Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Indian National Movement (1885-1996)
Indian National Movement (1885-1996)
Indian National Movement (1885-1996)
... ..
•• .
PHASES OF INDIAN NATION AL J)Jd,1hlM1 ~aornji, Sur~ndranalh Ba
MOVEM ENT .i.nJ Cop.ii Krishn;i Gnl.'hale. ""It.
The h1,ton or th I d . oer11an dso
e
Ied b, the Con..,_n ,.,n Ln.ition,11 moH•ment
. · - •
,... ·' c,,n ,.., divided hroadly Beliefs 111at1onahst
m10 th r,x- phases.
• Eul) nation.dist ph.i,e: 1885-!90S
• 6-il• ckl~ ~atinn,,lbts believed that British fhl! early natio
rule was a bl~,ang beca~t had COl1iftre,! uce ccrta1
• A,scrth e n.:1tion.ahst phase: 1905-18 1otrod ,
sewral benefit, on ll)d.i.iJ They felt ~ .._..:UN'~ of tnu1
• Gandhian phase: 1916-4, at lhat ~tagc ol hi,tory. 11 wa~ in theu thl' 13ritish "o
own inlen>'ih to remain und~r th~ BntJll! the'/ \,rer"" \.·<>n
J
THE EARLY NATJONALISTS ,Inn• U11?y w..-rc not yet ready lo govern reoso11.1blc an
them elve•,.
(THE MODERA TES) (1885- 1905)
• The l',irly nJllonah,t, were ron,inred tlwi contnb utl
Dunng 115 1m11al years, the Cnn~r,•,~ ,,·a, thl1 Bnti,h could bf., persuaded to inlrodlltf
11.!d b) lc,1d1?1"!> who ,n•n tlcscribt•tl by l~ler Ol'CcssJn
Nationa li
tom,, and the gonmm<'Ilt
lu,tor1an, ,1, early nalion,1li~ts. Th,• nu:mbers ,·nulJ be lrnn,fnrmed to suit thl' interests /\,,ording
of lhe Conl;T('s, Junng lhc earl~ n,1lion,1list '!!, th,• Ind Ian
,ubject;). f ...._ nationali
pha"<! belonged mainl>• to the eJuc.,ted •f 1
h,·y had great ta1Ui tn t!)e Bnh,h l!Cl1Se o1 obtt-,--tive
middle-class inlelleclua l communil\ ' JUshce and iair p ~ 1-1 ~ truth in
(lawy,•r,, leach,•r,, Jnumalists. official~, the earl
profession ab, induslriJlis ts and other~). rl1e Objectiv es
.
important leaders during this penoJ were
Jlui early nationalists wanted
participatio n of the Indians in the
Ul Lhl• near future and a gradual
1,elf-govemmenl in the di
Method s
I , I r.,
l!l:!!' \Moderates
constilulional mcth
rli grievances to the
p•tlently for
:c Oadabha1 Naoro11
Gopa( Knihno Gokho/r remove those en..-N
.,,,',rn•2,' "rea d u ill
. I wnuld .,
11" ~ '1•111,111,b. F- I b ' ) >1ivp In l
(\ 1.unir
~·· 10 iarr,~J th
gov.e•nmc~ " 111 W lh
ii" r.,,ri111lllll'"unit, ' !-.pr,•,1d , ,d,·,1! ot fr
~ flt'~i ,111wng tlw p1.•tmf. 11011tir,,1 natum"ll \dc;,oc,acy ,cdom,
1 m, t~ • sccubri\m
bl' t l ,111(! 1
11 1hrllll~h 'Uill "I' II~ know! I
tiff r,111111,g I •
,·
..,i,: pu IC o1l11}1f~
I !I\".
,111<1 llw 11 ._., 11 r111•1•lin1•s n,11t1111,,i1\l8 'lh1c.il aff urir, h~~ ~f ;nd
:111r<'' · wy 11 I 11 ,. • 11i11in '" orgi1111,.. n 1,1n
I' ,1rtn, ~ to I ngl,111<1 l11 Iwr.,, 1~ I Hl'l1I t n,,I n111,,•,n1•111 t •nd ra, •• tlw
,J,S• th(! " ll ,t.ag_P "'
, .• c;,...,,"•innwnt tu mtrIll1lll l' ''' ,. llw I l"Vt•h1p1111•111 fJ
.
II l •ll'Ss,u-y
'.-, 11"' l>(•Jid s 1,f ti
W~arly
llt•rjcil Ohlnly chnngc and :atron.,tr
~ pu«ful,
.
