TNALC PRIORITY ONE - Reversing 2020 election fraud to secure future elections

Before we discuss HOW to reverse and overturn the fraudulent 2020 elections, remove those who
committed the fraud from office, and seat the rightful victors of legitimate 2020 votes, we must first
agree that we have no choice but to do so.

Complete election integrity and transparency is absolutely critical to freedom and liberty. It shouldn’t be
a partisan issue at all, but it is, because far too many Americans no longer care how they win, so long as
they win. Our government never has been and never will be any more decent or honest than Americans
themselves. If you want to know who is to blame for corrupt politics, it’s corrupt and disengaged
American citizens who simply do not care.

The simple truth is, there is no way to secure future election integrity without confronting the 2020
fraud, overturning the fraudulent results, and holding all responsible for it, fully accountable for their
actions, as well as all who had a duty to take action and failed to do so. We will either have lawful and
constitutional legitimate elections, or we will have no elections at all.

Sadly, far too many patriotic citizens have already given up on any notion that the 2020 fraud can be
reversed. They have joined the “let’s just move on” herd, ignoring the basic fact that so long as the 2020
fraud is allowed to stand, it is the “new norm” for all future elections. We have no choice but to right
this fatal wrong.

ARE UNLAWFUL ELECTIONS LEGITIMATE?

Simply stated, anything gained or derived from an act of fraud, is also tainted by that fraud, and
therefore, fraudulent in nature. In terms of elections, actions taken in the election process, which were
not lawful, or were specifically prohibited by law, can only result in an unlawful outcome. Such is the
case with the 2020 elections.

Numerous fraudulent acts occurred in many states throughout the 2020 election cycle, which resulted in
an unlawful outcome, affecting political races up and down the ballots, from top to bottom.

• Millions of fake, duplicate, illegal alien, and untraceable ballots were cast and counted
• Illegal ballot dumping occurred after voting deadlines in all of the swing states
• Voting software manipulations, both domestic and foreign, occurred in numerous states
• Legitimate ballots were dumped into ditches, trash bins, and landfills
• Dozens of State Election Laws were intentionally violated in all swing states

Understand that U.S. Elections are held by State’s and governed by State Election laws. Although
candidates are often seeking Federal offices, the means, methods, timing, and laws governing the
election processes are all State laws, varying from State to State.

Therefore, it is the laws in each State which must be strictly adhered to, or the elections in that state are
unlawful and therefore, illegitimate. If the problem exists in a state, then the solution for the problem
also exists within the state.
If there is evidence that the 2020 elections were in direct violation of your State Election Laws, then the
election in your state was unlawful, and so is the outcome of your state elections. Unlawful election
results cannot be legitimately certified or in the case of a Presidential Election, used to establish the
Electoral College Vote for your state.

The following State Officials hold individual and collective responsibility for advancing unlawful or
fraudulent election results to a fraudulent conclusion…

1. The State Attorney General

2. The Secretary of State
3. The State and County Elections Board
4. The Governor
5. The State Political Party Officials
6. The State Legislature

Cities with evidence of the most widespread election fraud in 2020 (in no particular order)

1. Philadelphia PA
2. Pittsburg PA
3. Detroit MI
4. Phoenix AZ
5. Atlanta GA
6. Los Angeles CA
7. San Francisco CA
8. Madison WI
9. Raleigh/Durham NC
10. Newark NJ

These ten cities within eight States are most responsible for the massive election fraud that took place in
the 2020 election cycle. Without investigating and correcting the events that happened in these cities
and states, there is literally no chance of securing any future elections.

ARE FRAUDULENT ELECTIONS EVER OVERTURNED?

The answer is yes, although throughout history, it has been somewhat infrequent. As recent as just last
week, a Judge overturned Eatonville Council election results due to just 2 ‘illegal’ votes. The original
election was decided by just one vote a year ago. A year later, two votes were confirmed to be “illegal”
and removed from the vote tally, resulting in the Judge overturning that election, with just a one vote
victory for the candidate declared the loser a year ago. So, yes, it does happen more often than people
think.

