Event
Data Extraction Form

Title of Review Abstractor Date

Authors of Article Being Reviewed Title of Article

Prueksaritanond S, Tubtimtes S, Asavanich K, Tiewtranon V.  Type 2 diabetic patient-centered care

Name of Journal and Year Volume (Number) Pages

Medical Association of Thailand= Chotmaihet thangphaet May 2004 87 345-352

Description of Study (Content of Table 1)

Design Year Subjects Sample Size

Quasi- experimental design 2004 Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus 78
patients who regularly
attended the outpatient clinic,
Family Medicine Department,
whose FPG was more than
150mg/dL non pregnant, could
communicate well in Thai and
had no other complications
Intervention Control Outcomes Measured Others
n= 33 n= 45 HbA1c
FPG
Complete follow-up subjects Partial follow-up subjects Lipid profile
Eating and exercise behaviors
Symptoms of diabetes
Assessment of Bias

Poor randomization Concealed allocation Dropouts Intention-to-treat

 Low risk __Low risk  Low risk  Low risk
High risk  High risk High risk High risk
Unclear Unclear Unclear Unclear

Co-intervention Blinding of investigator Blinding of participants Other source

 Low risk Low risk Low risk Low risk
High risk High risk High risk High risk
Unclear  Unclear  Unclear Unclear

Results

Continuous Outcome Complete follow-up Partial follow-up Complete follow-up subjects Partial follow-up
subjects subjects
subjects

Pre-Intervention Post-Intervention

Mean SD Mean SD Mean SD Mean SD

HbA1c 9.07 1.48 8.15 1.14

226.09 71.29 214.25 51.94 152.52 48.35 174.70 55.04

FPG

Lipid profile
 Eating and exercise
behaviors
Symptoms of diabetes

Dichotomous Family-focused Control Family-focused Intervention Control

Outcome Intervention

Adverse Event
Title of Review Abstractor Date

Authors of Article Being Reviewed Title of Article

Varming AR, Rasmussen LB, Husted GR, Olesen K, Improving empowerment, motivation, and medical
adherence in patients with poorly controlled type 2
Grønnegaard C, Willaing I. diabetes: A randomized controlled trial of a patient-
centered intervention.

Name of Journal and Year Volume (Number) Pages

Patient Education and Counseling, December 2019 102 2238-2245

Description of Study (Content of Table 1)

Design Year Subjects Sample Size

Unblinded parallel randomized controlled October 2014-September 2017 Adults diagnosed with T2DM 97
trial for ≥ 1 year, HbA1c ≥8% (≥
64mmol/mol)
Intervention Control Outcomes Measured Others
n= 49 n= 48 Primary outcome: HbA1c
All participants received four EMMA Usual care at the diabetes clinic Secondary outcome: autonomy
consultations consultations support, motivation, self-
management skills, and well-
being.
Assessment of Bias

Poor randomization Concealed allocation Dropouts Intention-to-treat

__Low risk __Low risk __Low risk __Low risk
 High risk  High risk  High risk  High risk
Unclear Unclear Unclear Unclear

Co-intervention Blinding of investigator Blinding of participant Other source

__Low risk __Low risk __Low risk Low risk
 High risk  High risk  High risk High risk
Unclear Unclear Unclear Unclear

Results

Continuous Outcome Intervention group Control Intervention group Control

Pre-Intervention Post-Intervention

Mean SD Mean SD Mean SD Mean SD

HbA1c 77 13 75 10 75 75 73 13

Health Care Climate 30 32 35 32

Questionnaire
( HCCQ )
Summary of Diabetes 21 26 24 27
Self- care Activities
( SDSCA )
WHO-5 60 72 72 70

Problem Areas In 8 5 7 6
Diabetes (PAID-5)
Dichotomous Patient- Control Patient-centered Control
centered Intervention
Outcome
Intervention

Adverse Event
Title of Review Abstractor Date

Authors of Article Being Reviewed Title of Article

Slingerland AS, Herman WH, Redekop WK, Dijkstra RF, Jukema JW,
Niessen LW. Stratified patient-centered care in type 2 diabetes: a
cluster-randomized, controlled clinical trial of
effectiveness and cost-effectiveness. 
Name of Journal and Year Volume (Number) Pages
Diabetes Care, October 2013 36 3054-3061

Description of Study (Content of Table 1)

Design Year Subjects Sample Size

Cluster- randomized controlled trial November 1999 and March 2000 506

Randomized Excluded hospitals Usual care Patient-centered Outcomes Measured Others

hospitals care
n= 276 Primary outcome: changes in
n= 13 n= 5 HbA1c and Quality-adjusted life
n=240
years
Secondary outcome: costs and
incremental costs after 1 year

Assessment of Bias

Poor randomization Concealed allocation Dropouts Intention-to-treat

__Low risk  Low risk __Low risk  Low risk
 High risk __High risk High risk __High risk
Unclear Unclear Unclear Unclear

Co-intervention Blinding of investigator Blinding of participant Other source

__Low risk __Low risk __Low risk Low risk
High risk  High risk  High risk High risk
Unclear Unclear Unclear Unclear

Results

Continuous Outcome Patient – centered Usual care Patient – centered care Usual care
care

Pre-Intervention Post-Intervention
Stratified according to HbA1c at baseline
Mean SD Mean SD Mean SD Mean SD

HbA1c 8.1 1..2 7.9 1.1

Cost

Dichotomous Patient- Control Patient-centered Control

centered Intervention
Outcome
Intervention
Adverse Event
Title of Review Abstractor Date
Authors of Article Being Reviewed Title of Article
Jutterström L, Hörnsten Å, Sandström H, Stenlund H, Isaksson U. Nurse-led
patient-centered self-management support improves HbA1c in patients Nurse-led patient-centered self-management support
with type 2 diabetes-A randomized study.  improves HbA1c in patients with type 2 diabetes-A
randomized study

Name of Journal and Year Volume (Number) Pages

Patient Education Counseling, November 2016 99 1821-1829

Description of Study (Content of Table 1)

Design Year Subjects Sample Size

Randomized controlled trial 2010-2011 Patients diagnosed with Type 2 182
DM within 3 years
Group Individual Internal Control External Control Outcomes Measured Others
Intervention Intervention group group

n= 70 n= 35 n=34
n= 54

Assessment of Bias

Poor randomization Concealed allocation Dropouts Intention-to-treat

__Low risk Low risk  Low risk Low risk
 High risk __High risk High risk __High risk
Unclear Unclear Unclear Unclear

Co-intervention Blinding of investigator Blinding of participant Other source

__Low risk __Low risk __Low risk Low risk
High risk High risk High risk High risk
Unclear Unclear Unclear Unclear

Results

Continuous Outcome Intervention group Control Intervention group Control

Pre-Intervention Post-Intervention

Mean SD Mean SD Mean SD Mean SD

HbA1c

Cost

Dichotomous Patient- Control Patient-centered Control

centered Intervention
Outcome
Intervention

Adverse Event