Waseem et al.

: The impact of MET and eccentric training on hamstring flexibility Serb J Sports Sci 4(1): 41-46

Serbian Journal of Sports Sciences ISSN 1820-6301 Original article

2010, 4(1): 41-46 ID 173779724 Received: 20 Aug 2009
UDC 796.422.012.46(540) ; 796.422.015.52 Accepted: 14 Feb 2010

A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF THE IMPACT OF MUSCLE ENERGY

TECHNIQUE AND ECCENTRIC TRAINING ON POPLITEAL ANGLE:
HAMSTRING FLEXIBILITY IN INDIAN COLLEGIATE MALES
Mohd. Waseem1, Shibili Nuhmani1, C. S. Ram2, Anjani Agarwal1,
Shabana Begum1, Faheem Ahmad3 & Shamim Ahmad1
Faculty allied health and science, Jamia Hamdard University, Delhi, INDIA.
1
2ITS, Physiotherapy college, Ghaziabad, INDIA.
3Department of Pharmacy, Alkhums, LIBYA.

Abstract Success in sports depends on the athlete’s ability to develop and perfect a specific set of
coordination and joint range of motion, i.e. flexibility. The aim of the study was to investigate and compare the
influence of Muscle Energy Technique (MET) and Eccentric Training (ECC) on popliteal angle, i.e. hamstring
flexibility in Indian collegiate males. Twenty collegiate males with hamstring tightness were randomly divided
into two equal groups. Group A subjects were treated with MET whereas the subjects in Group B were treated
by Eccentric Training with 3ft black Theraband. The treatment was given for 5 consecutive days with the follow-
up measurement on the 8th day. The outcome was measured in terms of popliteal angle. Statistical analysis
indicated more significant hamstring flexibility in MET (p<0.001) than ECC (p<0.02) but the improvement level
decreased in the follow-up measurement. It can be concluded that both muscle energy technique and eccentric
training improves popliteal angle i.e. hamstring flexibility, which could lead to an improvement in athletic
performance.

Key words: Muscle energy technique, eccentric training, popliteal angle

INTRODUCTION
Sports coaches, performers and scientists are constantly in search of new means to enhance sports
performance and gain a competitive edge. Flexibility is related to physical fitness and is often evaluated
from the joint range of motion [3, 9, 16]. It is defined as “performance of smooth and extensive movement of
body joints” [6, 23]. Reports on the significance of flexibility have focused on the contribution to preventing
injuries and improving sports performance [16, 27]. For example, in hurdles an extensive joint range of
motion i.e. flexibility is required in the hip joint [27].
Flexibility is considered an essential element of normal biomechanical functioning in sport [11, 12].
The literature reports a number of associated benefits of flexibility including improved athletic performance,
reduced injury risk, prevention or reduction of post-exercise soreness and improved co-ordination [19].
Some studies have shown that decreased hamstring flexibility is a risk factor for development of patella
tendinopathy and patellofemoral pain, hamstring strain injury [10, 13, 20, 25]. Hamstring muscle injuries are one
of the most common musculotendinous injuries in the lower extremity [5]. They occur primarily during high
speed or high intensity exercises and have a high rate of recurrence [17, 22]. Worrel et al stated that a “lack
of hamstring flexibility was the single most important characteristics of hamstring injuries in athletes" [24].
Muscle energy technique is a manual technique developed by osteopaths that is now used in many
different manual therapy professions [1, 4]. Such approach which targets the soft tissues primarily (although
it makes a major contribution towards joint mobilization) has been termed as MET and this is also known as
active muscular relaxation technique. It is claimed to be effective for a variety of purposes including
lengthening shortened muscles, as a lymphatic or venous pump to aid the drainage of fluid or blood and
increase the range of motion [1, 14, 15].
Eccentric contractions are a type of training that allows the muscle to elongate naturally and in its
relaxed state this elongation is achieved by having the subjects eccentrically contract the antagonist muscle
to move the joint through the full available range in slow controlled manner to stretch the agonist muscle

41
Waseem et al.: The impact of MET and eccentric training on hamstring flexibility Serb J Sports Sci 4(1): 41-46

group [21]. It is a better training strategy to improve flexibility and is also able to increase strength and
protect against muscle damage [2, 26].
This present study tried to control all the risk factors which are due to inappropriate flexibility, and are
related to performance, both physical and psychological. Thus we could observe solely the effects of these
techniques on improvement, i.e. hamstring flexibility. The aim of the study was to investigate and compare
the influence of Muscle Energy Technique (MET) [14] and Eccentric Training (ECC) on popliteal angle, i.e.
hamstring flexibility in Indian collegiate males.

