Professional Documents
Culture Documents
An Index of Deterioration in Hops (Humulus: Lupulus)
An Index of Deterioration in Hops (Humulus: Lupulus)
To cite this article: S.T. Likens, G.B. Nickerson & C.E. Zimmermann (1970) An Index of
Deterioration in Hops (Humulus�Lupulus), Proceedings. Annual meeting - American Society of
Brewing Chemists, 28:1, 68-74, DOI: 10.1080/00960845.1970.12006963
Article views: 10
1.0
% (<<.,e>
LOST
0.8
100 2.4
...u
..
0.•
z
c
.
0
II:
II)
c 0.4
50
0.2 0 0.20
After August 9 there was no significant small amount of oxidation of hop acids
change in the proportion of a- and {3:acids could be expected during drying, packag-
or in A275/A325 which was attributable ing, and grinding of the samples in pre-
to the two acids. Excess A2 75'1 A 325 was paration for analysis. Conversion of 0.2%
0.01 to 0.06 through the entire series a- and 0.1% {3-acids to _their oxidation
which indicated very little contribution products would account for the excess
by compounds other than hop acids. A A275/A325 found in Table 1.
TABLE I
Maturity Series of the Hop Variety Bullion a
mloill A275/A325
100g a-acids {j-acids Thear-
Date hops (%1 (%1 Found etical Excess
TABLE II
Loss of Hop Acids by Nine Varieties and Corresponding
Increases in A2 7 5 /A 3 2 5 During Storage at 72° F.
a-t{3
Months in a-acids (3-acids a+~ lost
Identification storage (%) (%) (%) (%)
TABLE III
Indicated Loss of Hop Acids From 62 Commercial Samples of Bullion
and Brewers Gold from the 1968 Crop. Analyzed Between
4 Sept., 1968 and 4 Oct., 1968.
Range No. Avg. Indicated
A275/A325 Samples A275/A325 % Hop Acids loss (%)a
aT;lken from Figure 2 for the average A275/A325 found for each group.
o
iII 1.0
0 .• o
~ 0.' o
- 0.7
} 0.'
:) 0.5
0.4
OQ o
o.a 00 0
o
0.2 o~---'-----'---L----'-------'----'-----'------J~--'---~
20 80 100
TABLE IV
Loss of Hop Acids from Lupulin of 20 Male Genotypes and Corresponding
Increases in A 2 7 5/ A 3 2 5 After 16 Hours at 85° C (±0.01)
Initial After Storage Hop Acids
Identification a+(3 A2 7 S / A3 2 S a+(3 A2 7 S / A 3 2 S lost
1%) 1%) (%)
TABLE V
Statistical Data for Relationship of "% Hop Acids Lost" and
"Log A 2 7 5/A 3 2 5" for Hops (Female) and Lupulin (Male).
Correlationand Linear Regression
Female Male
Sample size 30 20
Mean of "log A275/A325 " -0.2400 -0.1925
Mean of "% lost" 37.37 45.65
for a comparative storage test, it is neces- acid content prior to any deterioration
ary that all entries are exposed to the can be estimated.
same conditions for the same length of A27S/A32S was also shown to bear
time. It is helpful to include varieties with the same relation to oxidation of hop
known storage stabilities as controls and acids in lupulin from male hops as in
as reference points. The advantages of cones of the female plants. The relation-
using single analyses (i.e. after deteriora- ship was found to be reliable at elevated
tion only, rather than before and after) 'temperatures for short periods in an ac-
for judging both hop acid content and celerated storage test.
storage stability are obvious.
Literature Cited
Summary
The ratio of absorbance of hop acids 1. Alderton, G., Bailey, G.F., Lewis, J.C., and
(from extracts of hops or lupulin) in Stitt, F. Anal. Chern. 26: 983 (1954).
2. American Society of Brewing Chemists.
alkaline methanol at 275 mil and 325 mil Methods of Analysis (6th ed.), (HOPS-4).
(A27S/A32S) was shown to be loga- The Society: Glenview, IUinois (1958).
rithmically related to the extent of oxida- 3. Ibid. (HOPS-5).
tion of the acids. It was demonstrated 4. Burgess, A.H. Hops. Leonard Hill Books,
that A2 75/A 32 5 can be used as a quanti- London, England (1964).
5. Whitear, A.L. J. lnst, Brewing 72: 177
tative estimate of the degree of deteriora- (1966).
tion of commercial hop samples at the 6. Wright, R.G., and Connery, F.E. Am Soc.
time of analysis. Furthermore, the hop Brewing Chemists, Proc, 1951, p. 87.