RARE BOO] HS MER SPE HY MAME Safety Assessment and Rating of Road Bridges against the Crossing of Heavy Military Tanks @ = aR Cho, Hyo Nam cy s a Han, Bong Koo £ ® aR Chun, Chai Myung Abstract This study is intended to propose an approach to reliability-based safety evaluation as well as LRFR(Load and Resisitance Factor Rating) type capacity classification of military or civilian bridges based on the limit state models which are delived by incor- porating all the uncertainties of resistance and load random variables including deter- ioration, and are used in a practical AFOSM (Advanced First Order Second Moment) method. ‘The proposed methods for the assement of safety and load carrying capacity are applied for the evaluation of rating and classifications of several practical bridges against the crossing of military vehicles. Based on the observation of the numerical results, it can be concluded that the cur- rent NATO classification method which is based on the tradition! allowable stress concept can not provide real load carrying capacity but results in nominal classification, and therefore the reliability-based safety evaluation and LRFR-classification method or the corresponding rational allowable stress method proposed in this paper may have to be introduced into the classification practice. = & ARRAAS FRAY SPE BME MEU AS MUD WHEL MERE A] ARCS SUC RARGRMS HEFT, ASFA] Aud 2AEDE AM Mes AS sho] ALAR FP AIRS] faMleeod 71 ARE SARE PAT RSL AMET BAS) PRET BEE RRA. = ERR: RABE HAM Bet, ETRE ERR LEM BEM. KT EAR ICL I, TRE 18 @ 1M 1988 3H aolAMR) RR RES SH DL AM METS BA Aa) 2se] AS | we ok. ABR] AP AG AVA SLIP] YY NATO FeAPYS MWAH Feel od BSA FeeI Ve BE AF OA, Hey] Be atelal WaRa BMA ol Le RE DHE MTR BE AAD Holt cle] ASHE Belatel eee MAK) Nt RAGA HAPEY =e] Ads 4, Le om aa G24 Ab S BARS Heol TS ARR REM SHE a HR PRY HADAZL RLAMA AWE NA- TOS RRRRAB GK] Sse Act, 22 Ola PETA ES eTANe HAE BR Mitel Ae} AWW Ss 4} Sep] Val AW A2Z4 Bw BARE of ye} SHE Se AAASS wasp] Ge AD E14 FSD So Meld we BAAS Ezz 37] AE MRS) RI ASYM ABZ: BAA. A MRAAS PRAM Sl TERRE HE Ase] Bae BAe Ae we Raw PRR RD ERR aA Bey, 2. MAMIE BAO HEL RAT MRI AE Be BA Feet eet Qe Bol ae AAS HR REE SAKE NATO REOWAR HK Ate Me, o| oy & KLE 7leay (TM 5-312) Huse} ah. 24] HRS AYA) MRA] S SZ df PAS AEhz Le MAKE WE MBS] oF ep. 3. WU SMO! CHEE RS AM WA A ean ARRAS RARER A MS] ES Hap) US RAM] ee} AFOSM GEA Sa] Mo ol et RHR S| RABE ART LGN ATM TREE ~62— SKIBA BO. 3.1 FRA Rt Bo] HU RRR BA we 2) RAMS JERE} BOR Flo] Jee ay SY AATAS VAD BADR MHZ) SF AAAS RARRBMS F25} 22 thes aaa + ath R-Sp-Si<0 a ola, & D2) abt ol RR BE BRAMBOH Be YAos Vea + Meh C) et R=R,PMFD @) 7A Rt RBH FASIIE, PE AARQ] BU MR, M3 FE 42} ALBS FAA EE AT BAe wae 2, De F284, PY uFEMFeAol Sa 24h) y see] oh, (2) PRED BBL PRA AAPAS DAD PHAN SEK CDS el FE BR TM SR PE FD Sp SB FRY Ge dest get, S=Sot St ‘pDpDsLo+C1t+i)PaPs @) AAA Co, Cr & HAS Y Beast a SI) FEN Ao] WR EA ABA, D, a} 22 47 SAAS 2 BARE, TE BASANS, Loe AMBER Hem BK, Doe ANSE HHADLS Mie) e ALS ICE HEB RO], Py ROT Heol 1 RDS Fee eel) MBL 9 RHI STFA Bas] THIS EW: MPBMEA BSS azn y VATS TH Ua Ss Ad. S, as AM Pst TRAAIY BBAGAS P's h Zi sCeSAW SABAAFK's KDY MLE BR Fe RE SHES ee de als K(SR's+ KS AVY Ma HAREM SASS NAMM Pr] MS Ps= P'sK’Pr 2 YEAH, Aare A ah | Pst SER P's | BF Ps} 7% BRRS AFB Ad S Ae Aelot Get. 3.2 (RE OTS feet ® MRIS UES SS] Bel Wat BROMO AS Lo] Seo] HAL RN SL HANES TR SA KERR} AG WRI RAKE AHL 24 wee A Ad, CMG 225 RHE Hee RE oh. 4, Rackwitz-Fiessler Q223$¢ 01-23} AFOSM (281429) o}e] wef] Ala} b od et MERE BE Al epE a at asd 42} $s 22 24g JIE T . BoC =2. 5)S8+ 1.55 8<2.5 1.05 B<1.5 EEE RES S18, HE FE aaa bS1L0: BARS BE FRE 3.3 SRM A HAS 2] HARE WS Ral Sew = ARMAS So] 2g] Ads fe ddz Sat WA Se HAMM EAM ARs B84] Se Alo RS] HRPM fe Ay SBS S4H SES 2d Fs Re HKGR EREAAANMOe TAF | GD SS AA) te) ebetajebet. SOAR fH al] 43-4)-2. Rackwitz-Fiessler UySS BUT AFOSM HMEHKE 1S to] SA KK ¢ 1S WBE IS YSLEYH HRA MABRBBAS 12+ Be Fed + U4. tee A wa BE BRRRABLAA B ALDH] BARR, Sot, SR MRR MOH A] 70] RRB J, ro, re& Ab aX G7 at. OR—10Sp—7:81=0 @ 2a) BIAS Ashe wees AGE 580 1M 19884 3 A R, So, SpE rey How Fin, S HAAR HW BA 2) @OL244 Fie=maye (sa) Fi=mo1% (sb) Fu = m+. (c) BS =m A+iK'm, (a) 1h, AA = PMPD, no=DsLo =P oe. FEL RGDE ABMS VER Peoh 2 Sra T omar eml+i=0 (a) G mg—1' omor—7' um LA+i)K’=0 (6b) A} RGA) (OE A Akar IE AGH ASA el ARS BRIM HES 1. A Bt Bast el AAW oS SHE eGlavel eee) Slay SURROKE AYELE: at Mee AP WE AAT FE BE (ed RON 1 PUAN Mie AALS SF WA HEA Mee} was. ele LE 7 Wee MLSS] SWE] 7S Ce 2 ade ase RAE AHH: ATM —HGLRREST 91 he) BEE HIE 2] Yaad REOK 6, ro ASE AR A HABA ASE HABE Wet 2} 7} RA, MME LO), 2279 AGELE 1H AAR YOR ASA ERI ms HORA AA 22 SRM WI Pe Feb = ARE FA Aol Ma Hea RSF aa. Ca) RR FU © mace oRR DASA tm Ere Eom (7a) HD) SIBRAPS ma LET BRON. (7b) @ wee: D Aa m= BGs (Ba) fi) RZ m=" (Bb) —63—(2) MATH Hite] a PUR AT RH BR D MRR DAMP Hoa Ca ii) YapAAbs P= (gb) @ Henk DAM ERR Ga (a) i) 9a24 (a0b) 4. HRD AA APRA ASS RES MBAS AY BE, MBH AS] TE ERS) Seep 2 RH APRA MERE, 22] BMS] BERD Ao UR PAR Ro] RASS Reet FAIS 24d 4 At aoe 2a Me. 4.1 Si TR Wi PORES AVDA WLSey Fal AF M2, WR AGNSTY Mies me) 75 3 MRAM EBA MOM OH A] SF Ho} +g Roe vey + Beh Fig=mgPMFD ap ARRAS RAD SG) Ya = A FE SAE WY EAA ZL RE AGA RM 1A 4A. 2a e HMR RAZA Wt|A= A Te RF AY] ROM] AS Lo] HMIERMG AE Fest, 4.2 (ASE TRO HE AGMA CWE Ree WE] Ae MRMBMES HME BAYS FAST ARE SURA Ho HG R24 o] AMA. R24, APSLDE mor S MSAS Vent $4 ASE Bat te Fee, 1S Bae TERS Bio KRMEME AS Woe Bds}7] Bilt, PISSVEY] Ne HAMM 2A PsBUd, Pst MISA VTE AD Lt RHDHAS BE Fed Sy gy RHI] AAS Zo] ABE S A ART AS 2 ERE 0.052 FA 5, ERRS| CR wi HE 5. aE REAM 1a ARIAT Pt Se 2 27 RRR aR deisel Aaa Re) adel, BAERIENIRS) Aabgat FAAS GBM] Aso} Lowe Vingo=(V pt + V+ Vet) * a2) AAs Att) Bile a. Ving=(Vinge? + Vor)? 