Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Unit Marxist and Socialist Thought: 12.0 Objectives
Unit Marxist and Socialist Thought: 12.0 Objectives
Unit Marxist and Socialist Thought: 12.0 Objectives
THOUGHT
f
L
Structure
12.0
12.1
Objectives
Introduction
L
12.2 Definition of Socialism
12.3 Origins of Socialist Thought
12.4 Early History of Socialist Thought
1 12.4.1 St. Simon
12.4.2 Charles Fourier
12.4.3 Roben Owen
12.5 Marxism: Economic and Social Analysis
12.5.1 Marxism: Political Theoly
12.5.2 Marxism: Theoly of Revolution
12.6 Let Us Sum Up
12.7 Key Words
12.8 Answers to Check Your Progress Exercises
12.0 OBJECTIVES
The purpose of this Unit is to introduce you to the meaning of the concept of socialism, and
its origin and development in the 19th and 20th century Europe. After going through this
Unit you should be able to :
understand what the concept of socialism means,
understand what were the factors that gave rise to the growth of socialist ideas in Europe,
trace the main stages of the development of socialist ideas and socialist movements,
distinguish between utopian and scientific socialism,
recognise the basic principles of a socialist society. and
know something about the contribution'of Karl Marx to social and political theory.
12.1 INTRODUCTION
You may have heard the words socialist and socialism used many times, and also the words
capitalist and capitalism. You may also have heard that United States is a capitalist country
and the Soviet Union a socialist country.
You may not be very clear as to what are the distinguishing features that make a society
capitalist or socialist. This is not surprising. because these historical concepts are sometimes
used very carelessly and without clear reference to their scientific meaning. Therefore, you
i must know first what exactly is meant by these terms.
I Today almost one third of the world's people live in a socialist society. Many millions are
fighting in their countries for the establishment of socialism in their countries. What are they
fighting for, do you know? Why are they ready to give their lives for transforming their
societies into socialist societies? Why have so many millions already given their lives in
history for a socialist cause? You will only understand this if you know what socialism
means and what kind of a society is a socialist society.
When did mankind first think about a socialist society? Where did people first think about
it? And why did they think about it at a particular stage in history? Man has always thought
1! about building a better world, but how and when did he start thinking about socialism? You
may want to know something about the ideas of those who wanted to build throughout the
world a society free from oppression, a society which is equal, and in which the resources of
the world are equally shared. The ideas of such people are known as socialist ideas, and the
kind of society they wanted to build is known as a socialist society. Their movements which
I were aimed at building a socialist society are known as socialist movements.
Radical Trends, Nationalism The most important socialist thinker was Karl Marx. But he went further than most socialist
and Mahatma Gandhi
thinkers of his time, and drew a blue print of a communist society. He based his ideas of
how to change the world, on a scientific analysis of society through history. He saw the final
stage of man's history as a stage in which the society would be communist. He also showed
how it could be brought about. Therefore, to distinguish his ideas from that of other
socialists his followers began to call themselves communists, and his ideas began to be
known as Marxism. We will also study in this lesson what was the contribution of Marxism
to socialist thought.
The first country in which Socialism, or the kind of society the communists were fighting
for, was built in Soviet Russia after the Revolution of 1917. You will read about the
revolution in Unit 14.
I
land, factories, mines, raw-materials are owned by a few individuals known as capitalists.
But, in order to produce goods one other thing is also required, and that is labour. For, if
nobody is there to work with the raw materials in the factories, mines or land, how will 1
things be produced? For production. labour is one of the most essential needs. Therefore, for
this purpose, the factory owners employ workers who do not have any other source of
income except the hands with which they work.
So you can see, in a capitalist system there is one class of people who own things frorp
which income can be derived, and another class of people who work on these things. Those
who own the sources of income do not work. But still they are the ones who are rich by
exploiting the labour of others. Those who work are poor because they cannot take and sell
in the market what they have produced.
But now you will ask me why is that wrong. After all the capitalist pays wages to the worker
for the work he does for him. And if one gets the profit from the market, the other gets the
wages.
But do you know. the workers are not paid the full amount for what they produce. The
factory owner pays to the worker for the number of hours the worker works in his hciory.
