Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Going Green - The Psychology of Sustainability in The Workplace
Going Green - The Psychology of Sustainability in The Workplace
February 2011
Contents
Chapter Page
1 Introduction: The psychology of sustainability in the workplace 1
Dean Bartlett, London Metropolitan Business School
2 Green recruitment, development and engagement 6
Anna Kane, Ampleo.
3 Greening your organisation: The case of the Environment Agency 18
Julian Feasby and Karen Wells, The Environment Agency
4 Green buildings: Understanding the role of end user behaviour 31
Mindy Hadi & Chloe Halfhide, BRE
5 Green organisational performance: Behavioural change interventions 36
based on the theory of planned behaviour
Richard Parker, Boots Opticians
6 Green behaviour: Barriers, facilitators and the role of attributions 47
Richard Plank, City University.
7 Green behaviour: Differences in recycling behaviour between the 59
home and the workplace
Seonaidh McDonald, Robert Gordon University
8 Green behaviour change: HOT topics 65
Mike Page and Nadine Page, University of Hertfordshire
9 Green behaviour change: A case study of Eco Concierge 76
Karen Anderton and Kirsten Jack, Eco Concierge.
10 Promoting environmental behaviour in the workplace: 84
A survey of UK organisations
Lara Zibarras & Catrin Ballinger, City University
This report draws together a range of research and case studies which were developed as
part of the British Psychological Society’s Division of Occupational Psychology Going
Green Symposium held in London in 2010. Its aim is to provide an illustration of the
important contribution that the field of work and organisational psychology can make to
understanding and promoting green behaviour in the workplace.
This first introductory chapter outlines what is in the other chapters, reflecting on their
key messages and summarising some of the issues which they individually and collectively
raise. The report contains a range of useful material for ‘people specialists’ in
organisations, including a number of vignettes and case studies particularly aimed at
practitioners, alongside the sorts of theoretical material and research results you would
expect from the specialist area of occupational psychology which applies the science of
psychology to the workplace.
2 Going Green:
has a large number of such well-established theories of behaviour change and maintenance
upon which to draw in the design and implementation of green interventions, as well as
new insights which are emerging from cutting-edge research and theory in areas such as
‘self-regulation theory’ (i.e. theories concerning the role of the self-concept and related
constructs in behavioural regulation), for example.
The theme of the influence of the work context upon green behaviour continues in the
seventh paper which raises the issue that, even when individuals are keen to recycle, they
do not always translate this green behaviour into the workplace. The survey reports that
more people recycle at home than they do at work across a wide range of recyclable
materials, but even those who do recycle at work do so less than they do at home. One
reason behind this difference could be that recycling facilities are not provided at all
workplaces, but the findings also suggest that there are other factors which are potentially
important and which organisations need to consider in the design and implementation of
recycling schemes. Such issues include raising awareness of what, if any, recycling
arrangements have been put in place and also providing clear guidance about to staff
about their responsibilities and those of the organisation in relation to recycling as well as
precise instructions about what staff have to do in order for arrangements to be effective,
for example whether or not staff need to sort rubbish or just put it all in the same bin.
Following on from the results reported in this paper, it would seem that encouraging
people to recycle at work is about more than simply engaging them. Even employees who
have high levels of motivation and performance in relation to recycling behaviour at home
appear to recycle less in the workplace setting and so while previous papers in this volume
have highlighted the importance of an approach which draws upon the psychological
literature around employee engagement, there are other issues which need also to be
considered from the organisations perspective.
4 Going Green:
any significant progress towards sustainability. Getting a handle on the psychology
underlying the deeper causes of the problem and more radical changes that are required
to solve it - in particular, the role that corporations can play in bringing about such
changes – is an area which the papers in this collection touch upon only tangentially. It is
an area we have yet to cover and so it is where, in my opinion, the future of the psychology
of sustainability lies.
This chapter considers how organisations can achieve environmental objectives through
their staff by recruiting, developing and motivating them to do their jobs in an
environmentally friendly way. In considering the drivers behind why organisations ‘go
green’ and the means by which they do so, it draws upon theory and research on
motivation and work engagement which help organisations to understand what motivates
and engages staff and how to handle the processes of organisational change involved in
building ‘green’ performance indicators into employees’ job roles and the impact of these
changes across an organisation in the context of redesigning such jobs.
Green business is big business these days. Going green, or at least being seen to be green
brings benefits to the organisation such as enhanced reputation, competitive advantage,
reduced operating costs and increased margins and longer term benefits such as non-
reliance on virgin materials. Unsurprisingly, therefore, many organisations are keen to
espouse their environmental credentials. Sometimes this might be nothing more
substantial than a clever marketing campaign, otherwise known as ‘greenwashing’. For
many organisations however, it is driven by a genuine organisational objective to be
environmentally responsible. Of course, a starting point is to ensure that the organisation
has low energy light bulbs installed, recycling bins in the corner of each office and
increased use of renewable energy such as solar power. However, a strategic approach will
go further than this to involve much deeper and systemic root and branch reform,
redesigning jobs and ultimately driving the recruitment and development of staff.
I would like to illustrate some of the issues involved through an imaginary vignette. Take an
organisation recruiting to fill the vacancy of a Design Manager. The organisation designs
and manufactures electrical items for use in household kitchens and has whittled down the
applicants to two. The first of these applicants, let’s call her Nita, has an excellent track
record of managing teams who design user-friendly products. She can manage her budgets
effectively, handles personnel management issues successfully and keeps an eye on her
competitors.
The second applicant, let’s call her Valerie, also has an excellent track record of managing
a team who designs user-friendly products. Valerie encourages the team to design products
that are energy efficient (saving the customer money and thus making products more
competitive) and to use recycled materials (again, more marketable products with resource
security for the organisation). She also manages her budgets effectively, and has a carbon
budget (giving senior management data to report to shareholders, whilst enhancing her
own career). She handles personnel management issues successfully and arranges remote
working (giving staff a better work-life balance and saving carbon). Valerie also keeps an
eye on her competitors, but they probably keep a sharper eye on her!
6 Going Green:
From the outside, taking an environmentally friendly approach to business can appear to
be a very specific, restrictive or niche marketing strategy. However, when considering the
case of Valerie and Nita it is possible to see how an organisation benefits widely from
recruiting ‘green’ staff (or are they just ‘smart’ staff?). If the above organisation recruited
Valerie, they would have a much better ‘all rounder’ as an employee. Valerie’s skills,
approach and thinking are more progressive than Nita’s. Valerie understands the business
world and natural world are inextricably linked. Nita is not demonstrating an ability to gain
competitive edge. Her team’s products are made using virgin materials that may become
expensive as the resources dwindle, she isn’t offering her staff the best work-life balance
which would result in increased productivity and loyality to the organisation. She isn’t
developing their skills to make them the most progressive designers in the industry. Nita is
not demonstrating a carbon and cost saving approach to her work, which would improve
sales and increase profit margins. Therefore she is failing to enhance her own career
prospects and the reputation of the business. The comparison of Valerie and Nita
demonstrates some of the benefits of taking an environmentally sound approach to
running an organisation. But moving beyond this example, what are the drivers for
organisations? Roth & Bansal (2000) revealed three motivators that induce corporate
ecological responsiveness: competitiveness, complying with the legislation and ecological
responsibility.
Research conducted by Ampleo, a firm of Occupational Psychologists, revealed more
reasons why organisations feel the need to ‘go green’. These include cost reduction,
energy security, attraction and retention of staff, staff wellbeing, enhanced staff skills and
productivity, positive business reputation and superior services and products. A number of
writers (e.g. Savitz, 2006) make reference to the triple bottom line (economy, environment
and social) or what has been referred to as ‘the 3 P’s’; people, profit, planet. Sustainability
is a fundamental principle of smart management, and the triple bottom line is a measure
of success which provides a broader rubric within which organisations can consider their
efforts in relation their corporate responsibilities. Esty and Winston (2006) see smart
companies as the ones who get ahead of the green curve and lower both financial and
operational risk. Their environmental strategies provide added degrees of freedom to
operate, profit and grow. Any organisation that enjoys the benefits listed here could be
better described as a ‘smart’ organisation than a ‘green’ organisation.
Why low-energy light bulbs and fuel efficient cars aren’t enough
Technical solutions to energy challenges can help an organisation achieve its reduction
goals significantly, but what can often be overlooked is the need to plan the behaviour
change. An organisation’s 10:10 efforts to reduce vehicle emissions by 10 per cent over one
year are likely to require a combination of approaches:
■ fuel efficient vehicles;
■ reduction in miles driven; and
■ enhanced driving skills.
So simply purchasing fuel efficient vehicles isn’t enough, and organisations purchasing fuel
efficient vehicles will benefit by getting the vehicle drivers ‘on board’ with the change.
Changing behaviour to reduce the amount of miles driven and enhancing drivers’ skills
will require skills development and a change in systems and procedures.
8 Going Green:
behaviour will lead to specific outcomes. The motive or driver for wanting a promotion
may be different, some may want the status, and others may want the pay rise. Either way,
these motives will energise someone into action. So the individual sets about behaving in a
certain way to achieve the goal of being promoted. They are likely to self monitor whether
such behaviour impresses the manager. If the outcome of a promotion is not achieved,
then the person may employ a different set of behaviours to achieve it, or re-evaluate
whether the goal is realistic.
A manager cannot directly influence whether someone desires something like a promotion.
Managers are however, able to provide an environment that offers a range of the following
rewards for the desired behaviour. Rewards can be intrinsic, extrinsic and social.
Intrinsic Social
rewards rewards
Tangible benefits such as pay, fringe benefits, pensions, Obtained by being with other people,
conditions of work and security that individuals receive often by having a sense of common
in return for their efforts. Because these are provided purpose and obtaining reassurance or
by the organisation, how much is received is largely confirmation of identity, also have a
beyond the control of the individual. substantial psychological content.
Getting the balance right between the three will be nearly impossible as what may be
extrinsic for one person, will be intrinsic for another. But, however much people vary, most
individuals expect rewards of all three types and so the important point is to ensure all
three are offered.
There is often a general reliance on extrinsic motivators, possibly due to the difficulty of
understanding an individual’s pattern of needs, or the ease of providing extrinsic
Often split into two sub-types. Needs for self-esteem concern an individual’s view
of him or herself; for instance having a sense of self-respect, self-confidence or
of doing something that is meaningful and worthwhile in a competent way.
Esteem by others is needed because a considerable part of our self-concept is
Self-actualisation obtained from signals about ourselves that we get from others (Argyle 1968,
Cooley 1964), and if other people indicate that their view of us is favourable as is
the one that we hold of ourselves, it is a highly rewarding experience.
Virtually inexhaustible and are concerned with a person’s need to realise his full
Esteem potential, and it is these that are said to drive humans to do things that have
never been done before.
Consist of security, freedom from pain or harm, emotional security and well-
Security being, fairness, predictability and order.
The most basic of all and arise from the internal physical imbalances such as
Physiological hunger, thirst, warmth and shelter; they need to be satisfied at fairly infrequent
intervals.
10 Going Green:
Figure 3: Herberg’s Two-factor Theory (1959)
The Work
Environment
There are of course criticisms to both Maslow and Herzberg’s theories, for example there
is an assumption an individual has fulfilled all other needs in the hierarchy, and Herzberg’s
theory is regarded by some as an oversimplification (Burke, 1966 and Wood & LeBold, 1970).
Going back to Valerie and Nita, they both do the same job, however Valerie’s job is
enriched through the approach she takes. Valerie doesn’t necessarily have much more to
do than Nita, but she is achieving more by being smarter about how she goes about her
work.
As Clegg and Spencer (2007) point out, job design still remains a significant practical issue
for organisations. Hackman and Oldmans’s Job Characteristics Model (1976), which
supersedes the two-factor theory, is still the dominant theory in job design.
It is concerned with the following job characteristics that influence the motivation of the
job holder, in turn affecting her performance and well being.
Skill variety: the extent to which the job requires a mix of skills, the exercise of which is
valued by the job occupant.
Task identity: the extent to which the job is a ‘whole’ one, that is, it has a beginning and an
end and results in the completion of a tangible, identifiable outcome.
Task significance: the extent to which the job occupant perceives that the job ‘matters’, in
terms of affecting the work or lives of other people inside or outside the organisation.