MATHERIALS AND METHODS

METHODS
SAMPLES
20 Indian collegiate males, aged 18-25 years, having tightness in hamstring muscles (inability to achieve
greater than 160° of knee extension with the hip at 90° of flexion) [3], were included in the study.
Those subjects who had acute or chronic low back pain, hamstring injury, inhibition to actively extend
the knee fully in sitting position, visual acute swelling in the region of hamstring muscles, or were already
involved in any exercise programs for lower extremity were omitted from the study.
The written informed consent was obtained from all the subjects. The study was approved by
Institutional Medical Ethics Committee of Jamia Hamdard University, Delhi, India.

EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURE
The study was experimental with different subject design. The subjects were randomly assigned into two
equal groups: Muscle Energy Technique group & Eccentric Training group. Each subject was assessed for
hamstring tightness by measuring the popliteal angle. The testing was taken over 5 days' period with each
subject in both groups, A and B, receiving one treatment session in a day for consecutive 5 days and the
follow-up measurement on the 8th day. The study was conducted at Hamdard University, N.D., India. The
subjects were tested approximately at the same time of each day.

OUTCOME VARIABLE
Popliteal Angle / Active Knee Extension Test
Pre-, post- and follow-up measurement data on the popliteal angle were collected from both groups.
The subjects were assessed for hamstring tightness using the Active Knee Extension test (Popliteal
angle). The subject was in supine position with the hip flexed at 90° and the knee flexed. A cross bar wa s
used to maintain the proper position of the hip and the thigh. The testing was done on the right lower
extremity and subsequently, the left lower extremity and the pelvis were strapped down to the table for
stabilization and control over accessory movements. Landmarks used to measure the hip and knee range
of motion were the greater trochanter, the lateral condyle of the femur and the lateral malleolus, which were
marked by a permanent skin marker. The fulcrum of the goniometer was centered over the lateral condyle
of the femur with the proximal arm secured along the femur using the greater trochanter as a reference. The
distal arm was aligned with the lower leg using the lateral malleolus as a reference. The hip and knee of the
extremity being tested were placed into 90° flexion with the anterior aspect of the thigh in contact with the
horizontal cross bar frame at all times to maintain the hip in 90° flexion. The subject was then asked to
extend the right lower extremity as far as possible until a mild stretch sensation was felt. A full circle
goniometer was then used to measure the angle of knee flexion. Three repetitions were performed and an
average of the three was taken as the final reading for Popliteal Angle [21].

TRAINING PROGRAM
Muscle Energy Technique
The Muscle Energy Technique (MET) is a manual technique developed by osteopaths, which is now used
in many different manual therapy professions. It is claimed to be effective for a variety of purposes, including
lengthening a shortened or contractured muscle and increasing the joint range of motion of the restricted joint
[14, 18]. It can be used in older patients who have restricted motion from arthritis or who have brittle osteoporotic
bones. MET was applied to the experimental group B. The subject’s knee was extended to the position where he
first reported any hamstring discomfort, and moderate isometric contraction (approx 75% of maximal) of the
hamstring muscle was then elicited for a period of five seconds. After a period of three seconds of relaxation,
the technique was repeated three times (for a total of four contractions) [1].

Eccentric Training
The Eccentric Training group performed a full range of motion eccentric training for the hamstring muscles.
The subject lay supine with the leg fully extended. A 3ft (0.91-m) long piece of black Theraband was
wrapped around the heel and the subject held the ends of the Theraband in each hand. The subject was

42
Waseem et al.: The impact of MET and eccentric training on hamstring flexibility Serb J Sports Sci 4(1): 41-46

instructed to keep the opposite knee locked in full extension and the hip in neutral internal and external
rotation throughout the entire activity.
The subject was then instructed to bring the test hip into full hip flexion by pulling on the Theraband
attached with the foot and both arms, making sure that the knee remained locked in full extension at all
times. Full hip flexion was defined as the position of hip flexion at which a gentle stretch was felt by the
subject. As the subject pulled the hip into full flexion with the arms, he was instructed to simultaneously
resist the hip flexion by eccentrically contracting the hamstring muscle during the entire range of hip flexion.
The subject was instructed to provide activity of the hamstring muscles, so that the entire hip flexion took
approximately 5 seconds to complete. Once achieved, this flexed hip position was held for 5 seconds and
then the extremity was lowered to the ground (hip extension) by the subject’s arms.
This procedure was repeated 6 times with no rest between repetitions, thereby providing a total 30
seconds of stretching at the end range [21].

