Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Determination of Caffeine in Soda Using HPLC
Determination of Caffeine in Soda Using HPLC
De Guzman BSChE-IV
Rizella C. Galban September 16, 2021
This experiment aims to determine the levels of caffeine concentration in soft drinks.
Quantitative estimation of caffeine concentration in drinks was performed by a High
performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). The experiment resulted with the highest suggested
caffeine content of 375 mg/l for energy drink. It was found out that the energy drink Redbull had
the highest concentration of caffeine. With diet soda and regular soda, as shown in Figure 3 and
4, that they are only slightly higher as compared to pure caffeine.
Introduction
The presence and amount of caffeine found in common beverages can be measured using
HPLC. To determine the actual quantity of caffeine in a beverage requires generating a
calibration curve from known concentrations of caffeine. Using the calibration curve for pure
caffeine, the concentration of caffeine in a caffeinated beverage, such as soda, coffee, tea, or any
other “modern” caffeinated beverage, can be determined.
Caffeine is a stimulant that is commonly found in many foods and drinks that we
consume. Concerns exist about the potential adverse health effects of high consumption of
dietary caffeine, especially in children and pregnant women. Recommended caffeine intakes
corresponding to no adverse health effects have been suggested recently for healthy adults (400 –
450 mg/day), for women contemplating pregnancy (300 mg/day), and for young children age 4 –
6 years (45 mg/day).
Figure 1
Related literature
Nishitani and Sagesaka (2004) developed an improved HPLC analytical method for
simultaneously determining caffeine and the eight catechins as well as other phenolic compounds
in tea. The proposed method provided additional ability to analyze phenolic compounds when
compared with former HPLC methods. This procedure was based on an improved reverse-phase
ODS column operated at 4°C, a binary gradient elution system of water-methanol-ethylacetate-
phosphoric acid, and a photodiode array detector. The quantitative measurement of eight
catechins and caffeine confirmed the validity of this proposed method. The detection limits of
these analytes ranged from 1.4-3.5 ng per injection volume. The recovery rates of the analyses
were in the range of 96-103%. The caffeine contents of Sencha, Matcha, Gunpowder, Tie Kuan
yin, and Darjeeling determined in this study were 2.94±0.007, 3.62±0.005, 2.61±0.059,
2.51±0.019, and 3.24±0.016% (dry weight), respectively (Nishitani and Sagesaka 2004).
Pura (2001) modified a HPLC method for determining caffeine and theobromine contents
in aqueous cocoa extracts. Instead of directly injecting the extracts on the column, the improved
method can successfully remove the interfering cocoa pigments by passing them through a Sep-
pak C18 cartridge which was also used to separate the theobromine and caffeine. This method
enhanced the efficiency of the column and prolonged its life. After this treatment, the recoveries
of caffeine and theobromine were 98.0-100.1 and 97.8-100%, respectively. The modified method
displayed good resolution and sharp peaks on chromatograms that favoured correct
determination of theobromine and caffeine.
HPLC method with diode array detection developed in our laboratory for the quantitative
determination of caffeine in carbonated beverages provides stable retention times and a detection
limit of 0.01 mg/L for a signal-to-noise ratio of 3. The mean recovery of caffeine was
99.25%.Wanyika discussed the levels of caffeine in certain coffee (Nescafe, africafe, Dorman's)
and tea (chai maramoja, kericho gold, sasini, final's premium) brands found in the Kenyan
market were determined using High performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) and UV/ Vis
spectrophotometer (Shimadzu) at 274 nm which gave a concentration of 471 .73 ± 1 96.92 ppm
(Nour, et. al)
Farah (2006) investigated the relationship between the Arabica coffee cup quality and the
contents of sucrose, caffeine, trigonelline, and chlorogenic acids. The researchers applied
reverse-phase HPLC analysis to determine each compound. Sucrose was analyzed by using 80%
acetonitrile and 20% water as the mobile phase and a refractive index detector. For analyzing
caffeine, the UV detector was set at 272 nm. The mobile phase was composed of 60% water and
40% methanol. The results demonstrated that the caffeine content was the highest in the highest
quality sample and the lowest content was found in the poorest quality sample. However,
trigonelline and 3,4dicaffeoylquinic acid gave a better indication of high quality coffee.
Chen and Wang (2001) analyzed the level of artificial sweeteners (sodium saccharin,
aspartame, acesulfame-K), preservatives (benzoic acid, sorbic acid), caffeine, theobromine, and
theophylline in carbonated cola drinks, fruit juice drink, fermented milk drink, preserved fruit,
and one pharmaceutical preparation by an ion exchange chromatography method. Analytes were
separated using an anion-exchange analytical column maintained at 40°C and detected by
wavelength-switching ultraviolet absorption. The detection limits ranged from 4-30 ng/mL for all
analytes. The average recoveries for samples ranged from 85 to 104%. In addition, the data
obtained from this method were in good agreement with those determined by reference HPLC
procedures.
Objectives
The purpose of this lab is to determine the amount of caffeine in a sample of soda using
HPLC.
To demonstrate High Performance Liquid Chromatography.
