Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Indiana V Mary York Oct 2020 Final Judgement - 2018 Dennis Intermediate School Shooting
Indiana V Mary York Oct 2020 Final Judgement - 2018 Dennis Intermediate School Shooting
Indiana V Mary York Oct 2020 Final Judgement - 2018 Dennis Intermediate School Shooting
2020 TERM
Defendant's counsel states Defendant desires t0 withdraw Defendant’s previous not guilty pleas and
enter guilty pleas t0 the charges of Neglect of a Dependent, a Level 6 Felony, as charged in Count
IIof the Information, Neglect of a Dependent, a Level 6 Felony, as charged in Count IV of the
Information, Neglect 0f a Dependent, a Level 6 Felony, as charged in V 0f the Information and
Neglect of a Dependent, a Level 6 Felony, as charged in Count VI 0f the Information. The Court
advises Defendant of constitutional guarantees, the possible consequences of entering guilty pleas,
and those matters set forth in LC. 35-35—1-2. Defendant with counsel moves to withdraw
Defendant’s previous not guilty pleas. Such Motion is granted, and Defendant’s previous not guilty
pleas are withdrawn. Defendant enters pleas of guilty to the charges of Neglect of a Dependent, a
Level 6 Felony, as charged in Count II ofthe InformatiOn, Neglect of a Dependent, a Level 6 Felony,
as charged in Count IV ofthe Information, Neglect of a Dependent, a Level 6 Felony, as charged in
V 0f the Information and Neglect of a Dependent, a Level 6 Felony, as charged in Count VI of the
Information. A factual basis is established in order to accept Defendant's guilty pleas. And the
Court, having heard the evidence and the statements ofcounsel, and having examined and considered
the Pre-Sentence Report, accepts Defendant's guilty pleas, and finds the Defendant guilty of such
charges.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that {he Defendant, Mary York, is 44 years 0f
age, and Defendant is guilty of the crimes of Count II, Neglect 0f a Dependent, a Level 6 Felony,
I.C 35—46- 1--4(a)(1) Count IV
Neglect 0f a Dependent, a Level 6 Felony, I. C. 35 46- 1--4(a)(3)
Count V, Neglect 0f a Dependent, a Level 6 Felony, I. C. 35- 46- 1--4(a)(3) and Count VI, Neglect 0f
a Dependent, aLevel 6 Felony, I. C. 35- 46— 1--4(a)(1)
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that JUDGMENT OF CONVICTION be, and hereby is entered against
the Defendant, Mary York, on the charges of Count II, Neglect of a Dependent, a Level 6 Felony,
I.C. 35-46—1-4(a)(1),Count IV, Neglect of a Dependent, a Level 6 Felony, I.C. 35-46-1—4(a)(3),
Count V, Neglect of a Dependent, a Level 6 Felony, I.C. 35-46- 1 -4(a)(3), and Count VI, Neglect of
a Dependent, a Level 6 Felony, LC. 3 5-46- 1 -4(a)( 1 ).
Page 1 of 3
Judgment and Sentence
State of Indiana vs. Mary York
Cause No.2 89D01—1910-F5-0001 13
Evidence and statements of counsel are heard, and Pre-Sentence‘ Report re-examined upon
sentencing. In open court, the following obj ections, corrections, and/or additions to the Pre-Sentence
Report are addressed:
Page five (5) of said report is corrected to reflect the Defendant's sister's name to Tena.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that in the event that the Defendant successfully completes all
The Court notes that the above sentence is consistent With the Plea Agreement entered into between
the Defendant and Defendant’s counsel and the State.
.
Defendant shall pay the costs of this action in the amount of $185.00.
The Court finds and the Defendant agrees that Defendant has spent one (1) actual day in confinement
as a result 0f this cause, said time calculated as follows:
October 15, 2019 to October 15, 2019 1 actual day
and that Defendant is entitled t0 credit for time so spent towards the sentence of imprisonment. The
Court finds that with good time credit Defendant is entitled t0 an additional one (1) day for a total
The Court further finds that with credit for time spent in confinement, Defendant has served that
portion of Defendant's sentence which is not suspended, and IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that
Defendant be permitted to go at liberty upon the terms and conditions of Defendant's probation.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the cash bond posted by the Defendant in this cause be applied
Page 2 of 3
Judgment and Sentence
State of Indiana vs. Mary York I
The balance of the cash bond, if any, shall be released to the Defendant.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, consistent with the plea agreement 0f the parties, that any weapon
seized 0f Defendant during the investigation of this cause be destroyed by the appropriate law
enforcement agency pursuant to Indiana Code § 3 5-47-3 -2(c)(5), provided, however, that in the event
that any such weapon is being held as evidence in any co-defendant or other cause, said weapon shall
not be destroyed until the disposition of said cause or causes, and in the event that said weapon is
the lawful property 0f a person or agency, said weapon may be returned to said person or agency.
pursuant to the terms' and conditions of the Plea Agreement, and the Court finds that such Motion
should be granted.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Counts I, III and VII of the Information be, and hereby are
dismissed.
This entry is made this date for hearing held on October 8, 2020.
Distribution:
Michael W. Shipman and Ashley J. Green, Wayne County Prosecuting Attorneys
William R. Frederick, Counsel for Defendant
Pamela Waters, Adult Probation Officer
Richmond Police Department, Attn: Property and Evidence
Wayne County Sheriffs Department, Attn: Property and Evidence
Page 3 of 3