But the goods the workers collectively produce in the factory have more value and are sold
at a higher price in the market, and this amount the factory owner keeps, for himself. This is
the factory owner's profit with which he becomes rich, while the worker who is the real
producer remains poor.
Radical Trends, Nationalism This relationship of inequality is of tremendous importance in a capitalist society, and it is
and Mahatma Gandhi this that makes the capitalist society an unjust society. One classlives by owning, the other
class lives by working. One lives without working, the other cannot live unless it works.
Can you then see how a capitalist society is a society of inequality, social injustice and
oppression of the large majority of the people? And how this inequality is a result of private
property and profits?
It was against this growing capitalist factory system that socialist thought arose.
Man can think about a pfioblem only when a problem exists. The problem of a capitalist
society could be thought about by man only when the consequences of capitalism were felt
and seen. Therefore, socialist thought arose only with the development of capitalism, when
it became necessary to think about how to improve the conditions of life of the working
people in factories.
But did the socialist thinkers emerge suddenly in an intellectual vacuum? Did no one before
them think about the oppressed?
No, this is not so.
But man can conceive (think) of as attainable, only that, which is not very far removed from
the possibilities of his time and age. For example, going to the moon could only be a dream
in the 16th century when science and technology were not so developed. To man it seemed a
dream then. In the 20th century, when science and technology had developed so much more,
man began to see that going to the moon was a possibility. It could happen if he tried and
worked for it. And it has happened! Do you think it could have happened in the 16th
century? Similarly, mankind could think of providing all the necessities of life to everyone,
of having a good life for everyone, only when the possibilities of such a life existed. Only
under capitalism and growth of factories when production increased so much did it become
realistic to think of providini for everyone's needs -material and other needs such as
leisure, health and education for all. Therefore, ideas for betterment of mankind existed
almost as long as man hiaself has existed, but the ideas of socialism could emerge only in
the 19th century with the growth of factory industry:
Early thinkers had debated about social justice and equality. But for them justice and
equality were seen in relation to the ruling, rich and educated sections of their society. For
example, Plato of whom gou may have heard of, did not question the slavery of his times.
The chivalrous and brave knights of the medieval legends were not sensitive to their
peasants who were serfs. It was the Enlightenment thinkers of the 18th century who
extended the idea of freedom to all. But their idea of freedom was limited. The socialists
developed these ideas of freedom and extended them to a broader vision of freedom. In fact
we cannot think of socialist ideas without thinking of the intellectual heritage of the
Enlightenment thinkers of the 18th century. Just as socialism could not be possible without
factory industry, which creates the conditions for socialism, socialist ideas could not be
possible without the contribution of the Enlightenment thinkers. Everything in history
develops through contifiuity and conflict, which sharpens the struggle to a higher stage.
Socialist thought was thus not only a product of capitalism, but also a product of the
intellectual heritage of the 18th century Enlightenment.
- - - -
Radical Trends, Nationalism result automatically from a further development of society. Also, they did not analyse the
and Mahatma Gandhi
sources and distribution of surplus value, i.e., the source of exploitation of workers.
................................................................................................................................................
4 At what period of time did their ideas emerge?
...............................................................................................................................................
...............................................................................................................................................
5 Write true or false as answer:
a) The Utopian Socialists were scientific in their outlook.
b) They were a product of undeveloped capitalism.
C) Robert Owen understood the causes of exploitation of the workers.
d) The Utopian Socialists were concerned about social justice.
i In other words, the material bases of life in a society -the economic system, how they
produced their means of living, and how they organised themselves to do it. Here you must
know that it was Marx who analysed and categorised the different social systems. He
I
showed that it was the material bases of life which determined the nature of society, and
i class struggle, resulting from these material bases, which caused change and development in
I
society.
