LN01 INU Flooding

You might also like

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 16

Phase change heat transfer

Lecture 01

Ho Seon Ahn, Department of Mechanical Engineering, INU

Phase change heat transfer, Lecture Note No. 01 1


FLOODING

Phase change heat transfer, Lecture Note No. 01 2


Flooding - Background
 Counter current flow limitation (CCFL) or flooding

 Studied since 1930’s by chemical engineers

 Lots of previous works by mechanical and chemical


engineers

 Theoretical approach by G.B. Wallis, Richter, G.F. Hewitt

 Experimental data by Bankoff, Celata, ……

 It is of importance in HVAC&R engineers due to oil return


criteria

Phase change heat transfer, Lecture Note No. 01 3


Flooding - Phenomenology

 Let’s consider a counter current flow, where liquid phase flow downward and
gas phase flow upward.
 Increased gas velocity retards downward liquid flow and some roll waves may be developed
on the liquid film.
 If gas phase velocity reach a certain critical value the counter current flow regime does not
persist and it may change into a chaotic flow pattern.
 Under this situation, the downward liquid flow drastically reduces and the supplied liquid
starts to flow upward with the gas.
 This critical gas velocity is called flooding gas velocity or CCFL velocity.
Flooding
jl*
jg

jg ↑
0  1

jl
Flow reversal Wallis Diagram

Phase change heat transfer, Lecture Note No. 01 4


Flooding
 Applications : steam generator,
particulate scrubber, chemical
process plant, NPP ECCS

 Characteristics
 geometry effect
 length effect
 non-dimensional number
 limited range of models

 Three popular mechanisms


 drop dynamics (early)
 film flow dynamics (majority)
 wave dynamics (recent)

Phase change heat transfer, Lecture Note No. 01 5


Flooding – Theoretical Approaches
 Occurrence of a standing wave on the liquid film (Shearev and
Davidson, 1965)
 Smallest velocity to sustain a standing wave

 Liquid Film Instabilities


 James and Cetinbudakar, 1969
 Phase velocity=-interfacial velocity
 Cetinbudakar and James, 1969
 Amplification factor,

 No net flow in the Liquid Film


 Grolmes et al. 1974
 Definition of the flooding point
 Dimensional formula

 Droplet entrainment
 Dukler and Smith, 1976

Phase change heat transfer, Lecture Note No. 01 6


Flooding Mechanism

 Liquid Film hanging by gas y
z

flow z

 Force balance i 
z  i       y l gz     y l g   i
 If film is laminar u
du du   y  l g  i
     Gas Liquid
l l
l
dy dy

 Integrating B
du  l g  y2  i y
u   y    C
dy l  2  l y=, u=0 A

 If y=0, u=0, c=0 u(i=0)


i ↑
l g  y2  i y
u  y    i = 0
l  2  l

Phase change heat transfer, Lecture Note No. 01 7


Flooding Mechanism
 Liquid Film hanging by gas flow
l g  y2 
 If i=0, u  i  0    y  
l  2 
1/ 3 z 
  l g 3
 6 Q  y
 Ql   udy      l l 
0 6l  l g  z
 Point A (u=0, at y=)
l g   2   i l g   2   i i 
uA  0          
l  2  l l  2  l
1 u
    l g
i
A

2
Gas Liquid
 Point B, net liquid flow is zero
  l g 3  i  2 2
Ql  0   udy    i   l g
0 6l 2 l 3

 i
flooding

real
  iabove Growth of waves on the liquid film

Phase change heat transfer, Lecture Note No. 01 8


Flooding
 Phenomenological definitions :
 liquid drop entrainment
 liquid flow reversal
 zero liquid penetration
 liquid bridge
 chaotic flow pattern
 sudden change of gas pressure
across the test section

 Various definitions may


influence measurements

Phase change heat transfer, Lecture Note No. 01 9


Flooding - Correlation
 Flooding Experiments

Phase change heat transfer, Lecture Note No. 01 10


Flooding - Correlation
 Consider Vertical Slug Flow
 In general j gl   1    u
n

 Lecture said for slug flow n0


1/ 2
 gd 
u  0.35  
 Drift flux  l  ug
j gl  1    j g  jl   j  j g dj
 j gl

d
 Flooding Limit (CCFL) ul
dj (jl)*
j gl   j  j g  gl   j g   1    u
n

d jg
dj gl
j g  j gl    n 2 1   n 1 u  0 dj gl
d j
n0 d
dj gl
jl   j gl  1     n  11   n u  u
d (jg)*
j
j g*  jl*  u 0  1l
Phase change heat transfer, Lecture Note No. 01 11
Flooding - Correlation
 Wallis (1961)
1/ 2
 gd 
u ~ C  

 l 

jg jl
j g*  1/ 2
, jl*  1/ 2
 gd   gd 
    

 g   l 

* 1/ 2 * 1/ 2
j g  j l  C0 or C11/ 2 ~ C0  0.8

Phase change heat transfer, Lecture Note No. 01 12


Flooding - Correlation
 Wallis (General)
jg j g  g1/ 2
j 
*

g
 gd 
1/ 2
gd 1/ 2
 
  g  j g* ~ Froude Number 
Inertial Forces
jl j l  l1/ 2 Buoyancy Forces
j 
*

l
 gd 
1/ 2
gd 1/ 2
  
 l 

 l gd 3  Buoyancy Forces
NL  ~ Gr  If NL>103, m=1
 
l
2 1/ 2 Viscosity Forces
If NL<10, m=5.6(NL)-0.5

j  * 1/ 2
g  m j  * 1/ 2
l C
C=F(NL, inlet and outlet condition)
0.7<C<1.0

No Length Effect in this type of correlation

Phase change heat transfer, Lecture Note No. 01 13


Flooding - Correlation
 Kutateladze Type Correlation

jg jl
Kg  1/ 4
Kl  1/ 4
 g   g 
 2   2 
  g   l 

Bubbly Flow

Pushkina and Sorokin (1969)

K g  3.2

Phase change heat transfer, Lecture Note No. 01 14


Flooding - Correlations
Wallis Parameter Kutateladze Number
0 .5 0.25
 k    k2 
jk  jk 
*
 K k  jk  
 gD   g 
 Characteristic : characteristic length surface tension
 D > 5cm : poor good
 D < 5cm : good poor
 Preference : circular circular, annular
annular rectangular, porous
rectangular complicated
 Both are equally used in CCFL correlation development
 No guidance for better choice

 Whalley (1985): One single optimized correlation

0.18 0.25
.    d 2 g 
 g 
K g  0.286 Bo 0.26 Fr 0.22 1  l  , Bo  , Fr  jl  
 w   4   
Water viscosity at room temperature ~10-3Pa.s

Phase change heat transfer, Lecture Note No. 01 15


Flooding – Parametric Effects
 Entrance Phenomena
(Ug)A|flooding < (Ug)B|flooding

(Ug)A
(Ug)B
Sharp Entry
Smooth Entry

 Length Effect Gas. FR

 Highly turbulent  No length effect L↑


 Lower turbulent  Length Effect

Liq. FR
Phase change heat transfer, Lecture Note No. 01 16

You might also like