Management Dynamics

Dear Peer Reviewer,

Given your expertise in the field, we are requesting you to be a reviewer for the manuscript for The
Management Dynamics mentioned below. Please send the “Manuscript Review Report Form” as
well as the manuscript with your comments/suggestions to the editorial board via email at
rmc@shankerdevcampus.edu.np as early as possible. Wherever necessary and possible, you are
requested to make marginal comments on the manuscript and submit it with your filled in form.
Your comment regarding the manuscript will strongly be considered when the editorial board makes
the final decision. Your honest feedback will highly be appreciated.

You are also requested to strictly follow the policies and guidelines of the editorial board while
working on this peer review report form.
 The manuscript under review must be confidential. Please do not discuss any aspect of the
manuscript with any third party.
 Please ask the editor first in case you need to discuss the manuscript with a colleague.
 Please do not directly contact the author or authors of the manuscript.
 If you suspect that the manuscript is plagiarized or fraud, or has been a violation of the
accepted norms, please let the editorial board know, providing evidence in writing.

Editorial Board

Reviewer’s Report Form

Area of review Yes/No/NA

Abstract offers a clear picture of the purpose and findings/conclusions of the
article
The topic is of interest and relevant to the field
Research issue is raised clearly
The gap in research/literature is clearly stated and relevant (Significance of
topic is explained):
Selection of variable is appropriate to represent the research topic.
Research design, population and sampling, and tools are appropriate.
Data tables/figures support the article's narrative (if not applicable, select
n/a)
All information incorporated is factually accurate (for non-original research,
based on credible sources)
Important terms are defined when necessary
Industry-specific terms have been used appropriately
The practicality of findings/conclusions is clearly stated
Conclusion/implications are clear
References are credible
The majority of references are recent (5-7 years)
 Language
Format and Technical
Correctness
Originality/Novelty
Contribution to the Field
Any other (mention here)
……………………………..

Additional comments related to any areas you selected 'no' above:

Please make a summary and critique of the whole manuscript. Please make specific
comments (positive and negative) to each major part of the manuscript.

Any other personal opinion?

Recommendation. (Please tick in appropriate box below)

Reject Accept with major Accept with minor Accept as it is

revision revision

* If the manuscript is rejected, please mention the reasons for rejection here: