Professional Documents
Culture Documents
BANI 2019 Harvesting Salt Water Energy
BANI 2019 Harvesting Salt Water Energy
, SALEH, S.,
MUHAMMAD SUKKI, F., ABU BAKAR, S.H., MAS'UD, A.A. and ARDILLA-REY, J. 2019. Harvesting sustainable energy
from saltwater, part II: effect of electrode geometry. Test engineering and management [online], 81 (11-12), pages
5709-5717. Available from: http://testmagzine.biz/index.php/testmagzine/article/view/810/731
2019
2. Methodology
3. Results and Discussions the current output reduced with the duration of
3.1 Geometry and surface area of electrodes the experiment as depicted in Fig. 5. It is
apparent from the results obtained that using
The results for this experiment are tabulated in
hollow cylindrical aluminium rod of 2-inch
Table 3. The results are the measurement of
outer diameter (Ahollow_2.0) produced higher
voltage (V) and current (mA) produced at 1 and
voltage output when combined with solid
5 minutes at the commencement of every
cylindrical carbon rod of the same diameter
experiment for all combinations. In general,
(Csolid_1.0). The lowest voltage output was
voltage output decreased slightly as the time
produced by the combination of Asolid-1.5 and
duration of the experiment increased. This is
Csolid-0.5.
true for all electrodes’ combinations. This is
also in agreement with the current output where
as such Zn/MnO2 demonstrates a substantial electrode’s surface, thus promotes the reaction
drop in voltage output as the battery discharges. rate. Increasing the surface area is comparable
A high drop in voltage output during discharge to the characteristic of a parallel current source,
cycle could disturb the functionality of any whereby the voltage output remains the same
electrical applications that require a stable but the total current output adds up.
constant voltage supply. One possible solution Theoretically, the hollow cylindrical
to mitigate this problem is by incorporating aluminium rod of 1-inch outer diameter
voltage regulator in the circuit to provide more (Ahollow_1.0) is expected to produce higher current
stable supply. Other factors that can contribute output when combined with solid cylindrical
to the discharge characteristics are cell carbon rod of the same diameter (Csolid_1.0) as a
temperature, the state of charge and the age of result of larger surface area and greater contact
the cell [7-10]. with ions as shown in Fig. 7(a). The electrode’s
surface area for hollow and solid rod is
calculated based on Fig. 7(b):
The total area surface for hollow rod,
𝑇ℎ𝑜𝑙𝑙𝑜𝑤 = 𝜋𝑅 2 − 𝜋𝑟 2 + 2𝜋𝑅ℎ + 2𝜋𝑟ℎ (1)
The total area surface for solid rod,
𝑇𝑠𝑜𝑙𝑖𝑑 = 𝜋𝑅 2 + 2𝜋𝑅ℎ (2)
Where R and r are the external and internal
radii respectively and h is the length of the rod
that is being submerged in the saline solution.
Figure 6: Battery performance characteristics. The dimension and calculated surface area are
Used by permission of The Electropedia [10] as tabulated in Table 4 where the symbol of
surface area for all electrodes used is
The geometry and surface area of the introduced.
electrodes play an important role in varying the
current output of the galvanic cell. It is
anticipated that the larger the surface area, the
larger the current output with little to no
changes in the voltage output. The cell voltage
is determined by the relative potential of the
metals used and does not depend on the
dimension of the electrodes. For galvanic cell,
the internal resistivity is inversely proportional
1
to the surface area of the electrode (𝑅 ∝ 𝐴𝑟𝑒𝑎 ).
