Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Structural Analy Is Methods
Structural Analy Is Methods
Structural Analy Is Methods
IS 1893-1:
2002 IS-1893 Provisions
Criteria for earthquake resistant design of structures
Part 1: General provisions and buildings
EN 1998-1:
2004
Eurocode-8 Provisions
Design of structures for earthquake resistance
Part 1: General rules, seismic actions and rules for buildings
the seismic weight of the whole building is the sum of the seismic weights of all the floors.
∑k (DLk + ILk )
DL + IL
ΨEi = φ Ψ2i
storeys with correlated occupancies 0.80 Public, commercial (shops), parking 0.60
H: Height of building, in m. This excludes the basement stories, where basement walls are
connected with the ground floor deck or fitted between the building columns. But it
includes the basement stories, when they are not so connected.
0,09
Ta H
d
d: Base dimension of the building at the plinth level, in m, along the considered direction
of the lateral force.
IS 1893-1: 2002, 7.6
A. Meslem & D. Lang © NORSAR – Kjeller (Norway) 2014
Dynamic Characteristics: Fundamental Natural Period
EN 1998-1:2004
based on any equation coming from structural mechanics (e.g. Rayleigh method)
for building heights H 40 m :
Ac Ai (0.2 (lwi /H)2 )
with: Ac - total effective area of the shear walls in the first storey (in [m2])
Ai - effective cross-sectional area of shear wall i (in [m2])
lwi - length of shear wall i parallel to applied forces
EN 1998-1:2004, 4.3.3.2
A. Meslem & D. Lang © NORSAR – Kjeller (Norway) 2014
Modeling Specifications: Planar (2D) & Spatial (3D)
if regular in plan, planar (2D) models may be used for each direction X and Y
Regularity
Model type
Plan Elevation
● ●
planar (2D)
● ○
○ ●
spatial (3D)
○ ○
m4 m4
k
m3 m3
k
m2 m2
m1 k
m1
k*
A. Meslem & D. Lang © NORSAR – Kjeller (Norway) 2014
Modeling Specifications: Masses Lumped System
m4 m4
k
m3 m3
k
m2 m2
m1 k
m1
k*
A. Meslem & D. Lang © NORSAR – Kjeller (Norway) 2014
Methods of Analysis
Analysis methods specified in IS 1893-1:2002 and EN 1998-1:2004
low complexity
of computation
high complexity
of computation
Buildings shall be deisgned and constructed to resist the effects of design lateral force
as a MINIMUM IS 1893-1:2002, 7.5
This approach defines a series of forces acting on a building to represent the effect of
earthquake ground motion, typically defined by a seismic design response spectrum.
Criteria :
shall be applied to buildings whose response is principally dominated by the 1st mode:
4 TC
T1 EN 1998-1:2004, 4.3.3.2
2,0 sec
Buildings shall be deisgned and constructed to resist the effects of design lateral force
as a MINIMUM IS 1893-1:2002, 7.5
This approach defines a series of forces acting on a building to represent the effect of
earthquake ground motion, typically defined by a seismic design response spectrum.
Criteria (cont'd):
and that are regular in elevation
Steps:
Step 1: the design lateral force shall first be computed for the building as a whole
Step 2: this deisgn lateral force shall then be distributed to the various floor levels
Step 3: the overall design seismic force thus obtained at each floor level, shall
then be distributed to individual lateral load resisting elements depending on
the floor diaphgram action
VB Ah W IS 1893-1:2002, 7.5
with: Ah - design horizontal seismic coefficient for the structure, using the fundamental period Ta
W- seismic weight of the building.
Z I Sa
Ah IS 1893-1:2002, 6.4.2
2 R g
Z = seismic zone factor (given in Table 2 Clause 6.4.2);
I = importance factor depending upon the functional use of the structure (given in Table 6 Clause 6.4.2 );
R = response reduction factor depending on the perceived seismic damage performance of the structure
(given in Table 7 Clause 6.4.2);
Sa/g = average response acceleration coefficient. IS 1893-1: 2002, 6.4.1
Wi hi2 h2 Q2 W2
Qi VB n IS 1893-1:2002, 7.7
W j h j 2
j 1
h1 Q1 W1
with:
Sd (T1) = ordinate of the design spectrum at T1
M= total mass of the building
= correction factor = 0.85 if T1 2TC and the building has more than 2 storeys.
