CLO 4

Critically evaluate the suitability of the different assessment methods for use in the classroom
(C6)

ILO
Critically evaluate the usefulness of portfolios as an assessment tool.

QUESTION

Despite its popularity, the use of portfolios as an assessment tool has been criticised. Elaborate
on any FOUR (4) main criticisms and discuss if these criticisms override the usefulness of
portfolio assessment? Justify your answer.
[10 marks]

MARKING SCHEME
Reference: Topic 7, Section 7.2.4 & 7.2.5 pg 162-164, CLO4 (C6)

Suggested Points on criticisms for elaboration

Answer:
 Extra time needed to plan an assessment system.
 The gathering of necessary data and work samples can make portfolio
bulky and difficult to manage
 Scoring portfolios involve extensive use of subjective evaluation
procedures and thus open to the question of reliability
 Scheduling of individual portfolio conferences is difficult and time-
consuming

(Accept other possible answers.)

Usefulness of portfolio assessment

Accept either “YES” or “NO” answer as long as the justifications are

appropriate and convincing.

Possible argument against criticisms

 The portfolio provides for formative assessment as well summative

assessment).
 Emphasis is more on monitoring students’ progress towards achieving
the learning outcomes of a particular subject, course or programme.
 Improves student achievement through feedback and self-reflection.
 Allows the teacher to see the student as an individual, each with his or
her own unique characteristics, needs and strengths
 Emphasises improving student achievement rather than ranking
students according to their performance on tests.
 Help students to be more accountable for their work;
 Involves students in the assessment process
  Invite students to reflect upon their growth and performance as
learners.

Possible argument for criticisms

 Time-consuming at the expense of learning and developing other critical

skills
 Subjective scoring affecting reliability. Assessment is useless if data
obtained are unreliable.

Accept any other appropriate answers.

Marks Award 1 mark for an appropriate elaboration of each criticism (1 mark x 4 = 4

allocation: marks)
Award a maximum of 6 marks for a judicious discussion using the following
rubric:

Score Descriptor
5-6 Discussion is judicious, supported by lots of details.
Justification is convincing
3-4 Discussion is fairly judicious, supported by some details.
Justification is fairly convincing
1-2 Discussion is hardly judicious and not supported by details.
Justification is hardly convincing.
0 No or irrelevant response

[10 marks]