Kempton, 31 7 N. W .2d 3 61, 3 66 (Minn. 19 82) (Explaining That Summary Affirmances Lack

You might also like

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 2

STATE OF MINNESOTA

November 17, 2021

IN SUPREME COURT

A21-0702

James Senftner,

Relator,

vs.

Bimbo Bakeries USA, Inc.

and

ACE USA,

Respondents.

James T. Hansing, Minneapolis, Minnesota, for relator.

James S. Pikala, Emily A. Lacourse, Arthur, Chapman, Kettering, Smetak & Pikala, P.A.,
Minneapolis, Minnesota, for respondents.

Considered and decided by the court without oral argument.

ORDER

Based upon all the files, records, and proceedings herein,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the decision of the Workers' Compensation Court

of Appeals filed May 4, 2021, be, and the same is, affirmed without opinion. See Hojf v.

Kempton, 317 N.W.2d 361, 366 (Minn. 19 82) (explaining that summary affirmances lack

1
precedential value "because they do not commit the court to any particular point of view,"

and because they "do no more than establish the law of the case").

Dated: November 1 7, 2021 BY THE COURT:

G. Barry Anderson
Associate Justice

You might also like