Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Co2 Utilization Via Power-To-X Technologies
Co2 Utilization Via Power-To-X Technologies
PLAN
CO2 Conversion & Utilization
Power-to-X Concept
Power-to-X Approaches
Power-to-X via CO2 hydrogenation
Power-to-X via electrochemical CO2 reduction
Hydrogen Production via Elecytrolyzers
Power-to-METHANE (PtM)
Power-to-LIQUID FUELS (PtL)
Challenges & Trends & Economics
CO2 Utilization
Coupling of Surplus
Renewable Energy
Power-to-X
Power-to-Gas
Power-to-Liquid
X Power-to-Hydrogen
Power-to-Methane
…
Power-to-X Approaches
Two Steps:
1- H2 production: via water electrolysis
powered by renewable energy (solar,
wind, hydro)
2- CO2 hydrogenation: captured CO2 is
catalytically reacted with produced H2.
- Fast kinetics
- Challenges related with sustainable hydrogen production
- Integration of the different steps of the technology (CO2 capture,
water electrolysis and CO2 hydrogenation) is also still an issue
2) Power-to-X via electrochemical CO2 reduction
bn
- Alkaline is expected to remain the most low-cost solution in the coming years
- PEM electrolysis extra costs could become marginal by 2030
- SOE costs can also decrease, but there is much more uncertainty for this technology
Power-to-METHANE (PtM)
- Methane or substitute natural gas (SNG), has a great potential, can be injected
directly into the natural gas grid, benefiting of the existing natural gas facilities
- Catalytic CO2 hydrogenation (methanation) has been extensively investigated and
demonstration plants are already in operation in different countries.
- Between 200 and 550◦C and at pressures up to 100 bar.
- Highly exothermic => Reactor temperature control is an issue => thermodynamic limitations
and catalyst deactivation by sintering
- Challenges => Optimum reactor & catalyst design
- Adiabatic fixed-bed reactor most common, 2 in series with intermediate cooling
- Studies have been carried out on catalyst development, aiming at synthetizing more
performing and temperature-resistant catalysts.
Power-to-METHANE (PtM)
Fischer-Tropsch and Methanol are the two main production pathways for PtL
Fischer-Tropsch pathway => CO2 first is Methanol pathway => H2 produced from water
converted to CO via a reverse water-gas shift electrolysis, and CO2 (or CO) are used in the
reaction and H2 is produced through water synthesis of methanol. Methanol can be then
electrolysis. H2 and CO are then used in FT converted to fuels through further steps, such as
synthesis to produce liquid hydrocarbons that DME synthesis, olefin synthesis, oligomerization etc.
can be upgraded to fuels such as gasoline & diesel
Power-to-LIQUID FUELS (PtL)
Fischer-Tropsch and Methanol are the two main production pathways for PtL
Fischer-Tropsch pathway => CO2 first is Methanol pathway => H2 produced from water
converted to CO via a reverse water-gas shift electrolysis, and CO2 (or CO) are used in the
reaction and H2 is produced through water synthesis of methanol. Methanol can be then
electrolysis. H2 and CO are then used in FT converted to fuels through further steps, such as
synthesis to produce liquid hydrocarbons that DME synthesis, olefin synthesis, oligomerization etc.
can be upgraded to fuels such as gasoline & diesel
Power-to-LIQUID FUELS (PtL)
Hydrogen generation via water electrolysis => AEL (Alkaline electrolysis), PEM (Polymer electrolyte
membrane) and SOEC (Solid oxide electrolysis)
- AEL has lower investment and maintenance, already commercialized, most mature, yet
coupling it with variable renewable energy (RE) could be challenging due to its long start-up.
- SOEC is very promising when coupling with RE is considered, exhibits a great potential for
coupling with exothermic processes, yet still not a mature technology.
- PEM has high efficiency and short time response, being the most promising for PtX
applications.
CO2 hydrogenation => into chemicals and fuels either via a Fischer-Tropsch (FT) pathway
or using methanol pathway
- More advanced compared to electrochemical CO2 reduction
- Existing FT infrastructures can be utilized
- Focus is on the development of more efficient/selective catalysts
- Companies, such as Audi, Carbon Recycling International and ZSW have successfully built and
operated PtX commercial plants for the production of methane and methanol
Challenges & Trends & Economics
Electrochemical CO2 reduction => Cathodic CO2 reduction powered by RE to produce chemicals
and fuels
- Still being developed at laboratory scale
- Drawbacks from scaling-up => very low selectivity to the desired products, low efficiency as
well as the high overpotentials required.
- Considerable technical and catalytic advances have yet to be achieved in order to get this
technology to a larger scale.
The two most important factors affecting the production cost of all electrofuels are;
- Capital cost of the electrolyser
- Electricity price
The capacity factor of the unit and the life span of the electrolyser are also important parameters
affecting that production cost.