Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Gas-Phase Reaction of NO Radicals With Isoprene: A Kinetic and Mechanistic Study
Gas-Phase Reaction of NO Radicals With Isoprene: A Kinetic and Mechanistic Study
ABSTRACT: The gas-phase reaction of NO3 radicals with isoprene was investigated under flow
conditions at 298 K in the pressure range 6.8 , P(mbar) , 100 using GC-MS/FID, direct MS,
and long-path FT– IR spectroscopy as detection techniques. By means of a relative rate
method, the rate constant for the primary attack of NO3 radicals toward isoprene was deter-
mined to be (6.86 6 2.60) 3 10213 cm3 molecule21 s21.
The formation of the possible oxiranes, 2-methyl-2-vinyl-oxirane and 2-(1-methyl-vinyl)-
oxirane, was observed in dependence on total pressure.
In the presence of O2 in the carrier gas, the product distribution was found to be strongly
dependent on the reaction pathways of formed peroxy radicals. If the peroxy radicals mainly
reacted in a self-reaction, the formation of organic nitrates was detected and 4-nitroxy-3-
methyl-but-2-enal was identified as a main product. On the other hand, when NO was added
to the gas mixture and the peroxy radicals were converted via RO2 1 NO : RO 1 NO2 , the
formation of methyl vinyl ketone as the main product as well as 3-methylfuran and meth-
acrolein was observed.
From the ratio of the product yields if NO was added to the gas mixture it was concluded
that the attack of NO3 radicals predominantly takes place in the 1-position.
A reaction mechanism is proposed and the application of these results to the troposphere
are discussed. q 1997 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Int J Chem Kinet 29: 755– 765, 1997.
compilation is given in [4]. The overall uncertainty of concentrations for the organics were (4.3 – 6.1) 3 1012
the rate constant at 298 K was estimated to be of a molecule cm23. The yield of reacted isoprene was in
factor of two demanding improvements. the range 21 – 71% and for trans-butene, 9.2 – 50%. N2
Organic nitrates were identified as products of the was used as the carrier gas at a total pressure of 6.8
reaction of NO3 radicals with isoprene and 4-nitroxy- mbar. The flow velocity varied from 2.8 to 5.5 m s21.
3-methyl-but-2-enal represents the main component of The following reaction pathways are considered
the product distribution [5 – 8].
NO3 1 isoprene !: products (2)
2
O2NO
1 4
O NO3 1 trans-butene !: products (3)
3
isoprene (with numbering 4-nitroxy-3-methyl-but-2-enal and the ratio of the rate constants is given by:
of the carbon atoms)
k2 ln([isoprene]0 /[isoprene]t )
The formation of this product must be discussed as a 5 (I)
result of a 1,4-addition (the first number presents the k 3 ln([trans-butene]0 /[trans-butene]t)
position of the NO3 attack and the second number the
position for the O2 addition according to the given Concentrations have been obtained without NO3 rad-
numbering of the carbon atoms). Products of a 1,2- ical production in the side tube, index “0,” as well as
addition, methyl vinyl ketone (MVK), and a 4,3-ad- with NO3 radical production, index “t.” The detection
dition, methacrolein (MACR), were found in subor- unit served a GC – FID equipment (HP 5890) which
dinate yields, 0.035 for each [8]. However, in the was directly connected with the flow tube by a vacuum
reaction of OH radicals and O3 with isoprene MVK system. In order to terminate all radical processes, NO
and MACR are formed with considerable yields [9]. was added to the gas stream of the transfer line to the
Furthermore, in the reaction of NO3 radicals with mon- GC. The desired amounts of consumed reactants were
oalkenes unsubstituted carbonyls are regarded as main achieved by variation of the N2O5 flow through the
products formed after the break of the former double thermal prereactor and so by variation of the initial
bond which was attacked by the NO3 radicals [10,11]. NO3 radical concentration.
