Professional Documents
Culture Documents
How Do Child-Friendly Spaces Benefit Children?
How Do Child-Friendly Spaces Benefit Children?
children's unique needs can be met. These spaces help children return to a normal
routine by offering activities, games and informal education.
World Vision recognizes that when emergencies occur, children are often the most
susceptible to injury, exploitation, abuse and other dangers. Child-Friendly Spaces are
one of the ways we prioritize the care and protection of children in emergency
situations.
How do Child-Friendly Spaces benefit children?
Child-Friendly Spaces offer children a safe place to play and the support they need to
deal with grief and loss. The centres are available to all children in a community, no
matter how they’ve been affected by the disaster.
Child-Friendly Spaces provide things like:
2) While there is growing evidence for the effectiveness of mental health interventions in low- and middle-
income countries and humanitarian contexts, this is lacking for psychosocial programming. We aimed to
summarise the evidence for psychosocial programming in these contexts through a systematic review
(PROSPERO: CRD42017069066) of peer-reviewed and grey literature of programme evaluations. A total
of n = 42,435 unique records were initially identified, with n = 211 records meeting full inclusion criteria.
We identified 51 randomised controlled trials of 47 different interventions. The remaining studies used
different evaluation methodology. Only three interventions had more than one experimental/quasi-
experimental evaluation: Brief Intervention and Contact, Problem Management Plus and Child Friendly
Spaces. While there are many studies of interventions, it was challenging to identify the same
intervention across studies, leaving almost no interventions with more than one rigorous study supporting
their use and many interventions that are poorly described. This makes it difficult to choose between
them or even to implement them. Future research should focus on replication of well-described
interventions in multiple different sites, to place future intervention selection on a more scientific basis.
There is also a need to better understand the impact of psychosocial programmes in sectors other than
health and protection, such as nutrition. These sectors may provide critical delivery mechanisms for
psychosocial programming to broaden the reach of such interventions.
Key implications for practice
Efforts to build the evidence base for psychosocial programming in humanitarian settings are challenged by
the breadth of programming delivered, populations served and outcomes targeted in this field, resulting in
predominantly one-off studies of a wide range of interventions.
To inform future intervention selection, research initiatives should focus on replication of well-described
interventions in multiple contexts or stages of humanitarian response.
Rigorous evaluation of community-focused psychosocial programmes is also needed.