Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Structure: 403 Princip Es O # I A N Foreign Policy
Structure: 403 Princip Es O # I A N Foreign Policy
1 I
10.0
10.1
40.2
Objectives
Introduction
Principles of Ind n Foreig
I'
40.3 Evolution of Ind d Foreig
40.4 Non-aligned Mo arnent I/
40.5 Disarmament
40.6 Pakistan
40.6. I Karhnur
40.6.1 Indur Rncr 'drcr lhpr
40.7 Chino d
40.6.3 M~litaryAI to Pakr\tan 4
l
40.9 West Asia
-
403 PRINCIP~ESO ~ # ~ ~ I AFOREIGN
N POLICY -
i
Th9 power configurati ,thus, fqm a bi-polar to a multipolar world. Over a
period of time, India t ac degree the status of a military power that
could not be easily ign ed. Indi licy had to change its postures accordingly,
though the basic postul tes kame. The Indian foreign policy is very much
conditioned by:
40.5 DJSARMAMENT
I
India has always worked for disarmament at the international level. When the Charter of
I the United Nations was beiig framed, India kept itself closely associated with that process.
! In order to achieve international disarmament, Article 11 of the Charter said, that the
Geneial Assembly "may consider the general principles of cooperation in the maintenance
of international peace and sechrity, including the principles governing disarmament and the
regulation of armaments and may make recommendations with regard to such principles to
the members or the Security Council or both". India supported the formation of Atomit
Energy Commission in 1947 and sponsored Eighteen Nations Disarmament Conference in
1962. The United States and the Soviet Union differed on the process of complete or
partial disarmameneand thereby, the issue remained unresolved. India was a great critic of
nuclear ~roliferationand s ~ o k eagainst it at the UN and other world forums.
- -
Check Your Progress 1
1 List the three important principles of Indian foreign policy. (Answer in about 5 lines)
2 What do you understand by non-alignment? What are the principles that a non-align-4
country has to follow? (Answer in about 10 lines)
Independent Indin: Towards
Development 1947-1964
......................................
on international issues. ( )
policy is the promotion of world peace. ( )
ions created by 'bloc
40.6.1 Kashmir
India and Pakistan. Pakistan refused to
October 1947 and sponsored a tribal
action, supported by the local population led by
Sqikh Abdullah, to
odged by India with the Security Council
1948,resulting into a cease-fmon 1
offer to hold plebiscite in
finally withdrew in 1955 because of the
diplomatic battles for Kashmir were fought in
ms, no hot war took place between India and
s to defy any solution and remains a
40.7 CHINA /
After India became independent, one of the first countries with which it established
diplomatic relations was the Nationalist Government of China led by Chiang Kai Shek. But
when the Nationalist Government was overthrown by the Communists in 1949, India
recognised the new government led by Mao Tse Tung on 30 December 1949. India
thereafter tied consistently to get the People's Republic of China admitted to the United
Nations. India sought to pursue a policy of friendship with China since independence, but
the results were frustrating. In order to understand the genesis of strains in Sino-Indian
ties, it is useful to know the differing perceptions on the question of developments in
Tibet, border conflicts and the Chinese aggression of 1962.
40.7.2 Tension on
The developments in T td indulge in border violations on the Indian
frontiers. China laid cl n territories which India firmly
m-En-Lai came to New Delhi in April 1960
d to any settlement. Official teams of the two
40.7.3 Chinese
In October 1962 Ch on India in N.E.F.A. (new Aiunachal)
and Ladakh. Thus, a war started, which ended in, a military
debacle for India.
2 What was India's attitude to the Chinese occupation of Tibet in 1950? (Answer in about
five lines)
Thailand
Thailand, which was in b e past, became a member of SEAT0 in
September 1954. The
of these factors India
Cambodia
e Norodom Sihanouk was very friendly to India
to avoid being parties to the cold war. India as
Commission worked satisfactorily to demarcate
the boundaries of th ar Indo-Chinese countries. Both the countries were
very active at the B in 1955. Nehm and Sihanouk were admirers of
each other and this fadilitated th{#mbtion of cordial relations between the two countries.
