Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Preface To A Graduate Course in The History of Music Theory
Preface To A Graduate Course in The History of Music Theory
Preface To A Graduate Course in The History of Music Theory
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide
range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and
facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at
https://about.jstor.org/terms
College Music Society is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to
College Music Symposium
Preface to a
Graduate Course
in the History of
Music Theory
Mark Lindley
Accademia Tartiniana
Padua, Italy
II
III
A number of treatises and topics which might not find a place in the
course by the first two criteria are nevertheless so likely to be regarded by a
musicologist as belonging to the history of music theory that they should
be encountered, however superficially, by every advanced theory student.
Boethius is a prime example of a writer in this category, and perhaps
the only non-musician who is so important to the history of theory that his
entire treatise (circa 500) should be looked at. Other influential non-
musicians are Augustine (circa 400, see Knight 1948), Cassiodorus (circa
550), Isidore of Seville (circa 625) and Alcuin (circa 800); Jean de Muris
(1319); Mersenne (1636); and Helmholtz (1863) and Ellis.
There have also been some accomplished musicians who wrote his-
torically important treatises about some aspect of their art which might,
however, be of only slight interest to many present-day theory students:
Odo of Cluny (circa 935) and Guido of Arezzo (circa 1025); Johannes de
Grocheo (circa 1300); Marchetto of Padua (1310s; see Pirrotta 1955);
Ramis (1482) and his opponents (see Jeppeson 1941); Caccini (1602);
Leopold Mozart (1756) and Quantz (1753); Berlioz (1843) and Rimsky-
Korsakov (1896). The encyclopaedic writings of Jacques de Liege (circa
1330; see Smith 1968); Ugolino of Orvieto (circa 1440; see Seay 1955);
Tinctoris and Gafurio (Clement Miller 1968 summarizes Gafurio's Practi-
cae Musicae); Zacconi, Cerone (see Gallo 1968) and Praetorius; Kircher
Tevo (see Gallo 1967), Nassarre, and Walther; and Riemann and Dlndy
should be surveyed. Certain relatively minor treatises might be included
because they represent so nicely some aspect or moment of the history of
theory. I am thinking of Aurelian of Reome (circa 850, exemplifying the
Carolingian renaissance), Arnaut (circa 1440, applying fifteenth-century
science to the devising of instruments), and Descartes (1618, at the thresh
old of the Enlightenment). The total of all these is obviously unwieldy,
and can only be dealt with by a combination of guided browsing, thematic
summaries, and bibliography.
Many treatises can be represented well enough in this course by a
brief description and excerpt (especially those which are significant for
only one or two things); and for many others it would suffice to do littl
more than examine the chapter headings and grasp the meaning and
spelling of the title. The ability to tell something about a treatise from such
an examination is valuable in its own right. A person well informed about
what kinds of books have been written on music can usually "place" an un
familiar work in a few moments and then proceed efficiently to find out
whether the first impression was correct.
To complement or review the fruits of this "browsing" technique the
IV
dia" and Owen Wright on "Arabia" in The New Grove (see also W
1978) would be extremely worthwhile even for students with little inte
in non- Western music. But at the same time the course should offer
enough rewarding contact with primary source facsimiles and texts to
show what would be lost by limiting oneself, in the name of broader hori-
zons, to secondary sources.
Abbreviations:
AIM American Institute of Musicology
JAMS Journal of the American Musicological Society
JMT Journal of Music Theory
MD Musica Disciplina
MR The Music Review
RISM Repertoire Internationale des Sources Musicales
UM University Microfilms
Springs).
Berlioz, Hector. See Clarke 1856 and Strunk 1950.
Bermudo, Juan. See Stevenson 1960.
Bernhard, Christoph. See Hilse 1973.
Blum, Fred, 1958, "Santayana's Music Aesthetics," JAMS XI, 20.
Blumenfeld, Harold, trans. 1970, Michael Praetorius, Syntagma Musicum,
Vol. 2 (Kassel).