The subject of this work is to determine the rate
constant for the reaction of NO3 radicals with isoprene
Product Studies
and to carry out comprehensive product studies in or-
der to get information about the reaction products The equipment for the study of the product distribution
which can be expected under atmospheric conditions. consisted of the same main components as mentioned
Special attention is given to the fate of the produced above. A detailed description is given in [14]. In con-
peroxy radicals. trast to the equipment for the determination of rate
constants, for GC analysis a GC – MS/FID system (HP
5890 with HP – MSD 5971) was used. For on-line FT –
EXPERIMENTAL IR detection, a 2050 cm3 cell with a White mirror
system (optical path length of 10 m) was attached to
Rate Constant NO3 1 Isoprene the flow tube downstream the port for the GC sam-
pling. The FT – IR analysis was carried out by a Nic-
For the determination of the rate constant a relative olet spectrometer (Magna 750) with a MCT detector
rate method was used. The experimental setup was in the spectral range 1000 – 4000 cm21 by coadding of
equal to that described previously [12,13]. The exper- 200 scans and an instrumental resolution of 8 cm21.
iments were performed in a 2.13 cm i.d. quartz flow- Spectra were recorded when either only the N2O5 flow
tube at 298 K. NO3 radicals have been produced in a was switched on and the thermal prereactor was cold
thermal prereactor located in a side tube by thermal or all flows (N2O5 and isoprene) were set and the pre-
decomposition of N2O5 at ca. 400 K. reactor was hot. In the resulting difference spectrum,
consumed N2O5 appeared as negative bands and all
N2O5 1 M !: NO3 1 NO2 1 M (1) products as positive bands. Furthermore, a mass se-
lective detector (HP – MSD 5971) connected to the
At this temperature the reverse reaction is negligible. flow tube by means of an uncoated deactivated column
The mixture of the organics, isoprene and trans-butene served as an on-line MS monitor. Spectra were re-
as the reference substance, was introduced into the corded in the 70 eV electron impact mode. short
flow tube through a moveable inlet. Typical initial Isoprene and all reaction products with the excep- standard
long
JCK(Wiley) BATCH
tion of the organic nitrates were analyzed with GC 2-chloro-3-methyl-but-3-enyl-acetate with sodium hy-
methods. Absolute calibrations were performed for droxide [17]. 4-Nitroxy-but-2-enal was prepared by
isoprene (6 10%), methyl vinyl ketone (MVK) bromination of 1-ethoxy-buta-1,3-diene [18] with N-
(6 10.4%), and 2-methyl-2-vinyl-oxirane (6 9.8%) bromosuccinimide in ethanol, treatment of the formed
using GC – FID, experimental uncertainties are given 1,1-diethoxy-4-bromo-but-2-ene [19] with silver ni-
in the brackets. For structurally similar compounds, trate in acetonitrile and liberation of the aldehyde with
methacrolein (MACR) and MVK as well as 2-(1- tartaric acid. The synthesis of 3-methyl-furan and 2-
methyl-vinyl)oxirane and 2-methyl-2-vinyl-oxirane, methyl-2-vinyl-oxirane are described elsewhere
the same response factors were used. The response [13,12]. Isoprene, methyl vinyl ketone, and meth-
factor of 3-methylfuran (MF) was determined with re- acrolein were commercially available (Aldrich). The
spect to the absolute calibration for isoprene according gases used had stated purities as follows: N2
to the method of “effective carbon number” [15]. (99.999%) and He (99.999%), Linde; and O2
Within the experimental errors, the response factors of (99.9995%) and NO (99.5%), Messer Griesheim.
MVK, MACR, and the oxiranes were in reasonable
agreement with those obtained with the “effective car-
bon number” method with respect to the absolute cal-
ibration for isoprene. The identification of all products RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
was achieved by their mass spectra and the retention
time of authentic samples. From the FT – IR analysis, Rate Constant NO3 1 Isoprene
the concentrations of N2O5 , NO2 , and organic nitrates According to eq. (I), the experimental data are given
were monitored by absorption peaks at 1246, 1629, in Figure 1. The plot shows a reasonable linearity, the
and 1284 cm21, respectively. An averaged cross sec- axis intercept is slightly positive but within two stan-
tion for the organic nitrates, s 5 (6.4 6 1.4) 3 10219 dard deviations of zero. The least-squares analysis
cm2 molecule21 (base 10), was taken from [6]. Be- yields a rate constant ratio k2/k3 5 1.76 6 0.14. Error
cause of insufficient sensitivity, formaldehyde could given represents two standard deviations. Using k3 5
not be determined with the desired precision using the 3.90 3 10213 cm3 molecule21 s21 with an overall un-
present equipment. Product yields were obtained with
respect to reacted isoprene. If isoprene was used in
excess (experiments with NO) the product yields were
obtained with respect to consumed NO3 radicals which
were derived from consumed N2O5 .