STATISTICAL ANALYSIS
The data were statistically analyzed using the Statistical Package for Social Science (SPSS)/15.0.
(Copyright © SPSS Inc.). Statistical tests used in the present study were the independent-t-test and the
repeated measure ANOVA test.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

The mean physical parameters of the subjects are shown in Table 1. There was no significant difference in
the baseline Popliteal angle values of the subjects when compared across the 2 groups, as shown in Table
2. There was however a significant difference in the post 5 days' range of motion across both groups, as
shown in Table 2. On the post intervention and the carryover/follow-up, the mean values showed significant
difference (p<0.05).

Table 1. Physical characteristics of the subjects in each group.

Age (Years) Height (cm) Weight (Kg)

Group
Mean ± SD Mean ± SD Mean ± SD
A 22.1 ± 1.1 163.8 ± 6.8 60.4 ± 10.7
B 22.0 ± 0.6 164.4 ± 4.5 63.5 ± 10.5
F 6.330 3.513 0.040
NS NS NS
p 0.809 0.807 0.517
NS: non significant

The comparison of pre-, post- and follow-up results of the outcome (Popliteal Angle) shows that it was
significant in both experimental groups (p<0.01). Groups A and B showed significant difference at post
intervention with p value of 0.018 (lesser than 0.05). In the follow-up, Groups A and B showed significant
difference with p value of 0.014 (lesser than 0.05).

Table 2. The baseline, post-, and follow-up Popliteal Angle ranges of the subjects (N=20).

Baseline Post-Intervention Follow-Up

Group
Mean ± SD Mean ± SD Mean ± SD
A 130.4 ± 3.8 136.0 ± 4.0 134.5 ± 3.3
B 130.8 ± 3.7 131.5 ± 3.6 130.3 ± 3.5
NS
p 0.818 0.018* 0.014**
NS: non significant, * significant p< 0.05, ** significant p<0.01,
Group A: Muscle Energy Technique, Group B: Eccentric Training.

In both groups, the range of Popliteal Angle (Degree) shows that the mean range of motion during the post-
test is higher than that during the pre-test (p<0.001). In group A, follow-up values were lower than post-test
values (p< 0.20) but higher than pre-test values after application of Muscle Energy Technique (p<0.02). In
group B, follow-up values were lower than post-test values (p<0.008) but less than pre-test values after
application of Eccentric Training (p<0.733).

43
Waseem et al.: The impact of MET and eccentric training on hamstring flexibility Serb J Sports Sci 4(1): 41-46

Figure 1. Between-group comparison ( Pre-, Post- to Follow-up).

POP 0: Pre-test values of Popliteal Angle (Active Knee Extension).
POP 1: Post-test values of Popliteal Angle (Active Knee Extension).
POP F: Follow-up values of Popliteal Angle (Active Knee Extension).
MET: The group that received Muscle Energy Technique.
ECC: The group that received Eccentric Training intervention.

Figure 2. Within-group comparison.

POP 0: Pre-test values of Popliteal Angle (Active Knee Extension).
POP 1: Post-test values of Popliteal Angle (Active Knee Extension).
POP F: Follow-up values of Popliteal Angle (Active Knee Extension).
MET: The group that received Muscle Energy Technique.
ECC: The group that received Eccentric Training intervention.

DISCUSSION
The review of the existing literature regarding the role of different techniques in improving flexibility reveals
a confusing picture so as to which technique, Eccentric training/contraction or MET, is best for the purpose.
Therefore the current study was undertaken to investigate and compare the influence of Muscle Energy
Technique (MET) and Eccentric Training (ECC) on the popliteal angle, i.e. hamstrings flexibility in Indian
collegiate males and to determine which is better in the long run. For the purpose of this, a pre-test, a post-
test, and a follow-up (experimental study) were carried out. The hamstring was the muscle of choice since it
is the muscle that is most prone to injuries during sporting activities and there are also well documented,
reliable and valid methods of testing flexibility of hamstring muscles, such as the Popliteal Angle/ Active
Knee Extension test.