Boethius, Anicius Manlius Severinus. See Bower 1967.
Borgese, Elizabeth M., trans. 1954, Heinrich Schenker, Harmony (Chi-
cago).
Bower, Calvin M., trans. 1967, Boethius, The Principles of Music (George
Peabody College dissertation, UM 67-15,005).
logne).
Ferris, Joan, 1959, "The Evolution of Rameau's Harmonic Theories,"
JMT III, 231.
F6tis, Francois Joseph. See Arlin 1971.
Finkelstein, Sidney W., 1952, How Music Expresses Ideas (New York).
Fischer, Pieter, 1968, The Theory of Music from the Carolingian Era up to
1400 \ Vol. II (RISM B IIP).
Forte, Allen, 1959, "Schenker's Conception of Musical Structure." JMT
III, 1, reprinted in Yeston 1977.
Franco of Cologne. See Strunk 1950.
Fux, Johann Joseph. See A. Mann 1958 and 1965.
Gaffurius, Franchinus. See C. A. Miller 1968.
Galilei, Vincenzo. See Herman 1973.
Gallo, Franco Alberto, 1963, "Pronuntiatio: ricerche sulla storia di un ter-
mine retorico-musicale," Acta Musicologica, XXXV, 38.
Musicae, IV.
101.
Theory: 1680-1730,"JMTXXII,65.
Lesure, Francois, ed. 1971, Ecrits imprimes co
VI, Vols. 1 and 2).
Levin, A., trans. 1964, Andre Gedalge, Treatis
Fugue (Mattapan, Mass.).
Macran, Henry S., 1902, The Harmonics ofAri
Mandelbaum, Mayer Joel, 1 96 1 , Multiple Divisio
Resources of 19-Tone Temperament (Indian
UM 61-4461).
Mann, Alfred, 1958, The Study of Fugue (New
XXII, 105.
XVI, 221.
cological Society).
Riemann, Hugo, 1920. See Haagh 1962.
Rimsky-Korsakov, Nikolai. See Schmidt 1895 a
Rivera, Benito V., 1978, "The Isagoge (1581)
Early Formulation of Triadic Theory," JMT
Robert, Walter, trans. 1961, Rene Descartes, Co
Rohloff, Ernst, trans. 1972, Die Quellenhandschrift
hannes de Grocheio (Leipzig).
Rousseau, Jean-Jacques. See Moran 1967.
Sabbatim, Luigi Antonio. See A. Mann 1958.
Saroni, Herrman S., trans. 1868, A. B. Marx, The
Composition (New York).
Schenker, Heinnch. See Borgese 1954, Jona
1979.
Schmidt, Hans, trans. 1895, Nikolai Rimsky-Ko
buch der Harmonie (Leipzig).
Schoenberg, Arnold. See Adams 1948 and Newl
Seay, Albert, 1955, "Ugohno of Orvieto, The
IX, 1 1 1 ; addenda in MD XI, 126.
22.
XV, 254.
orado Springs).
Serwer, Howard J., 1970, "Marpurg vs. Kirnberger: Theories of Fugal
Composition," JMT XIV, 209.
Strun
Tello,
(Madrid).
Tinctons, Johannes. See Seay 1957, 1961, 1965, and 1967.
Tolkoff, Lyn, 1973, "French Modal Theory Before Rameau," JMT XVII,
150.
Turrell, Frances Berry, 1959, "The Isagoge in musicen of Henry Glarean,"
JMT III, 97.
Van, Guillaume de, 1948, "La p6dagogie musicale a la fin du moyen age,"
MD II, 75.
Verba, E. Cynthia, 1973, "The Development of Rameau's Thoughts on
Modulation and Chromatics," JAMS XXVI, 69.
Vitry, Philippe de. See Plantinga 1961.
Waesberghe, Jos Smits van, 1961, The Theory of Music from the Carolingian
Era Up to 1400, Vol. I (RISM B III1).
131.