Reactions were conducted in the pressure range
6.8 – 100 mbar using He, N2 , or N2 /O2 mixtures as the
carrier gas. Initial isoprene concentrations were (7.1 –
8.7) 3 1012 molecule cm23 if product yields were de-
termined with respect to reacted isoprene or 9.3 3 1014
molecule cm23 if isoprene was used in excess. Initial
concentrations of NO3 radicals varied in the range
(2.0 – 10.8) 3 1012 molecule cm23. Flow velocities
varied from 0.74 to 1.33 m s21. Reaction conditions
were chosen so that the point for the GC-sampling the
disappearance of the NO3 radicals was complete with
$ 99%.
Chemicals
N2O5 was prepared according to the method of David-
son et al. [16] by adding NO to a stream of about 7%
ozone in oxygen. The product was trapped at dry-ice
temperature and purified by subsequent trap-to-trap
sublimation under a continuous stream of ozone/oxy-
gen. 2-(1-methyl-vinyl)oxirane was synthesized from Figure 1 Plot according eq. (I) for the gas-phase reaction
3-methyl-but-2-enyl-acetate by chlorination with hy- of NO3 radicals with isoprene using trans-butene as the ref- short
pochlorous acid followed by treatment of the formed erence substance. standard
long
JCK(Wiley) INTERACTIVE
Table I Summary of Rate Constants for the Gas-Phase Reaction of NO3 Radicals with Isoprene Available in the
Literature and Obtained in the Present Study. SC: Smog Chamber, FT: Flow Tube, R: Relative Method, MS: Mass
Spectrometry, and LIF: Laser Induced Fluorescence
k2 [cm3 molecule21 s21] T[K] Technique Reference
(5.94 6 0.16) 3 10 213
295 6 1 SC–R Atkinson et al. [20,4]
(1.3 6 0.14) 3 10212 298 FT– MS Benter and Schindler [21]
(6.52 6 0.78) 3 10213 297 FT– LIF Dlugokencky and Howard [22]
(1.2 6 0.2) 3 10212 298 6 2 SC–R Barnes et al. [6]
(7.8 6 0.62) 3 10213 298 FT– MS Wille et al. [23]
Recommended value
6.78 3 10213 298 Atkinson [4]
(6.86 6 2.60) 3 10213 298 FT– R This study
certainty of 6 30% from [4], the obtained rate constant signed to 3-methylfuran (MF) and 2-(1-methyl-vi-
ratio can be placed on an absolute basis and it follows nyl)oxirane appeared.
k2 5 (6.86 6 2.60) 3 10213 cm3 molecule21 s21. In
Table I a summary is given for gas-phase rate con- O O
stants of the reaction of NO3 radicals with isoprene
from the literature together with the value obtained in 2-methyl-2-vinyl-oxirane 2-(1-methyl-vinyl)oxirane
this study. Using the relative method (R) under smog
Furthermore, in the presence of O2 , methyl vinyl ke-
chamber conditions (SC), the rate constants were
tone (MVK) was found in traces. Figure 2 shows de-
found in the range (5.94 2 12) 3 10213 cm3 mole-
tected oxirane yields with respect to converted iso-
cule21 s21. Approximately the same range, (6.53 2 13)
prene observed in He as well as in N2 using GC – FID.
