Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 3

Poem Analysis of “Fra Lippo Lippi” by Robert Browning: The Theme &

Meaning of Celibacy

Throughout the poem, “Fra Lippo Lippi” Browning seems to be engaging in a dialogue with the
Church regarding celibacy—both in the artistic and sexual sense. The feelings of the poem’s
narrator can easily be seen as Browning’s own critique and while the main theme concerns art,
the strict sense in which the church views artistic pursuits and products is similar to the way it
requires priests to live celibate lives. While the church’s main argument is that art should be
presented as something “higher” than the base representation of the human form, this denies
the essential humanity of the subject, God’s people. Along these same lines, the way the church
frowns upon sexual, lustful activity on the part of its clergy by demanding celibacy is exactly the
same request as for the artist. Both demands of the church, artistic and sexual are idealized
conceptions of how humans should be represented and both, according to the narrator of the
poem, are entirely unrealistic and misguided. Through this poem, Browning is arguing against
mandatory celibacy for priests and is suggesting, through the story and artistic struggle of Fra
Lippo Lippi, that the demands of the church go against human nature. We are all, to use
Browning’s word, “beasts” thus prone to the same desires that the church wishes to “rub out”.

The narrator of the poem by Browning, “Fra Lippo Lippi” argues that his life in cloister has been
unnatural and restraining and bemoans the lack of life he is allowed to experience (although he
obviously breaks the rules). The mandatory celibacy is made even more absurd when the Fra
point out, “You should not take a fellow eight years old/ And make him swear to never kiss the
girls” (224-25). Earlier in the poem, he speaks of this in terms of other boys that had been
brought into cloister by openly saying with great meaning, “Trash, such as these poor devils of
Medici/ Have given their hearts to—all at eight years old” (100-101). He seems to see this
celibacy as a terrible waste of youth and life—both of which he values above all else. He seeks
to represent truth through art, despite the fact that everything in his life is geared towards a
completely celibate existence—both in art, sexuality, and life. The story of his life can be
summed up in the simple phrase on line 221, “Rub all out!’ Well, well, there’s my life in short.”
He has been told to extinguish the art and the humanity, thus the keen sexual desire that longs
to be free.

Browning, through the character of Fra Lippo Lippi, creates meaning of the poem by suggesting
that the unreal expectations thrust upon him by the church authority go against all that is
natural in human beings. Just as his artwork seeks to preserve the central nature of the human
form, his mindset and lustful appetites are part of this preservation of unrealistic ideals of
celibacy. In mocking the demands put upon by the church, the narrator relates these demands:
“Your business is not to catch men with show, / with homage to the perishable clay, / But life
them over it, ignore it all, / Make them forget there’s such a thing as flesh” (179-182). The
church’s desire for unrealistic representation extends from art to the idea that celibacy should
be adhered to and they wish to make parishioners and clergy alike wipe out ideas of the sinful
flesh.

Ultimately, the whole of the poem is a criticism on mandatory celibacy, which is told through
the metaphor of art. If art, like sexual desire, cannot be expressed, then it would seem that
religion is somehow a lie, that there is always something lurking under the surface. The narrator
points out not only the hypocrisy of these celibacy rules, but the inherent flaws that exist within
them, namely, that humans are creatures of the flesh.

oem’s narrator can easily be seen as Browning’s own critique and while the main theme
concerns art, the strict sense in which the church views artistic pursuits and products is similar
to the way it requires priests to live celibate lives. While the church’s main argument is that art
should be presented as something “higher” than the base representation of the human form,
this denies the essential humanity of the subject, God’s people. Along these same lines, the way
the church frowns upon sexual, lustful activity on the part of its clergy by demanding celibacy is
exactly the same request as for the artist. Both demands of the church, artistic and sexual are
idealized conceptions of how humans should be represented and both, according to the
narrator of the poem, are entirely unrealistic and misguided. Through this poem, Browning is
arguing against mandatory celibacy for priests and is suggesting, through the story and artistic
struggle of Fra Lippo Lippi, that the demands of the church go against human nature. We are
all, to use Browning’s word, “beasts” thus prone to the same desires that the church wishes to
“rub out”.

The narrator of the poem by Browning, “Fra Lippo Lippi” argues that his life in cloister has been
unnatural and restraining and bemoans the lack of life he is allowed to experience (although he
obviously breaks the rules). The mandatory celibacy is made even more absurd when the Fra
point out, “You should not take a fellow eight years old/ And make him swear to never kiss the
girls” (224-25). Earlier in the poem, he speaks of this in terms of other boys that had been
brought into cloister by openly saying with great meaning, “Trash, such as these poor devils of
Medici/ Have given their hearts to—all at eight years old” (100-101). He seems to see this
celibacy as a terrible waste of youth and life—both of which he values above all else. He seeks
to represent truth through art, despite the fact that everything in his life is geared towards a
completely celibate existence—both in art, sexuality, and life. The story of his life can be
summed up in the simple phrase on line 221, “Rub all out!’ Well, well, there’s my life in short.”
He has been told to extinguish the art and the humanity, thus the keen sexual desire that longs
to be free.
Browning, through the character of Fra Lippo Lippi, creates meaning of the poem by suggesting
that the unreal expectations thrust upon him by the church authority go against all that is
natural in human beings. Just as his artwork seeks to preserve the central nature of the human
form, his mindset and lustful appetites are part of this preservation of unrealistic ideals of
celibacy. In mocking the demands put upon by the church, the narrator relates these demands:
“Your business is not to catch men with show, / with homage to the perishable clay, / But life
them over it, ignore it all, / Make them forget there’s such a thing as flesh” (179-182). The
church’s desire for unrealistic representation extends from art to the idea that celibacy should
be adhered to and they wish to make parishioners and clergy alike wipe out ideas of the sinful
flesh.

Ultimately, the whole of the poem is a criticism on mandatory celibacy, which is told through
the metaphor of art. If art, like sexual desire, cannot be expressed, then it would seem that
religion is somehow a lie, that there is always something lurking under the surface. The narrator
points out not only the hypocrisy of these celibacy rules, but the inherent flaws that exist within
them, namely, that humans are creatures of the flesh.

You might also like