Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Solution Far560 - Dec 2015 (S)
Solution Far560 - Dec 2015 (S)
QUESTION 1
A.
i. Exploration expenditures are those costs incurred in the exploration and evaluation
phase and include the geological and geophysical surveys, licences acquisition and
costs of drilling and equipping exploratory wells.
1
Argument against: does not result in proper matching of costs with revenues.
Full cost method
Capitalise all exploration and evaluation costs regardless of whether the prospects
prove to be successful or unsuccessful.
Views the entire exploratory activities as one comprehensive cost centre.
Argument for:
o as a going concern in the extractive industry, the entity need to continually
search for commercially viable mines/deposits. Therefore, costs of
unsuccessful explorations are part of the costs of successful explorations.
o exploration and evaluation costs are all directed at increasing the entity’s pool
of commercially recoverable deposits
The maximum amount to be capitalised is subject to a ceiling test – the aggregate of
the costs carried forward should not exceed the net recoverable amount of the
deposits.
Argument against:
o method is not feasible for new entities without proven pool of reserves.
o method is in contrast with definition of assets because it capitalises the costs
of abandoned prospects.
RM
Fair value less point-of-sale costs of consumable vegetable produced 8,000,000
Fair value less point-of-sale costs of bearer vegetable produced 6,000,000
Gain from change in fair value less point-of-sale costs of consumable 500,000
vegetables (2.5m -2m)
Gain from change in fair value less point-of-sale costs of bearer
vegetables (4.5m – 3.0 m) 1,500,000
Total farm income/ 16,000,000
2
QUESTION 2
RM
Cost 1/7/13 200,000
Less: acc dep (200,000-50,000)/5 (30,000)
CA 170,000
RA
NSP 76,000
Value-in-use
Year ended cash flow DF@14% PV (RM)
30/6/2015 50 000 0.877 43,850
30/6/2016 41 000 0.769 31,529
30/6/2017 37 000 0.675 24,975
VIU 100,354
RM
CA 1/7/14 100,354
Less: Depreciation (100,354/4) (25,089)
CA 30/6/15 75,265
CA without impairment: RM
Cost 200,000
Acc depreciation 30,000 x 2 yrs (60,000)
CA without impairment 140,000
CA before reversal 75,265
Amount of reversal 64,735
3
QUESTION 3
a) Pandan Bhd holds 48% of the ordinary shares of Cumin Bhd. Ordinarily, this would
not give Pandan Bhd control over Cumin Bhd√√. However, under MFRS 10, if an
entity holds less than 50% of the voting rights of the investee, it can still have control
over the investee if it can appoint or remove members of the investee’s key
management personnel.
Since an agreement with two other shareholders of Cumin Bhd gives Pandan Bhd the
right to appoint or remove the directors of Cumin Bhd, Pandan Bhd is deemed to
have control over Cumin Bhd. Thus, Cumin Bhd is a subsidiary of Pandan Bhd.
(10√ x ½ = 5 marks)
Goodwill on consolidation
Acquisition of SeraiBhd RM’000 RM’000
Consideration transferred 1,875
NCI [25% x 2,262] 565.5
2,440.5
FVNA
OSC 2,000
General Reserve 25
Retained profit 237 (2,262)
Goodwill 178.5
Impairment (8%) – (partial) (14.28)
Remaining Goodwill 164.22
4
RETAINED PROFIT and NCI
GROUP NCI
RM’000 RM’000 RM’000
Pre-acquisition net assets – Serai 565. 5
– Cumin 767
Preference shares - Serai (200-20) 180
Retained Profit
Serai
Balance c/f [350 + 175] 525
Pre-acquisition profit (237)
Post adjusted profit 288 (75%) 216 (25%) 72
Cumin
Balance c/f [150 + 125] 275
Pre-acquisition profit (125)
150
Under depn- property [(100 / 40)2 yrs] (5)
URP inventory (60% x 12.5 x 20%) (1.5)
Post-acquistion adjusted profit 143.5 (48%) 68.88 (52%) 74.62
Pandan
Retained profit c/f [532 + 217] 749
Unrealised profit (land) (35)
Goodwill impairment (14.28)
Current assets
Inventory [750 + 650 + 305] -1.5 1,703.5
Bills receivable (175 + 675 + 37) - 100 787
Trade receivables [281 + 383 + 210] – 8 - 2 864
Bank [187 + 206 + 88] 481
Cash in transit 8
11,721.72
5
Equity
6
Ordinary shares 5,650
Non-redeemable preference shares 750
Share premium 900
Group General Reserves [270 + [(170 - 25 )x 75% ]] 378.75
Retained Profit√ 984.6
NCI√ 1,695.37
10,358.72
Non current liabilities
Long term loan [250 – 100] 150
Current liabilities
Trade payables [(468 + 110 + 25)– 2] 601
Bills payable [269 + 46 + 90] 405
Ordinary dividend payable[182 + (100 – 75)] 207
11,721.72
QUESTION 4
a. Depreciation:
RM RM
Costs 90,000
Accumulated depreciation (30,000)
Carrying amount 60,000
Disposed (10,000)
Remaining value 50,000
Depreciation 50,000/ 4 12,500
Depn of new equipment 60,000/5 12,000
Total depn expense per annum 24,500
Depreciation for the 3rd quarter 24,500/4 6,125
b. Insurance is paid for the whole calendar year but the entire amount cannot be
recognised as an expense in the third quarter ending 31 March 2015. Since
insurance paid in advance would be deferred in the annual financial statements, the
same treatment should apply in the interim financial reports. Therefore, only payment
for the quarter should be recognised as expense in the SOPL and OCI for the quarter
ended 31 March 2015 and the balance recognised as prepaid insurance. Amount to
be shown in the statement of financial position as at 31 March 2015 would be
250,000 x (3/4) = RM187,500.
7
B.
Operating Segments
10% threshold 30,500 x 100 37,200 x 100 13,400 x 100 7,300 x 100
test 88,400 88,400 88,400 88,400
= 34.5% = 42.1%/ = 15.2%/ = 8%/