3 10213 cm3 molecule21 s21, is covered if the rate con-
Added O2 did not influence the oxirane yields. The
stants were determined under flow tube conditions
concentrations of 2-(1-methyl-vinyl)oxirane were near
(FT) with the absolute method using mass spectrom-
etry (MS) or laser-induced fluorescence (LIF). There
is no obvious dependence of the magnitude of the rate
constant on experimental conditions or on the method
of determination. No reasons can be given for the dis-
crepancies. Atkinson [4] recommended a value of 6.78
3 10213 cm3 molecule21 s21 determined from a Ar-
rhenius expression (T 5 251 – 381 K) using absolute
rate constants by Dlugokencky and Howard [22]. The
value obtained in this study is in an excellent agree-
ment with this recommendation.
PRODUCT STUDIES
the detection limit of this method and only at P # 20 radicals to isoprene. In principle, with increasing total
mbar a determination seems to be serious. From all pressure the concentration of the carrier gas M in-
available data, an averaged oxirane ratio [2-methyl- creases and the stabilization step ([M]k st ) becomes
2-vinyl-oxirane]/[2-(1-methyl-vinyl)oxirane] 5 5.34 more important in comparison to the decomposition
6 1.02 can be given. The observed pressure depen- step (k dec). NO3 radicals should predominantly attack
dence of the oxirane yields can be described by a isoprene in 1- and in 4-position. In each case, an ad-
model by Olzmann et al. [24]. Using this treatment, duct radical with allylic structure is formed, while ad-
the pressure dependence of the product distribution is dition in 2- or 3-position yields adduct radicals without
given by a competition between collisional stabiliza- resonance stabilization. The following reaction pattern
tion (k st ) and decomposition (k dec ) for the chemically is considered:
activated adduct radical formed after addition of NO3
NO3 1
ka kb
O2NO * *
ONO2
kdec a [M], kst a [M], kst b kdec b
O O
1NO2 O2NO 1NO2
ONO2
pecially NO2 , in our experiments. Using [O2 ] $ 1015 4-nitroxy-3-methyl-but-2-enal was not successful.
molecule cm23, a band located at 1717 cm21 appeared From the FT – IR spectrum of the structurally identical
and with increasing O2 amount up to ca. 1016 molecule 4-nitroxy-but-2-enal the ratio of absorptions due to the
cm23, the band intensity grew in the same way as the nitrate group and the carbonylic group was determined
band intensity of the organic nitrates was going down. being in a reasonable agreement with the ratio of these
Further addition of O2 did not show an effect. The absorptions from our product spectra.
position of this band is typical for an absorption of an On the other hand, if the attack of NO3 radicals in
a,b-unsaturated carbonylic substance. Taking into ac- 4-position is considered, the formation of 4-nitroxy-2-
count that the attack of NO3 radicals predominantly methyl-but-2-enal as well as 4-nitroxy-2-methyl-but-
takes place in the 1-position, as pointed out later, 4- 1-en-3-one is possible. A contribution of signals of
nitroxy-3-methyl-but-2-enal has to represent a main these substances to the observed absorptions can not
product. This observation is in full agreement with the be ruled out. For the discussion of the path-
results of Skov et al. [7]. As a result of our experiments ways leading to the detected main product, further re-
at 100 mbar with [O2] $ 1016 molecule cm23, a nitrate actions of the collisionally stabilized adduct radical
yield of ca. 0.9 with respect to reacted isoprene was from the attack of NO3 radicals in 1-position are con-
found. An attempt to prepare an authentic sample of sidered:
O2NO
k24a [O2], k 4a k24b [O2], k4b
O2NO O2NO
O2 O2
self
k5 reaction
O2NO 1 (xHO2)
O
The reaction of this radical with O2 results in the for- of the corresponding oxy radical as a intermediate re-
mation of a tertiary peroxy radical via reaction (4a) or acting immediately with O2 forming HO2 and the ob-
a primary peroxy radical via reaction (4b). If the cor- served 4-nitroxy-3-methyl-but-2-enal. The occurrence
responding reverse reactions (2 4a) and (2 4b) pro- of this oxy radical as a product of pathway (5) under
ceed with relevant rate an establishment of an equilib- different experimental conditions of this study is dis-
rium each has to been taken into account as observed cussed later.