Otherwise = 1.0
2 T 2.5 2
for 0 ≤ T1 ≤ TB : S a ,d ( T1 ) a g S 1 ( )
3 TB q 3
z m z2 F2 m2
Fi Fb i i EN 1998-1:2004, 4.3.3.2
z j mj z1 F1 m1
m3
3-story RC frame building (residential use) m2
3 x 3.5 m
m1
1. Seismic masses:
TB T1 TC TD
Period T [sec]
- base shear force Fb:
(since T1 < 2 TC → = 0.85) → Fb = Sa,d (T1) m = 2.12 152.33 0.85 = 274 kN
A. Meslem & D. Lang © NORSAR – Kjeller (Norway) 2014
(1) Design Lateral force Method: EN 1998-1:2004
Tutorial 1
3. Load distribution and moment calculation: F3 m3
F2 m2
z m
Fi Fb i i
z j mj F1 m1
Level Height z [m] Mass mk [tons] zk mk [mtons] Force Fk [kN] Moment = Fk zk [kNm]
3 10.5 29.44 309.12 96.68 1015.1
2 7.0 39.10 273.70 85.60 599.2
1 3.5 83.79 293.27 91.72 321.0
Totals 152.33 876.09 274.0 1935.3
This approach permits the multiple modes of response of a building to be taken into
account.
the Response spectrum method shall be performed using the design spectum, or by a site-
specific design spectrum mentioned.
the resulted design base shear (VB) shall be compared with a base shear (𝑉𝐵) calculated
using a fundamental period TB.
• Where VB is less than 𝑉𝐵 , all the response quantities (e.g. Member forces,
displacements, story forces, story shears and base reactions) shall be multiplied by
𝑉𝐵 /VB.
The sum total of modal masses 90 % of the total seismic mass and
of all modes considered ≥ missing mass correction beyond 33 %
shall be applied if the criteria for analysis method (1) are not Fb
fulfilled, this means if:
4 TC
T1 1st mode
2,0 sec
response of all modes shall be considered that contribute significantly to the global
building response (i.e., important for buildings of a certain height)
those modes shall be considered for which:
(1) the sum of the modal masses is at least 90% of the total mi ≥ 0.9 mtot
building mass
or
(2) the modal mass is larger than 5% of the total building mass mi ≥ 0.05 mtot
if the '90%' and the '5%' criteria is not fulfilled (e.g. for buildings prone to torsional
effects), those modes shall be considered for which:
k ≥ 3 √n
and
Tk ≤ 0.20 s
m1 0 0 0 c11 .. .. c1n k 11 .. .. k 1n
0 m2 0 0
C
.. c22 .. .. .. k 22 .. ..
with: M K
0 0 m3 0 .. .. c 33 .. .. .. k 33 ..