In this case, the election was overturned by a court, which tossed two “illegal” votes from the tally,
resulting in the overturning of the declared winner from a year ago.

“Councilman Tarus Mack had been declared the winner of the March 2020 election by a single
vote over Marlin Daniels, 269 to 268.
 In March, Daniels filed a complaint against Mack and the Orange County Canvassing Board,
alleging an elaborate voter fraud scheme orchestrated by a “self-interested cabal” led by former
Mayor Anthony Grant. According to the ruling filed in Orange County Circuit Court this week, the
judge agreed that at least two votes in the election were cast illegally.” STORY

ARE THE COURTS THE BEST SOLUTION?

Yes and no… Because all elections are governed by State Election Laws, and administered by State
Officials, the right court for any serious challenge to fraudulent election results is the State Supreme
Court, not a Federal Court.

An unlawful or unconstitutional decision by your State Supreme Court can be challenged or appealed in
a Federal court. But the correct first stop for proper adjudication is your State Supreme Court.

NOTE: In May of 2020, TNALC was hired to research and work behind the scenes on a case challenging Michigan Governor
Whitmer’s “unlawful and unconstitutional” COVID19 Executive Orders. TNALC advice right away was to move the case from
Federal Courts and the Lower State Courts directly to the Michigan State Supreme Court. However, while they agreed in
principle, lawyers involved in those cases had already filed in the improper courts and refused to correct it by moving the cases
to the Michigan Supreme Court.

As good fortune would have it, a Federal Court Judge also advised case attorney’s that the cases they had filed in Federal
Courts, belonged in the State Supreme Court, and he moved the cases there himself by Federal Court Order in September 2020,
six months after TNALC had advised the same.

The Michigan Supreme Court was a 4-3 liberal leaning court, with an enormous amount of political pressure on it from the
Whitmer administration. But due to the arguments presented being constitutionally and legally sound, the high court had no
real choice but to rule in our favor, declaring Governor Whitmer’s tyrannical orders both “unlawful” and “unconstitutional,” in a
7-0 ruling on October 2, 2020. The court further ruled in our favor, that the 1945 Law Whitmer was hiding her orders under,
was also “unlawful” and “unconstitutional,” in a 4-3 decision split on political lines.

Whitmer tried to appeal these high court decision twice and lost both of those as well. (SOURCES)

So, this is a good example of the proper filing and arguments in the proper court, being a solid potential
solution for wrongdoing within a State, including when the wrongdoing is at the hands of government
and political officials. The election just overturned in the Florida City Council race also provides and
positive look into how the courts can be used to right these types of wrongs, when done properly. In the
recent Florida case, the court was simply asked to determine whether or not those two votes were
“lawful.” The court determined they were not.

WHAT IS THE RIGHT STARTING POINT THOUGH?

Ever since Bush v. Gore in 2000, the courts, including the U.S. Supreme Court, have been reluctant to
weigh in on election fraud. No matter how a court rules, they are seen as “political” in nature by one
side or the other of the case.

In the Bush v. Gore case, the U.S. Supreme Court was never asked to “declare a winner.” Instead, the
high court was engaged to “stop the steal” that was underway in Florida, being allowed to continue by
the Florida Supreme Court. In several initial vote counts, Bush had won the Florida Electors over and
over again. However, the Gore campaign refused to concede the race and instead, wanted an endless
string of recounts, each knocking more and more “hanging chads” from the ballots to the floor, inching
their way towards victory with each fallen chad.

After numerous recounts, the U.S. Supreme Court simply ruled that they could not continue knocking
chads on the floor and recounting until Gore liked the outcome. The court did not “decide” the election,
they simply “stopped the steal” that was underway in Florida.

In this case, the high court was really the only venue they could use, other than the Florida Supreme
Court, which had already allowed the attempted steal to continue, despite watching the chads falling to
the floor on live TV.