in the reaction of allyl radicals C3 H5 with O2 [25,26]. Products of the attack of NO3 radicals toward iso-
Under the experimental conditions employed, the self- prene in 4-position and the consecutive reaction with
reaction of formed peroxy radicals should be favored, O2 are a secondary peroxy radical after 4,3-addition
NO was absent and the reaction with NO3 radicals and a primary peroxy radical after 4,1-addition and the
should be of minor importance. The self-reaction of formation of 4-nitroxy-2-methyl-but-1-en-3-one and
primary peroxy radicals is much faster in comparison 4-nitroxy-2-methyl-but-2-enal, respectively, is pos-
to tertiary peroxy radicals [27], for instance: sible.
k(CH3O2 1 CH3O2 )/k(t-C4 H9O2 1 t-C4H9O2 ) ca.
12000. Therefore, the self reaction of primary peroxy
radicals from pathway (4b) should be the most impor-
Product Formation in the Presence of NO
tant loss process in this system. The cross reaction, All experiments were performed at a total pressure of
k(CH3O2 1 CH3O2 )/k(t-C4H9O2 1 CH3O2 ) ca. 120 100 mbar with [O2 ] 5 1.09 3 1017 molecule cm23;
[27], should not be significant. This consideration as- isoprene was used in excess (9.3 3 1014 molecule
sumes that allylperoxy radicals show the same behav- cm23) and product yields were obtained with respect
ior as described for nonallylperoxy radicals. Accord- to consumed NO3 radicals. It was assumed that each
ingly, with a dominance of pathway (5) the formation removed N2O5 produced one NO3 radical and wall loss
of 4-nitroxy-3-methyl-but-2-enal as a main product processes as well as the reaction with NO2 were neg-
can be explained. Concerning pathway (5), Skov et al. ligible. In this way, the stoichiometry D[N2O5 ]/D [iso- short
[7] as well as Kwok et al. [8] discussed the formation prene] 5 1 : 1 follows. By consideration of simulta- standard
long
JCK(Wiley) BATCH
NO 1 NO3 !: 2 NO2 (9) Figure 5 Yields of NO2 (attributed to the reaction RO2 1
NO : RO 1 NO2 ) and nitrates (mainly 4-nitroxy-3-methyl-
As pointed out in the beginning of this section, these but-2-enal) in dependence on initial NO concentration if NO
experiments were conducted with an excess of iso- was added after completeness of NO3 radical consumption
prene and product yields were obtained with respect at t 5 39 ms.
to consumed NO3 radicals. However, if reaction (9)
plays a significant role, from the measured product
concentrations only lower limits for the product yields Set B: Using isoprene in excess (9.3 3 1014 mole-
can be obtained. With initial concentrations of cule cm23), the NO3 radical consumption via reaction
[NO]0 5 9.9 3 1012 molecule cm23 and [isoprene]0 5 (2) is complete with . 99% after 10 ms. In this set of
9.3 3 1014 molecule cm23, a ratio of the initial reaction experiments, NO was added by means of a capillary
rates r20/r90 5 2.5 follows, k 2 5 6.86 3 10213 cm3 after the completeness of reaction (2); t NO addition 5 20 –
molecule21 s21 from this study and k9 5 2.6 3 10211 49 ms, [NO3 ]0 5 (6.4 – 6.8) 3 1012 molecule cm23.