0 0 0 m c .. .. cnn k
i n1 n1 .. .. k nn
Assumption: [C] = zero matrix ! – Undamped system M u C u K u 0
T1
Modal participation factor of mode k:
n n
W j j ,i m
j 1
j j ,i
Pi
j 1
i
W j j ,i
n n
2
m
j 1
j j2,i
j 1
k ≥ 3 √n 11
12
0.118
0.117
0
0
0
0
0
1.2
13 0.114 0 0.8 10.7
and 14 0.111 11 0 1.7
15 0.11 4.3 0 0
Tk ≤ 0.20 sec 16 0.109 53.2 0 0.8
17 0.106 0.8 0 0
18 0.1 7 0 0
k ≥ 3 √4 = 6 modes 19
20
0.096
0.095
0
0
0
0
0
0.5
21 0.094 0 0 1
22 0.093 0 0 0
23 0.092 0 0 0
24 0.087 0 0 0
25 0.084 0 0 0
26 0.083 0 0 0
27 0.082 0 0 0
28 0.078 0 0 0
29 0.077 0 0 2.9
30 0.077 0 0 1.8
… … … … …
first torsional
mode is 3rd
Σ = 0,90 0,98
first eigenmode
is torsional
first eigenmode is
torsional
Σ = 0,83 0,74
A. Meslem & D. Lang © NORSAR – Kjeller (Norway) 2014
(2) Modal Response spectrum method
Steps:
Step 1: for each mode of vibration, a response is read from the design spectrum,
based on the modal frequency and the modal mass, for each floor;
Spectral acceleration Sa
Sa,d (T1)
Sa,d (T2)
Design seismic coefficient for each mode i: Sa.d (T3)
Z I S a Ti
Ai
2 R g T1 T2 T3
Period T [sec]
Q j ,i Ai j ,i Pi W j IS 1893-1:2002, 7.8.4
W i ik
where Pk n
i 1
Wi ik
2
i 1
A. Meslem & D. Lang © NORSAR – Kjeller (Norway) 2014
(2) Modal Response spectrum method
IS 1893-1:2002
Procedure:
Story shear forces in each mode – the peak shear force (Vj,i) acting in story j in mode i is
given by:
n
V j ,i Q
j i 1
j ,i IS 1893-1:2002, 7.8.4
Story shear forces due to all modes considered– the peak story shear force (Vj) in story j
due to all modes considered is obtained by combining those due to each mode
r r
i 1 j 1
i ij j IS 1893-1:2002, 7.7
Froof Vroof
IS 1893-1:2002, 7.8.4
F j V j V j 1
Story shear forces due to all modes considered– the peak story shear force (Vj) in story j
due to all modes considered is obtained by combining those due to each mode
Lateral forces at each story due to all modes considered – the design lateral forces, Froof
and Fj, at roof and at floor j:
Froof Vroof
IS 1893-1:2002, 7.8.4
F j V j V j 1
Spectral acceleration Sa
Sa,d (T1)
Sa,d (T2)
Sa.d (T3)
T1 T2 T3
Period T [sec]
A. Meslem & D. Lang © NORSAR – Kjeller (Norway) 2014
(2) Modal Response spectrum method
EN 1998-1:2004
Procedure:
Fj,i m j j,i i S a,d (Ti ) EN 1998-1:2004, 4.3.3.3
Mode shape i: 1 2
3 n,1 n,2 n,3
n
resulting shear forces Fb,m : Fb ,m i1
Fb2,m ,i
M u C u K u 0 if [C] = 0 : M u K u 0
m1 0 0 2 0 0 k1 k2 k2 0 5 2 0
M 0 m2 0 m 0 1.5 0 K k 2 k 2 k 3 k3 k 2 3 1
0 0 m3 0 0 1 0 k3 k 3 0 1 1
4. Eigenmodes:
m
j1
j j ,i
i
i n
Mi*
m
j1
j
2
j ,i
q T1 4.0 1.50
2.5 2.5
T3 = 0.47 sec : Sa,d (T) ag S (2.943 1.0) 1.15 2.115 m / s2
q 4.0
F3,2 = –46.3
F3,3 = 9.5
n
Fb ,m F
i1
2
b ,m ,i
Acceleration is in g unit
A number of ways to combine modes given direction including CQC, SRSS,..and others...
Response spectrum will be applied as an acceleration in U1 (UX) direction using the
previously defined curve EC-8-B
Linear time history method of analysis, when used, shall be based on an appropriate
ground motion and shall be performed using accepted principles of dynamics.
The result of a response spectrum analysis using the response spectrum from a ground
motion is typically different from that which would be calculated directly from a linear
dynamic analysis using that ground motion directly, since phase information is lost in
the process of generating the response spectrum.
the resulted design base shear (VB) shall be compared with a base shear (𝑉𝐵) calculated
using a fundamental period TB.
• Where VB is less than 𝑉𝐵 , all the response quantities (e.g. Member forces,
displacements, story forces, story shears and base reactions) shall be multiplied by
𝑉𝐵 /VB.
