Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Eapp Week-2 Q2
Eapp Week-2 Q2
OBJECTIVE At the end of the lesson, the learners are expected to:
1. Identify reasonable arguments.
2. Use appeal to support claims/stands
3. Value the importance of writing a properly cited factual
evidence.
LEARNING TASK 1:
LET’S GO BACK
Before we proceed to the lesson, let us try to answer thus activity to
test your prior knowledge on the topic to be taught on this lesson
LEARNING TASK 2:
LET’S SEE
I know you are eager to learn and discover new learning through
different learning tasks. This is time, engage yourselves in an
activity that will lead you to the lesson.
“PICTURE IT OUT”
Directions: Fill out the missing letters to form a word. Use the
pictures as your aide.
_E_EN_
1.
A___M__T
2.
__I_D_C_
3.
LEARNER’S ACTIVITY SHEETS (LAS)
Processing:
Discuss the word that you were able to form based on your
understading in the past lesson. Limit your answer in 1-3 sentences
only. Use a separate sheet of paper for your answer.
B. Emotional Appeals
This is the use of the audience’s feelings for the subject of the
paper such as anger, pity, and aversion to persuade. It may also
refer to values that the reader may identify with such as the
importance of family ties, hospitality and the bayanihan spirit.
Example:
How can you say that the government should not censor the
internet? Think of the poor children who might be exposed
to inappropriate content.
Sample Outline
I. Introduction
A. Introduce the topic
B. Provide background on the topic to explain why it is
important C. Assert the thesis (your view of the issue).
Your introduction has a dual purpose: to indicate both the topic
and your approach to it (your thesis statement), and to arouse your
reader’s interest in what you have to say. One effective way of
introducing a topic is to place it in context – to supply a kind of
backdrop that will put it in perspective. You should discuss the area
into which your topic fits, and then gradually lead into your specific
field of discussion (re: your thesis statement).
IV. Conclusion
A. Restate your argument
B. Provide a plan of action but do not introduce new information
SAMPLE:
A Position Paper on the Death Penalty in the Philippines
By:Almer S. Cuerda
Introduction
Death penalty is a kind of capital punishment which refers to the
sentence of death over a person who has been decided by the
government as guilty of committing capital crimes or offences.
Death penalty in the Philippines is stated on the Republic Act No.
7659 which is an act to impose the death penalty for certain
heinous crimes, amending for that purpose the revised penal laws,
as amended, other special penal laws, and for other purposes.
The death penalty can be traced back during the Pre-Spanish time
where Filipinos although infrequent, is already practicing it. The
Spanish also imposed it on locals who rebelled against them and it
was retained during the American period. The Martial Law in 1965-
1986, even though it was abolished during Cory Aquino’s term, it
was re-imposed when Ramos stepped into the presidency. It was
also present in Estrada and Arroyo’s term
(This paper present the pro and con of death penalty in the Philippines,
even though the death penalty is important to minimize the persons who
have got a very hard crimes, but death
penalty violates the person to live.)
Counter Arguments
LEARNER’S ACTIVITY SHEETS (LAS)
The overwhelming conclusion from years of deterrence studies is
that the death penalty is, at best, no more of a deterrent than a
sentence of life in prison. In fact, some criminologists
maintain that the death penalty has the opposite effect; that is
society is brutalized by the use of the death penalty, and this
increases the likelihood of more murder.
Society has always used punishment is discourage would be
criminals from unlawful action. Since society has the highest interest
in preventing murder, it should use the strongest punishment
available to deter murder, and that is the death penalty. If
murderers are sentence to death and executed, potential
murderers will think twice before killing for fear of losing their own
life.
Retribution is another word for revenge. Although our first instinct
may be to inflict immediate pain on someone who wrongs us, the
standards of a mature society demand a more measured response.
The emotional impulse for revenge is not a sufficient justification for
invoking a system of capital punishment. Our laws and criminal
justice system should lead us to higher principles that demonstrate a
complete respect for life, even the life of a murderer. Encouraging
our basest motives for revenge, which ends in another killing,
extends the chain of violence. The notion of an eye for an eye, or a
life, is a simplistic one which our society has never endorsed.
When someone takes a life, the balance of justice is disturbed. Unless
that balance is restored, society succumbs to a rule of violence. Only
the taking of the murderer’s life restores the balance and allows society
to show convincingly that murder is an intolerable crime which will be
punishment in kind. Retribution has its basis in religious values, which
have historically maintained that it is proper to take an ‘’eye for an
eye’’ and a life. Offenders deserve the worst punishment under our
system of law, and that is the death penalty.
