Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Did Huge Tsunami On 11 March 2011 Impact
Did Huge Tsunami On 11 March 2011 Impact
Did Huge Tsunami On 11 March 2011 Impact
Shuji Sasaa, Shuhei Sawayamaa, Shingo Sakamotoa, Ryo Tsujimotob, Genki Terauchib,
Hiroshi Yagic and Teruhisa Komatsua
a
Atmosphere and Ocean Research Institute, The University of Tokyo, 5-1-5, Kashiwanoha,
Kashaiwa, 277-8564, Japan; bNorthwest Pacific Region Environmental Cooperation Center, Toyama,
Toyama, 930-0856, Japan; cVisionTech Inc, 2-1-16 Umezono, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-0045, Japan
ABSTRACT
Seagrass beds play important roles for coastal ecosystems as an ecosystem engineer and also as a habitat for fish and
mollusks as spawning, nursery and feeding grounds, and provide us important ecological services. On 11 March 2011,
huge tsunami hit Sanriku Coast, Japan, after the big earthquakes occurred in Northwestern Pacific Ocean. Seagrass beds
were distributed on sandy or muddy bottom in Shizugawa Bay, Sanriku Coast. Thus, remote sensing research was
conducted to evaluate impact of the tsunami on seagrass bed in Shizugawa Bay, Sanriku Coast. GeoEye-1 multi-band
imageries taken on 4 November 2009 and 22 February 2012 were analyzed to map seagrass beds before and after the
tsunami, respectively. Analysis of the former imagery showed seagrass beds were distributed in sheltered bottom against
waves along the coast corresponding to seagrass distributions obtained through inquiry to fishermen and references on
seagrass bed distributions before the tsunami. Analysis of the latter imagery indicated that seagrass bed distributions on
22 February 2012 were less than on 4 November 2009. Seagrass beds in the bay head disappeared while some seagrass
beds remained behind the points along the north coast. This was verified by the field survey conducted in October 2011
and May and October 2012. Since the tsunami waves propagated into the bay along the longitudinal axis of the bay
without crossing both sides of the bay, they produced only big sea-level changes during the propagation along the both
sides from the center to the bay mouth. Their energy is concentrated the bay head and removes seagrass with sand and
mud substrates. On the other hand, the tsunami higher than 12 m could not completely destroy seagrass beds due to
topographic effect protecting seagrass from strong force by the tsunami. Thus, all seagrass weren’t destroyed completely
in Shizugawa Bay even by the hit of the huge tsunami.
Keywords: Tsunami, GeoEye-1, remote sensing, coastal habitat mapping, seagrass, seaweed
1. INTRODUCTION
Coastal ecosystems provide important ecological services to human society [1]. Seagrass and seaweed beds are one of
the most important ecosystems due to their capabilities to create unique environments. Seagrasses make dense meadows
in their luxuriant season. The meadows reduce water motion as resistance against it. Komatsu (1997) [2] revealed this
phenomenon in Zostera marina meadows using plaster balls [3]. This influence of seagrass meadows consequently
stabilizes bottom sediments [4, 5, 6]. This is also true for seaweed forests [7]. It seems that other influences of seagrass
meadows are similar to those of seaweed forests through shading effect of canopy on light from the sea surface [8],
water temperature [9, 10, 11], and dissolved oxygen and pH distributions through photosynthesis [12, 13]. In coastal
waters, seagrass and seaweed beds are important habitats for many species related to fishery resources. Seagrass beds
are mainly distributed on sandy or muddy bottom, and provide spawning, nursery and feeding grounds to fish, mollusks
and crustacean. Since these habitats are distributed in shallow waters, human activities in coastal waters threaten them,
especially seagrass beds, which extend on flat sandy and muddy bottoms. In 1960s during high economic development
in Japan, seagrass beds had been destroyed by reclamation and pollution [14]. They are vulnerable to environmental
disturbances even natural ones [15]. Thus, it is possible that the tsunami influences seagrass meadows.
Huge tsunami on 11 March 2011 brought catastrophic damages on Sanriku Coast facing Northwestern Pacific Ocean.