1h11I ion.ii prnbltm~-hav uculu nnn.Oilch t
~r- o
111
ands of the Early rt• l'Volnu, in lud.i •·s • c oc,1111rcJ l~flal
rnmmunal pohtiJ. Aworld of v1olmce and
t onalists
lht• complex problems :~~rat, approach lo
British · • ,Jrh• nationalb
... . b wanted u,". . 8 r1Ush
..to
only mo~t viabt' I
world.
a) is perhaps~
c "° ution that can heal ow
..,,n,Jucei:er tam I forms for thew lf
1 forrcd ~ - . . . e are of alt
rt lhat ,,'1itJ!'..' ol lnd1an society. Tuey believed lhal
et6nti-.h would . gr.int them lheir reques1s ·r
1
By the beginning of the .,0th
character of the national :iov=ry • the
1 tlwir
M M'r. ,om·'.m:t.>d that lhe demands were lo changt! 1':ew trends appeared llll~
[nti,h leadership of the Congr~-ss passed from the
f 0\ <.'l'.n
'1'1,m,1blt.> and 1usl.
hands of the early nation.ihsts lo those of the
as,;erlive nationalist!>-
d that
1 {ontribution of th e Early
~ ationalists "j C '"'i m
nmcnt Do you think the Bnt,sh w"e genuinely
I ' • I'
wirdin~ to Sl,,mC historians, the early concerned about the welrare of the Indians,
t.!tionali,t leaders i ,ii, ·d to achieve their G,ve reasons for your answer
se of iLJfdl\e,. lnere is, no doubt, some clement of
tr:ttiin Lhtircribasm. f Jowever, il we examine THE ASSERTIVE M
~. early nationalist phase in Lhe context of (THE RADICALS)
L'imtire mo\"emenl, lhe achievements of lhe
The transition in
Cr-:.6res.~ tome obvious. marked the beg. ·
' The early nationalists established a solid the national movem
oundatiofl which served as a base ~ a
.q;f ~ical approach in later years./
Y ~pread polt1ic:1I awarenes s among
assertive nationali
outstanding men I
Lala ..wjrat Rai,
JX'<>ple and instilled in them a sense of Aurobind o G
n11i,,naJ unity. The people began to think aims and methods
and
of ~~'JCh,~ ~
members of one ,tnP atoseofffie ea
llaho lh~ lnclian natio n.~
their
1
l ited ' '-'d naliofll truggle
1
r,~: • ~ongre £°
ltained the
educated
fI
the Bri· I"1' h Sense ••I ju<lice .111.t t,1ir pl,!)I
.
"\ C.n· ,1 radical mt'lhod of active oppos,r .
111
tlw 11ovemmcnt wuuld have to be a 111
n)'-'Y bduiwd that tlw llri•s~,1ul1• 111 1ndln
Sw,1r,1j would h,1vc to ht· a,hicvl'cl !'Pll·d
\\',1' 11 ''1 ' 1 1' 1l"-,mg hut a cur~l' I lw1 wt•n•
,1 pt1lillc,1l, ,111tl•gove rnment agitatt 'Oui,
connn,·,~i that tlw Hnti,h h,nl 1111 inh·nlion•
1' 1 111tr,'1,.l11,1z rch~ll;, h•t tlw w,•lt n, 111
with the i1w11lwment Jnd suppor/'~ l1lj
mo1sscs. The Congre<~ W1)11IJ hav 11-t
~lw lnd1.1ns.~~ l'\ r.•,11!1,•d lh,1t thl lhlli~h .: to .._
1,·,,nst,,rnwd trorn a pl,1llorm for Ut•b1"I
mll'H'5h \\ 1'tl' lfiltcrent ,1ml d,1,hl'll with I Ill' •111
wl•M,•rmll'<I. lndi,u, intdl'111 11
,11111mg tlw
ln,lian inll'rc.-~b Indio .. ,1.~lll'\'Ct 11,ow ,mtl
an to., rcg1111enl o f I ree d 001 fighters- " . "'-
•
progrc.-"" un,'kr Briti,h n;., tf Jr ,klcrnune
• J, con fid I ent
'
I willing to
..,.
u "lltA
._
llli1t
~.,crifice,.
t. m
Do you agree w,th the methods of the
rtie su
early nattonahru or those of the asser-w ,e 111e r"r:
nat1onaltsts' Give reasons for your ans·,,er. tJ,.e ear~
nationah
~upport
Leaders ble Lala LOJPOt Ra, (ltft), Bal Gangadhar Tllak THE PARTIT~N OF BENGAL
Ice :t'J) and 8,t)fll Chandra P" ,ght) led the national
~.a-,-r~t ,nm asser:r, e pha~, from 1905 to 1918 ( 9os1 V agitatio
agaiJl~I
llw Briti5h partitioned Bengal in l 'l05 111 unity
Objecti vef pursuance of their poliq of dh:ide and rult ti, ed .