IS 1893-1:2002, 7.8.4
A. Meslem & D. Lang © NORSAR – Kjeller (Norway) 2014
(3) Linear time history analysis
SAP2000
SAP2000 – 3-Story RC Frame System
Define ground motion to be used Linear Time History analysis in UX direction (LTH_UX)
a) Horizontal components:
Step 1: Compute the structural response of the structure under each
component separately
Load factors for design of reinforced concrete and prestressed concrete structures:
The following combination shall be accounted for:
1) 1,5 DL IL
2) 1,2 DL IL EL
3) 1,5 DL EL
4) 0,9 DL 1,5 EL
The terms DL, IL, and EL stand for the response quantities due to Dead Load,
Imposed Load and Earthquake Load.
A. Meslem & D. Lang © NORSAR – Kjeller (Norway) 2014
Combination of effects of seismic action: ISN 1893-1:2002
Design horizontal earthquake load : IS 1893-1:2002, 6.3
When the lateral load resisting elements are oriented along orthogonal horizontal
direction, the structure shall be designed for the effects due to full design earthquake
load in one horizontal direction at time.
Example:
Case of steel building, and where
lateral load resisting elements are
oriented along UX direction. The
building should be deisgned for:
1) 1,7 DL IL
2) 1,7 DL EL x
3) 1,3 DL IL EL x
When the lateral load resisting elements are not oriented along orthogonal horizontal
direction, the structure shall be designed for the effects due to full design earthquake
load in one horizontal direction PLUS 30% of the design earthquake load in the other
direction
Example:
Case of steel building, and where
lateral load resisting elements are not
oriented along UX direction. The
building should be deisgned for:
1) 1,7 DL IL
2) 1,7 DL EL x 0,3 EL y
3) 1,3 DL IL EL x 0,3 EL y
When responses from the three earthquake components are to be considered, the
responses due to each component may be combined using the assumption that when
response from one component are 30% of their maximum.
The response due earthquake force (EL) is the maximum of the following three cases:
Alternatively, the response (EL) due to the combined effect of the three components
can be obtained on the basis of Square Root of the sum of the Square (SRSS):
E E2x E2y
E Ex 0.3E y
E E y 0.3Ex
Exception:
For buildings satisfying the regularity criteria in plan and in which walls
or independent bracing systems in the two main horizontal directions
are the only primary seismic elements, the seismic action may be
assumed to act separately and without combinations.
If avg is greater than 0.25g, the vertical of the seismic action should be taken
into account for the following cases:
• for horizontal or nearly horizontal structural members spanning 20 m or more.
• for horizontal or nearly horizontal cantilever components longer than 5 m.
• for horizontal or nearly horizontal pre-stressed components
• for beams supporting columns
• in base-isolated structures
The analysis for determining the effects of the vertical component of the
seismic action may be based on a partial model of the structure, which
includes the aforementioned elements.
The effects of 2 horizontal and vertical components will be combined by:
E Ex 0.3E y 0.3Ez
E 0.3Ex E y 0.3Ez
E 0.3Ex 0.3E y Ez
A. Meslem & D. Lang © NORSAR – Kjeller (Norway) 2014
Accidental/Torsional Effects
Mode 1 Mode 1
UX = 0,08906 UX = 0,144
UY = 0,15627 UY = 0
RZ = 0,54874 RZ = 0,61726
Mode 1 Mode 1
UX = 0 UX = 0,73509
UY = 0 UY = 0
RZ = 0,7735 RZ = 0
esi – Static eccentricity at floor i defined as the distance between centre of mass and centre of
rigidity. y
M di edi Qi , j
Second-order effects (P-∆ effects) need not be taken into account if the following
condition is fulfilled in all storeys:
Ptot = is the total gravity load at and above the storey considered in the seismic design
situation;
= is the design interstorey drift, evaluated as the difference of the average lateral
dr displacements ds at the top and bottom of the storey under consideration and
calculated in accordance with Chapter 4.3.4;
Vtot = is the total seismic storey shear; and
Second-order effects (P-∆ effects) need not be taken into account if the following
condition is fulfilled in all storeys:
If 0,1 < θ≤0,2, the second-order effects may approximately be taken into account by
multiplying the relevant seismic action effects by a factor equal to 1/(1 - θ).
not considered
considered