Professional Documents
Culture Documents
AAA Anesthesia
AAA Anesthesia
AAA Anesthesia
aneurysm repair
• Diabetes mellitus
• Hypertension
• Renal impairment
• Pulmonary disease
• Coronary artery disease
All of which should be assessed and, if possible -optimised prior to sx
ROLE OF PREOPERATIVE
EVALUATION
Not to give medical clearance
To perform an evaluation of the patient’s current medical status
Make recommendations concerning the evaluation, management, & risk for cardiac
problems
Provide a clinical risk profile that the patient & caregivers can use in making treatment
decisions that may influence perioperative & longer term cardiac outcomes
The overriding theme of the perioperative guidelines is that preoperative testing should
not be performed unless it is likely to influence patient care.
Preanesthetic evaluation
Cardiac function : baseline ECG, additional cardiac testing only in patients with
change in symptoms & functional status
Statins :
1
2 Statin use can help preserve renal function after aortic surgery and improve
graft patency after lower extremity bypass surgery
OHA :
Abdominal aortic aneurysm
An aneurysm is typically defined as a greater than 50% dilation of the expected
normal arterial diameter
The aorta tapers gradually from the thorax to the abdomen such that its normal diameter
at the level of the renal arteries is approximately 2.0 cm
FACTORS such as age, gender, race, and body surface area may influence normal aortic
diameter, an abdominal aortic diameter greater than 3.0 cm is considered
aneurysmal
Aneurysms of the thoracic and thoracoabdominal aortas occur far less commonly
Classification
Abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) are classified by location as
This distinction is important because it dictates the complexity of the surgical repair
and the potential for hemodynamic derangements, particularly with open
intervention and the accompanying aortic cross-clamp
The majority of AAAs are infrarenal, whereas approximately 5–15% involve the
suprarenal aorta.
Crawford classification of
thoracoabdominalDefinedaortic
by
• anatomic location
the extent of involvement.
and
Inflammatory
Infective
Trauma
Congenital conditions
Prevalence : 5%, &t his is decreasing, perhaps as a result of better risk factor
modification
Nonmodifiable risk factors for AAA : age, gender, and family history
Smoking is the modifiable risk factor most strongly associated with AAA
Protective effect of diabetes against AAA may be the consequent vascular stiffness
and calcification, preventing aneurysm formation
Clinical features
Most AAAs are asymptomatic and are often discovered incidentally
Occasionally, patients may present for vague abdominal pain and/or may note a pulsatile
abdominal mass
Rarely, a large AAA may be secondary to a mass effect on related structures, such as
vomiting from gastrointestinal compression, urinary symptoms from ureteral
compression, or venous complications from iliocaval compression
In this setting, of the 50% of patients who reach the hospital alive, about 50% will
survive to hospital discharge
Given these high mortality rates from rupture and emergency surgery in patients with
AAAs, a major management goal is to identify and treat AAAs before they rupture
Role of Screening
Current European and North American guidelines recommend ultrasound screening for
AAAs in high-risk circumstances, such as for adults older than 64 years and adults with
a family history of AAA 1
Furthermore, the frequency of surveillance imaging for patients with known AAA is a
function of aneurysm size
Indications for Abdominal Aortic
• The singleAneurysm Intervention
greatest risk factor for aneurysm rupture is size.
• Current evidence-based guidelines suggest repair when aneurysm diameter
exceeds 5.0–5.5 cm.
• Rapid aneurysm growth, defined as greater than 10 mm per year, is also an
indication for intervention.
• Furthermore, urgent repair is recommended in the setting of symptomatic
nonruptured AAA, regardless of size.
• Finally, in the setting of excessive perioperative risk, medical rather than
surgical management may be considered in patients with multiple significant
Open repair V/S EVAR
• Two strategies - open AAA repair and EVAR
• The decision for open versus endovascular repair for the individual patient depends
on multiple factors, such as aortic anatomy, urgency, patient preference, and surgical
expertise
• Open repair in young patients
• EVAR in older patients with significant coexisting morbidities
Evidence for open repair V/S
EVAR
EVAR provides a short-term survival benefit but no long-term survival benefit
Anatomic constraints posing the greatest barrier to EVAR: A hostile proximal aortic
neck ;compromise adequate endovascular seal because of factors such as short length,
excessive angulation, heavy calcification, or high thrombus burden.