13) “EBM AAE DES ya RCW Pel. mane ze RC Tia RC eee 1 ti te maim | Vann wislta | Vem | winltin | Ver # @| 12 0.16 10 | 016 | Lor 0.15 a OF [ - ‘Vine=0. 189 7 Virig=0. 180 2 A LM LES HEH FM 20 awk PIE 0.20 gy a & aR ois SC 4] SR AAA AVA S43 ASSES BE RE EC 3.0UE 2A Re MBAS = Ea WUVS4A So] YA TALS AE Fs} We Pht SHRM S f=2.5, EMEMS 2th HUMRAT BS f= 152 AMBE Ao] vbeyees adele 5.2 058 wR HME SRI BS SAGA A BEE mi/mpr | BAe eb E6779 RS Soly7] Ve AFOSM AVZ VI Mey AA Ae aeeby op SUH, AVS SHAS (G=2.5)A A 7'd E74 Be BF AN MR RE HH oy Fb mic/mon 1 Bol tA Qe] AS] UIE A & ged. ada vr T8294 lasdae AQ MRAZ SABIE oS wyBwrp HO 8S SS AE Heh FY HR BF mufmo | Mts TBA UA] Sep BP) eS AAD LCM /mp) | we AP 33] UddS teh. PRAT 4 (Go=1.5)E MME G=25U YH AS} »] RUE FARE HEAT LS mr/mp, 9 3} a daw dai. A WMA BRE TEL UYEY BS of AE AGE SAAS VE Vos AS Os, 7 AAAS laste A 2ewe F 3S) eA ASHE ¢ 7’S AAA 4 age eed ae 244 mms 7 Bee READ tES Ae. AS RSA AHR TSE SAS) CB ADK AR ASAD Ypart Be AS} 8, HE VOAAL4, HE Bole 01 FS} THERE & Histol] BRE BH RRS eh Lh, we} oes] Fe 4 of] WI A DIU 6, éS VRE Wei 3.314] Ha PE BE VRE RO)~U)L 28 & Bartel Te SM EVE mi. 3} RARE MP, S HE H 59 Ao] Arh. 59] HSS quay TYsd mae At 2 Es FEAR] AL RABE AS Sa) Aspee RCH] RAE SUR HMDS AAA oy. Ett MPT Aikel Ae BUR TIME HRERAA BOR Na TSE ES & RRA AE Or Dw BA af. Fore 1. reali 1.218, sal aa alo 24) 1.060) 1. va 1.364 0.956] 1.057] 1.088] 1.127 cL) jo [rt [we | a ee tea a2 4 | 0.866 ou tar end tr te a -) | 0.774 1.06 1.20 1.500] 0.879) 1.062] 1.103] 1.251 | sa 2 + | 0.805] 1.059] 1.372] 1.574] 0.699] 1.056 1.167] 1.261 RE S's 1! ed MLB. 1988% 3 7) __ 9 Fa 400 7’=1-30 G'=1.20) | Gx/=1.00) * = ve ASAT Wy | BR Feel | ee ae) CMe ASA r'=1.00 —65—HG. & deitikel =e tesewas @) He-ABATY zag4 NATO FFAAS EEC) [aaa eae 3 /|a a 8 aaa wel Ib BS BREED 0.8»—1. 057. Ri) 9. Bret. Oat. | 0.81. OS, OR +4) [4 Saye | now. 1.2R+4) 0. 85m, TORU+H) 05m | 1. 05m, | 0.85 mq~1, 0500 [sees ©) Assay | 085m, 1. 550m 1.080 2 Ti) BAC) | L0G) ot, | 0. 75:mp—1. 0504 0.751p—1, OSeoy LOR UH) ACTED er | eg OCU TOR? 2541.05 | 0.75410 O5mon, T8Cr)) ave] a aan] BIAS Ce RRM tae AERA KE MSs] CAM] Ne Tela i Bi71ek Ba 59] BE AEP, AA Ad Che RABZR VAY AEE o] See GORI HM AE Ala + ol ao. abode, 6. BA BH ARRAS Heil] RRA HRM HY HRA GREER Bol ey MR] & SBE HORE HH Ads t AEA] M4, TEAM Aaa] 2S AV HL UAE AA Aste 2 AAs A a area. 6.1 RE HE qe qEyos Aga 4 ago] yet 4 54 Roh Bde 4a wee] RE RIT ERE RNSHIAT. Rackwitz-Fiessler 22S 0]. AFO- SM (agitate) Ya Alas s2+e4 wei 3.26 ANS Bry alo seh Ab ae e so] FE REAPS Aesgor| ole WA AS GY Het ehh Ao. He Glad Be, F2AR(1 9D) AP BE Bepbe | eh see 5ese QySst +See, F YR(RC GHz Atle s=2228 1.5<8<2.57t APS FSR PASS TT BdT FA aly Aoka(R.C.T a Ae RE BHI P= 10a eS RO Aase ANE gr RMR Abca AL Add4 eta He 6 ae O75 1zz Ber EHWPos Fay] AAY BE SSS FHAAIS AMe UA 