Their wave heights were 10-30 m along the coast. A lot of broad seagrass beds were located along Sanriku Coast with
many rias-type bays (Fig. 1) which suffered serious damages by the tsunami. Shizugawa Bay is located in southern
¡
'
Tòbi-'shima
Ce6 ooold
±1141iDo
Honshu Island
Sanriku Coast
Shizugawa Bay
Sendai
02011 Europa
0 2011 Cues/
Data C 2011
C 2011 Z
Figure 1. Map showing Sanriku Coast with rias-type bays facing the Pacific Ocean and Shizugawa Bay obtained from Google Earth
Sodehama
Figure 2. GeoEye-1 true color satellite image of Shizugawa Bay on 4 November 2009.
3. RESULT
At western side of Araita River mouth, seagrass beds were detected before the tsunami (left panel of Fig. 3). They
disappeared after the tsunami (right panel of Fig. 3). However, the ground truthing survey confirmed that sand beds
remained at this area in October 2011 and May and October 2012.
At Yoriki, seagrass beds were distributed in the center of harbor before the tsunami (left panel of Fig. 4). They
disappeared after the tsunami (right panel of Fig. 4). Ground truthing survey on 29 May didn’t verify seagrass beds, but
that on 25 October 2012 did small seagrass patches near the coast.
At Niranohama, seagrass beds were distributed before and after the tsunami. This was confirmed by the ground surveys
in October 2011, May and October 2012. We could sample seagrass at these surveys.
4. DISCUSSION
Seagrass beds disappeared at the area of bay head of Shizugawa Bay after the tsunami (Araita River mouth,
Sodegahama and Yoriki), but they remained near the bay mouth (Niranohama). Ground truthing verified
seagrass patches at Yoriki near the bay mouth in October 2012. The seagrass beds at the area of bay head
were seriously damaged and have not recovered although sandy bottom remained. On the other hand, some
seagrass beds could remain in Niranohama near the bay mouth and other has been recovering at Yoriki. This
indicates that the tsunami strongly damaged seagrass beds near the area of bay head in Shizugawa Bay. If
sufficient amount of seagrass seeds and sandy bottom remain, seagrass beds can recover after one year
through germination from the seeds. However, it doesn’t occur at Araita River mouth and Sodegahama. It is
suggested that the tsunami waves flush out seeds from these areas to the land or other areas. At Niranohama
and Yoriki, which are near the bay mouth, the tsunami didn’t damage seagrass beds completely. One of the
reasons are geomorphological features of thes areas that are situated behind the point projected from the coast
to the longitudinal axis of Shizugawa Bay near the northeast of the bay mouth. The tsunami waves might be
reflected at this point and be weakened at these areas.
Our study shows that the tsunami completely destroyed seagrass beds at the bay head but near the bay mouth
which were geomorphologically protected from the tsunami in Shizugawa Bay. It also indicates that satellite
Figure 3. Seagras (green), seaweed (yellow), sandy bed (carnation), turbid or deep water (blue) and land (black) at Araida River mouth
befor (left) and after (right) the tsunami.
Seagrass bed
Seaweed bed
Figure 4. Seagrass beds distribution at Yoriki before (left) and after (right) the tsunami. Colors are the same as in Figure 3.
This study was supported by the grant for Recovery from the Great East Japan Earthquake provided by The Mitsui &
Co., Ltd. Environment Fund. Authors thank to Minami-Sanriku Town Government and Shizugawa Branch of Miyagi
Fiheries Cooperative to help our field surveys. This study constitutes a part of studies under the Environment Research
and Technology Development Fund (S9) of the Ministry of the Environment in Japan and the Japan Science and
Technology Agency (JST/CREST).
REFFERENCE
[1] Costanza, R., d’Arge, R., de Groot, R., Farber, S., Grasso, M., Hannon, B., Limburg, K., Naeem, S.,
O'Neill, R., Paruelo, J., Raskin, R. G., Sutton, P. and Belt, M. van den., “The value of the world's
ecosystem services and natural capital,” Nature, 387 (6630), 253-260 (1997).