Experimental
Energy Drink (Redbull)
Materials
100ml Beaker x2 Spatula
100ml Graduated Cylinder Syringe w/45um Filter x6
Delivery Funnel 100ml Volumetric Flask x5
HPLC Vial x7 500 ml Volumetric Flask
10ml Pipette Weigh Boat
Pipette Pump Acetonitrile
Reversed Phase Column Red Bull
Solvent Filter Ultra-Pure Water
500ml Solvent Reservoir
Procedure:
Measure com Acetonitrile and transfer it to a 500mL Volumetric Flask.
Fill flask with Ultra-Pure Water and check the meniscus at eye-level.
Insert the flask to mix.
Set up the vacuum filter and switch it on.
Sample preparation
In order to identify that there is indeed caffeine in the beverage we need to run a pure
sample of caffeine to use pure sample caffeine took a small of it and put it on motor and
pestle grind up so it will dissolve faster.
Put it on about 3 mL of mobile phase which is used in instrument using a pipette, mix it
up so that it was dissolve fully.
To ensure its high quality enough to run through the instrument, filter it.
Use a 3 ml syringe and filter patch fill the syringe with beverage sample (regular soda,
diet soda) and mobile phase mixture.
In HPLC it need a small about so get about 1 to 2 ½ ml and attach the filter patch into the
syringe sample and transfer it into a new test tube.
Put it in the flask and shake it to combine it and transfer to a new test tube and repeat the
procedure for filtering and through the filter pad and covering it.
Set-up
Inject the pure caffeine into the system make sure that you don't capture bubble in the
syringe.
Inject it up to three times to run it through the system press auto zero in the first box then
press auto zero to the second box.
Switch the load position to the injection position go over to the computer.
The scan takes between 2 to 5 minutes during this time take the syringe used to inject the
pure caffeine into the sample and rinse it out with the motor phase.
After about 5 minutes switch off the load position so you're ready for the next sample
repeat the set up for the next sample beverage.
Each of the defectives has returned to the baseline and no longer rising go to the
acquisition and stop.
Stop the instrument and complete the scan.
After the run of the caffeine the beverage sample such as regular soda and diet soda was
continued to run.
After each sample was analyzed printed the graphs so it can analyze to see if there is
indeed caffeine its sample.
In the figure 3 and 4, it shows there that the Regular Soda there was a peak occurred at
3.13 and the Diet Soda had a peak of at 3.13. The sample such as Regular Soda and Diet Soda
are exactly similar to identify the caffeine. A pure sample shows in figure 2 that the Pure
Caffeine was run the peak at 3.123 ,therefore the regular soda and diet soda are successfully
identify that there was a caffeine in there.
Hazards
Chemical Hazards
Chemical hazard using chemical in lab is inevitable, but so can be injured or harm if the
chemicals are misused or mishandled.
Caffeine -harmful if swallowed
Methanol -highly flammable liquid and vapour
-Toxic if swallowed toxic in contact with skin
-Toxic if inhaled
-Cause damage to organs.
Theobromine - toxic if swallowed
-Avoid contamination.
Physical Hazards
Physical hazard such as electrical safety hazard ergonomic hazard associated with manual
material handling and equipment use handling sharp objects and basic housekeeping issues.
Radiation
Exposure to hazardous chemicals.
Accidental Spill- in the event of spill hazardous materials evacuate immediately, warn
other personnel, wear appropriate PPE, cleanup spill using appropriate spill kit if trained
to do so contains fill material in study plastic bag or sealed drum apply a hazardous waste
label.
Conclusion
The experiment resulted with the highest suggested caffeine content of 375 mg/l for
energy drink. It was found out that the energy drink Redbull had the highest concentration of
caffeine. With diet soda and regular soda, as shown in Figure 3 and 4, that they are only slightly
higher as compared to pure caffeine.
References
https://www.scribd.com/document/388526953/HPLC-Determination-of-Caffeine-in-Soda?
fbclid=IwAR2cJsHtUxsX03zZoR85Ikjd2Mxsjb8A6QBGNyO-Ce9j1n4S3jC3Noxp-hQ
https://studylib.net/doc/7471197/high-performance-liquid-chromatography---hplc?
fbclid=IwAR2ImP56ROxsvnTcT0V6egjJi6uUASJkUJmTVb52iITBhEp1wRmF2mfGbNA
http://classes.kvcc.edu/chm250/HPLC%20Determination%20of%20Caffeine%20in
%20Beverages.pdf
http://bepls.com/?
fbclid=IwAR3aRoTbt0HsC2iNoSuiBYqgBCeMqtcPrVZ13XoG_FagHTr9YbEM9jrTc_E
https://www.hindawi.com/journals/jspec/2020/3716343/?
fbclid=IwAR2iqwLBlHJ7VCuRxJOTu72mtnjPe0t1szU2YfkfDaQ-iUMALG8Jb0Cs3f8
https://www.ajer.org/?fbclid=IwAR1zebgLPCj7gLb-
fe5VaiEm95mejq36APjN1akOCBMDrADbuPIHEjnuDAA
Video Reference
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o6Dq9Z59vlg