22 Bde. 2812 A zeed da Te aAb & SRG FR Heed Be 69 ME 4 Role. 2a] wad a abe EF 2AM et PE Ate] of alsy A Mica. Ss] RC THR At ES 7] Ske WS Be 1.522 ERE 7s 8} YR BIO, SHES zeit] WHS] w HEAE Bree] F 85% UTE He AP = AAOTUFS ABS Yole ASS Y FIZAS AA tl dt. a RS RAB AS Alas lo a4) BRE So] a] 5 RH Bw] 4 a RSE AMS SA TeSabse] WA da aes dete dead aoe Age w S4de t+ At. 6.2 SUR SM HIRE AAS BRIER mit WA REI TZAY AHAK al AAT He, lt 72S Bo} AA AR AS ST AK Sa AA AR A le Ba aA. AA Feee RRM AMS he 7 ol Heb st. 7A Bal zy we] Ba 7 OUERME WMS BF NATO F912 Wek Sse MIM 1988 ae 8 9 eT. RAO Otel 1 ASHER ete RIF, BAB) Re Vaesney] aaaey iT OL &j LR] SIE BIWSDIE Biwsp 9% = ]aqaal 20vse 25/20] 21/28 85/41] 26/54 24/28 19/29] 30/39] 24/32 jaa] 98/57] 46/58) 45/50] 47/56) 37/45. aa Inez] —| 49/58] 45/59] 47/50] 97/45. 9/6 70/85 68/88. | fan “41/50, 68/88] 0/72 of] Rt RAMS ok Fisted TT PMB Gl RPA] St KAAS ADT BRE He HE het BTA TARE HE THERE RADE 71 a7 AF RE RE He. ee SBDKY 3 KAR WHS ALE a> AS WRB 9} Ald stat 4 & REM ASHE Gea RAPA MA FAS SAS BAF USE t+ ad. cr a 2) Pe) 7.8 & 1) Sift NATO east Rol 9] a GEAR, HAM HARE AAA HMA 2 Zt] KEKE ST] ASz, 2s) AA AY SHES AANAZLS WSs] Se Soba AAA MMT | Set 2S RUN Bide We RD AHS S EASE TATE ASF Ad 2) A BSA HR MGI ABE SRD NEHEL BE] BHF AS A EMRE A1Fl2 29 RH PASH LSA RTM HA] ehe] Ras} BL aby S342] RRB Aled BSE F MRS a+ oe. 3) 54 Rt Bo] Fe KaRSHS At V2ASME FZATIMAY Ya] KEK SAAB SA 7h ete, MER] spe} WR KENES N R E F —67—3S Maal SSE NSE SE Mt zed OA FR] RUE PRAMAS AN FAB] s RAR Se RAED RHR Vols PRLS FAY Fe a Aa. ee xe 1. Cho, Hyo-Nam, “Reliability-Based Safety Asse- ssment and Rating of Road Bridges, Procee- dings of the US-Korea Joint Semtinar/Work- shop on Critical Engineering System, Vol. 1, may 1987, Seoul, Korea 2, Ellingwood, B. et. al, “Development of a Pro- bability Based Load Criterion for American National Standard A58” NBS SP-S77, June 1980. 3. Hasofer, A.M, and Lind, N.C, “Exact and In- variant Second-Moment Code Format", Journal of Engineering Mechanics Div., ASCE, Vol. 100, No. EM1, Feb. 1974, pp.111~121. —68— 4, Medsen, H.0., Krenk, S, Lind, N.C., “Method of Structural Safety,” Prentice-Hall, Inc., Eng- lewood Cliffs, 1986, 5. “Manual of Steel Construction; Load and Resi- stance Factor Design", AISC, First Edition, 1986. 6. Military Fized Bridges, TM 5-312, U.S. Army, 1968, 7, Rackwitz, R. and Fiessler, B..” Structural Rel ability under Combined Random Load Sequences" Computers & Structures, Vol. 9, 1978, pp.489 ~494, 8. “Rationalisation of Safety and Serviceability Fac- tors in Structural Code’, CIRIA Report No. 63, London, 1977. 9, Thoft-Christensen, P. and Baker, Reliability Theory and Is Springer-Verlag, Berfin, 1982. 10. 2933, BOR, bam, “HeR] Sol aE a SEATS RERURN UERtlesa, AGA MAR, 1966.12. pp.i~s. 1 ORR AID BHAT AAS SPAG!, 1985.12. (48S: 1987. 12. 7) ” Structural Applications*, en Amora