Autonomy: the extent to which the job gives its occupant the freedom and discretion to
plan the work and decide how it is carried out.
Feedback: the extent to which doing the job gives its occupant clear information about the
effectiveness of his or her efforts.
12 Going Green:
the individual work through the change process and find ways to adapt and learn how to
do their job differently.
What is clear from the research is that involving employees in the redesign of their jobs
is crucial to its success (Parker & Wall, 1998; Clegg & Spencer, 2007; Pasmore &
Friedlander, 1982).
Despite handling the challenges to job redesign, can organisations be assured that job
redesign is sufficient, or is there more to be done? Job or work engagement is a relatively
recent theory that has emerged since the turn of the century. It is a motivational concept.
Work engagement is a positive, fulfilling, affective-motivational state of work-related
wellbeing that can be seen as the opposite of burnout. Engaged employees have high levels
of energy, and are enthusiastically involved in their work (Bakker, Schaufeli, Leiter &
Taris, 2008).
Job resources, such as social support from colleagues and supervisors, performance
feedback, skill variety and autonomy, and learning opportunities are positively associated
with work engagement. (Bakker & Leiter, 2010). Work engagement and job resource
theory can be seen as overlapping with motivational theory, and complementing it. Job
resources play either an intrinsic motivational role because they foster an employee’s
growth, learning and development, or they play an extrinsic role; instrumental in achieving
work goals. Job resources are seen to become more salient and gain their motivational
potential when employees are confronted with high job demands (Bakker & Demerouti,
2007).
Work engagement thrives in settings that demonstrate strong connections between
corporate and individual values. This is a two-way process, not only should the organisation
promote its values to employees, it should also understand and promote what the
employees value (Bakker & Leiter, 2010).
Establish the importance of change within an organisation: If the organisation does not
sense the importance of the need to change, individuals are unlikely to change. Why
should they? It is therefore essential to highlight the drivers behind the change. The
Higher Education Funding Council for England (HEFCE) have now linked Capital
Funding to Carbon Management, and if universities do not produce a credible carbon
management plan which has been signed off, HEFCE will withhold 40 per cent of a
university’s capital funding. This, amongst other key drivers, is what led the University of
Brighton to set themselves a commendable and challenging target of achieving 50 per cent
carbon reduction in 5 years.
Team building: Any project, programme or initiative requires a team to lead it, so this
applies to culture change too. Because change programmes are notoriously hard to lead, it
is essential to have a team of credible, powerful and committed individuals who have the
expertise to represent and lead a cross section of the organisation through the change.
Strategy and vision development: A vision is essential. It builds a picture of what the
organisation is striving to achieve. Without vision, the best individuals can do is operate
within the remit of their job. With a vision, they can consider whether their actions are
contributing towards reaching the vision. For example an organisation such as the
University of Brighton (UoB) could have the vision of being a centre of excellence; a low
carbon university that attracts quality staff and students. Employers who value low carbon
skills and ethos in their workers will want to employ UoB students due to the exceptional
courses that promote low carbon working. The strategy is a plan that describes how the
vision will be achieved, for example lecturers enhancing their courses, by paying necessary
attention to the emergence of a low carbon industry.
14 Going Green:
Understanding individual reaction to change: Personality theory such as Myers Briggs Type
Indicator (MBTI) can be useful in helping us understand how individuals react to change.
Some individuals embrace change whilst others do everything they can to resist it. Taking
the time to consider how individuals are likely to react helps an organisation prepare to
handle it. Directors and managers at all levels can learn how to respond to the individuals
on the teams they are leading through change.
There is also an argument for conducting an audit to measure and understand staff’s
perspectives on the pending change. The Ampleo Employee Engagement Survey©
measures the following:
■ Individuals’ existing attitudes towards climate change and the environment, and their
motivation to undertake pro-environmental behaviour in the workplace.
■ The values employees hold about environmental matters in the workplace. These
values can be thought of in the context of organisational culture.
■ How individuals react on an emotional level to language that is frequently used when
communicating environmental issues.
The output, an organisational profile, can then be used as a benchmark and starting point
of understanding about the employees for those leading the change.
The communication strategy: Kotter provides some useful advice for effective
communication of change.
■ Keep it simple, focused and jargon free so it can be disseminated to large groups of
people.
■ Use metaphors, analogies and examples to communicate complicated ideas quickly
and effectively.
■ Use many different forums so that when the same message comes at people from six
different directions, it stands a better chance of being heard and remembered.
■ Repeat, repeat, repeat to transfer information in an otherwise cluttered world.
■ Walk the talk, or lead by example so that employees can see the top management
acting out the vision.
■ Listen and be listened to, to ensure it doesn’t turn into a one-way broadcast where
useful feedback is ignored and employees are inadvertently made to feel
unimportant.
Action Planning: Short term wins and feeding back results: Ideally short-term wins will
build momentum by being easy to implement, with high impact or high visibility. Few
people will be able to argue with them and short term wins will clearly support and relate
to the change effort. For example, removing one car-parking space and building a bike
shed sends out a clear message, only the very hardened car drivers can argue with the loss
of one car parking space and it clearly promotes low-carbon transport and healthy
lifestyles. The next step is to report back the results to the organisation, in this example the
feedback might be the number of car journeys saved, the total amount of weight lost by
staff members who cycled and the amount of money saved on petrol.
Action Planning: Longer term strategies to sustain change: Start by establishing the
barriers, identifying resistance to change. Based on the strategy, establish the different
areas that need to be considered and require planning. Decide what actions need to be
taken to implement change. Encourage action and activities.
Smart green?
The evidence points organisations to embracing environmentally friendly strategies to
ensure behaviour is embedded across the organisation for long lasting culture change by
recruiting and developing staff to fit redesigned jobs. The provision of job resources will
lead to work engagement and the many benefits this brings. The overall outcome is not
only a green organisation but a smart organisation that attracts quality staff, retains staff
who are happy and productive. It is a cost efficient organisation, with competitive
advantages and a more secure and sustainable future.
References.
Bakker, A.B. & Demerouti, E. (2008). Towards a model of work engagement. Career
Development International, 13, 209–223.
Bakker, A.B. & Leiter, M.P. (2010). Work engagement; A handbook of essential theory and research.
Hove: Psychology Press.
Bakker, A.B., Schaufeli, W.B., Leiter, M. P. & Taris, T.W. (2008). Work engagement: An
emerging concept in occupational health psychology. Work & Stress, 22, 187–200.
Bansal, P. & Roth, K. (2000). Why companies go green: A model of ecological
responsiveness. Academy of Management Journal, 43, 717–736.
Burke. R.J. (1966). Are Herzberg’s motivators and hygienes unidimensional? Journal of
Applied Psychology, 50.
Cameron, K.S. & Quinn, R.E. (2006). Diagnosing and changing organizational culture. New
York: John Wiley & Sons.
Clegg, C. & Spencer, C. (2007). A circular and dynamic model of the process of job design.
Journal of Occupational and Organisational Psychology, 80, 321–339.
16 Going Green:
Collins (2209). Collins English Dictionary. (Complete & Unabridged 10th edn.). William
Collins Sons & Co. Ltd.
Deci, E.L. (1972). The effects of contingent and noncontingent rewards and controls on
intrinsic motivation. Organizational Behaviour and Human Performance, 8(2), 217–229.
Esty, C.D. & Winston, A.S. (2006). Green to gold; How smart companies use environmental strategy
to innovate, create value and build competitive advantage. New Haven and London: Yale
University Press.
Greening, D.W. & Turban, D.B., (2000). Corporate social performance as a competitive
advantage in attracting a quality workforce. Business & Society, 39(3), 254–280.
Herzberg, F., Mausner, B. & Synderman, B. (1959). The motivation to work. London:
Granada.
Hackman, J.R. & Oldman, G.R. (1976). Motivation through the design of work: Test of a
theory. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance 16, 250–279.
Kotter, J.P. (1996). Leading change. Harvard Business School Press.
Maslach, C. (1993). Burnout: a multidimensional perspective. In W. B. Schaufeli,
C. Maslach, & T. Marek (Eds.) Professional burnout: Recent developments in theory and
research (pp.19–32). Washington, DC: Taylor & Francis.
Maslow, A.H. (1954). Motivation and personality. New York: Harper and Row
Pasmore, W. & Friedlander, F. (1982). Administrative Science Quarterly, 27, 343–362.
Parker, S. & Wall, T.D. (1998). Job and work design: organizing work to promote well-being and
effectiveness. London: Sage Publications
Savitz, A.W. (2006) The Triple Bottom Line, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass
Schaufeli, W.B. & Bakker, A.B. (2004). Job demands, job resources, and their relationship
with burnout and engagement: a multi-sample study. Journal of Organizational
Behaviour, 25, 293–315.
Shalley, C.E. & Oldham, G.R. (1985). Effects of goal difficulty and expected external evaluation on
intrinsic motivation: a laboratory study. Academy of Management Journal, 28(3), 628–640.
Wood, D.A. & LeBold, W.K., (1970). The multivariate nature of professional job
satisfaction. Personnel Psychology, 23.
The Environment Agency is a large employer with an annual budget of more than £1
billion and over 12,000 staff dispersed around England and Wales. It is our job to look after
your environment and make it a better place for people and wildlife. Given the nature of
our organisation, you might think that getting the right behaviours for ‘greening the
workplace’ should be easy. Not necessarily so, when you consider that people have
different ways of learning and responding to change and that well-informed people are
often the hardest to change.
Who we are
The Environment Agency is the leading public body for protecting and improving the
environment in England and Wales. It was set up under the Environment Act 1995 and
given certain duties and powers. We work with business, government and society to ensure
that air, land and water are looked after so that tomorrow’s generations inherit a cleaner,
healthier world.
There are some big challenges to face over the coming years. Climate change, population
growth and unsustainable resource use will all put significant pressures on the
environment. That’s why the Environment Agency’s current work is its most important yet.
We are part of the solution but only through working with others can we make a
difference.
We are a public body – around 60 per cent of our funding comes from Government and
the majority of the rest comes from various charges schemes. We are independent but work
closely with Government. We have a presence across all of England and Wales with regional
and area offices so that we can work closely with local bodies and communities.
Our work includes:
■ Regulating industry to protect the environment and human health – air pollution is
estimated to lead to a reduced life expectancy of about eight months per person in
the UK. Since the mid 1990s we have reduced the amount of sulphur dioxide
released into the air by 75 per cent and we regulate the EU emissions trading scheme
and carbon reduction commitment (CRC).
■ Taking action against those who don’t take their environmental responsibilities
seriously – every year we bring many offenders to justice, leading to substantial fines.
■ Protecting people from floods – we protect properties, communities and key
infrastructure (like roads, railways, power sub-stations and water treatment plants)
through flood protection schemes. Every £1 spent on protecting communities from
flooding saves £8 spent repairing flood damage over the lifetime of the scheme.
18 Going Green:
■ Helping business use resources more efficiently – fossil fuels (a finite resource) are
used up 300,000 times faster than the processes that created them. Waste is a valuable
resource and we encourage it to be put to productive use such as reuse, recycling and
producing energy.
■ Working with farmers to build their role as guardians of the environment – farming
and forestry cover over 80 per cent of the total land area of England and Wales. Some
2.2 million tonnes of soil are lost to erosion each year, much of which is washed into
rivers and streams.
■ Looking after wildlife and their habitats – each year more than 100 hectares of
saltmarsh are lost to rising sea-levels. Between 2004–10 we helped to create more than
2,700 hectares of new wetland and saltmarsh habitats and otters are returning to
rivers. They are now found in every county in England and Wales.
■ Working to create sustainable places – over the next 20 years the number of
households in England and Wales is projected to rise by 25–30 per cent. We work with
policy makers, planning authorities and local communities to make sure the natural
and built environment work well together and help to improve the quality of inner
city areas and parks by restoring rivers and lakes.
■ Tackling climate change – the ten warmest years on record have all occurred since
1997. Some climate change is now inevitable so we work to help society both adapt to
these changes and also take action to reduce its impacts. This includes regulating
important low carbon technologies such as nuclear power and some renewables.
■ Making sure there is enough good quality water for people and the environment –
water is precious and its demand will increase in the coming years. Fifteen per cent of
river catchments already have too much water drawn from them.
■ Managing fish stocks to conserve and maintain the diversity – Juvenile eel numbers in
Europe have reduced by 95 per cent compared to pre-1980 levels. Freshwater fish,
salmon and sea trout are also our priority.
20 Going Green:
Example – Identifying and understanding
The pie chart below shows the various sources of our carbon dioxide emissions and gives
a flavour of the breadth of what we have to manage and where the biggest impact is
coming from.
The breakdown allows us to tackle each source and prioritise where we focus our efforts.
Pumping electricity (operational) is responsible for 33 per cent of our carbon dioxide
emissions but improvement is not easy. Our pumping activity demonstrates this. We
pump water to:
■ help water companies to provide water as a resource for homes and business on an
ongoing basis (such as in the east of England), or as required to;
■ ease drought conditions or prevent flooding.
This means that we are responsible for a lot of carbon dioxide emissions whatever the
weather. Dry conditions require more pumping to prevent water levels in our waterways
reaching dangerously low levels for our fish and aquatic species and allow for water to
be drawn for use by businesses and society. Wet conditions require pumping to prevent
floods.
Most of our historic efforts to reduce carbon dioxide emissions have been associated
with travel and buildings but this pie chart showed that we needed to address our
pumping activities. We are challenging standards that have been in place for many years
to pump at given time scales or to ensure an upper or lower level for a watercourse.
We had to change perception so we started to inject this pie chart into our work
wherever we could. We provided it to senior managers, who could then use it with their
own functions and teams. We included it in as many of our communications as possible
and generally pestered people with it so it could not be avoided. This has led to each
region developing carbon reduction plans which identify changes that can be made that
will improve the efficiency of the pumping equipment itself but also the parameters of
the pumping involved.
sources, have a robust baseline, investigate options and work within the lead in times for
policy changes and kit installations as well as change behaviour.
The graph below demonstrates the level of reduction we have been able to make in our
buildings energy use (KWh) over the last five years – steady but also able to be maintained.
22 Going Green:
Dealing with staff that are well educated and scientifically minded
■ Be bold and stick to your guns
On one of our sites there was uproar when we replaced paper towels with energy efficient
hand driers in the toilets. We checked the science but either option could be argued as
the best environmental choice. We made a decision and moved forward. What followed
was a period of discontent. Thirty-eight staff (approximately a fifth of the staff based at
that site) contacted our team to complain, including various scientific data to back up
their arguments. Certain staff used toilet paper instead and caused a hygiene issue when
the toilet paper ran out part way through the day. However, it was short lived; in little
over two weeks, staff accepted the change and no problems have occurred since.
Sometimes there is no right answer so the correct move is to pick one and stick to it.
■ Accept that they may try to sabotage with science
This poster is one of four designs that were developed to display at sites across the organisation
and to ‘pop up’ on computer screens. We received 20 e-mails informing us that if we put
carbon dioxide into hot air balloons they would not fly. True, but clearly not the point.
■ Converting negative but vocal individuals
Negative staff can be very damaging to efforts to change behaviour. We have taken to
phoning them up to deal with their comments rather than getting trapped in e-mail
debates. They usually either back down when challenged or become an avid supporter.
■ Refer challenges
We now ask some of those formally negative but vocal individuals to champion change
locally when we next communicate. It makes them feel involved and useful as well as
helping us to prepare for the type of questioning we may face.
The above are two of four stickers which have been produced to stick to the windscreen
of our operational vehicles. We have a range of vehicles, including light transit vans and
4x4’s. The stickers allow our operational staff to make an informed choice of vehicle
when they leave the depot each morning, only choosing a 4x4 (which is normally the
most polluting) if they need to go off road.
24 Going Green:
1) Positive messaging and ‘nudging’
Sometimes it feels easier to train a dog to do something rather than a human because we are so
complex. Positive messaging is essential as it is not threatening and does not rear up our defiant
heads. When talking to a child about not running onto the road, you will have more success if
you say ‘stay on the pavement as it is safer’ rather than ‘don’t run into the road because you
may get hurt’. The same principle applies for all communications. With lighting, you would
use ‘please turn the lights off because it saves energy’ rather than ‘don’t leave lights on’.
A ‘nudge’ is where you offer no neutral choice in order to influence people’s behaviour.
You are still giving people a choice but it is an informed one.
2) Getting senior directors involved
There is no doubt that it is helpful for senior management and directors to lead from the
top with a commitment to improve environmental performance. However, it is more
effective if staff see these directors and managers visibly getting involved and demonstrating
how it is done. This could range from directors simply using the train rather than making a
journey as a single occupant in a car or by turning off the lights and monitors in their office
when away from the desk and walking around to ask others to do the same.
3) Make it part of normal business reporting and build it into your training and human
resource (HR) processes
For staff to begin embedding environment management into the way they work it is
important to show it incorporated across the business. Our internal environment
management targets are part of the corporate business reporting process rather than an
‘add-on’.
We have also included internal environment management into the staff induction process.
The electronic induction learning package details what our staff need to do to manage our
environment footprint. The induction day includes a success story where one of our staff
talks to the new starters about their job and how they work sustainably. Feedback from this
has been particular good as new starters see real people in everyday jobs not someone from
Head Office telling them to take the environment seriously.
4) Buying kit
It is obvious that any organisation is limited in how much it can reduce its environment
impact if it relies on staff behaviour change only. What may surprise you is that by buying
kit you can indirectly change behaviour so it is worth the visit to the finance director with a
convincing case.
We have chosen not to offset our carbon dioxide emissions through an external offsetting
scheme. Instead every year we invest the money in ourselves through our Carbon
Reduction Fund which provides money to projects which have good carbon dioxide savings
per pound spent, encourage new technology and engage our staff. The ideas come from
our staff on the ground who know the systems they work to and the opportunities available.
One project involved using the tide changes from a feeder river and pumping at different
times of day so that less overall pumping was required on a particular river. Another
involved the construction of a visitor centre at a lock site which reused tyres as foundations,
and used straw bales to construct the walls and photovoltaic cells to convert sunlight into
electricity.
26 Going Green:
Some ‘kit’ ideas
■ Voltage optimisation – we have introduced this technology at suitable sites and are
achieving an average 10 per cent saving in electricity use per site with financial
payback between five to six years. Average voltage supplied from the national grid is
around 260v. Most electrical equipment manufactured for Europe and the UK can
run effectively at lower supply voltages (220v). Voltage optimisation reduces and
smooths our supply voltage to improve the performance and lifespan of our
equipment, which enables us to save energy.
■ Bring in a sparky – a local electrician will have the technical knowledge to tell you
what you can improve on a site. Environment consultants can be expensive and will
usually give general ideas that will still require an electrician’s visit to see if it is
feasible for the site. A local electrician will show on-site staff that you are committed
to trying to improve the sites energy performance and support local business.
■ Fewer, and automatic lights – many of our offices have intelligent lighting systems
which are controlled by movement or light sensors. This helps to ensure that lights
turn on only when needed.
■ Rainwater harvesting – several of our sites have rainwater harvesting systems and
reduce their mains water consumption by 30–40 per cent.
5) ‘Star charts’
Improving performance through recognising good behaviour is an age-old trick with
children, who tend to thrive on seeing stars added to a chart. In the workplace we also
respond to good feedback. Showing performance as a comparison allows progress to be
We provide information on individual performance so that line managers can do their jobs
effectively. For example, we publicise the top 100 highest mileage lease and casual (staff’s
own vehicle used on business) car drivers on a quarterly basis. We have a policy that
restricts the number of miles that can be driven in a casual vehicle as on average these
vehicles are older and more polluting.
28 Going Green:
Local green groups are encouraged and supported. The following screen shot shows the
start of one newsletter produced by a particular area in the east of England. Recognition is
important to staff who give up their time to work on these groups. The more recognition,
the more the group appears to grow and the more successful it seems to be at changing
local behaviour.
P Here at the Environment Agency we have reduced our average water use to
18 litres per person per day. This compares to a UK office average of 30 litres per
day. Please support our water reduction initiatives.
Every month we send out a footer that can put at the end of e-mails. It is communicated by the
Head of Internal Environment Management to a large network of staff, who in turn forward
it on. We end up with a lot of staff using the footer and suggesting ideas for the next one.
10) Publicity
There can be a big impact on how staff behave through external recognition or publicity.
We have found more general enthusiasm about environmental change from our staff.
People want to be proud of the company they work for.
Our award from the Sunday Times has shown our staff that we are as good as many large
companies out there that spend a great deal of time on marketing their environmental
plans. A Guardian article on our national wind turbine project also prompted much
internal interest along with sustained publicity on our new head office in Bristol. The new
office has achieved one of the highest scores ever awarded under BREEAM (BRE
Environmental Assessment Method).
30 Going Green:
Green buildings:
Understanding the role of end user behaviour
With the advent of new technologies, driven by the move to low carbon design, buildings
are becoming increasingly complex to operate both for the facilities professional and the
end user. Designers of buildings, systems and controls are not always aware of the impact of
their decisions on the occupant and do not always take account of the principles of user-
centred design. The findings of this research show that if users are uncomfortable they will
adapt the building to meet their needs, even if this increases energy wastage and
compromises safety.
Buildings are responsible for about 40 per cent of the UK’s energy consumption (Perez-
Lombard et al., 2008) although until recently energy saving was not high on the list of
priorities for an occupying organisation, as energy costs represented a very small
percentage of a company’s total costs compared to labour and other operating costs.
However, this position has changed substantially in recent years: concerns about the impact
of climate change and continuity of energy supplies are no longer the preserve of a few
lone voices but becoming mainstream. New Government regulations and a drive to reduce
energy bills and carbon emissions have meant that new buildings are being designed to be
as energy efficient as possible; many use advanced, innovative systems to heat, cool and
light the building. These include features such as movement-activated sensor lighting,
water efficient appliances, automatic opening windows, etc. However, it has frequently
been found, by BRE researchers and others, that these new buildings are not meeting their
design targets for energy and water use.
32 Going Green:
BRE research
Recognising a need to examine actual occupant behaviours that impact on the energy
efficiency of buildings and to provide guidance for designers to take these into account,
the BRE Trust funded a research project involving a systematic investigation of eight
buildings from a variety of sectors and regions over a 12-month period in 2008-9. The
buildings were selected based on their energy-efficient and sustainable design. The case
studies investigated the ways in which occupants actually used their buildings, whether they
were used as they were designed to be, and the reasons for any discrepancies. Each case
study visit comprised interviews with the architect, building services engineer and facilities
manager of each building as well as focus groups with occupants and an observational
walk-through.
Summary of findings
The research team found that, as hypothesised, building occupants were adapting their
workplaces to meet their own needs, and exhibiting behaviours that increased energy
usage, compromising the original design intent for a low energy building. However, these
behaviours were often inadvertent, resulting from a lack of understanding of the systems
installed, poor communication to occupants about how to use the systems and, most of all,
a lack of consideration of the principles of user-centred design in the design of
environmental systems and controls. These principles, such as feedback, mapping,
affordances, intuitive controls, etc., as advocated by researchers such as Norman (1988) are
not new and, although they have been discussed by psychologists and ergonomists for
many years, they appear to have fallen out of use.
This was particularly apparent with reference to the design of lighting controls – all the
buildings visited had been designed with energy efficient lighting; however, in the majority
of cases occupants had experienced difficulties in controlling the lighting with the result
that lights would be left on unnecessarily. Issues noted included multi-function controls
which were often counter-intuitive or contained a number of complex switches
incorporating various functions such as dimming with others such as the on/off function
or scene lightings (see first picture). It was noted that even experienced users did not
understand how to operate some such switches. Also large banks of switches without labels
can be a problem. These sometimes have no labels indicating which light each switch
controlled. Occupants may have to use trial-and-error and this can even result in all lights
in an open-plan office being switched on, even if there was only a single occupant! The
second picture illustrates how one enterprising facilities manager got around the problem
by attaching his own labels, while the third picture, below, shows how even simple switches
can be improved by providing feedback about whether they are in the on or off position.
