Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Intro To Phrase Structure 2
Intro To Phrase Structure 2
Intro To Phrase Structure 2
II
What do all these trees do?
VP ?
‘PP Attachment’
NP ?
NP PP
V
The dwarf saw the gnome in the garden
it was the gnome who was seen in Two
the garden
structures:
S
the gnome was seen in the garden two meanings
in the garden the dwarf saw the gnome
VP
‘PP Attachment’
NP
NP PP
V
The dwarf saw the gnome in the garden
it was the gnome in the garden who was seen
Two structures:
S
the gnome in the garden was seen two meanings
?? the gnome in the garden the dwarf saw
VP
‘PP Attachment’
NP
NP
V PP
The dwarf saw the gnome in the garden
The gnome in the garden is sad
What rule???
S
NP PP VP
prep NP
det N det N
The gnome in the garden is sad
S
NP
VP
PP
prep NP
det N det N
The gnome in the garden is sad
Syntactic Rules
S
NP PP VP
prep NP
det N det N
The gnome in the garden is sad
What do all these trees do?
ideational
NP VP
Participants PP
NP
Process
verb prep NP
det adj N det N det N
The small gnome wiped his hands on the hill
Grammatical ideational
Functions
S
Process
VP
verb
Participants Circumstances
Grammatical Finite
Functions
S
interpersonal
NP VP
Subject PP
NP
verb prep NP
det adj N det N det N
The small gnome wiped his hands on the hill
Grammatical interpersonal
Functions
S
VP
verb
Subject
Finite
Subject Participant
Finite S Process
NP VP
PP
prep NP verb NP
functional interpretation
depends on tree geometry
S IC-analysis
(immediate constituency
NP VP analysis)
NP PP
N V D N
I saw the gnome in the garden
Subject S IC-analysis
+
NP VP Functions
NP PP
N V D N
I saw the gnome in the garden
S IC-analysis
+
NP VP Functions
Participant
NP PP Circumstance
Participant
Process
N V D N
I saw the gnome in the garden
Semantics
Compositional Semantics
+ -
×
3 4 5 2 4
(3 + 4) × (5 - 2 x 4) = ?
×
+ -
×
3 4 5 2 4
(3 + 4) × (5 - 2 x 4) = ?
×
+ -
×
3 4 5 2 4
(3 + 4) × (5 - 2 x 4) = ?
×
+ -
×
3 4 5 2 4
(3 + 4) × (5 - 2 x 4) = ?
×
+ -
×
3 4 5 2 4
(3 + 4) × (5 - 2 x 4) = ?
×
+ -
×
3 4 5 2 4
Semantics
Compositional Semantics
VP
‘the-boy’
NP NP
det noun verb det noun
The dog chased the boy
we are talking about
s.o. chasing X
VP
s.o. chases s.t.
we are
V NP talking
about
chase something,
call it X
S s.o. chased s.t.
s.t. = the-boy
VP
‘the-boy’
NP NP
det noun verb det noun
The dog chased the boy
S s.o. chased the-boy
VP
NP NP
det noun verb det noun
The dog chased the boy
s.o. chased the-boy
S s.o. = the-dog
s.o. chased the-boy
VP
‘the-dog’
NP NP
det noun verb det noun
The dog chased the boy
s.o. chased the-boy
S s.o. = the-dog
s.o. chased s.t.
s.t. = the-boy
VP
‘the-dog’ ‘the-boy’
NP NP
det noun verb det noun
The dog chased the boy
Structural ambiguity entails
semantic ambiguity...
S
NP VP
NP
PP
NP
det noun verb det noun
det noun prep
NP VP
PP
NP
NP
det noun verb det noun
det noun prep
PP
NP
NP
det noun verb det noun
det noun prep
PP
NP
NP
det noun verb det noun
det noun prep
NP VP
PP
NP
NP
det noun verb det noun
det noun prep
NP VP
NP
PP
NP
det noun verb det noun
det noun prep
NP
PP
NP
det noun verb det noun
det noun prep
NP
PP
NP
det noun verb det noun
det noun prep
NP
PP
NP
det noun verb det noun
det noun prep