IN THE COURT OF THE ADDL.

JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS AT

GADWAL.

Crl.M.P.No. of 2016

In

Crime No. 195 OF 2016

BETWEEN:

Vadde Ganganna Alias Gangully

S/o Late Narayana, Aged 50 years,
Occ. Business,R/o CT padu village
Of Ieeja Mandal . … PETITIONER/
ACCUSED (A1)
And

The State of Telangana,

Represented by SHO,
Police Station Ieeja. … RESPONDENT/
COMPLAINANT

Offence: Under Section 9(1) of AP Gaming ACT.

PETITION FILED UNDER SECTION 436 OF Cr.P.C.

The above named petitioner most humbly submits as follows:-

1. That the police Ieeja registered the above case against the Accused (A1) for the
offence U/S 9(1) of AP Gaming ACT .,basing on the false allegations against the petitioner.
2. The police Ieeja arrested him on 27-10-2016 and produced before this Hon’ble court and this
Hon’ble court remanded them to judicial custody.
3. That the allegations level against the Petitioner /Accused is false and baseless and that the
petitioner did not commit any alleged offence. The Petitioner was falsely implicated by the
Respondent/Police. The Petitioner /Accused is an innocent person .He is poor man, with driving
as his only means of livelihood and has to maintain himself, his wife parents and children at
present. The petitioner has a fixed place in ieeja Mandal. There is no intention or scope for the
Petitioner to escape from the jurisdiction of the court if the petitioner is released based on bail.
And the petitioner is ready to prove their innocence by facing trial.
4. The petitioners submit that this court has proper forum to try the case and have got the ample
powers to enlarge the petitioners on bail.
Further, it is submitted that the remand report clearly reveals that the entire investigation is
completed and no part of the same is pending and the accused got arrested and remanded to
judicial custody before by this Hon’ble court.
That the petitioner is prepared to furnish the sureties for his punctual attendance on the
each and every date of the case during the course of trail by undertaking before this Hon’ble
court, if they are released on bail.The other grounds of the petition will be elicited at the time of
arguments.
No other bail application is pending in any other court of law except this petition before this
Hon’ble court.
It is, therefore, prayed in view of the above facts and circumstances that the Hon’ble
court may kindly be pleased to enlarge the petitioner on bail in the interest of justice, otherwise
he will be put to hardship and heavy loss.

Dt.27-10-2016 COUNSEL FOR PETITIONER/ACCUSED

VERIFICATION:
I, S/o , aged 42 years, R/Ieeja do hereby declare on my behalf
and on behalf of the petitioner with his consent that Sri U.Rajesh, Advocate, Gadwal is appointed
to defend the case and no others are appointed.

INTERESTED PERSON VERIFIED ADVOCATE

IN THE COURT OF THE JUDICIAL
MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS AT
GADWAL

Crl.M.P.No. of 2016
In

Crime No. 159 OF 2016

BETWEEN:

V Ganganna Alias Gagully

…. PETITIONER/
ACCUSED

and

The S.H.O. Ieeja P.S

.…RESPONDENT/
COMPLAINANT

PETITION FILED U/S 436 OF Cr.P.C.

Filed on: 27-10-2016

Filed by: Advocate for Petitioner/

Accused

Address for service:

U.Rajesh,
Advocate, Ieeja.