As mentioned above, a recurring theme throughout the project was the lack of simple
information for occupants explaining how to control their environment when new
technologies and systems are installed, again increasing energy usage. Designers as
technical experts tend to forget that the end users of their technologies are not – examples
included occupants using an energy -intensive mechanical ventilation system rather than
using the high level opening windows which formed the natural ventilation strategy; or
The detailed findings of the research are reported in Hadi and Halfhide (2009), which
provides targeted recommendations for designers, facilities managers and building users,
showing how negative behaviours can be avoided and their impact reduced.
34 Going Green:
References
Bordass, W. & Leaman, A. (1997). Design for manageability. Building Research and
Information, 25(3).
Cooper, I. (2001). Post-occupancy evaluation – where are you? Building Research &
Information, 29(2), 58–163.
Hadi, M. & Halfhide, C. (2009). The move to low carbon design: Are designers taking the needs of
building users into account? A guide for building designers, operators and users. Bracknell:
IHS BRE Press.
Perez-Lombard, L., Ortiz, O. & Pout, C. (2008). A review on buildings’ energy
consumption. Energy & Buildings, 40, 394–398.
Leaman, A. & Bordass, W. (2001). Assessing building performance in use 4: the Probe
occupant surveys and their implications. Building Research & Information, 29(2),
129–143
Nicol, J.F. (2001). Characterising occupant behaviour in buildings: Towards a stochastic
model of occupant use of windows, lights, blinds, heaters and fans. Proceedings of the
7th International IBPSA Conference, 2001.
Norman, D. (1988). The psychology of everyday things. Basic Books.
Robinson, D. (1997). Occupancy related data for use in energy and environmental
Modelling. BRE report CR 102/97.
Sharples, S., Callaghan, V. & Clarke, G. (1999). A multi-agent architecture for intelligent
building sensing and control. International Sensor Review Journal, 19(2), 13–14.
WBCSD. (2007). Energy efficiency in buildings: Business realities and opportunities: Summary
report. World Business Council for Sustainable Development.
Measuring organisational performance has always been a difficult task, and one that
occupational psychologists have been inherently interested in as they endeavour to
improve this performance through psychological means. But in order to assess the merit of
a particular strategy, we need to be able to measure ‘high’ performance. This also allows us
to look at ‘high performing’ organisations more closely to emulate their success (Hubbard,
2009). A vast array of key performance indicators (KPIs) have, in the past, been indicators
of a more general ‘bottom line’ measurement which have sought to illustrate economic
performance. More recently, measures of environmental and social performance have
been included to determine organisational performance as a whole, popularly termed a
Triple Bottom Line (TBL) (Elkington, 1997). Hubbard (2009) defines each aspect of the
TBL as follows: economic performance is straight forward and encompasses purely
financial aspects of the company, such as sales and profit growth; social performance is the
impact an organisation has on the communities in which it is based and also those working
for the company; and environmental performance generally refers to the amount of
resources used by organisations (energy, water, land), as well as the by-products of its
activities (waste, air emissions, chemical residues).
36 Going Green:
species will be hit and even may become extinct (Walker & King, 2008). Some of these
effects can already been seen in the poorest parts of the world and it is widely agreed that
we have less than 15 years to act on our greenhouse gas emissions to stop dangerous
impacts (Spence, Pidgeon & Uzzel, 2009; Walker & King, 2008).
DEFRA (2008) have identified 12 key behaviours that will help to combat climate change
within the areas of personal transport (e.g. use more efficient vehicles and avoid
unnecessary flights), energy, waste and water in our homes (e.g. insulation, recycling and
more responsible water usage), and eco-products (e.g. eat more locally produced, seasonal
food). However, just listing behaviours does not lead to behaviour change, and further to
this, favourable attitudes toward a behaviour is not enough for that behaviour to be carried
out (Ajzen, 2001). In addition, changing behaviours at home may not be the best way to
combat climate change, as according to recent government studies by the DTI (2006) and
DEFRA (2006), the non-domestic sector (e.g. services, public sector and industry) has a
significantly higher impact on climate change than residential sectors. In fact, the UK’s
service and industry sectors contribute twice the amount of carbon (MtC) to the
atmosphere (DTI, 2006) and industry and commerce almost three times the amount of
annual waste (DEFRA, 2006).
38 Going Green:
Figure 1: Pictorial representation of the Theory of Planned Behaviour
Behavioural
Behavioural At
Attitude
titude
Toward the
Toward the
Beliefs
Beliefs
Behaviour
Behaviour
Normative
Normative Subjective
Subjective
Intention Behaviour
Behaviour
Beliefs
Beliefs Norms
N orms
Control
Control Perceived
Perceived
Beliefs
Beliefs Behavioural
Behavioural
C
Control
ontrol
Attitudes are defined as beliefs about the predicted outcomes of a behaviour and the
evaluations of the pleasantness of each of these outcomes. For example, someone could
consider looking good to be a positive outcome of keeping fit and they may rate that
benefit moderately. However, they could also see the aches and pains from keeping fit as a
negative outcome and rate that cost highly, which overall would lead to an unfavourable
behavioural belief and hence an unfavourable attitude to keeping fit.
Subjective norms are defined as beliefs about whether others would want to perform the
behaviour in question weighted by the motivation to comply with that person. Adding to
the previous example, the person in question could have a neighbour that likes to keep fit
but their motivation to comply with their neighbour may be low. On the other hand, their
brother may not keep fit and if the person is closer to their brother they may have a
stronger desire to comply with him.
The theory of reasoned action didn’t include a measure of perceived behavioural control
as it assumed that behaviour was under volitional control, i.e. that someone could perform
the behaviour if they wished. However, as shown on many occasions in psychological
research there are often personal and environmental barriers. Perceived behavioural
control is an individual’s perception of their ability to perform the behaviour in question
and hence the constraints they perceive in doing so. It is caused by beliefs concerning
whether resources and opportunities are available to perform the behaviour in question
and what the expected impact is of each of these factors. In this case the person in the
example may have no gym nearby and perceive this as an important factor in being able to
keep fit.
It is thought that the more favourable a person’s attitude, subjective norm and perceived
behavioural control, the stronger intentions they will have and hence a higher probability
that they will carry out the behaviour in question. However, as Ajzen (1991) points out, the
‘relative importance of attitudes, subjective norms and perceived behavioural control in
the prediction of intentions is expected to vary across behaviour and situation’ (p.188).
Hypothetically this means that if attitudes and subjective norms are strong, perceived
Similarly, Ajzen found between 4 per cent (r = 0.20) and 61 per cent (r = 0.78) of variance
in behaviours was explained by intentions, with the average at 26 per cent (r = 0.51),
whereas Armitage and Conner found 22 per cent of the variance was accounted for. Other
studies concluded that the figure was around 20 per cent (Randall & Wolff, 1994), with
Sheeran and Orbell (1998) reporting a similar figure of 19 per cent; however, this did not
include perceived behavioural control, which can act directly on behaviours and which,
when included, increases the amount of variance explained to 27 per cent (Armitage &
Conner, 2001). These results are summarised in Table 2.
40 Going Green:
Authors Year Explained Variance
42 Going Green:
Consistent with the increased proportion of explained variance of behaviours and
intentions within a work place setting the research carried out showed that 48 per cent of
the behavioural intentions were explained by the theory of planned behaviour variables
(perceived behavioural control and subjective norms were significant; however, attitudes
were not). This result showed greater explained variance than previous meta-analysed
(Armitage & Conner, 2001; Perugini & Bagozzi, 2004), although not than Ajzen’s (1991)
initial review. However, the variance of behaviours explained by intentions and perceived
behavioural control was 58 per cent, which was significantly greater than all the previous
meta-analysis and reviews (Ajzen, 1991; Armitage & Conner, 2001; Sheeran & Orbell, 1998;
Randall & Wolff, 1994). Furthermore, this study found that by reframing the social norm
questions to look at work norms, this significantly added 20 per cent extra to the
explanation of the variance in intentions supporting the importance of social influence
within organisations.
These results strengthen the idea that the theory of planned behaviour has greater
relevancy within a workplace setting. This could be because colleagues are acting more
mindfully at work and are not ‘on automatic’ as they may be at home. Or there could be a
greater need to comply with rules and regulations at work than outside of work and
therefore people are more likely to act on their normative beliefs, i.e. doing as their peers
do or doing as superiors say, rather than what they want to do. Hence this may explain why
attitudes failed to correlate with intentions but subjective norms did. Furthermore, it seems
that if you intend to do something at work and believe you have the necessary skills and
tools to carry it out, you are more likely to carry this intention through to action. This
again could be down to the social and organisational pressures, but also the greater
importance of control an individual perceives that they have. This is consistent with the
literature on organisational change (see Senior & Swailes, 2010) – if an employee feels they
have little control over a situation they are less likely to carry out that behaviour.
With these results in mind there are certain steps an organisation may want to take if
introducing (or reintroducing) recycling or other pro-environmental behaviours into the
workplace. First of all changing attitudes is only the first step and does not always correlate
with action, as this research illustrates. However, the majority of other studies and reviews
have found this to be a robust antecedent of intentions (and so behaviour) and it is,
therefore, an important first step. The literature around cognitive behavioural therapy
(e.g. Branch & Willson, 2010) and social marketing (e.g. McKenzie-Mohr & Smith, 2006)
provide just two examples from the wider literature around how to influence attitudes.
However, because changing attitudes alone does as not guarantee subsequent behaviour
change and, given that many attitudes are implicit and therefore difficult things to
influence, it is also important to look at other variables suggested by the theory of planned
behaviour.
Consistent with the finding reported by Peach et al. (2005), that ‘social influence may help
to create social pressure among employees to act in change-supportive ways’ (p.18), the
results from this study indicate that social norms should also be considered when
encouraging pro-environmental behaviours. It can’t be concluded from the present study
what groups different employees will be motivated to comply with and further research is
needed here, but it is likely that this will differ from employee to employee so messages
should be given by a range of different employees (i.e. senior management, middle
44 Going Green:
References
Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human
Decision Processes, 50, 179–211.
Ajzen, I. (2001). Nature and operation of attitudes. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 27–58.
Ajzen, I. & Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting social behaviour.
Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Anonymous. (2004). Does it add value? The Economist, 373, 13 November.
Armitage, C.J. & Conner, M. (2001). Efficacy of the theory of planned behaviour: A meta-
analytic review. British Journal of Social Psychology, 40, 471–500.
Arnold, J., Silvester, J., Patterson, F., Robertson, I., Cooper, C. & Burnes, B. (2005). Work
psychology: Understanding human behaviour in the workplace (4th edn). London: Prentice
Hall.
Branch, R. & Willson, R. (2010). Cognitive behavioural therapy for dummies (2nd edn). Wiley
Climate Group, The (2007). Carbon down, profits up (3rd edn).
http://theclimategroup.org/assets/resources/cdpu_newedition.pdf
Davis, M.C. & Challenger, R. (2009). Climate change – Warming to the task. The
Psychologist, 22(2), 112–114.
DEFRA (2006). Key facts about: Waste and recycling – estimated total annual waste
arisings, by sector. Retrieved 11 March from www.defra.gov.uk/environment/statitics/
waste/kf/wrkf02.htm
DEFRA (2008). A framework for pro-environmental behaviours. London: Author.
Department of Trade and Industry (2006). A supplement to the third annual report on the
Energy White Paper Our energy future – Creating a low carbon economy. London: Author.
Elkington J. (1997). Cannibals with forks: The triple bottom line of 21st century business.
Capstone: Oxford.
Elliott, R., Jobber, D. & Sharp, J. (1995). Using the theory of reasoned action to
understand organisational behaviour: The role of belief salience. British Journal of
Social Psychology, 34, 161–172.
Fishbein, M. & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention and behaviour: An introduction to
theory and research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Hill, M., Mann, L. & Wearing, A.J. (1996). The effects of attitude, subjective norm and self-
efficacy on intention to benchmark: A comparison between managers with
experience and no experience in benchmarking. Journal of Organizational Behaviour,
17, 313–337.
Hubbard, G. (2009). Measuring organizational performance: Beyond the triple bottom
line. Business Strategy and the Environment, 19, 177–191.
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (2007). Climate change 2007: Synthesis report.
Geneva: Author.