[2] Komatsu, T., “Influence of a Zostera bed on the spatial distribution of water flow over a broad geographical
area,” In: Kuo, J., Phillips, R. C., Walker, D. I. and Kirkman, H. (Eds.) [Seagrass Biology], University of
Western Australia, Nedlands, pp. 111-116 (1996).
[3] Komatsu, T. and Kawai, H., “Measurements of time-averaged intensity of water motion with plaster balls,”
Journal of Oceanography, 48, 353-365 (1992).
[4] Komatsu, T., Umezawa, Y., Nakaoka, M., Supanwanid, C. and Kanamoto, Z., “Water flow and sediment in
Enhalus acoroides and other seagrass beds in the Andaman Sea, off Khao Bae Na, Thailand,” Coastal Marine
Science, 29, 63-38 (2004).
[5] Komatsu, T. and Nakaoka, M., Water flow and sedimentation rate in seagrass beds off Khao Bae Na in Trang
Province, Thailand, Biologia Marina Mediterranea, 7, 240-242, (2000).
[6] Komatsu, T. and Yamano, H., “Influence of seagrass vegetation on bottom topography and sediment
distribution on a small spatial scale in the Dravuni Island Lagoon, Fiji,” Biologia Marina Mediterranea, 7, 243-
246 (2000).
[7] Komatsu, T. and Murakami, S., “Influence of a Sargassum forest on the spatial distribution of water flow,”
Fisheries Oceanography, 3, 256-266 (1994).
[8] Komatsu, T. and Kawai, H. and Sakamoto, W., “Influences of Sargassum forests on marine environments,”
Bulletin on Coastal Oceanography, 27, 115-126 (1990).
[9] Komatsu, T., Ariyama, H., Nakahara, H. and Sakamoto, W., “Spatial and temporal distributions of water
temperature in a Sargassum forest,” Journal of the Oceanographical Society of Japan, 38, 63-72 (1982).
[10] Komatsu, T., “Temporal fluctuations of water temperature in a Sargassum forest,” Journal of the
Oceanographical Society of Japan, 41, 235-243 (1985).
[11] Komatsu, T., Murakami, S. and Kawai, H., “Some features of jump of water temperature in a Sargassum
forest,” Journal of Oceanography, 52, 109-124 (1995).
[12] Komatsu, T., “Day-night reversion in the horizontal distributions of dissolved oxygen content and pH in a
Sargassum forest,” Journal of Oceanographical Society of Japan, 45, 106-115 (1989).
[13] Komatsu, T. and Kawai, H., “Diurnal changes of pH distributions and the cascading of shore water in a
Sargassum forest,” Journal of the Oceanographical Society of Japan, 42, 447-458 (1986).
[14] Komatsu, T., “Long-term changes in the Zostera bed area in the Seto Inland Sea (Japan), especially along the
coast of the Okayama Prefecture,” Oceanologica Acta, 20, 209-216 (1997).
[15] Aioi, K. and Komatsu, T., “A preliminary report on the recovery process of Zostera marina in Otsuchi Bay,
Northern Japan after disturbance by large atmospheric depressions,” In: Kuo, J., Phillips, R. C., Walker, D. I.
and Kirkman, H. (Eds.) [Seagrass Biology], University of Western Australia, Nedlands, pp. 319-322 (1996).
[16] Komatsu, T., Sagawa, T., Sawayama, S., Tanoue, H., Mohri, A. and Sakanishi, Y., “Mapping is a key for
sustainable development of coastal waters.” In: Ghenai, C. (Ed.), [Sustainable Development - Education,
Business and Management - Architecture and Building Construction - Agriculture and Food Security], In Tech
Publishing Co., Rijeka, pp. 145-160 (2012). Available from: http://www.intechopen.com/books/sustainable-
development-education-business-and-management-architecture-and-building-construction-agriculture-and-
food-security/mapping-is-a-key-for-sustainable-development-of-coastal-waters
[17] Komatsu, T., C. Igarashi, K. Tatsukawa, M. Nakaoka, T. Hiraishi and A. Taira: “Mapping of seagrass and
seaweed beds using hydro-acoustic methods,“ Fisheries Science, 68, sup. I, 580-583 (2002).