I
Laos
India had close dih supported the Laotian policy of neutrality. Laos
also followed the and the two countries had identity of views on
international affairs.
India had been conc light of the Viet Minh A d the conflict between the
with the Democratic Republic of Vietnam and the
e level. India wanted to work for peace and
on-cooperation of the Ngo Dinh Diem regime in
erican influence, came in the way. India welcomed
ahi Minh t o ' ~ e wDelhi in 1957, and 1958
unattached on the question of unity of the two
ralion struggle in Indo-China had received tremendous
Malaysia
b
Malaysia, inhabited y the Ma
1
,Chinese and the'1ndian communities, has had a
democratic polity. It supported India to strengthen Afro-Asian solidarity. It too was Foreign Policy of India
(1947-64)
apprehensive of the intentions of the People's Republic of China towards South and South-
East Asia. Malaysia supported India at the international forums and forged closer economic
ties. Malaysia welcomed the largest number of L-.dian joint ventures. As Nehru and Tunku
Abdul Rahrnan were educated in Britain, both of them had similar perception on several
international issues. Thus the relations were forged on a sound footing of mutual trust and
cooperation. India was opposed to Indonesia's "Crush Malaysia Plan" and gave support to
Malaysia in nation building.
Indonesia
Indonesia is the largest country in the South-East Asian region. The leader of Indonesian
independence movement, Sukarno, was friendly to Nehru. India and Indonesia signed a
Treaty of Friendship in March 1951 to promote "perpetual peace and unalterable
friendship". Indonesia initially supported India to forge Afro-Asian unity, to accelerate the
pace of decolonization. It hosted the Afro-Asian Conference at Baridung in 1955. But
Indonesia under Sukarno began to advocate the concepts of New Emerging Forces
(NEFOS) against the Old Established Forces (OLDEFOS). It started a crusade against
colonialism, neo-colonialism and imperialism. India did not share these militant ideas in
international relations. India's refusal to join NEFOS offended Indonesia to a great extent.
When China invaded India, Indonesia was cool and did not express sympathy for India.
Sukarno even supported the formation of Jakarta - Pindi - Peking - Pyongyang Axis
against the Western bloc. In September 1964, Ayub-Sukamo Communique supported
Pakistan's stand on Kashmir and in the following year Indonesia urged NEFOS to help
Pakistan in its war with India. However, the diplomatic, cultural and economic relations
between the two countries continued. India, however, did not take sides with the foes of
Indonesia.
8. A Cartoon by R.K. Laxinan showing Pakistan's stand on the proposed Bandung Conference,
April 1955. (Timesof Indh, 24 March 1955)
(1
I
1; 9. Nehru and Nasser
I
In October 1956, ~srkel,France and Britain attacked Egyptian positions in the Suez Canal
area. India and the Afro-Asian group expressed their sympathy for Egypt and urged
immediate ceasefire. Finally, in November there was a ceasefire and thus a plan was
mooted for an Emergency Force of the United Nations to supervise the end of hostilities
and protect Egypt. Egypt agreed to the stationing of the UN Forces and once again to
respect the obligations unde~the Treaty of Constantinople. India played an active role in
the resolution of the Suez Crisis.
......................................................................................................................................................
2 Explain the relations between India and Indonesia? Answer in about ten lines.
.......................................................................................................................................................
........................................................................................................................................................
,
......................................................................................................................................... u............
3 What do you understand by Suez Crisis? What was India's attitude towards it? Answer
in about ten lines.
se Thailand is a member of
I.
India tried to balance it he Super Powers and other Major Powers right
from its independence. shall examine how these relations developed over
the years.
40.10.1 The U
his support during the independence struggle,
gion, till the rise of communism in China.
During the initial ye nce, the US supported Pakistan on Kashmir
India to join military alliances sponsored by
eptions became widespread. On many
developments in the international scene brought the two countries, further closer to each
other. The Soviet leaders were impressed due to:
I
India's decision to recognise PRC, (People's Republic of China)
,
its support to anti-colonial struggles at the United Nations
its efforts to establish ceasefire in Korea and refusal to brand PRC as an aggressor,
its refusal to be a part of alliances against USSR.