46 Going Green:
Green behaviour:
Barriers, facilitators and the role of attributions
48 Going Green:
Dimension Description
interventions (e.g. adding more accessible recycling bins). On the other hand, if negative
outcomes are associated with internal attributions (such as not caring about recycling
paper) then it may be harder to deal with using interventions.
Theoretical rubrics such as the Theory of Planned Behaviour (TOPB; Ajzen, 1985) have
proven useful in predicting certain specific pro-environmental behaviours (Stern, Dietz &
Guagnano, 1995) and, based upon such findings, the current research suspected that
control was likely to be a significant factor in relation to sustainable behaviour in the
workplace. Other relevant factors that were thought to be of significance included whether
an attribution is coded as internal or external, and whether it is personal or universal.
Previous research has implied an association between personal values and constructs such
as personal norms, environmental awareness and attitudes towards recycling (Do Valle et
50 Going Green:
In order to identify the causes attributed to acting (or not) in a sustainable way at work,
attributions were extracted from the transcripts and coded in accordance with the Leeds
Attributional Coding System (LACS) (Stratton et al., 1988). Following LACS guidelines,
the attributions were coded from the point of view of the speaker so that the meaning that
the individual wants to convey is coded, whether or not the researcher agrees with or
believes the statement (Silvester, 2004).
Over 1,000 attributions were extracted from the interviews and each was rated along a
three-point scale where 1 = unstable, external, uncontrollable, universal and 3 = stable,
internal, controllable, personal. To aid further analyses, each attribution was also coded in
relation to whether the outcome of the attribution is negative or positive (Silvester, 2004).
Those attributions relating to either a negative or undesired occurrence were coded as
1 = ‘negative’ and those attributions that referred to either a positive or desired occurrence
were coded as 3 = ‘positive’. Examining the positive-negative dimension of attributions was
useful in this context for understanding attributional patterns. Below is an example of a
coded attribution:
‘I can actually read e-mails and so on >so I don’t need to print any of it off”
This attribution was coded as Positive (3) – Internal (3) – Controllable (3) – Stable (3) –
Global (3) – Personal (3)
■ Positive – by not printing emails, paper resources are conserved:
a positive environmental behaviour
■ Internal – the cause reflects something that the speaker does:
‘I can actually read e-mails…’
■ Controllable – the speaker has control over whether or not they read e-mails
■ Stable – the fact that the speaker can read e-mails is likely to be relatively permanent
and unchanging
■ Global – the capability to read e-mails is quite important and is likely to impact on a
range of outcomes
■ Personal – the speaker indicates that both the cause and outcome relates to
something about him or her: ‘I can…’; ‘I don’t need…’
A sample of the data was coded by an independent second coder, who was also trained in
the use of LACS, to establish reliability. Cohen’s Kappa coefficient was calculated for each
coding dimension. Kappa values in the range of 0.4 to 0.6 are considered fair, between 0.6
and 0.75 is good, and above 0.75 is excellent (Carter, 2004). Reliability of coding was found
to range from fair to excellent.
Finally, statistical analyses were performed on the coded data using SPSS. Since the data
was drawn from populations that were not normally distributed, non-parametric tests were
employed: Mann-Whitney U to investigate differences, and Spearman’s Rho to explore
relationships.
Comments & “A lot of the stuff that I do, I learn from the person I
Positive Comments
Suggestions share the office with’
52 Going Green:
The content analysis of the interview transcripts resulted in the identification of the
following types of barrier to sustainable behaviour at work (see Table 3):
The perception that the individual ‘The heating and air cooling in this
Lack of Control
is unable to change the situation building are outside my control’
Lack of Lack of knowledge regarding ‘I don’t know whether you can do double-
Knowledge energy or resource conservation sided printing on this printer’
Lack of ‘You want people to turn off monitors and
Others demonstrating little or no
Engagement speakers and even though you do ask, it
interest in behaving sustainably
from Others doesn’t happen’
‘There are some rooms I’ve taught in,
Not having appropriate or
particularly in the main building, where
Lack of sufficient resources to save energy
there is a bin for recycling and no other
Resources and minimise waste in the
bin. And if that’s the only bin, people are
workplace
going to put everything in it’
‘People don’t know what they’re supposed
to do and they don’t understand enough
Lack of Not knowing if one’s behaviour is
about how they can manage things better.
Feedback having the desired effect
Sometimes there’s not much feedback on
what success they’ve had’
‘You have to purchase from an approved
supplier. They have a green book so you
‘Green’ options often viewed as
Costs can get some things from there. But
more expensive
there’s always the cost as well: people
have budgets’
Attributional Analyses
The first hypothesis proposed that Champions would score higher on the Positive,
Personal, Internal and Controllable dimensions than Non-Champions. This hypothesis was
found to be partially supported. Champions scored significantly higher than Non-
Dimensions
1 Positive 4 Stable
2 Internal 5 Global
3 Controllable 6 Personal
The second hypothesis proposed that Positive attributions would be higher on the
Personal, Internal and Controllable dimensions than Negative attributions. This hypothesis
was fully supported: Positive attributions were significantly higher than Negative
attributions on the Personal (p<0.01), Internal (p<0.01) and Controllable (p<0.01)
dimensions.
Figure 2 reveals that the pattern of results for Positive attributions is that similar to that of
Negative attributions, with the notable exception of the Personal dimension, where mean
score for Positive attributions is significantly higher than the mean score for Negative
attributions.
54 Going Green:
Figure 2: Differences between Positive and Negative Attributions
Dimensions
Dimensions
1 Positive 4 Stable
2 Internal 5 Global
3 Controllable 6 Personal
This study also found that Champions made significantly more Positive attributions than
Non-Champions. This seems to indicate that Champions engage in more pro-
56 Going Green:
Recommendations for promoting sustainability in large
organisations
A number of recommendations for implementing sustainable practices at work can be
made on the basis of the results of this study.
1) Encourage flexible working as a means to save energy; for example, enable staff to
work from home where possible.
2) Set ‘green’ targets. Ensure that staff at all levels are aware of the targets and are
supported to achieved them
3) Provide feedback to staff regarding the organisation’s environmental performance.
This helps to improve personal ‘meaningfulness’ and thus should have a positive
impact on sustainable behaviours
4) Provide education and training regarding sustainability at work. This should enable
staff to feel that they have greater control over their environment, and again helps to
improve ‘meaningfulness’
5) Offer rewards and incentives to encourage green behaviour in the workplace
6) Consider implementing schemes such as the Environmental Champion network
The author hopes that these suggestions will help organisations to foster sustainable
behaviour in their workforce, enabling them to ‘go green’ without costing the earth.
Acknowledgements
The author would like to acknowledge the invaluable assistance of Dr Zibarras in the
design and implementation of the study, and in the composition of this chapter.
Dr Lara D. Zibarras, Psychology Department, City University London, Northampton
Square, London, EC1V 0HB (e-mail: l.zibarras@city.ac.uk)
References
Ajzen, I. (1985). From intention to actions: A theory of planned behaviour. In J. Kubl &
J. Beckman (Eds) Action control: From cognitions to behaviour (pp.11-39). New York:
Springer-Verlag.
Arnold, J., Silvester, J., Patterson, F., Robertson, I., Cooper, C. & Burnes, B. (2005). Work
psychology: Understanding human behaviour in the workplace (4th Edition). Pearson
Education.
BERR (2009). The UK low carbon industrial strategy. Retrieved 23 November 2009 from
http://www.berr.gov.uk/files/file52002.pdf
Bryman, A. (2001). Social research methods. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Carter, D. (2004). Qualitative psychological research: A student’s handbook. Hove: Psychology
Press.
Davis, M.C. & Challenger, R. (2009). Climate change – warming to the task. The Psychologist,
22(2), 112–114.
58 Going Green:
Green behaviour: Differences in recycling behaviour
between the home and the workplace
In 2008 the Scottish Environmental Protection Agency reported that commercial waste
amounted to 5.75 million tonnes, compared with 2.94 million tonnes of domestic waste.
Despite the fact that waste arising in commercial premises is nearly double that produced
by households in the UK, the study of recycling in the workplace is less common than the
study of recycling at home (Marans & Lee, 1993). Some of the work that has been done on
recycling within commercial settings has focused on specific commercial recycling schemes
(see for example Bacot, McCoy &Plagman-Galvin, 2002; Clay, 2005). In a parallel to the
research which aims to characterise the domestic recycler and understand the antecedents
to their (non) recycling behaviour, there is a strand of research in the environmental
psychology tradition which tries to establish predictors of the employee characteristics (see
for example Marans& Lee, 1993), organisational characteristics (see for example
Maclaren& Yu, 1997) or scheme design factors (see for example Brothers, Krantz &
McClannahan,1994; Ludwig, Gray & Rowell, 1998) which will lead to successful recycling
initiatives.
The focus on the reduction of domestic, rather than commercial, waste may have been
fuelled by the UK Government targets for the increase in recycling rates (DEFRA, 2007).
This has contributed to the lack of attention to workplaces as contexts for the production
of many waste streams also found in domestic waste. There is also perhaps an underlying
assumption that recyclers will behave in similar ways in their domestic context and at work.
However, recent work has shown that people do not recycle in the same ways in different
contexts. Studies have shown that people do not necessarily continue to recycle whilst on
holiday (Barr et al., 2010) or while away at university (Scott, 2009). This raises the question
of whether people who have established patterns of recycling at home can or do translate
these practices into recycling at work.The first study which attempted to make a link
between home and work place recycling was by Lee, De Young and Marans (1995) which
examined whether private recycling behaviour was a useful predictor of participation in
office recycling schemes. The study surveyed nearly 1,800 Taiwanese office workers from 32
different firms, and found that although prior (home) recycling experience of a specific
material was a predictor of office recycling, the actual rates of recycling at work were much
lower than those reported at home. In the UK context, this result was also obtained by a
study of the recycling habits of university staff and students (Clay, 2005).
This chapter describes a small study which aims to ascertain whether there is a difference
between recycling behaviour at home and at work. However, rather than focus on a specific
work environment (offices, university), it surveys a population with access to comparable
opportunities to recycle their household waste, but makes no inferences about their
specific employment setting.
The design of the questionnaire was deliberately kept very simple with the fewest possible
questions in order to facilitate as high a response rate as possible. For example, a decision
was taken not to ask householders for any demographic information which would lengthen
the questionnaire and make people less willing to participate.
The questionnaires were placed inside an open freepost envelope and hand delivered to
1,000 households in Banchory, a small town in the North East of Scotland during June
2010. Householders were asked to complete the questionnaire, place it back into the
freepost envelope and put it in the post. The questionnaires were not marked in any way
and so the responses to the survey were entirely anonymous.
Banchory was selected for the study as it is a small commuter town in the Aberdeenshire
countryside. Many of Banchory’s residents are employed in the oil and gas industry in
nearby Aberdeen, 16 miles away. However, the area is also home to thriving farming,
tourism and timber related industries which also employ a proportion of residents,
providing the potential to get information about recycling in rural, as well as urban,
workplaces. Households were sampled by taking consensus samples of 40 streets in
Banchory which were randomly selected to ensure representation form a wide range of
council tax bands. All of the households in the town receive the same municipal recycling
facilities provided by Aberdeenshire Council:
60 Going Green:
■ a fortnightly doorstep collection of paper and white/grey cardboard;
■ A fortnightly doorstep collection of mixed glass, plastic bottles and food and drink
cans;
■ a recycling centre which provides for the disposal of paper, glass, plastic bottles,
cardboard (any), food and drinks cans, cardboard drinks packs, telephone directories
(periodically), textiles, scrap metal, garden waste, soil, rubble, oil, car batteries,
domestic batteries, WEEE, domestic appliances and furniture as well as general
household waste; and
■ several ‘bring’ sites scattered across the town in car parks near parks, schools and
supermarkets which also provide a range of banks for glass, paper, paper, glass, plastic
bottles, cardboard (any), food and drinks cans and textiles.
62 Going Green:
What’s the reason for the difference between recycling at home and
at work?
This pilot study confirms that recycling in the home is more common than recycling in the
workplace. Even people who recycle a wide range of materials at home do not seem to
translate those habits into their workplace contexts. Now that this difference has been
established, further study will be required to ascertain why this situation has arisen. Some
of the comments offered in response to the open question at the end of the questionnaire
(see Figure 1) offer insights into why this is the case.