After the partition in 1905, the a~rbll
The goal 01 th~ a,..,..rti\'I? n.:tlionilli~ti,; was not
nationali-.b adopted the methods of boycott.
,,clf-go\ 1.:mment in ' 0radu.:tl ~t.1gvs but
o;wadesh i .:tnd national educ.ition to achim
immed.1.ale fn•Piinm (sw3raj) frnm 13rilish the goal 01 o;waraj. The people were asked ID
ruli'
Method s
The a,:-.ertive nationalist s
had no faith in the
constituti onal met ~ods
followed by the early
nationalist~. Twl'ntv, vears .
of prayers, petitions,
appeal:., resolution s ,1nd
represent ations had f.liled
.
to \'ll'ld an,• , cum:rete
resulh.
Tilak km•,,· lh<1 I tlw British
t would nl•,·cr concede to
0
the ,k mand for swaraj
I without ,1 struggle.
ti .ill Bnfuh S<>ods a d
inr, i,ii1~~.te•h• gOQJs. n u~ imlv lndi,1n lhe••
ov1u,11
t11v'l',;j
l1)
f.' .;('rtin: nallunah~t s,150
°
0111 11 Muil11.ea&\lch1 l'it'\ !ht-
m.tlnobjl'(hves
r . Na' 1 , . l im I (;agu., w .
Ot1gh v ,\'ti J~s1gns ut thl' B . ,lw thruu.,h
rtlf ll <1111.1
.1.11
,,. ,1 ,,n cnnunu tt.,I 1•
•"'S I J
nh,h
•n1?s
.111" ,;". " prorn.,t,
,hvidin i; ~ lht, M •1mo11K
. w,1,
I l11,
,
r....1,·11 11,tlrns a
""' ;as I ,Uow,
lI
>ort the
The Esmblost,men1 ol lho 1,lusln,
·others
t
ea,ty Mll0<1ahsl plll,$,U L\.ICkflOff 1e5r- ~
t ··~·J
u,,p
""'c,,,,ps
aulan~
l Azad r
~lim~. I ) Tte7~
:onflict
,i t\ \j
~ ~
Kalam I
u.sllms
lose to
l them lmport~nt words Muslim League sei-ed as a polmul p14tfwnl fol
, 1916. Eiriy nationar.sts were the nationalist leadeis who led upper-dass Musl,ms. ttsestabl,shmenttheotdtht
growth of oauonal urniv and ~al(et1<d the ,_,.a
ngned tl>e Congress ,n ,ts initial years
movement
·ess to l,mrt••e- nationalists were those leaders of the
-
Separate •IKtOrates ,e!tr 10 the v
,Jilical Congres, who believed in the radical method of the coun1rv, dwid!d ,nto d,ff
actNe oppos,uon to the Bnbsh government. on factori lil<e 1el,91on, uste,
Swu1j means self-rule. It refers 10 the end of foreign eiample, ,t munt that Mu1l•
ointly n;'e
Muslim rep1escn11toves
~
rnand Part,t,on of Bengal was done 1n 1905 by Lord Cun.on Home Rule Leag~u w•"foeffltd
communal Imes, destroying the unity between aesant w,1h 1he a,m 10 i1Ch1
ras an
.~
011
within tht 8!1111h
U,nilY· the H,ndus ,nd the MushrnS hi l,U(lmO"' P1<t wt! 119ned
Boycott of foreign goods refers to the refldll to ijll nd tnt (O(ICJ!~l ,n 1
f pc,1,1I01 refOIIN 1n I
Br,ush goods
ti~ s.-4deshi means the use rA indl~ Ie.
1oit1I goods produced and~~
split
I wcJS
4 The assertive n~bonal1sts had no faith In the constitultonal methods follow
ed by th
nat10.,ahsts - ,, , -{ eea-1..
·,
5. T1lak knew that the British would concede to the demand of swaraJ easily
Without any
struggle
(D Pictur e study
This is the picture of a nationalist leader
1 . Identify the person 1n the picture.
2 . Whteh poltt1cal organization did he Join and when?
3. When and by whom was this organization founded?
4. What were the obJecttves of this organizatton?