Additional factors influencing
surgical decision
Challenging iliac artery anatomy such as calcification, aneurysm, and/ or stenosis :
problem for both adequacy of distal endovascular seal and safety of arterial access
Patients with unique vascular anatomy, such as anomalous renal arteries or in whom the
inferior mesenteric artery is paramount for intesti- nal perfusion, may be better served
with open repair
Complications related to previous EVAR (such as endoleak or migration) that are not
amenable to further endovascular intervention require open repair
Contraindications for EVAR
ABSOLUTE RELATIVE
Aortic neck diamater > 32 mm at the renal More than 40% of the aortic neck diameter
arteries: problem with adequate proximal seal occupied with thrombus
Ruptured AAA with aortic neck length < 7mm: at Circumferential calcification at aortic neck
least 15 mm of undilated aorta below the renal Aortic neck angulation > 60 degrees
arteries is ideal to achieve an adequate seal Bilateral iliac arteries < 6.5cm in diameter
between endograft & aortic neck
Conversion from EVAR to Open
repair
Bleeding can’t be controlled with end-vascular balloon occlusion
Given the extensive incision and frequency of COPD, epidural analgesia facilitate high-
quality pain control, limit the side effects of parenteral narcotics, and preserve
respiratory function
Nitrous oxide : avoided d/t bowel distension & increased PONV risk
Monitoring during anesthesia
Standard monitoring : ecg, spo2, NIBP
Continous ECG monitoring with leads II & V5, with computerised ST segment
trending to detect myocardial ischemia, arrhythmia : more sensitive & superior
1 Site of clamping : more in c/o supra celiac clamping than infrarenal clamp
2 Cardiac function of patient : coronary reserve, ventricular function
3 Effect of anesthetic drugs
4 Effect of splanchnic circulation venous tone : important in infrarenal/ infra
celiac clamping
Role of site of clamping
• An increase in MAP and systemic vascular resistance (SVR) caused by impeded
arterial flow is the most consistent response to AXC, with an increase in arterial
pressure of 10% or more with infrarenal aortic cross-clamping. 2
• The potential for a substantially greater increase exists if the aorta is clamped at a
higher level such as above the celiac axis where flow to the abdominal viscera is also
interrupted.
Infra celiac clamping
• The hemodynamic effects of an aortic cross-clamp below the level of the celiac axis
allows for shifting of blood flow to the splanchnic circulation, which in turn
augments its venous capacitance
• The typical result of this volume redistribution is little change in venous return and
cardiac output, unless major swings in splanchnic venous tone occur
Supra celiac clamping
• When the clamp is placed above the celiac artery, the splanchnic circulation cannot
serve as a reservoir
• Rather, venous capacitance below the clamp decreases, expelling blood from the
splanchnic system to the central circulation, with resultant increases in filling
pressures and venous return
• The redistribution of blood volume in this setting is also affected by blood loss, fluid
loading, anesthetic depth, and administered vasopressors
Changes in blood volume distribution during aortic cross-clamping (AXC). The shifting
of blood volume with aortic cross-clamping is dependent on the level of cross-clamp
Role of cardiac status
• Baseline myocardial contractility reserve may also affect the response to AXC during
AAA repair
• The increases in preload and afterload acutely increase myocardial work and
oxygen demand, particularly with supraceliac clamping
• The physiologic response to this increased demand is to increase myocardial
perfusion via coronary vasodilation
• P atients without significant CAD and preserved ventricular function may tolerate
P
these increases in preload and afterload with minimal effect on cardiac output
Role of cardiac status
• In the setting of concomitant CAD where the coronary vasculature is already
maximally vasodilated and/or there is left ventricular dysfunction, the acute increase
in myocardial oxygen demand during AXC may precipitate myocardial ischemia,
overt heart failure, or both
Hemodynamic management
during AXC
Goal : decrease afterload & LV wall stress with arteriolar dilators and normalizing
preload with venous dilators
Close communication between the surgical and anesthetic teams is paramount so that
pathophysiologic derangements can be anticipated and appropriately managed
Physiologic changes with aortic
cross-clamp release. Typical
hemodynamic response to aortic
cross-clamp release.
Hemodynamic effects of
Unclamping
After completion of the entire AAA repair, release of the distal aortic cross-clamp is
frequently associated with dramatic hypotension
Distal aortic unclamping results in an immediate and profound (up to 70–80%) decrease
in SVR d/t tissue hypoxia & release of vasoactive mediators
Hemodynamic effects of
Unclamping
sequestration of blood distal to the aortic cross-clamp, resulting in a relative central
hypovolemia
vasoactive and inflammatory mediators (such as lactic acid, oxygen free radicals,
prostaglandins, endotoxins, and cytokines) promote vasodilation and myocardial
depression on release of the aortic cross-clamp
Management of hemodynamic
effects
Minimize ischemic time
of unclamping
Release the aortic cross-clamp gradually
Start vasopressors
A slow release of the aortic cross-clamp and/or opening of iliac artery clamps one at a
time may allow for a more gradual metabolic washout with less profound hemodynamic
derangements
Mobilization of aortic cross-clamp during open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. To
minimize unnecessary ischemic time on visceral organs, the aortic cross-clamp is moved
sequentially lower on the graft as each anastomosis is completed. Each cross-clamp
release will result in metabolic washout to the previously ischemic organs, although the
subsequent quick replacement of the cross- clamp lower on the graft will mitigate some
(D) Right renal artery is anastamosed, with perfusion to right kidney achieve by moving
aortic crossclamp distal. (E) Reperfusion of legs: all arterial clamps are removed.
Anaesthetic considerations for EVAR
Anesthetic goals in EVAR
(a) To provide hemodynamic stability, and preserve perfusion to vital organs including
the brain, heart, spinal cord, kidney, and splanchnic vessels
(d) normothermia
Anaesthesia for EVAR
local anesthetic infiltration with sedation, regional,or general anesthesia.
CSE gives a fast and dense block, and also allows top ups via the epidural in prolonged
procedures and can provide good postoperative analgesia
Anaesthesia for EVAR
The main advantages of regional anesthetic techniques are less stress response, less
inflammatory response, avoidance of mechanical ventilation in a patient with
severe cardio vascular and pulmonary diseases, and good postoperative analgesia.
Things to consider when selecting a technique are patient’s premorbid states, the
length of the procedure, the use of anti‑platelets and anti‑coagulant medications,
and the ability to stay supine position throughout the procedure
Benefits of GA in EVAR
General anesthesia is frequently more practical than regional anesthesia for the
following reasons:
• Blood pressure control is easier and can be achieved by titration of anesthetic agents
and vasopressors in majority of case
• If aneurysm rupture occurs during the procedure, the patient’s airway is already secure
and transport to theater is less complicated
Benefits of GA in EVAR
Breath‑holding on the ventilator is easy and can be prolonged if necessary to improve
the image quality in digital subtraction angiography
• Use of iliac bifurcated devices or complex fenestrated grafts and or concomitant open
surgery like femoro‑femoral crossover graft may take lengthy periods of time, which
may be tolerated poorly by some patients.
Conversion from LA to GA
Pain and discomfort from enlarging hematoma and endovascular manoeuvring
Ischemic pain in the buttocks and legs if the internal iliac artery and femoral artery
respectively are occluded
Classification of endoleak. Type I endoleak results from inadequate seal from the
proximal or distal end of the endograft. Type II endoleak is caused by inflow from a
visceral vessel. Type III endoleak occurs as a result of a defect in the graft, a
disconnection of modular graft components, or an inadequate seal. Type IV endoleak
occurs as a result of porosity of the graft fabric. Type V endoleak, also known as
Intraoperative Neurologic
Monitoring for Abdominal
Incidence of spinal cord injury < 1%,
Lower extremity ischemia :Technical issues with surgical anastomoses, acute thrombosis,
acute embolic disease, and clamp injury may all be a source for lower extremity ischemia.
Prevention by Adequate intraoperative systemic anti- coagulation and meticulous
surgical technique, distal aortic perfusion by shunt or temporary graft
Thank you for kind attention