44
Waseem et al.: The impact of MET and eccentric training on hamstring flexibility Serb J Sports Sci 4(1): 41-46

A comparison of the pre-test and the post-test values of the Popliteal Angle for the groups showed
that there was a significant improvement in both groups. Thus it may be said that these techniques are
effective individually in improving flexibility of hamstrings.
MET in the present study is comparable to that seen in earlier research. Ballantyne et al. [1] identified
30 seconds as the optimal duration for an effective stretch; MET, which can maintain muscle elongation for
this duration, may produce an increase in muscle length by a combination of creep and plastic change in
the connective tissue [7]. Flexibility increased after MET more, whereas Eccentric Training showed less
improvement in hamstring flexibility. The mechanism behind the gained flexibility in muscle after MET may
be due to biomechanical or neuro-physiological changes or an increase in tolerance to stretch. However,
the mechanism behind the increased flexibility with eccentric hamstring activity through the full range of
motion is unclear [21].
Skeletal muscle has a large adaptation potential induced by eccentric contraction and morphological
changes are related to the addition of sarcomeres in series [2]. Repeated (eccentric) contraction results in
disruption and membrane damage, which in effect leads to uncontrolled Ca++ movements and the
development of localized contracture [8]; this could be a cause of less improvement of muscle flexibility in
Eccentric Training than in Muscle Energy Technique.
At the time of the follow-up, the values of the Popliteal angle were higher than the pre-test values but
showed a decrease from the post-test values. Thus an analysis of the muscle flexibility after 72 hours of the
end of training did not reveal a significant maintenance of flexibility. The deterioration from the post-test
values at the time of follow-up can be attributed to the fact that there was no maintenance program that was
being followed during that period, and the subjects were not undergoing any active or passive stretching
regimes during those 72 hours.

CONCLUSIONS
It can be concluded that the Muscle Energy Technique and Eccentric Training program improve the
Popliteal angle, i.e. hamstring flexibility, and that they will enhance the athletic performance. Muscle Energy
Technique resulted in maximum improvement as compared to Eccentric Training/contraction on hamstring
flexibility.

PRACTICAL APPLICATION
APPLICATION
It is suggested to coaches, trainers, sports-physiotherapists, as well as athletes, to prefer Muscle Energy
Technique over Eccentric Training when both can be performed and where the gain in flexibility/ range of
motion is the objective/goal of the treatment.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
We gratefully acknowledge the co-operation provided by the subjects who participated in this study.