One of the most common statements made by respondents was that they could not recycle
many of the materials at work because they either did not arise in a work setting or that
there were no facilities to recycle them at work. Whilst it is likely that in many workplaces
some materials, such as glass, are found in lower quantities than they might be a home, it is
extremely unlikely that they are entirely absent from a workplace. For example, although
jam jars and ketchup bottles might be relatively rare, soft drink bottles and coffee jars may
well be found in many workplaces. Waste Watch estimates that 3 per cent of commercial
and office waste is glass (Waste Online, 2004). Reporting occasional occurrence of
recyclables as non-occurrence is something that has been found in previous studies of non-
recyclers (McDonald & Oates, 2003). Equally, assertions that no facilities exist at work
should be treated with caution as several respondents reported that there were no facilities
in Banchory to recycle metals (although food and drink cans are included in the
fortnightly doorstep collection and banks are available at the recycling centre as well as at a
number of points throughout the town) or garden waste (despite a dedicated skip located
at the recycling centre).
Another theme underlying many responses was that of responsibility. By noting that no
facilities were available to them at their workplace, respondents may be seeking to absolve
themselves from the responsibility of their non-recycling behaviour. Studies of domestic
recycling have found that low recycling rates are often attributed to the lack of facilities
provided, or the design of the schemes which are available. In an interesting parallel, the
‘fault’ here is transferred from the municipal providers of the domestic services to the
collective employers. This is underlined by a few respondents who reported that they assumed
that their waste was being recycled (even when no sorting or storing of recyclables was in
evidence) or that they didn’t know whether it was recycled or not. The responsibility for
sorting waste is further blurred when cleaning services are outsourced to another company.
However, there is a small group of individuals who report that they take their recyclables
home with them to recycle them along with their own household waste. One respondent
noted that although there was workplace recycling, a colleague had set it up informally and
simply took the recyclables away periodically and put them in banks on her way home. For
those determined to recycle in the workplace, informal systems have been put in place to
counter lack of official provision in some work places.
Conclusions
Further work will be required to understand the differences in the habits uncovered in this
pilot study. However, it does show that this is an important area for future study as it is clear
that people’s domestic recycling habits are not necessarily being carried over into their
References
Bacot, H., McCoy, W. & Plagman-Galvin, J. (2002). Municipal commercial recycling:
Barriers to success. The American Review of Public Administration 32(2), 145–165.
Barr, S., Shaw, G., Coles, T. & Prillwitz, J. (2010). ‘A holiday is a holiday’: Practicing
sustainability, home and away. Journal of Transport Geography, in press.
Brothers, K.J., Krantz, P.J. & McClannahan, L.E. (1994). Office paper recycling: A function
of container proximity. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis 27(1), 153–160.
Clay, S. (2005). Increasing university recycling: Factors influencing recycling behaviour
among students at Leeds University. Earth and Environment 1, 186–228.
DEFRA (2007). Waste strategy for England 2007. London: DEFRA.
Lee, Y.-J., De Young, R. & Marans, R.W. (1995). Factors affecting individual recycling
behavior in office settings: A study of office workers in Taiwan. Environment and
Behavior, 27(3), 381–402.
Ludwig, T.D., Gray, T.W. & Rowell, A. (1998) Increasing recycling in academic buildings:
A systematic replication. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 31(4), 683–686.
Marans, R.W. & Lee, Y.-J. (1993) Linking recycling behavior to waste management planning:
A case study of office workers in Taiwan. Landscape and Urban Planning 26, 203–214.
McDonald, S. & Oates, C.J. (2003). Reasons for non-participation in a kerbside recycling
scheme. Resources, Conservation & Recycling, 39(4), 369–385.
McLaren, V.W. & Yu, C.-C.(1997). Solid waste recycling behavior of industrial-commercial-
institutional establishments. Growth and Change, 28 (Winter), 93–109.
Scott, A.K. (2009). Towards sustainable consumption: Understanding the adoption and practice of
environmental actions in households. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Sheffield.
SEPA (2010). Waste data digest 10: Key facts and trends. Edinburgh: SEPA and Scottish
Government.
Waste Online (2004). Waste at work information sheet. Available from: www.wasteonline.org.uk/
resources/InformationSheets/WasteAtWork.htm accessed Nov 2010.
64 Going Green:
Green behaviour change: HOT topics
Climate change is a psychological problem. A rather stark statement maybe, but one which
is, we think, defensible. To be sure, the mitigation of the effects of climate change poses
very great technological challenges. However, the fact is that technologies that are widely
available today are capable of making a very large dent in the carbon dioxide emissions
that are thought to underlie the problem. To give just one of a plethora of possible
examples: according to DEFRA, the average family car in the UK emits around 215g CO2
per kilometre; by contrast, the most fuel-efficient family car currently available emits
around 90g CO2 per kilometre and, with the advent of plug-in hybrids over the next two
years, this figure is likely to be further reduced to around 65g. For those (like the UK
Government) seeking a 70-80 per cent cut in carbon emissions from private cars, the
problem therefore is not a technological one but a behavioural one: how can we get
people to adopt existing low-carbon technologies in their everyday lives?
The same considerations apply to businesses. We are engaged in a project called EASIER
(Environmental Assistance to SMEs In the Eastern Region), which advises small businesses
on ways in which they can reduce their carbon emissions. What has become clear from this
engagement is that there are many opportunities for such businesses to make changes that
substantially reduce both emissions and ongoing costs. Where these changes involve
modest capital investment (as they often do), there are funds available, interest free, from
organisations such as the Carbon Trust, a facility which contributes to a powerful case for
change. Nonetheless, we frequently find senior managers reluctant to proceed. Again, the
problem is neither technological nor financial: it is psychological.
In this chapter, we will give a brief outline of a framework that we are developing with regard
to pro-environmental behaviour change, for people at home and at work. We will start by
noting the relatively limited success that psychological/behavioural interventions have
enjoyed in the past. As a consequence, we will suggest that the net be cast rather wider in the
search for psychological techniques that might usefully be applied in this domain. For
mnemonic reasons, if nothing else, we will focus our discussion around the HOT topics of
the title: habits, opportunities and thoughts. As will be seen, for expository reasons the
discussion doesn’t necessarily deal with them strictly in this acronym-friendly order.
66 Going Green:
environmental problems with which we are currently faced suggest that these ‘good’ habits
are not yet the norm. For this reason, a programme for pro-environmental behaviour
change will need to take seriously the constraints that habits place on human action and
on the possibilities of change.
A number of authors have looked at the habits relating to the environment (e.g.
Dahlstrand & Biel, 1997; Davidov, 2007; Klöckner & Matthies, 2004; Verplanken, Aarts &
van Knippenberg, 1997; Verplanken, Walker, Davis & Jurasek, 2008). Interestingly, habits in
relation to travel-mode choice were the focus for all of these authors other than Dahlstrand
and Biel. Those authors looked at the purchase of environmentally friendly detergents in
relation to a ‘stepwise model of behaviour change’ in this domain. Their model is
interesting. It proposed seven key steps in the development of an environmentally benign
habit: activation (i.e. attending to the environment as a value); attending to present
behaviour; consideration of alternative behaviours; planning new behaviour; testing new
behaviour; evaluation of new behaviour; and establishment of a new habit. Alongside each
of these steps, they postulated factors that either impede or promote progress at that point.
So for the third step (the consideration of alternative behaviours), they identified negative
beliefs about the alternatives as an impeding factor (see below), while the presence of
‘evident, existing alternatives’ was considered a promoting factor at this level. It is notable
that the first two of Dahlstrand and Biel’s (1997) seven steps come under the general
heading of attention. This accords with a crucial observation from our own practice with
client businesses, namely, that many people do not attend to, and are hence not aware of,
the energy that they are using in various aspects of their business. They are, in some sense,
blind to the energy, and hence to the money, that they are wasting.
The phenomenon of ‘inattentional blindness’ is well attested: people literally fail to see
features of the visual environment to which they are not attending, even when these
features are embarrassingly obvious to the same people once attention is drawn to them.
Perhaps the most well-known popular demonstration of this phenomenon is the so-called
‘invisible gorilla’ test of Simons and Chabris (1999). In this test, participants are asked to
watch a video showing two teams of three people (one team dressed in white, the other
black), each passing a basketball among them. To ensure that participants attend closely,
they are asked to count the number of passes completed by the team in white. Under these
conditions, a majority of participants are unable to report the appearance of a person
dressed as a gorilla as they walk across the field of view, even as they pause in centre-screen
in a melodramatic beating of the chest.
While less engaging than a person in a gorilla costume, the ways in which our clients
(among others) use unnecessary amounts energy and, hence, spend unnecessary money,
are no less invisible to the clients themselves, and no less obvious to the experts
performing energy audits. Of course, the analogy is not complete – the ‘blindness’ of our
clients is more conceptual than perceptual, and has a good deal to do with crystallised
knowledge rather than fluid processing. Nonetheless, a key first step in any intervention
involves encouraging clients to pay active attention to aspects of their energy performance
and to the details of those cost-effective alternatives that are available to them. It is this
change in attentional set, and this expansion is situation-specific knowledge, that we
capture in the Opportunities component of our HOT topics.
68 Going Green:
events and the later feelings, and play a causal role in affecting the latter. Although it is
often misconstrued as attributing blame to the client for bringing about their own
problems by ‘thinking wrong’, this is a fundamentally an optimistic message. It is optimistic
in the following sense: if one genuinely thought that there was a direct (unmediated)
causal connection between events in the world and emotional consequences, one could
only change those emotional consequences by changing the way the world is. In many
circumstances, the ability to change events in the world is simply not a viable option: a
counsel of despair. If one accepts, however, that negative emotional consequences are
affected by the thoughts and beliefs that one has about events, then one has the ability to
modify those emotional consequences by changing the thoughts and beliefs. In many
circumstances, this is much more tractable than altering the events themselves.
In CBT, particularly for disorders of depression or anxiety, thoughts and beliefs are
categorised as being at three levels: negative automatic thoughts (NATs); negative core
beliefs; and nonadaptive rules for living. Very briefly, negative automatic thoughts are those
negative thoughts that are held to flood the mind at times of strain or challenge – they are
automatic, in the sense that they come to mind rapidly and unbidden, and they are
typically described as ‘irrational’ in one of a variety of ways. For example, a thought can be
irrational because it exhibits overly black-and-white reasoning, or because it
‘catastrophises’ a situation, frequently both. To give an example, someone who is socially
anxious may respond to a small mistake in a social situation with the NAT, ‘Oh God. That
was a total disaster. Those people must think that I’m a complete idiot!’. So a minor slip
has been characterised as a ‘total disaster’, and other people’s assessment is assumed to be
that one is a ‘complete idiot’ (this type of mindreading is another characteristic feature of
NATs). As they flood the mind, these NATs are thought to awake core negative beliefs
(e.g. ‘I am an absolute failure’) that have been a long time in gestation and are sometimes
described as ‘light sleepers’, ready to be activated at the slightest provocation. Finally, to
avoid these NATS and their stirring of the aversive core beliefs, people are supposed to
build around them a network of rules for living that minimises the unpleasantness that
results. So the socially anxious person who subscribes to these core beliefs and is prone to
these NATs, simply chooses to organise their life so as to minimise the negative affect. To
be specific, they might develop the rule ‘If I don’t go out, then I won’t experience this
unpleasantness’. So they stay indoors. Chances are, they become socially phobic: they
develop around them what they consider a ‘comfort zone’, but which other people can
clearly see is a highly constrained and inflexible space, that is, a discomfort zone.
So how does this relate to pro-environmental change? While we do not want to stretch the
analogy too far, a couple of examples drawn from direct experience should illustrate the
point.
