Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Project: Information Systems Department
Project: Information Systems Department
PROJECT
INTEGRATION
MANAGEMENT
management processes
project management
knowledge area
Information Systems Department 4
PROJECT INTEGRATION MANAGEMENT
For this activity you need to make a SWOT analysis for the
College of Medicine, or the College of Computer & Information
Sciences based on your personal treats.
Strengths
We have numerous contact in the film industry.
Weaknesses
No accounting/financial experience.
OPPORTUNITIES
Current client has mentioned a large project.
THREATS
selection.
23
succeed.
2- Use Realistic Methods to Select Projects: 2.1 Focusing on broad organizational needs
2- Use Realistic Methods to Select Projects: 2.1 Focusing on broad organizational needs
Improve safety
Increase morale
Another is:
Positive NPV means the return from project exceeds the cost of
capital.
The higher the NPV, the better project to select.
Calculate
NPV
NPV = ∑t=0..n At / (1 + r)t
Estimated Costs &
Benefit (t) equals the year of the cash flow.
(n) is the last year of the cash flow.
Discount (A) is the amount of cash flow each
Rate year.
(r) is the discount rate.
Information Systems Department 35
PROJECT SELECTION
Discount rate 8%
Project-1 Year 0 Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Total
Calculate NPV
Project 1:
ROI = $20/ $7580 = 0.0026 = 0.26%
Project 2: Select
ROI = $2300 / $7160 = 0.32 = 32% project 2
The table shown below lists the cash flow of two projects.
1. Find the NPV, ROI
2. Which project should be selected, and why?
Year0 Year1 Year2 Year3 Year4
Discount Rate = 0.08
Project1
Costs $120,000 $100,000 $75,000 $50,000 $50,000
Benefits $0 $60,000 $100,000 $120,000 $180,000
Project2
Costs $75,000 $90,000 $30,000 $30,000 $20,000
Benefits $0 $85,000 $100,000 $75,000 $50,000
Track the net cash flow across each year to determine the
year that net discounted benefits overtake net discounted
costs. [cash flow = discount benefits – discount costs]
Notes:
Some numbers in the table surrounded with braces which mean negative number.
Negative numbers mean loss, and Positive numbers mean gain.
Information Systems Department 48
PROJECT SELECTION
2-
2- Use
Use Realistic
Realistic Methods
Methods to
to Select
Select Projects:
Projects: 2.3.
2.3. Performing
Performing Financial
Financial Analysis
Analysis
2.3.3
2.3.3 Payback
Payback Analysis
Analysis Example 2: Steps
Example 2: Steps to
to perform
perform payback
payback analysis
analysis
Payback
year
Payback year
benefits
Discount costs $2,000 $1860 $1720 $1580 $7160
Cash flow ($1,000) $0 $720 $1580 $1,300
Net cash flow ($1,000) ($1,000) ($280) $1300
The table shown below lists the cash flow of two projects.
1. Find the Payback for each project.
2. Which project should be selected, and why.
2- Use Realistic Methods to Select Projects: 2.4 Using Weighted Scoring Model (WSM)
2- Use Realistic Methods to Select Projects: 2.4 Using Weighted Scoring Model (WSM)
2- Use Realistic Methods to Select Projects: 2.4 Using Weighted Scoring Model (WSM)
Addressing problems
Opportunities, or directives
2- Use Realistic Methods to Select Projects: 2.4 Using Weighted Scoring Model (WSM)
2- Use Realistic Methods to Select Projects: 2.4 Using Weighted Scoring Model (WSM)
03
Identify criteria
important to the
01 project selection
process.
Identify criteria
important to the
project selection
process
04
02
Multiply the scores
Assign weights
by the weights and
(percentages) to each
get the total weighted
criterion
scores
PROJECT SELECTION
2- Use Realistic Methods to Select Projects: 2.4 Using Weighted Scoring Model (WSM)
2- Use Realistic Methods to Select Projects: 2.4 Using Weighted Scoring Model (WSM)
Example 1
Example 1
Criteria Weight Project 1 Project 2 Project 3 Project 4
Project 4
Supported Key business objectives 25% 90 90 50 20
Has strong internal sponsor 15% 70 90 50 20
Project 3 Has strong Customer support 15% 50 90 50 20
Uses realistic level of technology 10% 25 90 50 70
Project 2
Can be implemented in one year or
5% 20 20 50 90
Project 1
less
Provides positive NPV 20% 50 70 50 50
0 20 40 60 80 100
Has low risk in meeting scope, time,
10% 20 50 50 90
and coast goals
Weighted Project Score 100% 56 78.5 50 41.5
2- Use Realistic Methods to Select Projects: 2.4 Using Weighted Scoring Model (WSM)
Example 2
Example 2
Criteria Weight Project 1 Project 2 Project 3 Project 4
×
Market share effect 10% 70 70 50 30 0.1 × 70 = 7
Competition 5% 30 70 70 70 0.05 × 70= 3.5
Risk 10% 10 30 50 30 0.1 × 10 = 1
Product fit 5% 70 70 50 0 0.05 × 70 = 3.5
Strategic plan alignment 15% 50 50 70 30 0.15 × 50 = 7.5 +
Customer Support 20% 50 50 30 30 0.2 × 50 = 10
Payback 10% 70 70 30 10 0.1 × 70 = 7
NPV 15% 70 50 30 30 0.15 × 70 = 10.5
ROI 10% 50 50 30 10 0.1 × 50 = 5
Total 100% 53
Project Selection Methods: (WSM)
Example 2
Criteria Weight Project 1 Project 2 Project 3 Project 4
The following table describes four projects in terms the scores in a set of evaluation criteria.
1. Find the WSM for each project.
2. Which project should be selected?
1 3 5
Planning Monitoring
& Control
A summary schedule.
A comments section.
Information Systems Department 70
PROJECT INTEGRATION MANAGEMENT
Project
Charter
Project titles Project A project Project Planned Role and sign-off Comments
and date of manager’s summary objectives success approach responsibilitie section section
authorizatio name and schedule criteria for s matrix
n contact managing
informatio the project
n
Input:
Project charter
Conditions that are not under the control of the project team, that influence,
constrain or direct the project. Are inputs to most planning processes.
Examples:
• Organizational culture, structure, and governance
• Government or Industry standards
• Political climate
• Marketplace conditions
Input:
Project management plan
Approved change requests
Enterprise environmental factors
Organizational process assets
Information Systems Department 80
PROJECT INTEGRATION MANAGEMENT
Expert judgment
Meetings
Outputs:
Deliverables
Change requests
Inputs:
The project management plan
Forecasts
Validated changes
Outputs:
Change requests
Work performance report
Inputs:
Project management plan
Work performance
Information
Change requests
Enterprise environmental factors
Organizational process assets
Outputs:
Approved change requests
A change log
Updates to the project management plan
Updates to project documents
Inputs:
Project management plan
Accepted deliverables
Organizational process assets
Outputs: