WWA Day I

HTF Structure

- Our HTF will determine our overall trend

-H4 and below will determine momentum + intra day LH

- Momentum timeframes are M5 and M1 This LH is

only deemed
- Every timeframe has its own market structure,
LH a LH if it creates a LL

LL

putting them together and having an understanding

LH
of what our HTF (D/W) and lower timeframes LL

(HH and below) are saying will help us determine

if we with be trading a retracement or a
LL

continuation.

Daily
HTF POI
MMM =

MW =
H4
① Look for a BOS
② look for a Wyckoff schematic
BOS

③ Look at LTF Structure

-

Bos

Look for RTO's or mitigation

RTO
④
Bos

Bos
LOOK for
BOS

accumulation

Continuation

Weekly Daily

Complex pullback 4HR 1HR

Daily Retracement Continuation

LH Retracement
-
Price needs to break

Weekly Daily
i don't care it didn't
break
this be bullish
at

to
(
"
× On H4

Bos only counts if body breaks

4HR 1HR
(
×
structure body breaks body)
LL

When doing analysis remember market

LH Daily
complex pullback

structure is different on every TF

LH 4 HR
LH

HH
H
LH

- if You want a weekly continuation

LL
LH

LL Bos

HL

to the down side the daily TF LL

LL

should be bullish for the

Retracement.
- understanding when You are trading if price fails to mane a new LL or HH expect a shift
Retracement and continuations are important on that specific TF always
 WWA Day I
Imbalances

Questions or thoughts people

have about imbalances.

too
many sellers - imbalaces are not reliable, You can use it as
g something that exists but not as an entry

F the market isn't obligated too fill these

levels, it is not Justified
- You never know where price will go into
the FVG, it can go 50% of 100%
fill or Just run through it
- However it can be extremely profitable, lets see..

- The concept of efficient PA Just shows

that the buyers and sellers both had
a fair chance at liquidity.
§ = Imin

him
% = I 5 min

% = 4h r

refined imbalance - The concept of inefficient PA shows

that there was pure power in one direction.
Price comes back to these areas to fill
any liquidity that was skipped.

How do I know which Order block would work?

BOS
- Price inefficiency is an imbalance
-This imbalance already gave the in Price, everything in the market
Market enough power to push up
so the OB below is of no use as
needs to be balanced

Bag
market does not need to push - These are Just voids in Price
higher.
- Price returns to these inefficiency
- You can use this to vent out to mate it efficient
imbalance
order blocks.
501 level
Bos
 WWA Day t
Institutional Theory

How IFC’s are made

Buy sell -They need to mitigate their buys

retail
at break even, the close their
200K 200K

liquidity Broker 200 K

200K
200 K
200K

Provider
trades and move on. (digital footprint)
200K 200K

200K 200K
- Swap

- This is known as mitigation

- spread
-
100 pips t 100 pips
- commissions

- They are present on all timeframes

Build
Liquidity

IFC = institutionally funded candle

loads of contracts sold here SL

Bn and Bn of dollars
- LP buy it off someone. 50% average level

- they build in there entries

entries
mitigated
Zpoips -

RTO
SL

BOS

100 pips

How do we know one organic and one is an IFC?

- if its an IFC significant orders were pushed into the
market
- if its not true price would Just run through it.
- these candles always needs some sort of
mitigation.
- a structural understanding is needed to identify the IFC

EQL'S
Liquidity +
EQH’s

>

$ SL More orders freed up

- SL hunt
- Better price to sell.

£
$ SL More
SL confluence
EQL - Algo's create
(Just a tight these
Free up
Zone)
money
 WWA Day T
Smart Money t FU

FU candle
- how do You know which IFC works and
what a FU candle is?
H orders in drawdown if
It’s a true IFC it
needs mitigation
^ which one needs to be mitigated? Hunt
H
SL SL

Entry

-FU candles are a type of IFC's

EQH

(high probability) w

IFC

"
IQH 30
- reefing
er

Institutions dont need retail money

unless the liquidity is along their way

The 3 M's
Means → lack of capital (institutions)
Motive → buy at resistance X (institutions)
Mindset → Liquidity (institution)

Fu candle
IFC

I
FU candles don't need
Fu candles take liquidity
to tap into Ifc's
90% retail
shor t
MFX Book . com

shows
this
 WWA Day 2
IFC
engulfing POI FU candles + Orderflow

how to know if IFC's are valid

IFC 's

mitigation 2
IFC 's
mitigation Bz mitigation

the process of mitigation actually

creates New IFC's

H
BOS on LTF

7am-10am (NY time)

- cross over between London and New York
↳ Highest volume, time to take trades.

BE refining IFC’s
mitigation

µµ
IFC
' '

\
I ,

(
I
engulfed

Banker Block - refine the candle

before the engulfing.
- conclusively engulfed.
'Banker block'
IFCIFU
← IFC formed as a
result of a mitigation
% mitigation

BOS

YOU need to be flexible

with all timeframes too

Beariosrhderflow
see the true picture.
✓ ✓ ideal entry

if an IFC leaves imbalance

No Bos
Take on Zones of doubts and it is mitigated it is
valid
 WWA Day 2
Wyckoff schematics

Buying upthrust
climax

Accumulation
seconda r y

✓
secondary test
#

PS LPSY

SOS
Automatic LPSY
Reaction

\
Automatic
pg LPSY
Reaction
(PSY

qq.qga.se#s+aarysqgzaary
Distribution
.es,
spring

Type 1 Accumulation ( HOCH

CHOCH
( HOCH UTAD
SOSIJAC
UT test
CHOCH
BC

①
"
"

Buasueiree
"

Psy
•
ar
MSOW
ST ICE
Lps

Type 1 Distribution
SC MSOW
ST as SOW
Test

Spring

w
Type 2 Accumulation Sos
( HOCH
(No Spring) CHEH
CHEH

.."
CPS UT

CHOCH SOSIJAC BC LPSY

UA

Ps
""

aim .

Type 2 Distribution
LPS
MSOW
Sc

(No UTAD)
STASSOW

✓
watch the day 2
Wyckoff videos .

went
10% retrace

70% retracewent
-
i
PS HR retracement
95%

"" " ""m

as

change
↳

L -
-

ST Test
high -

has the same property as

spring → spring
volume candle
an Fu
 WWA Day 2
LTF Entries

Type of entries
MS -
MI TF

IHR TF

iiiy
HTFPOI BOS entrs
"
Entry FU
H t t

MV
entry -

BOS

IFC Bos

KEI
imbalances

HoIShOWderS HTff
# -Testent#

BOS
Distribution