Paper Critic Rubric
“The Good, The Bad and the Ugly: Internet Use, Outcomes and the Role of Regulation in the Philippines”
TRAITS/POINTS 10 points
The proper format of the paper critic given by A part of the format for paper critic given by
Formatting the instructor were strictly followed.
Provides accurate and descriptive, concise
Summary summary of article information, effectively
summarizing main points of articles.
Gave complete overview of the article by
Introduction giving correct answers for the Introduction’s
questions.
Conclusions presents particularly strong or
Conclusion compelling closing statement that ties closely
to introduction.
Clearly articulated, well supported
Analysis statements of strengths and weaknesses of
the article.
Gave a strong and valid recommendations
Resolution for the article withs supporting statements.
Thoughtfully critiques author(s)’ main points,
Critique using evidence to back up arguments.
Critique is insightful and thorough.
Information is organized in a fully effective
manner; presents strong introduction,
Organization
expressive summary, and purposeful
recommendations.
Gave complete parts of the paper critic.
Completeness
The paper critic was submitted on time.
Date of Submission
BONUS Provides documentation to prove that his/her work was his/her own. (10 points)
8 points
the instructor were not strictly followed.
Summarizes main points of the articles
competently and accurately.
Gave an overview of the article but gave
incomplete answers for the Introduction’s
questions.
Effective conclusion is presented that
corresponds with introduction
Good attempt at analysis with some
supported statements of strengths and
weaknesses of the article.
Gave a valid recommendation for the article
withs supporting statements.
Critiques author(s)’ main points, using
evidence to back up arguments.
Information is organized competently with
supporting information and conclusion.
Gave an incomplete part of the paper critic.
The paper critic was submitted 2 to 3 days
after the due date.
5 points
2 or 3 parts of the paper critic given by the
instructor were not followed.
Fails to summarize articles effectively due to
omission of key points or inaccurate
characterization of information.
Gave an overview of the article but failed to
answers the Introduction’s questions.
Missing or inconsistent conclusion
Strengths and weaknesses of the article
were valid but not supported.
Failed to give valid recommendations for the
article.
Fails to effectively present critique; and/or
fails to use evidence to back up arguments.
Missing or ineffective elemnts.
2 or more parts of the paper critic was not
completed.
The paper critic was submitted 1 week after
the due date.