This document outlines and summarizes various topics in criminal law, including:
1) The aims of criminal law such as punishment and deterrence, as well as concepts like the presumption of innocence, proof beyond a reasonable doubt, and trial by jury.
2) Theories of punishment discussed in cases like The Queen v. Dudley and Stephens and Ewing v. California.
3) The principle of legality and statutory interpretation from cases like Commonwealth v. Mochan.
4) Requirements for actus reus such as voluntary acts discussed in Martin v. State, and omissions discussed in People v. Beardsley.
5) Elements of mens rea such as intent,
This document outlines and summarizes various topics in criminal law, including:
1) The aims of criminal law such as punishment and deterrence, as well as concepts like the presumption of innocence, proof beyond a reasonable doubt, and trial by jury.
2) Theories of punishment discussed in cases like The Queen v. Dudley and Stephens and Ewing v. California.
3) The principle of legality and statutory interpretation from cases like Commonwealth v. Mochan.
4) Requirements for actus reus such as voluntary acts discussed in Martin v. State, and omissions discussed in People v. Beardsley.
5) Elements of mens rea such as intent,
This document outlines and summarizes various topics in criminal law, including:
1) The aims of criminal law such as punishment and deterrence, as well as concepts like the presumption of innocence, proof beyond a reasonable doubt, and trial by jury.
2) Theories of punishment discussed in cases like The Queen v. Dudley and Stephens and Ewing v. California.
3) The principle of legality and statutory interpretation from cases like Commonwealth v. Mochan.
4) Requirements for actus reus such as voluntary acts discussed in Martin v. State, and omissions discussed in People v. Beardsley.
5) Elements of mens rea such as intent,
◦ Pre-Trial; Trial by Jury ◦ Proof Beyond a Reasonable Doubt ◦ Presumption of Innocence ◦ Owens v. State Theories of Punishment ◦ The Queen v. Dudley and Stephens ◦ MPC s 1.02 ◦ People v. Superior Court (Du) ◦ People v. Du ◦ Ewing v. California Principle of Legality and Statutory Interpretation ◦ Commonwealth v. Mochan ◦ In re Banks ◦ Desertrain v. City of Los Angeles Actus Reus ◦ Voluntary Act ◦ Martin v. State ◦ State v. Utter ◦ MPC 1.13(2); 1.13(3); 2.01 ◦ Omissions (“Negative Acts”) ◦ People v. Beardsley ◦ Barber v. Superior Court Mens Rea ◦ United States v. Cordoba-Hincapie ◦ Regina v. Cunningham ◦ MPC 2.02; 1.13(10) ◦ Transferred Intent ◦ Willful Blindness ◦ Strict Liability ◦ MPC 2.05; 1.04(5) ◦ People v. Conley ◦ State v. Nations ◦ Staples v. United States ◦ Mistakes (of Fact and of Law) ◦ People v. Navarro ◦ People v. Marrero ◦ MPC 2.04 Causation ◦ Actual Causation ◦ Proximate Causation ◦ Velazquez v. State ◦ Oxendine v. State ◦ People v. Rideout ◦ Velazquez v. State ◦ Magnolia Hypo Substantive Offenses ◦ Criminal Homicide Homicide: Intentional --- Murder State v. Guthrie Midgett v. State State v. Forrest MPC 210.0; 210.1; 210.2; 210.3; 210.4 Homicide: Intentional --- Manslaughter Girouard v. State People v. Casassa Homicide: Unintentional --- Murder and Manslaughter People v. Knoller State v. Williams Homicide: Felony --- Murder People v. Fuller People v. Howard People v. Smith State v. Sophophone ◦ Rape and Related Sexual Offenses The Traditional Approach --- the Requirement of Force and Resistance State v. Alston Rusk v. State State v. Rusk The Modern Approach --- Abandoning “Force,” Embracing Mens Rea State of New Jersey in the Interest of M.T.S. MPC 213 Defenses ◦ Justification Defenses Categories of Defenses Structure of Justification Defenses Self-Defense “Reasonable Belief” Requirement People v. Goetz MPC 3.09 State v. Wanrow State v. Norman State v. Norman United States v. Peterson MPC 1.12, 3.04, 3.11 Necessity (“Choice of Evils”) MPC 3.02 ◦ Excuse Defenses Excuses Duress United States v. Contento-Pachon MPC 2.09