I
The driving and underlying causes of historical development and change were not the
changing ideas of human beings, but class struggle. Class struggle, in turn, was the result of
the fact that some sections of people or classes were the privileged and ruling classes, and
1
L
others were unprivileged, oppressed and ruled classes. Their differing and conflicting
position in turn was based on their relationship to the sources of income-whether they
I
owned them and employed others to work on them, or whether they worked on them and
produced profit for others. Naturally, the interests of the two were opposed to each other and
Radical Trends, Nationalism irreconciliable. In short, Marxism showed that the prevailing economic system was the base
and Mahatma Gaodhi of society, which determined all its other aspects, and that class struggle was an integral part
of any such society where resources were privately owned by some, and, became a means to
live by the labour of others. Therefore, class struggle was inevitable in history as long as
private property existed i.e., it was an essential part of every stage of historical development
till the sociilist revolution, when the resources would be collectively owned. These ideas
constituted historical materialism.
Based on these ideas they showed how every society passed through the same stages of
development -primitive communism, slavery, feudalism, capitalism, socialism -and
how, though some features may be different in different countries, it was not possible to skip
any of these stages.
But Marx and Engels not only evolved an understanding of historical development, they
were also particular about analysing their own stage of history quite thoroughly. This is
because they not only wanted to understand the world, they also wanted to change it. In
order to change it, however, it was first essential to understand the workings of how things
actually were, as they existed. Their second major contribution was, therefore, a thorough
and scathing criticism of the capitalist society, particularly the manner in which it resulted in
the exploitation of the working class by the capitalist. We have already talked about how
this happens earlier in the lesson. It was Marx and Engels who had worked it out. In this
way they made an important contribution to economic theory also. They showed how under
capitalism a worker spends one part of the day covering the cost of maintaining himself and
his family (wages), while for the rest of the day he works without remuneration, because
now he is producing over and above what he would be paid for. It is through this, that he
creates surplus value, which is the source of profit for the capitalist and the means whereby
the worker is denied the ' h i t s of his labour. Thus capitalism is not just an economic system,
it is also a certain set of social relationships, i.e., a specific relationship between the
capitalist and the worker, which is against the interests of the worker, and which is socially
unjust. The worker is a necessary part of the system because without labour nothing can be
produced, and the worker cannot produce alone, so there is a certain social organisation of
labour. But this social organisation is dominated by capital or wealth which is owned by the
capitalist, and which the worker does not have.
1. Karl Marx
these crises by searching for new markets i.e., colonies, or by waging wars for the redivision
of markets, or by taking over some welfare measures for the workers to appease them. But
this cannot go on endlessly, because the contradiction lies in the system itself. Therefore,
from the economic analysis of capitalism Marx and Engels drew the political conclusion that
the overthrow of capitalism is inevitable.
The class which, they said, will overthrow this system will be'the working class or
proletariat. They pointed out that as large factories are established, there also emerges in
them a working class i.e. a proletariat, which owns nothing except its ability to work and
earn. Therefore, this class has no stake in a system based on private property such as
capitalism. Therefore, in the fight against capitalism, it has "nothing to lose, except its
chains". Secondly, the proletariat is also the most exploited section of society under
capitalism. and for this reason the most interested in its overthrow. Thirdly, there was no
other long term choice for the proletariat except to fight the system which exploits him -
for how could a worker be independent and live a meaningful life, if, all that he does for
most of the day goes into enriching not himself but the capitalist? Therefore, the overthrow
of capitalism becomes a necessary task for the proletariat, and also a desirable one because
on it would depend his right to shorter hours of work, leisure, culture, equality between men
and women and access to good health and education.
Marx and Engels also pointed out that with the emancipation of the working class will come
the emancipation of all other sections of society, as it was the working class which formed
the bottom most layer of this society. Also, given its situation, the working class could be
the only uncompromising class in the struggle for the overthrow of capitalism. Thus, the
second major political conclusion which Marx and Engels arrived at from their economic
analysis of capitalism, was that. it is the working class which will lead the struggle,and be
the vanguard of the socialist revolution.
Radical Trends, Nationalism Thus capitalism created the means of its own destruction.
and Mahatma Candhi In short, they said that before or without capitalism there cannot be socialism. Capitalism
,
with its big factories makes possible increased production, so that, there is enough to be
distributed to each according to his work. Capitalism with its factory system also creates the
working class which can overthrow it.
4 What were the political conclusions that Marx and Engels drew from their economic
analysis of capitalism?
................... ~~ . .~
~~ ~ ~
...............................................................................................................................................
5 ' Could the struggle against capitalism be a peaceful one?