The courts prefer NOT to decide elections. In fact, our Constitution doesn’t really even give the courts
any power to do so. However, our courts are supposed to uphold the Constitution and Law, including
when it comes to whether or not an election was held lawfully, honestly, with integrity.

Yet this is not really the proper first step in enforcing election laws, it’s more the last resort. None of us
really want elections to be decided by unelected and almost entirely unaccountable judges.

Instead, we must follow the constitutional processes for proper and lawful elections.

1. What do State Laws say is the lawful way for elections to be carried out? If these laws were not
followed, then the election was “unlawful,” period. No excuses, no reasoning for violating those
laws is good enough. They were either lawful or they weren’t.
2. If the election process was itself unlawful, then so is the outcome of that election.
3. Anyone and everyone involved in “certifying” unlawful election results within each state, can
and must be held accountable for doing so.
4. Anyone and everyone involved in issuing any “orders” that caused the election to be
administered “unlawfully” can and must also be held fully accountable, including everyone in
the itemized list above.
5. There is no one but “the people” to hold anyone accountable. If “the people” are not going to
hold anyone accountable, then no one is accountable, and fraud is our “new norm.”
6. Free, fair, and transparent election audits are the only way to determine whether or not fraud
was a part of the election process. Audits should not be confused with simple recounts.
Counting the same fraudulent ballots again and again, will still result in a fraudulent outcome.
7. When election audits uncover “unlawful” and/or “fraudulent” activities in an election, the
people responsible for administering and certifying that election must be immediately notified,
investigated as to how and why this occurred on their watch, and determine whether or not
criminal acts were committed in a breach of public trust, by these election officials.
8. Those responsible for certifying unlawful elections results, must also be investigated, and
prosecuted for their unlawful criminal acts.
9. In the case of a Presidential election, the Electors who cast an Electoral College vote based upon
fraudulent election activities within their state, must be recalled and removed, cancelling their
Electoral College vote and a new group of Electors must be chosen, issuing new Electoral College
votes based upon the “lawful” election results, all unlawful ballots removed from the process.
10. The new “lawful” Electoral College votes must then be delivered to Congress, withdrawing the
previous fraudulent votes, and replacing them with “lawful” Electoral College votes.
This is the “constitutional” process for overturning and reversing the 2020 election fraud, and it must be
done in each state where evidence of fraudulent or unlawful election processes exist. The role of the
courts here, is to uphold and affirm the “right of the people” to make certain that their elections are fair,
transparent, and free from fraud and unlawful balloting, or ballot counting.

As many already know, massive fraud took place in the 2020 elections, on a scale never before seen.
Evidence of that fraud is readily available and overwhelming. So far, many courts have declined to even
hear that evidence, for the reasons stated above. That’s should come as no surprise since the
Constitution really doesn’t grant the courts any power over elections.

The place to deal with this disaster in within each state, led by “the people” in each state, where
evidence of election fraud or unlawful election practices is available. The place to deal with this is within
the constitutional election process itself, relying upon the courts to only uphold the right of “the people”
to do so.

TNALC PARTNERS

TNALC is calling upon all of our supporters and partners to volunteer to participate in a working group
within your state, as you use the information provided by TNALC to reinstate election integrity within
your state.

EMAIL TNALC HERE TO VOLUNTEER

There is no need to email TNALC explaining that “no one is going to do anything.” The only people we
are looking to “do something” is YOU. You’re right, the politicians are not ever going to do anything.
Now, if YOU (we) aren’t going to do anything either, then nothing is going to get done.

NOTE: Enormous investigative work has been done by numerous groups, agencies and state level
lawmakers which has established a significant volume of evidence of massive fraud by numerous means
and in numerous states. My Pillow Guy Mike Lindell has spent millions of his own resources to uncover
election fraud and he has prepared a U.S. Supreme Court case in an effort to deliver that evidence to the
high court. TNALC is not in a position to endorse that effort at this time. However, we do want to make
the information available to the public for your consideration.

You can view the 82-page complaint HERE, view their Exhibits HERE, and check out their plan HERE.