cm3 molecule21 s21 from [4]. Using this simple treat- Figures 5 and 6 show detected product yields in de-
ment, only ca. 70% of the NO3 radicals should react pendence on added NO with tNO addition 5 39 ms. After
with isoprene. If even in the beginning of the reaction NO addition, for peroxy radicals there is a competition
further loss processes for NO are significant (RO2 1 between the self-reaction via reaction (5) and the re-
NO : RO 1 NO2 ), more than 70% of the NO3 rad- action with NO forming the corresponding oxy radi-
icals have to react with isoprene. Product yields at cals and consequently the stable oxidation products
[NO]0 5 9.9 3 1012 molecule cm23 (nitrate: 0.47 6 MVK, MF, and MACR via reaction (6), (8), and (7),
0.1, MVK: 0.26 6 0.03, MF: 0.085 6 0.01, MACR: respectively. Consequently, with increasing amounts
0.035 6 0.005, 2-methyl-2-vinyl-oxirane: 0.04 6 of added NO the yield of the nitrates, mainly 4-ni-
0.005) amounted to a C-balance of 0.89 6 0.15. The troxy-3-methyl-but-2-enal, decreased up to a constant
given errors were obtained from the corresponding un- value. A further increase of added NO did not show
certainties of the GC response factors and the cross an effect, (cf, Fig. 5). The remaining nitrates were
section in the FT – IR analysis. The found C-balance mainly attributed to reaction (5) proceeding up to the
indicates that a interference from reaction (9) was not point of NO addition. This interpretation was proven
so critical using [NO]0 # 1013 molecule cm23. Because by variation of the time of NO addition; [NO] 5 (4.6 –
of the relatively high uncertainties of the product 5.4) 3 1013 molecule cm23, t NO addition 5 20 and 49 ms
yields, especially for the organic nitrate, it is impos- with nitrate yields of 0.17 and 0.36, respectively.
sible to decide if interferences from other reactions Yields of NO2 formed via RO2 1 NO : RO 1 NO2 short
influence the product yields. were determined from the N-balance. standard
long
JCK(Wiley) BATCH
Table II Product Yields Obtained from Set A: NO (9.9 3 1012 molecule cm23) was Introduced Together with
Isoprene, Set B: NO (2.5 3 1013 molecule cm23) was Added after Completeness of NO3 Radical Consumption, t 5
39 ms. Oxirane Stands for 2-Methyl-2-Vinyl-Oxirane. The Given Errors were Obtained from the Corresponding
Uncertainties of the GC Response Factors and the Cross Section in the FT–IR Analysis
Set A Extrapolation Nitrate 5 0 Set B Extrapolation Nitrate 5 0
MVK 0.26 6 0.03 0.51 6 0.05 0.36 6 0.04 0.51 6 0.05
MF 0.085 6 0.01 0.17 6 0.015 0.13 6 0.015 0.18 6 0.02
MACR 0.035 6 0.005 0.07 6 0.01 0.07 6 0.01 0.10 6 0.01
Oxirane 0.04 6 0.005 0.04 6 0.005 0.04 6 0.005 0.04 6 0.005
Nitrate 0.47 6 0.1 – 0.28 6 0.06 –
short
C-balance 0.89 6 0.15 0.79 6 0.08 0.88 6 0.13 0.83 6 0.085
standard
long
JCK(Wiley) BATCH
A rough estimate for the ratio of the rate constants NO3 radicals with isoprene, in [7] an attempt is made
ka/kb for the primary attack of NO3 radicals toward to estimate the lifetimes with respect to the above men-
isoprene in 1- and in 4-position was performed using tioned pathways under tropospheric conditions. Ac-
the ratio of the product yields of MVK (1,2-product) cording to it, the reaction with NO3 radicals via
and MACR (4,3-product) and the assumption MVK/
MACR 5 MFfrom 1,4-addition /MFfrom 4,1-addition. As pointed RO2 1 NO3 !: RO 1 NO2 1 O2 (11)
out in an earlier section, under the used conditions
(100 mbar), the decomposition of chemically activated was found to be dominant. This result was confirmed
adduct radicals is negligible. Therefore, a determina- by a modeling study by Kirchner and Stockwell [36].
tion of ka/kb from the oxidation products seems to be In the considered scenarios, for all types of peroxy
feasible. From both sets of experiments follows: ka/kb radicals, the reaction with NO3 radicals via reaction
5 5.1 – 7.4. However, the C-balance was found to be (11) was the main loss process.
