Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Case Study 7
Case Study 7
Case Study 7
School of Engineering
Engineering Management
________________________________
CASE STUDY
________________________________
Submitted by:
SUBMITTED TO:
Engr. Leo Victor B. Amores, CIE, CLSSYB, Trained SSGB
Learning Assessment:
1. What are some of the potential benefits of a more formalized approach to forecasting?
• Stocks won’t be a problem as a formalized approach to forecasting will help you know
which products are more likely to run out of stock first and which products won’t sell more.
• Sales will be continuous and surges will be expected and easily handled because of the
forecasting data.
• Better control of the inventory and the ordering of new stocks for the company.
• Better decision making made available by the data from the forecasting.
• Forecasting data can be used to plan for future expansions of the company.
2. Prepare a weekly forecast for the next four weeks for each product. Briefly explain why you
chose the methods you used. (Hint: For product 2, a simple approach, possibly some sort of naive/
intuitive approach, would be preferable to a technical approach in view of the manager’s disdain
of more technical methods.)
1 50 40
2 54 38
3 57 41
4 60 46
5 64 42
6 67 41
7 90* 41
8 76 47
9 79 42
10 82 43
11 85 42
12 87 49
13 92 43
14 96 44
For Product 1
As seen from the graph the trend of product 1 is rising except in the 7th week where it has
recorded a product spike of 90 units and goes down again in the 8th week to 76 units. In order to
correctly interpret the trend, we would use a linear regression since the graph indicates a strong
linear relationship between the variables. Performing the linear regression:
Product - 1
Week (X) (Y) ⅀XY ⅀Y^2 ⅀X^2
1 50 50 2500 1
2 54 108 2916 4
3 57 171 3249 9
4 60 240 3600 16
5 64 320 4096 25
6 67 402 4489 36
7 90 630 8100 49
8 76 608 5776 64
9 79 711 6241 81
(𝑛⅀𝑋𝑌) − (⅀𝑋)(⅀𝑌)
𝑏 =
(𝑛⅀𝑋 2 ) − (𝑛⅀𝑋)2
11,011
𝑏 = = 3.45
3185
𝑎 = ȳ − 𝑏𝑥̄
1039 105
𝑎= ( ) − 3.45𝑥( ) = 48.34
14 14
𝑌 = 𝑎 + 𝑏𝑋
𝒀 = 𝟒𝟖. 𝟑𝟒 + 𝟑. 𝟒𝟓𝒙
week forecast
15 100.09
16 103.54
17 106.99
18 110.44
For product 2
As seen from the graph, product 2 has a much more complicated trend compared to product
1. It has a much-complicated trend since the values are closer to each other and does not exhibit a
positive or negative trend. It is observed from the graph that every 4 weeks there is a spike from
the demand. For week 16 the observed forecast would be 52 since the trend for the past weeks the
demand would increase 1 unit every week spike since the previous week the increase was 2 units
it is assumed that the increase for the week 16 is 3 units. In non-spike weeks the trend is that the
units will increase 1 unit per week. For week 15 the moving average is taken from weeks 9,10,11
before the spike occurred. The forecast would be (42+43+42)/3 would be now equal to 42.33 plus
1 since it is a non-spike week. For week 15 the forecast is 43.33. For the weeks 17 and 18 the
moving average is taken from weeks 13, 14, 15 that would be (43+44+43.33)/3 would now be
equal to 43.44 plus 1 since it is a non-spike week. For week 17 and 18 the forecast is 44.44.
Week Forecast
15 43.33
16 52
17 44.44
18 44.44