Let us suppose that one of our clients is a hotel business which uses a large number of
halogen downlighters (the small spotlights that are often used in corridors and common
areas). Such downlighters are typically rated at a power consumption of 50W, though 35W
‘energy saving’ versions are also available. In many hotels, a significant proportion of such
lights will be on for approaching 24 hours a day, and so together they represent significant
energy consumption and, hence, significant cost and significant CO2 emissions. Let us
further suppose that the hotel manager has recently instituted a policy of switching the
50W versions to 35W as the old bulbs fail. Although they are a little more expensive at £2
70 Going Green:
The comparative cost of the bulbs are shown in Figure 1. The regular kinks in the halogen
line represent the replacement cost, as each bulb lasts around 100 days. (Unrealistically, no
additional cost is assumed for the work involved in changing the bulbs, a cost that, if taken
into account, would only strengthen the case for change.) The intercept of the LED line
represents the £30 initial cost, while the gradients of each line represent the cost
implications of the differing power consumptions. What should be clear is that at around
day 330, the cumulative cost of the ‘energy saving’ halogen bulbs exceeds that of the LED
bulb. The investment in an LED bulb pays for itself in something less than a year. This 330-
day payback period means that the investment in LED bulbs is equivalent to doubling your
money in 660 days, in turn equivalent to getting tax-free, compounded interest at the bank
at an interest rate of 40 per cent. Over the three-year warranty period of the LED bulb,
each bulb saves £67, that is, a saving of £22 per bulb per year, or over £1,000 per year in a
(far from atypical) corridor containing 50 such bulbs.
So Epictetus had a point. By adopting a different perspective (in this case, towards what it
means to be expensive), our hotel manager might come to a different conclusion from
that embodied by their initial (automatic) assessment. When they learn that the capital
costs of the bulb replacement programme can be met by an interest-free loan from the
Carbon Trust, the case virtually makes itself: essentially, someone will lend them money at
zero rate of interest, for them to invest at a 40 per cent equivalent return! At the risk of
labouring the point (and an acronym), let us unpick our manager’s NETs: First, £30
doesn’t look ridiculously expensive any more – in fact, it looks like an unmissable
investment opportunity; second, there is no need to have the money upfront, since it is
available as an interest-free loan from the Carbon Trust; third, that bit of mind-reading
(‘The group manager would never approve it’) seems unlikely to be clairvoyant unless, of
course, the group manager is also NET-prone; fourth, the black-and-white thinking
embodied by the bald assertion that ‘I’ve done my bit’ (by moving to what is a very mildly
energy-saving alternative) is now rather less convincing than it might be; and, finally, the
assumed comfort zone (‘We’ll stick to what we know, thanks!) has now been exposed as the
discomfort zone that it truly is. As a last resort, the manager might retreat to an appeal not
to change those bulbs that have only recently been upgraded from 50W to 35W (‘I only put
them in last week!’) – a classic example of what decision theorists call a ‘sunk-cost fallacy’,
another form of cognitive distortion. An LED-bulb payback period of 330 days is entirely
independent of when the previous halogens were installed. Delaying the switch would only
be ‘throwing good money after bad’. Better get on with it.
A second, and briefer, example will, we hope, show that NETs can be implicated in a
refusal to take environmental problems seriously in the first place. How often has one
heard something like, ‘It doesn’t matter what I do – the Chinese are building two power
stations a week!’, used as a reason for failure to take pro-environmental action? We have no
idea whether this purported fact is even true, but let us suppose that it is. This is a classic
example of a NET, triggering the deeply held belief that we are all doomed: there’s
nothing we can do and, what is more, it’s someone else’s fault. What alternative perspective
might we encourage? Pointing out that China has recently become the world’s largest
emitter of carbon dioxide might not seem to be an obvious first gambit. Nonetheless, this
statement conceals a crucial factor: the population of China is approximately 1.3 billion
people, over four times that of the USA, the previous largest emitter. In other words, the
per capita carbon emissions of the Chinese people are around a quarter of those of the
72 Going Green:
might be encouraged to accompany the therapist to the front gate of the garden,
notwithstanding their possibly dire predictions of what might happen as a result. On
learning that the expected disaster failed to occur (note: if the client’s thinking is
genuinely disordered then the therapist relies on the fact that the predicted disaster is
indeed highly unlikely), the client is able to modify their cognitions at a rather deeper level
than they could simply by sitting in the home and thinking, however rationally, about the
matter. The client is, therefore, facilitated in acting like a scientist, with themselves and
their beliefs and dispositions as the object of study. Once the garden gate has been
conquered, the next experiment might involve a trip to the end of the street, then to the
local shop, and so on.
Therefore the notion that clients progress in large measure by doing rather than thinking,
and by observing that their predictions (thoughts) about the consequences of such action
are faulty, is properly acknowledged in the cognitive behavioural therapies. It is also
explicitly acknowledged in both the problem-focussed model of Palmer (2007) and the
stepwise model of Dahlstrand and Biel (1997): both subsume the planning, testing and
evaluation of new behaviours. Another framework in which this insight (i.e. that progress
relies on, and indeed comprises, ‘doing something different’) is the Framework for
Internal Transformation (FIT; Fletcher & Stead, 2000).
FIT comprises a collection of psychometrically validated tools (principally, the FIT
Profiler) and a variety of behavioural interventions (principally, a Do Something Different,
DSD, programme), all targeted at identifying and moderating a participant’s degree of
behavioural flexibility. Recent practical applications have been in the domain of weight loss
(Fletcher, Hanson, Pine & Page, in press; Fletcher, Page, & Pine, 2007; Page & Fletcher,
2008), though the approach is, by its nature, generic. The FIT Profiler measures behaviour
on 15 behavioural dimensions, specifically measuring the degree of flexibility in each. It
also measures five ‘Inner Constancies’ (Awareness, Balance, Conscience, Fearlessness and
Self-Responsibility), in an acknowledgement that thinking-style too can be prone to
inflexibility and habit. Unlike other personality measures, the FIT Profiler emphasises the
idea that for maximum effectiveness one would not want to be located at any given point
along a particular dimension. For example, taking an Introversion-Extraversion dimension,
it is clear that there will be some times at which one might best behave in an introverted
fashion (e.g. a funeral), and some times when extraverted behaviour would be appropriate
(e.g. a party). The FIT Profiler measures such behavioural flexibility and directs its
development.
As noted above, the primary FIT intervention is a Do Something Different (DSD)
programme. Taking weight-loss as an example, this programme invites participants to
engage in a programme of doing something different every day for a month (with two
additional tasks each week). Across the four weeks of the intervention, the focus changes
from new behaviours (weeks 1–2), to new ways of interacting with people (week 3) and
behaviours relating to the Constancies (week 4). Importantly, these DSD tasks are not
themselves food or exercise related, but might be as simple as writing to an old friend,
going to the theatre, or shopping at a different shop. The driving credo is that habits are
not independent one from another, but exist in a mutually supporting network of habit-
webs (cf. Neal, Wood & Quinn, 2006). If one comes home at the same time every day,
having shopped in the same shops, to watch the same TV programmes, etc., then it is very
Conclusions
In this paper, we have argued for a degree of eclecticism in psychological approaches to
pro-environmental behaviour change. Taking inspiration from areas beyond the more
frequently applied (and not obviously successful) single-track interventions, we have
argued for a broader framework organised around the mnemonically useful HOT topics:
Habits, Opportunities and Thoughts. We propose that the field will benefit from additional
insights from cognitive psychology (in relation to attentional stance and rational decision
making), cognitive behavioural therapies (in relation to NETs and the power of
behavioural experiments), and from FIT science (in relation to its emphasis on enabling
generic behavioural flexibility as an engine of change). Our current work involves bringing
these insights together in a practical programme for businesses and individuals alike.
74 Going Green:
References
Abrahamse, W., Steg, L., Vlek, C. & Rothengatter, T. (2005). A review of intervention
studies aimed at household energy conservation. Journal of Environmental Psychology,
25, 273–291.
Dahlstrand, U. & Biel, A. (1997). Pro-environmental habits: Propensity Levels in Behaviour
Change. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 27(7), 588–601.
Davidov, E. (2007). Explaining habits in a new context: The case of travel-mode choice.
Rationality and Society, 19(3), 315–334.
Fletcher, B.(C)., Hanson, J., Pine, K. J. & Page, N. (in press). FIT – Do something different:
A new psychological intervention tool for facilitating weight loss. Swiss Journal of
Psychology.
Fletcher, B.(C)., Page, N. & Pine, K. J. (2007). A new behavioural intervention for tackling
obesity: Do something different. European Journal of Nutraceuticals and Functional Foods,
18(5), 8–10.
Fletcher, B.(C). & Stead, B. (2000) (Inner) FITness and The FIT Corporation. London:
International Thomson Press.
Klöckner, C.A. & Matthies, E. (2004). How habits interfere with norm-directed behaviour:
A normative decision-making model for travel mode choice. Journal of Experimental
Psychology, 24, 319–327.
Neal, D.T., Wood, W. & Quinn, J.M. (2006). Habits: A repeat performance. Current
Directions in Psychological Science, 15, 198–202.
Page, N. & Fletcher, B.(C). (2008). FIT Science for weight loss: A controlled study of the
benefits of enhancing behavioural flexibility. European Journal of Nutraceuticals and
Functional Foods, 19(5), 8–10.
Palmer, S. (2007). PRACTICE: A model suitable for coaching, counselling, psychotherapy
and stress management. The Coaching Psychologist, 3(2), 71–77.
Simons, D.J. & Chabris, C.F. (1999). Gorillas in our midst: Sustained inattentional
blindness for dynamic events. Perception, 28(9), 1059–1074.
Staats, H., Harland, P. & Wilke, H.A.M. (2004). Effecting durable change. A team approach
to improve environmental behavior in the household. Environment and Behavior,
36(3), 341–367.
Verplanken, B., Aarts, H. & van Knippenberg, A. (1997). Habit, information acquisition,
and the process of making travel mode choices. European Journal of Social Psychology,
27, 539–560.
Verplanken, B., Walker, I., Davis, A. & Jurasek, M. (2008). Context change and travel mode
choice: Combining the habit discontinuity and the self activation hypotheses. Journal
of Environmental Psychology, 28, 121–127.
Wood, W. & Neal, D.T. (2007). A new look at habits and the Habit-Goal interface.
Psychological Review, 114(4), 843–863.
‘Tell me and I will forget, show me and I might remember, involve me and I will understand.’
Chinese proverb
Two of the significant issues that have been reported as having a negative influence on the
extent to which people engage in green behaviour such as recycling, related to their pre-
conceived ideas and attitudes about such behaviour (e.g. Nigbur, Lyons & Uzzell, 2010)
and the inconvenience which they perceive it engenders (e.g. Tucker & Speirs, 2003).
Eco Concierge was established in 2009 with the sole mandate of challenging such ideas and
removing those barriers – essentially to take the hassle out of being green. In one sense, a
concierge service that works with individuals and businesses to help them green their
lifestyles and operations. It therefore represents one way in which organisations can
become greener and also can help their employees do so. However, it is also much more
than this; by emphasising the need to go green without compromising the perspectives,
values and character of its clients and also by specialising in green behaviour change that
uses proven behavioural change research as a basis for the development of an effective
service operation, it aims to enable deep, significant and lasting change towards a greener
future.
The work of Eco Concierge is underpinned by the UK government’s Department for
Environment, Food and Rural Affairs’ (DEFRA) Pro-Environmental Behaviours
Framework. Individuals’ uniquely-held values, as well as their lifestyle and stage, result in
dramatically different perspectives on environmental issues. By tailoring messages to reflect
a deeper understanding of each personal outlook, it’s possible to deliver solutions that
appeal to individuals; not only achieving initial behaviour change at the point of
interaction, but also long-term habit and lifestyle change.
The absolute starting point for Eco Concierge and its modus operandi is the fact that three
out of five people in the UK want to be greener but don’t know where to start (or what to
do next), or don’t have the time to make the changes. These numbers are based on an
array of segmentation evidence in this field including DEFRA’s pro-environment
behaviours work, recycling, energy conservation and uptake of organic food studies and
Marks and Spencer’s internal market research. Crudely put, around 36 million of the
people in the UK could contribute to a less environmentally impactful society, but they
either haven’t been engaged, or aren’t being served the right information. Tapping into
this potential would close a substantial gap in the market and move us a long way towards a
more sustainable future. We’ll come back to this. But firstly, it is important to examine the
significance of individual behaviour change and why – as we’ve seen in our work –
engaging with businesses to motivate their employees to be greener is effective.
76 Going Green:
The context
The work conducted to date on behaviour change theory is vast; that on environmental
behaviours specifically is evolving and deepening at a rapid rate.