incomplete. Other to date unknown products can in- The used equipment is not suitable to conduct the
fluence this result. Skov et al. [7] reported a ratio reaction with an excess of NO3 radicals, necessary for
ka/kb 5 3.5 whose is in disagreement with the value the initiation of reaction (11). The reaction with NO
presented here. produces the corresponding oxy radicals in the same
It is to be noted that in general the NO2 concentra- way as the NO3 radical reaction via
tions calculated via eq. (II) were about twice as high
as the sum of the concentrations of MVK, MF, and RO2 1 NO !: RO 1 NO2 . (12)
MACR. Taking into consideration the formation path-
ways for these species via reaction (6), (8), and (7), If the rate constants of the reactions of NO3 radicals
respectively, a 1 : 1 correlation was expected. Obvi- with the various C5-peroxy radicals are nearly equal
ously, there were other peroxy radicals in addition to as found for the reaction with NO [32], an application
those being necessary for the formation of the ob- of our experimental results to conditions, in which re-
served main products MVK, MF, and MACR. A pos- action (11) is dominant, seems to be possible and
sible contribution from the oxidation of NO by O2 in MVK, MF, and MACR should represent main prod-
the homogeneous phase as well as at the walls was ucts.
checked under the present experimental conditions and It is to be noted, reaction (12) is more exothermic
can be ruled out. The interference from the OH/iso- than reaction (11), D H 300(RO2 1 NO : RO 1 NO2 )
prene reaction is too small in order to explain this dis- 2 D H 300(RO2 1 NO3 : RO 1 NO2 1 O2 ) 5 2 5.8
crepancy. kcal mol21 [30]. According to a different excess en-
ergy, the fate of oxy radicals and finally the product
distribution can be influenced by the way of formation
APPLICATION TO THE TROPOSPHERE of the oxy radicals, as pointed out by Wallington et al.
[31].
The experiments of this study showed that the product Under tropospheric conditions, the formation of ox-
distribution from the reaction of NO3 radicals toward iranes in this system is negligible.
isoprene is strongly dependent on the pathways of
formed peroxy radicals. Under conditions of the real
troposphere, reactions with NO, NO3 , HO2 , and all
available peroxy radicals as methylperoxy radicals The financial support of the Deutsche Forschungsgemein-
schaft is gratefully acknowledged. The authors thank I. Kind
(CH3O2 ) or acetylperoxy radicals (CH3C(O)O2 ) in-
for carrying out the experiments for the determination of the
cluding the self-reaction have to been taken into con-
rate constant.
sideration. A compilation of rate constants for reac-
tions of a series of peroxy radicals till then is given in
[27]. From recently published works, also data for the
BIBLIOGRAPHY
self-reaction of allylperoxy radicals and the reaction
with HO2 , CH3O2 , and C2 H5O2 are available [32,33].
1. R. A. Rasmussen and M. A. K. Khalil, J. Geophys. Res.,
Furthermore, rate constants for the reaction of NO3 93, 1417 (1988).
radicals with CH3O2 and C2 H5O2 were obtained indi- 2. P. R. Zimmermann, R. B. Chatfield, J. Fishman, P. J.
cating that this pathway represents an additional Crutzen, and P. L. Hanst, Geophys. Res. Lett., 5, 679
source of the corresponding oxy radicals at night-time (1978).
[34,35]. 3. D. D. Riemer, P. J. Milne, C. T. Farmer, and R. G. Zika, short
For produced peroxy radicals from the reaction of Chemosphere, 28, 837 (1994). standard
long
JCK(Wiley) BATCH
4. R. Atkinson, J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data, 20(3), 459 22. E. J. Dlugokencky and C. J. Howard, J. Phys. Chem.,
(1991). 93, 1091 (1989).
5. K. Jay and L. Stieglitz, Chemosphere, 19, 1939 (1989). 23. U. Wille, E. Becker, R. N. Schindler, I. T. Lancar,
6. I. Barnes, V. Bastian, K. H. Becker, and Z. Tong, J. G. Poulet, and G. Le Bras, J. Atmos. Chem., 13, 183
Phys. Chem., 94, 2413 (1990). (1991).
7. H. Skov, J. Hjorth, C. Lohse, N. R. Jensen, and G. Res- 24. M. Olzmann, Th. Benter, M. Liesner, and R. N. Schin-
telli, Atmos. Environ., 26A, 2771 (1992). dler, Atmos. Environ., 28, 2677 (1994).