There is no proof that any innocent person has actually been
executed since increased safeguards and appeals were added to
our death penalty system in the 1970s. Even if such executions have
occurred, they are very rare. Imprisoning innocent people is also
wrong, but we cannot empty the prisons because of that minimal
risk. If improvements are needed in the system of representation, or
in the use of scientific evidence such as DNA testing, then those
reforms should be instituted. However, the need for reform is not a
reason to abolish the death penalty. Besides, many of the claims of
innocence by those who have been released from death row are
actually, based on legal technicalities.
The death penalty alone imposes an irrevocable sentence. Once
an inmate is executed, nothing can be done to make amends if a
mistake has been made. There is considerable evidence
that many mistakes have been made in sentencing people to death.
Since 1973, at least 121 people have been released from death row
LEARNER’S ACTIVITY SHEETS (LAS)
after evidence of their innocence emerged. For every eight people
executed, we have found one person on death row who never
should have been convicted.
These statistics represent an in tolerate risk of executing the
innocent. Our capital punishment system is unreliable: two thirds of
all capital trials contained serious errors.
My Argument
Conclusion
LEARNING TASK 3:
LET’S TRY
“IT’S APPEAL, MY DEAR”
1.At a
schoolboard
meeting, one
of the
members
argues
against the
change to a
longer school
day. She cites
facts about
the number of
students
involved in
after school
activities and
estimates how
many hours of
work it would
require to
adjust
schedules
2. A friend of
yours tells her
story: She
works hard to
keep up her
grades and
also puts in
long hours at
home taking
care of her
younger
siblings. She
says her
opinion on
the longer
school day is
important
LEARNER’S ACTIVITY SHEETS (LAS)
because she
is a hard-
working
individual
who knows it
would mean
trouble for
many
students like
her.
3.Your social
studies
teacher gets
into the fray.
He cites case
studies about
schools that
have tried a
longer day
without
seeing a rise
in test scores.
He is against
the extension
4.You have
dinner with a
friend whose
parent is a
teacher. The
parent is in
favor of the
longer day
and says you
should agree
with her. Her
experience
teaching,
administering,
and
counseling at
schools all
over the
country
means that
she really
LEARNER’S ACTIVITY SHEETS (LAS)
knows her
stuff on this
issue
5.As a
member of
the
newspaper
staff, you are
charged with
researching
information
that will help
students
decide
whether a
longer school
day will be
helpful to
them. You
give them
examples of
the research
you have
conducted as
you have
reached your
conclusion.
_________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________.
LEARNER’S ACTIVITY SHEETS (LAS)
Evidence/s:
___________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________.
“LOCKDOWN DEBATE”
Directions: Organize a mini debate among your family members or
friends at home. Invite at least 2 participants for this activity. Ask the
participants to present and defend their stand on the issue by
providing reasonable arguments. You will serve then as moderator.
As moderator, observe how each participant defends their stand on
the given topic. Take note the appeals used, and the evidence
presented. Use the table below in taking those important information
LEARNER’S ACTIVITY SHEETS (LAS)
Name of Stand on Appeals Statement Evidence
Participants the Issue Used of Presented
(State (Write the Appeal (Write down
whether Appeal (Write the all the
they used by statement evidence
are in favor The of appeal that
or Participant that the the
not with the In participant participant
issue.) Defending used.) mentioned
his stand. Is to support
it logical? and
Emotional? defend his
Or, stand.)
ethical?)
Processing Question:
Who among the participants convinces you to take his/her side?
Why?
LEARNING TASK 6:
LET’S DO MORE
“KEY LIST”
Direction: Complete the sentences below by supplying the
correct word from the key list inside the box. Write your answer on
a separate sheet of paper.
Argument conclusion
References
Books
Otero, Rowel Ll. (2016), English for Academic and Professional Purposes Worktext Writing Center
Online sources
https://content.bridgepointeducation.com/curriculum/file/ec1a76e3-
4965-4f8d-a845-06501f4317b3/1/Argumentative%20Paper%20Sample.pdf
https://quizizz.com/admin/quiz/5ce43ed0f4e808001a2bc4d7/arguments-and claims
https://texasgateway.org/resource/revising-persuasive-essay-appropriate appeals-eg-descriptions-
anecdotes-case-studies
https://writing.colostate.edu/guides/page.cfm?pageid=1123&guideid=54