REFERENCES
1. Ballantyne, F., Freyer, G., & McLaughlin, P. (2003).The
effect of muscle energy technique on hamstring
extensibility: the mechanism of altered flexibility. Journal
of Osteopathic Medicine, 6(2), 59-63.
2. Daniela, N. F., Janaina, L. L., Michelle, F. S., Aikelton, F.
S., & Macro, T. A. (2007). Analysis of the influence of
static stretching and eccentric training on flexibility of
hamstring muscles. Conference Proceedings XXV ISBS
Symposium: Ouro Preto – Brazil. 454-457.
3. David, O. D., Jennifer, L., Shane, S., & Dennis, E. (2004).
Shortwave diathermy and prolonged stretching increase
hamstring flexibility more than prolonged stretching alone.
Journal of Orthopaedic and Sports Physical Therapy, 34,
13-20.
4. Denise, K. B., & Michael, R. W. (2006). Gross range of
motion in the cervical spine: the effect of osteopathic
muscle energy technique in asymptomatic subjects.
Journal of the American Osteopathic Association, 106(3),
137-142.
5. Ekstrand, J. G. (1983). Frequency of muscle tightness
and injury in soccer players. The American Journal of
Sports Medicine, 4, 124-128.
6. Emika, K., Toshiaki, O., & Kentaro, C., & Toshiyuki, K.
(2005). Musculotendinous factors influencing difference in
ankle joint flexibility between women and men. International
Journal of Sport and Health Science, 3, 218-25.
7. Freyer, G. (2003). Muscle energy concepts-a need for
change. Journal of Osteopathic Medicine, 3(2), 54-59.
8. Gregory, J. E., Brockett, C. L., Morgan, D. L., Whitland, N. P.,
& Proske, U. (2002). Effect of eccentric muscle contraction
on golgi tendon organ responses to passive and active
tension in the cat. Journal of Physiology, 538, 209-218.
9. Harris, M. L. (1996). Flexibility. Physical Therapy, 49: 591-601.
10. Harvard, V., & Roald, B. (2007). The evaluation of
eccentric training as treatment for patellar tendinopathy
(jumper’s knee): a critical review of exercise programmes.
British Journal of Sports Medicine, 41, 217-23.
11. Hopper, D., Decan, S., Das, S., Jain, A., Riddell, D., &
Hall, T. (2005). Dynamic soft tissue mobilization increases
hamstring flexibility in healthy male subjects. British
Journal of Sports Medicine, 39: 594-8.
12. Huston, M. (1996). Sports injuries recognition and
management (2nd edition). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
13. Jonhagen, S., & Nemeth. G. (1994). Hamstring injuries in
sprinter. The role of concentric and eccentric hamstring
muscle strength and flexibility. The American Journal of
Sports Medicine, 22(2), 262-266.
14. Leon, C., & Craig, L. (2000). Muscle energy techniques.
Philadephia: WB, 45-46.
15. Madeleine, S., & Fryer, G. (2008). A comparison of two muscle
energy techniques for increasing flexibility of the hamstring

45
Waseem et al.: The impact of MET and eccentric training on hamstring flexibility
muscle group. Journal of Bodywork and Movement Therapies,
12(4), 312-317.
16. Michael, J. A. (2004). Science of flexibility: Modern view 23.
of flexibility and stretching (3rd Eds.), Champaign, IL:
Human Kinetics. 24.
17. Murphy, D. F., Connolly, D. A. J., & Beynnon, B. D. (2003).
Risk factors for lower extremity injury: a review of the
literature. British Journal of Sports Medicine, 37, 13-29.
18. Gleeson, N., Eston, R., & Marginson, V. (2003). Effect of prior 25.
eccentric training on concentric exercise induced muscle
damage. British Journal of Sports Medicine, 37, 119-125.
19. Pope, R., Herbert, R., & Kirwan, J. (2000). A randomized trial
of pre-exercise stretching for prevention of lower limb injury. 26.
Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, 32, 271-277.
20. Ross, A. C. (2008) Hamstring injuries: Risk assessment
and injury prevention. The Annals Academy of Medicine
Singapore, 37, 341-346. 27.
21. Russell, T. N., & William, D. B. (2004). Eccentric training
and static stretching improve hamstring flexibility of high
school males. Journal of Athletic Training, 39(3), 254-258.
22. Sharon, S., Susan, L., Ray, G., & Janine, E. (1993).
Lower extremity muscular flexibility in long distance
Address for correspondence:
Mohd. Waseem
Department of Faculty Allied Health and Science,
Jamia Hamdard University,
Delhi, INDIA
Email: mdwaseempt@rediffmail.com
46
Serb J Sports Sci 4(1): 41-46
runners. Journal of Orthopaedic and Sports Physical
Therapy, 17(2), 102-107.
Takada, J. (Ed.). (1990). Sports and health theory for
students. Kanagawa: Kogaku-Shuppan.
Weijer, C. D, & Gorniak, P. T. (2003). The effect of static
stretch and warm-up exercise on hamstring length over
the course of 24 hours. Journal of Orthopaedic and
Sports Physical Therapy, 33(12), 727-33.
Witvrouw, E., Lysens, R., & Bellemans, J. (2000). Intrinsic
risk factors for the development of anterior knee pain in
an athletic population: a two years prospective study. The
American Journal of Sports Medicine, 28, 480-489.
Worrell, T. W., & Perrin, D. H. (1992). Hamstring muscle
injury: the influence of strength, flexibility, warm up and
fatigue. Journal of Orthopaedic and Sports Physical Therapy,
16, 12-18.
Yamamoto, T. (1996). Significance of flexibility for prevention
of injuries and enhancement of sport performance. Training
Journal, 84-87.