A recent WWF report said, ‘It is now beyond dispute that any proportional response to
today’s environmental challenges will require profound changes to the way that most
people in developed countries, and many of the richer people in developing countries,
choose to live. This will entail widespread but far-reaching changes in individual behaviour,
fundamental changes in business practice, and the implementation of ambitious new
policies and regulations to drive these changes by government.’ (WWF, 2009)
Taking this and the numerous other calls to action into consideration, Eco Concierge aims
to facilitate the change through enhancing the effectiveness and rate of individual
behaviour change. To date our work has been most successful through taking our
approach and applying it to employee engagement initiatives within public and private
sector organisations. The missing link in effective Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR)
engagement strategies often stems from failing to take the environmental management
systems through which many companies operate much of their policy in this area, and
make it directly relevant to, and involve employees. In this case study, we briefly summarise
how we have reached this conclusion and outline how we have used this information to
enact a practical and successful business proposition.
As an attempt to deliver against one or all of these objectives, CSR has emerged over the
past decade as an influencing factor of corporate behaviour and response to
environmental issues is now considered one of the fundamental offerings that ‘should’ be
delivered in this realm. Yet several shortcomings have been identified in current CSR
approaches; by using information on the identified gaps which exist in this area, Eco
Concierge’s approach is designed to remove barriers or improve existing strategies.
Googins (2002) has argued that conventional approaches to CSR are limited due to the
boundaries in which the area has developed. The following areas were identified as
barriers to successful CSR.
■ Over-reliance on philanthropy.
■ Weak brand for corporate citizenship.
Added to these factors is the lack of understanding about issues across the spectrum of a
company and a lack of ownership of the work internally. Typically CSR doesn’t fall into
central business activities, so is frequently the first area to be disbanded, or is often offered
only rhetoric in day-to-day business. Pedersen and Neergaard (2008) state that in order to
move beyond the rhetoric of CSR one of the first steps is to embed social and
environmental concerns into the strategic management and performance measurement
systems that increasingly guide corporate decision-making and behaviour.
A recent study (Runhar, Tighelaar & Vermeulen, 2008) confirms that a lack of knowledge
by employees and employees not being eco-minded were both significant barriers to a
company’s environmental leadership; these barriers need to be overcome if corporate
strategies are to truly reflect the rhetoric of proactive environmental leadership. Education
and training of employees needs to be tailored to better engage them on issues. CSR is
unlikely to permeate the organisation unless social and environmental concerns are
integrated in the management frameworks and measurement tools of the business
mainstream.
Engaging with employees and empowering them to act through the company in a non-
superficial way is a most effective means through which to increase output towards and
ultimately achieve or enhance environmental strategies and goals. It has been identified
that employees are also compelled by a company’s CSR activities. Indeed, companies
pushing the boundaries on CSR activities and prioritising this area of activity offer a
legitimate way to attract and retain good employees, indeed, many companies big and
small, including Cisco Systems, General Electric and IBM, view employee engagement in
CSR as a ‘strategic imperative’ (Bhattacharya, Sen & Korschun, 2008).
Evidence on the appeal of strong environmental strategies for prospective employees
should not be underestimated. According to a survey of recent US graduates from
recruitment firm MonsterTRAK, 80 per cent of respondents said they are interested in a
job that has a positive impact on the environment, with 92 per cent stating they would
choose an environmentally friendly employer(MonsterTRAK, 2007).
But few organisations have figured out how to use CSR properly as part of their employee
engagement efforts. They fall short of communicating their CSR intentions and initiatives
to their employees and tend to keep CSR decisions in the hands of senior managers. At the
same time, they fail to understand which CSR initiatives work best to excite which groups
of employees. All in all, they fail to capture CSR’s considerable potential to help them fight
the war for talent (Bhattacharya et al., 2008).
Employees will always vary in terms of knowledge about the issue and also willingness to
act. A central element in Eco Concierge’s approach comes from identifying individuals
that are keen to take action and use them as internal champions; inviting employees to
develop, influence and manage the process will also empower them to get involved.
Ensuring that all employees are aware of environmental-related activities that are planned
or in progress will encourage those that are not so engaged to better understand what is
78 Going Green:
taking place. We know that communicating the initiatives and actions to employees is
paramount for achieving success (McDonald, 2007). Similarly, in keeping the initiatives in
employees’ minds and to maintain interest, periodic communications and events can be
effective.We have also found that a common frustration and even cause of stress amongst
professionals is not having the time to organise their personally green lives, hence the
value of linking workplace programmes to Eco Concierge’s individual offer for employees
at home.
When used properly, CSR can strengthen employees' engagement by creating the feeling
that they are part of a larger corporate mission and that the company shares their values, as
well as by helping them enhance their own social connections (McDonald, 2007). By
offering a tailored approach to employee engagement or empowerment, Eco Concierge is
able to facilitate the achievement of company objectives by effectively working with
employees to integrate positive changes made at home and at work into their professional
lives and thus the business. Furthermore, by initiating a whole-of-company ethos, Eco
Concierge attempts to create linkages between social, environment, marketing, human
resources and other organisational entities;therefore ensuring that environmental
objectives are anchored within a strategic framework strongly linked to a clear competitive
advantage (Googins, 2002).
#%)
!
(
#&)
!
'
)
#%)
!
!
!
!
!
#%)
#")
%##+
80 Going Green:
Drawing on our own experience of working with clients, as well as other research on
segmentation and DEFRA’s segmentation model, Eco Concierge have devised an approach
which identifies four behavioural types (see Figure 2). Our clustering of behaviours is
based on developing the segmentation developed by DEFRA to make it more commercially
applicable. It is also key to adopt an approach which is more meaningful to actual
consumer experiences. Two sectors mentioned in Figure 1 (‘honestly disengaged’ and
‘stalled starters’) are specifically not targeted through our work.
1. 2.
Waste not want not – 12% of the population Conscious consumer – 14% of the
population
3. 4.
I will if you will (groups together two of Positive green – 18% of the population
DEFRA segments ‘side-line supporters and
cautious participants’) – 28% of the
population
Conclusion
In Britain, a majority of people say they would like to do more to live sustainably – a
positive life with limited impact – but do not do so because of the range of practical and
perceived barriers discussed here. Eco Concierge has delivered numerous innovative and
reactive projects and is developing from its beginnings and the proof-of-concept work to
the development of robust programmes aimed at influencing behaviour change and habit.
This is often a crucial missing component in work aimed at reducing negative
environmental impacts, whereas it constitutes the central pillar for Eco Concierge. As
thought leaders in the area of behaviour change for sustainable lifestyles, our ‘whole
perspective’ stance, which incorporates an ecological footprint measurement and personal
values, and our environmental perspective ‘segment’ identification gives us an operating
model which is effective in engaging people who ordinarily wouldn’t feel engaged to
deliver change beyond expectations. For Eco Concierge it is and will remain our main
objective to help as many people as possible live greener lives.
82 Going Green:
References
Bhattacharya, C.B., Sen, S. & Korschun, D. (2008). Using corporate social responsibility to
win the war for talent. MIT Sloan Management Review, 49(2).
Googins, B. (2002). The journey towards corporate citizenship in the United States. Leader
or laggard?, pp.85–101. Greenleaf Publishing.
McDonald, G. (2207). In-house climate change: Use communication to engage employees
in environmental initiatives. Communications World, Nov-Dec. Retrieved from
http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m4422/is_6_24/ai_n21119945
MonsterTRAK (2007). MonsterTRAK joins forces with ecoAmerica to launch green
careers. Press release, retrieved from http://phx.corporate-ir.net/
phoenix.zhtml?c=131001&p=irol-newsArticle&ID=1058413&highlight
Nigbur, D., Lyons, E. & Uzzell, D. (2010). Attitudes, norms, identity and environmental
behaviour: Using an expanded theory of planned behaviour to predict participation
in a kerbside recycling programme. British Journal of Social Psychology, 49, 259–284.
Pedersen, E.R. & Neergaard, P. (2008). From periphery to center: How CSR is integrated
in mainstream performance management frameworks. Measuring Business Excellence,
(12)1, 4–12.
Rochlin, S.A. & Boguslaw, J. (2001). Business and community development: Aligning
corporate performance with community economic development to achieve win-win
impacts. Boston: The Center of Corporate Citizenship.
Runhaar, H., Tigchelaar, C. & Vermeulen, W.J.V. (2008). Environmental leaders: making a
difference. A typology of environmental leaders and recommendations for a
differentiated policy approach. Business Strategy and the Environment, 17, 160–178.
Stockholm Environment Institute (2010). http://sei-international.org/reap. Retrieved 15
December 2010.
Tucker, P. & Speirs, D. (2003). Attitudes and behavioural change in household waste
management behaviours. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 46,(2),
pp. 289-307.
WWF (2009). Simple and painless: The limitations of spillover in environmental
campaigning. Retrieved 20 February 2009 from http://www.wwf.org.uk/
wwf_articles.cfm?unewsid=2728.
This chapter aims to provide an insight into the approaches that organisations currently
take to encourage pro-environmental behaviour among their staff and to consider the role
that Human Resource (HR) departments could play in managing and implementing
environmental initiatives and engaging employees to behave in a more pro-environmental
way. It is based on the findings from a UK-wide survey of organisations, exploring the
approaches that companies take to encourage pro-environmental behaviour among their
employees (Zibarras & Ballinger, 2011).
The survey examined green initiatives being used by organisations and looks at where
responsibility lies within the organisation for the implementation and management of
green initiatives. It also examines which methods organisations have used to encourage
staff to behave in a pro-environmental way. The chapter also explores whether
organisations have evaluated the effectiveness of their environmental initiatives on
employee behaviour, what the perceived facilitators and barriers to effective environmental
practices are within the organisation, and the role of organisational culture. Work and
organisational psychologists can play a key role in designing and implementing initiatives
aimed at changing organisations and the pro-environmental behaviour of their employees;
however, it is also necessary for a wider engagement of organisational actors and the paper
therefore concludes with a call for HR personnel to play a larger role and become more
involved in making green initiatives mainstream throughout an organisation’s culture.
84 Going Green:
perceived lack of action by business is a significant barrier to engaging with climate change among
the UK public (Lorenzoni, Nicholson-Cole & Whitmarsh, 2007). There are many areas of potential
benefit that a new sustainable approach business can bring, but the role of employee behaviour in
delivering the necessary environmental improvements to organisations has been largely overlooked
(Davis & Challenger, 2009). This chapter goes some way to addressing this oversight by examining
what UK organisations are currently doing and highlighting the huge potential that work and
organisational psychology has to further inform the practice of HR professionals in the engagement
of employees and the facilitation of an organisational culture shift to a greener business future. Here
we present a snapshot of some of the key findings from the survey, based on a sample of 147 UK
organisations of various sizes and from both the public and the private sectors. Further details about
the survey and more in-depth findings are available from Zibarras and Ballinger (2011)
' (' )' *' +' ,' -' .' /' 0'
86 Going Green:
Figure 3: Methods used by organisations to encourage pro-environmental behaviour
$'
$ '
88 Going Green:
Promoting a culture of pro-environmental behaviour
The survey revealed that only a small majority of organisations (56 per cent) agreed that
environmental concerns are important to their organisation, although there does seem to
be a feeling that the organisation is taking some role in environmental issues, with the
majority of respondents agreeing that their organisation does its bit to protect the
environment and that their organisation is interested in developing pro-environmental
behaviour. While the recent economic and financial crisis might be suspected to have
reduced the importance of the green agenda, most organisations in the survey disagreed
that this was the case. Just 38 per cent of respondents agreed that their management
practices actively enhance and encourage environmental behaviour, and one third agreed
that their managers provide practical support for environmental behaviour or practices.
This is despite managers’ support and senior management commitment being seen as the
top two facilitators for effective environmental practices within organisations. Rewarding
green behaviour and setting personal development objectives in relation to environmental
behaviour were among the least popular means of promoting a green organisational
culture. Once again, penalising the failure to demonstrate pro-environmental behaviour
was the least popular concept among organisations.
ISBN 978-1-85433-713-9
The British Psychological Society
St Andrews House, 48 Princess Road East, Leicester LE1 7DR, UK
Tel: 0116 254 9568 Fax 0116 247 0787 E-mail: mail@bps.org.uk Website: www.bps.org.uk