The Soviet Union on its part supported India on the Kashmir issue. The Soviet leaders,
Bulganin and Khurshchev, visited India in 1955 and the two countries signed trade
agreements. Later the Soviet Union supported India on the Goa issue. During the Suez
Crisis, the Soviet Union and India took up a similar stand to condemn aggression. The
I
Soviet Union provided $ 500 million for the Third Five Year Plan and supplied oil when
the western companies were unwilling to do so.
I
I Independent Indla: Towards In 1962 when the Chind the Soviet Union not only expressed sympathy
I1.' Development 1947-1964
for India but helped
expressed their
MIG Fighter Planes. The Soviet leaders
of non-alignment and peaceful coexistence.
1 1111
I
40.10.3 Britain
1
bi led Commonwealth, India was ever cautious of
bra. Britain's attitude also gave grounds for such
t mir issue and the two countries became allies by
I a became naturally unhappy with these
developments. Mo t approve Britain's West Asian Policy. The most
condemnable Britis intervene militarily to occu@ySuez Canal and to
,Iqdia along with the Soviet Union, protested
@is annoyed Britain but it had to stop its
4
to the diplomatic solution of the crisis. Though
I British, the latter showed sympathy on
e clear at the time of the Chinese aggression of
i message of sympathy and support to India on
j
I
II..,
while dealing with the issues relating
to the Afro-Asian c t initiatives to influence France to
decolonise Indo-Ch of the transfer of power to Vietnam, Laos and
spect. But France felt unhappy with the Indian
i opposition to its interv z Crisis. Later on France made efforts to improve
i1 40.10.5 Japan
As far as Japan is ia did not share the allied powers' views of the
Id War. India refused to ask for war reparations
e Peace Treaty was signed, which paved the way'
I' for greater economic
further accelerated
relations. The process of Indo-Japan relations was
;1' ;>
the Civil Aviation
1 Cultural agreemen
First Yen Lo
IndoJapanese
Some joint ventures tance to develop small scale industries in India and
cooperation in other strengthened our bilateral relations.
40.10.6 Australia
India desired to dev ia also. The nearness and proximity to
the Pacific and the Ind very important strategically for
a neutralising role vis-a-visChina
and promote the sec the region. India and Australia
belonged to the same ons'. When Australia joined SEAT0
outh-East Asian countries, India toot
er economic and cultural ties with
ver took the side of Pakistan or
dia's interests.
2 Explain in about five lines India's policy towards the independence movements in the
African countries?
3 What are the basic differences in approach to international relations between India and
U.S.A.? Answer in about five lines.
i
pment which was India's great contribution to
international politics. Th ugh it setback in 1962 because of the Chinese
aggression the main fou ations o 's foreign policy were laid during 1947-64.
I i
t
Apartheid: A political stem us
kept apart by law. By th system
been perpetuated. 11
Sohth Africa in which people of different races are
mhnation of the Whites on the Blacks of Africa has
L
country has.
Geneva Conference: I 1954 ni nations met at Geneva to resolve the crisis of Korea
and Indo-China. One o the sign r~sultsof this conference was the division of
Vietnam into North Vi am an Vietnam. The communists formed the government
in North Vietnam and h e non- its in South Vietnam.
Independent rmulated by a country without any reservation or
bias to other country.
was established by the Geneva Conference to
in Indo-China and establish peace
s and India was its Chairman.
y, Nationalism, Socialism and Communism.
Non-alignment: ~ a k i &indepe decisions on international issues by a country
without being tied to qy or group of countries.
OLDEFOS (Old ~ ~ t d b l i s h eI?#):d Imperialism, Colonialism, Aristocracy.
TTECK
I
i
Check Your Progres 1
1 The three impo t princip mdian foreign policy are, non-participation in any
military alliance, ndepende bach to international issues and to work for world
peace through di ament explain these principles in two or three sentences.
See sec. 40.2
2 Non-alignment &ant inde nt decision making by a country on any international
y ~ t h e country.
r With this you have to add the
nqn-participation in any military alliance, supporting
her countries, etc. See Sec. 40.4