Thus, larger surface area will decrease the (a) (b)
internal resistivity value of the cell, which
Figure 7: (a) Larger surface area of the
eventually increases the current output and the
electrode allows greater contact with the ions,
allowable maximum current. Having larger
and (b) dimension for hollow and solid rods
surface area of the electrodes will also allow for
greater contact between the ions and the
Table 4: The dimension and surface area of hollow and solid electrodes under investigation
Symbol for
Electrodes R (cm) r (cm) h (cm) T (cm2)
surface area
Ahollow_1.0 1.27 0.97 5 72.48 TAhollow_1.0
Ahollow_2.0 2.54 2.24 5 154.67 TAhollow_2.0
Asolid_1.5 1.91 - 5 71.47 TAsolid_1.5
Csolid_0.5 0.64 - 5 21.39 TCsolid_0.5
Csolid_1.0 1.27 - 5 44.96 TCsolid_1.0
electrodes when placed in the saline solution.
The ratio of surface area for TAhollow_2.0 : Increasing the distance will increase the internal
TAhollow_1.0 : TAsolid_1.5 is 2.1 : 1.01 : 1 and for resistance in the solution thus affect the current
TCsolid_1.0 : TCsolid_0.5 is 2.1 : 1. The surface area output.
for Ahollow_2.0 is undoubtedly double the surface
area for Ahollow_1.0 and Asolid_1.5. Therefore, it is 3.2 Types of carbon
predicted that the current output for Ahollow_2.0 The results for this experiment are tabulated in
will be higher than Ahollow_1.0 and Asolid_1.5 if not Table 5. The results are the measurement of
double. Looking at the result in Table 3, the voltage (V) and current (mA) produced at 1 and
assumption is validated for Ahollow_2.0 and 5 minutes at the commencement of the
Ahollow_1.0 where the former produced higher experiment. The measurements were recorded
current output than the latter, albeit the for each type of carbon electrodes under
differences rather small. Surprisingly, Asolid_1.5 investigation with aluminium rod of 0.5 inch
was found to produce much higher current diameter as the anode. In general, all voltage
output than Ahollow_2.0 and Ahollow_1.0, which measurement showed a decreased in voltage
contradicts with the expectation mentioned output as the duration of experiment increased.
earlier. A possible explanation for this The same phenomenon was shown in current
unanticipated result could be due to the output for all carbon electrodes. Again, the
decreased in electrical resistance of the Asolid_1.5 results essentially demonstrated the discharge
as well as its saline solution. This is supported characteristics of a battery. Carbon impregnated
with the large reduction in the nominal voltage materials such as activated carbon, carbon felt,
output of Asolid_1.5. The most interesting finding carbon rod and carbon nano tubes were among
was the behavior of current output when carbon other cathode substrates that are usually being
electrode of larger diameter (in this case used in electrochemical process [11-13]. It is
Csolid_1.0) was used. Contrary to expectation, the interesting to note that the highest voltage
results of Csolid-1.0 in Table 3 show a drastic output was produced by Csponge at 1.92 V but
dropped by more than half in current output as there were no current detected from the
compared to that when Csolid-0.5 was used. electrode, thus the LED did not emit any light.
Nonetheless, the voltage output did not vary A possible explanation for this is that an open
much, albeit a little bit higher. This circuit occurred within the electrical circuit thus
phenomenon is observed in all electrodes under no current flowed in the LED. The highest
investigation with Csolid-1.0 as the cathode. The current output was produced by Cpaper at 17.3
only logical explanation for this contradictory mA, however surprisingly showed a constant
result may be due to the distance between the voltage output throughout the experiment. This
can be a good electrode combination for a electrodes under investigation are made from
longer lasting saltwater lamp. Crod also carbon, it is expected that at least the voltage
generated high voltage at 1.76 V with 8 mA output does not vary that much since voltage
current output at the first minute of the depends on the ability of the free electrons to
experiment. Meanwhile Cfabric generated the travel through external circuit from anode
second highest current output but with lower (aluminium electrode) to cathode (carbon
voltage output. Cactivated produced the lowest electrode). This discrepancy might be caused by
voltage and current output thus was deemed not the composition of the carbon electrodes as well
suitable for long term application. This is quite as the reaction rate of the material. Further
unexpected since activated carbon has been investigation on the molecule structure of these
frequently used in saltwater electrical materials must be undertaken before a firm
generation system. Although all carbon conclusion can be made.
e-energy-future-seawater.