8. E. S. C. Kwok, S. M. Aschmann, J. Arey, and R. At- 25. R. P. Ruiz, K. D. Bayes, M. T. Macpherson, and M. J.
kinson, Int. J. Chem. Kinet., submitted for publication. Pilling, J. Phys. Chem., 85, 1622 (1981).
9. W. P. L. Carter and R. Atkinson, Int. J. Chem. Kinet., 26. C. A. Morgan, M. J. Pilling, J. M. Tulloch, R. P. Ruiz,
28, 497 (1996). and K. D. Bayes, J. Chem. Soc., Faraday Trans. 2, 78,
10. R. P. Wayne, I. Barnes, P. Biggs, J. P. Burrows, C. E. 1323 (1982).
Canosa-Mas, J. Hjorth, G. Le Bras, G. K. Moortgat, 27. P. D. Lightfoot, R. A. Cox, J. N. Crowley, M. Destriau,
D. Perner, G. Poulet, G. Restelli, and H. Sidebottom, G. D. Hayman, M. E. Jenkin, J. K. Moortgat, and
Atmos. Environ., 24A, 1 (1991). F. Zabel, Atmos. Environ., 26, 1805 (1992).
11. T. Berndt and O. Böge, J. Atmos. Chem., 21, 275 (1995). 28. T. Berndt, O. Böge, and W. Rolle, Environ. Sci. Tech-
12. I. Kind, T. Berndt, O. Böge, and W. Rolle, Chem. Phys. nol., 31, 1157 (1997).
Lett., 249, 35 (1996). 29. R. Atkinson, S. M. Aschmann, E. C. Tauzon, J. Arey,
13. I. Kind, T. Berndt, O. Böge, and W. Rolle, Chem. Phys. and B. Zielinska, Int. J. Chem. Kinet., 21, 593 (1989).
Lett., 256, 679 (1996).
30. S. W. Benson, Thermochemical Kinetics, 2nd ed., Wiley
14. T. Berndt, O. Böge, I. Kind, and W. Rolle, Ber. Bun-
Interscience, 1976.
senges. Phys. Chem., 100, 462 (1996).
31. T. J. Wallington, M. D. Hurley, J. M. Fracheboud, J. J.
15. J. T. Scanlon and D. E. Willis, J. Chromat. Sci., 23, 333
Orlando, G. S. Tyndall, J. Sehested, T. E. Mogelberg,
(1985).
and O. J. Nielson, J. Phys. Chem., 100, 18116 (1996).
16. J. A. Davidson, A. A. Viggiano, C. J. Howard, I. Dotan,
F. C. Fehsenfeld, D. L. Albritton, and E. E. Fergusson, 32. A. B. Boyd, B. Noziere, and R. Lesclaux, J. Chem. Soc.,
J. Chem. Phys., 68, 2085 (1978). Faraday Trans., 92, 201 (1996).
17. S. Suzuki, Y. Fujita, Y. Kobayashi, and F. Sato, Synth. 33. E. Villenave and R. Lesclaux, J. Phys. Chem., 100,
Commun., 16, 491 (1986). 14372 (1996).
18. W. Flaig, Liebigs Ann. Chem., 568, 1 (1950). 34. P. Biggs, C. E. Canosa-Mas, J.-M. Fracheboud, D. E.
19. S. M. Makin, D. V. Nazarova, E. A. Kirsanova, and Shallcross, and R. P. Wayne, J. Chem. Soc., Faraday
L. N. Smirnova, Zhur. Obshch. Khim., 32, 1111 (1962). Trans., 91, 817 (1995).
20. R. Atkinson, S. M. Aschmann, A. M. Winer, and J. N. 35. A. Ray, V. Daele, I. Vassalli, G. Poulet, and G. Le Bras,
Pitts, Jr., Environ. Sci. Technol., 18, 370 (1984). J. Phys. Chem., 100, 5737 (1996).
21. Th. Benter and R. N. Schindler, Chem. Phys. Lett., 145, 36. F. Kirchner and W. R. Stockwell, J. Geophys. Res., 101,
67 (1988). 21007 (1996).
short
standard
long