Acknowledgments [7] EDN Series for Design Engineers,
Rechargeable Batteries Applications
The author would like to thank Ministry of
Handbook, 1st ed., Gates Energy Products, Inc.,
Higher Education (MOHE), Malaysia and Oxford, United Kingdom, 1998, pp. 35-151.
Universiti Teknologi Malaysia (UTM) [8] R. Zhang, B. Xia, B. Li, L. Cao, Y Lai, W.
(Research cost centre no. Zheng, H. Wang, W. Wang, Wei and M.
Q.K130000.3556.06G43) for funding this Wang, “A Study on the Open Circuit Voltage
project. The experimental procedure for this and State of Charge Characterization of High
project has been filed for copyright with Capacity Lithium-Ion Battery Under Different
reference number of IP/CR/2018/0264 (UTM). . Temperature”, Energies, vol. 11, no. 9, pp. 1-
17, 2018.
References [9] Z. Haizhou, “Modeling of Lithium-ion Battery
for Charging/Discharging Characteristics
[1] World Energy Issues Monitor 2018. (2018). Based on Circuit Model”, International
Perspectives on the Grand Energy Transition, Journal of Online Engineering, vol. 13, no. 6,
World Energy Council (2018) [Online]. pp. 86-95, 2017.
Available : https://www.worldenergy.org/wp [10] Electropaedia. Information on Battery and
content/uploads/2018/05/Issues-Monitor-2018- Energy Technologies, Battery Performance
HQ-Final.pdf Characteristics [Online]. Available:
[2] N. A. Bani, M. Z. Hassan, H. Mad Kaidi, M. N. https://www.mpoweruk.com/performance.htm
Muhtazaruddin, S. Sarip, S. Saleh, M. A. Mohd [11] V. Saez, M.D. Esclapez, I. Tudela, P. Bonete,
Izhar, S. A. Mohd Aris, S. Z. Abd Jalil, and A. and J. Gonzalez-Garcıa, “Electrochemical
H. Mohamed Rashidi, “Feasibility Study of a Degradation of Perchloroethylene in Aqueous
Low Cost Saltwater Lamp for Rural Area”, Media: Influence of the Electrochemical
International Journal of Integrated Operational Variables in the Viability of the
Engineering, vol. 10, no. 7, pp. 167-176, 2018. Process”, Industrial & Engineering Chemistry
[3] M.M.M. Aminuddin, M. Balasubramaniam, H. Research, vol. 49, no. 9, pp. 4123–4131, 2010.
Omar, M.H. Misran, M.M. Ismail, and M.A. [12] I.F. Cheng, Q. Fernando, and N. Korte, :
Othman, "The Correlation Between Salinity Electrochemical dechlorination of 4-
And Electric Voltage", in International chlorophenol to phenol”, Environmental
Symposium on Technology Management and Science & Technology, vol. 31, no. 4, pp.
Emerging Technologies (ISTMET), 2014, pp. 1074–1078, 1997.
458-461. [13] W. Xie, S. Yuan, X. Mao, W. Hu, P. Liao, M.
[4] P. Sangmin, S.K. Baskar, K. Kyoungho, S.M. Tong and A.N. Alshawabkeh, “Electrocatalytic
Hwang, and Y. Kim, “Saltwater as the energy activity of Pd-loaded Ti/TiO2 nanotubes
source for low-cost, safe rechargeable cathode for TCE reduction in groundwater”,
batteries”, Journal of Materials Chemistry A, Water Research, vol. 47, no. 11, pp. 3573–
vol. 4, pp. 7207-7213, 2016. 3582, 2013.
[5] S. Ramakanth, “Cheaper Electrodes Having
Higher Efficiency Using Salt Water And Salt
Vinegar Electrolytes”, International Journal of
Innovative Research and Development, vol. 1,
no. 8, pp. 310-322, 2012.
[6] J. Gonzales. 2016. Renewable energy of the
future: Seawater [Online]. Available:
https://www.quantumrun.com/article/renewabl