Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • SEM 1a - Rubric of Communication Project Proposal Presentation (30%) - V3 (Measurement System)

    Uploaded by

    Arifee Zaki
    13 views2 pages
    This document provides a rubric to assess communication project proposals with criteria on explaining the importance of the measurement system, describing the project and measurement system, justifying the budget, and creating a timeline. Proposals are scored on a scale from very poor to excellent in each criteria, with descriptions of the level of clarity, detail, and feasibility expected to achieve each score. The highest scores are for clear, concise, and interesting explanations of the measurement system and application with all required details and a feasible budget and timeline.

    Original Description:

    Original Title

    SEM 1a_Rubric of Communication Project Proposal Presentation [30%] - V3 (Measurement System)

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document provides a rubric to assess communication project proposals with criteria on explaining the importance of the measurement system, describing the project and measurement system, justifying the budget, and creating a timeline. Proposals are scored on a scale from very poor to excellent in each criteria, with descriptions of the level of clarity, detail, and feasibility expected to achieve each score. The highest scores are for clear, concise, and interesting explanations of the measurement system and application with all required details and a feasible budget and timeline.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    13 views2 pages

    SEM 1a - Rubric of Communication Project Proposal Presentation (30%) - V3 (Measurement System)

    Uploaded by

    Arifee Zaki
    This document provides a rubric to assess communication project proposals with criteria on explaining the importance of the measurement system, describing the project and measurement system, justifying the budget, and creating a timeline. Proposals are scored on a scale from very poor to excellent in each criteria, with descriptions of the level of clarity, detail, and feasibility expected to achieve each score. The highest scores are for clear, concise, and interesting explanations of the measurement system and application with all required details and a feasible budget and timeline.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    of 2

    Rubric for assessing Communication Project (Proposal)

    KIG1003 MECHANICAL ENGINEERING LABORATORY I & COMMUNICATION


    Department of Mechanical Engineering (Mechanical Program)

    Group : Matrix Numbers :


    Rubric For Communication Project Proposal

    Criteria very poor poor satisfactory good excellent


    Score (%)
    0% <S≤20% 20%<S≤40% 40%< S≤ 60% 60%<S≤80% 80%<S≤100%

    Importance of the The importance of the


    The importance of the measurement The importance of the measurement system The importance of the measurement The importance of the measurement system
    measurement system towards measurement system towards
    system towards the proposed towards the proposed application is system towards the proposed application towards the proposed application is explained
    the application the proposed application is
    application is explained poorly. explained satisfactory. is explained clearly. clearly in a remarkably interesting manner.
    missing.

    Important device/ tool/ technique/ software Important device/ tool/ technique/ software
    Important device/ tool/ technique/ software
    Project description on the needed for the measurement system are needed for the measurement system are
    It is unclear what is being Description on the measurement needed for the measurement system are
    described in a clear and easy to described in a clear, concise and easy to
    measurement system and the proposed. The measurement system and the application is not clear. described in an adequate manner, though
    understand manner, with a few understand manner with the aid of picture or
    application system is not suitable for the It may be verbose or utilize a lot of the need for greater clarity is apparent.
    exceptions. conceptual drawing or audio.
    proposed application. field-specific jargon.
    The proposed application is adequate.
    The proposed application is useful. The proposed application is useful and
    interesting.
    Few important device/ tool / software Most of the important device/ tool /
    None of the important device/ tool / Some of the important device/ tool / software All required device/ tool / software needed for
    needed for the project are calculated in software needed for the project are
    software needed for the project are needed for the project are calculated in the project are calculated in terms of quantity
    Budget (Appropriateness terms of quantity and amount. Market calculated in terms of quantity and
    calculated in terms of quantity and terms of quantity and amount. Market price and amount. Market price survey is done. Able
    & Justification) price survey is not performed. A amount. Market price survey is mostly
    amount. Market price survey is not survey is done on some of it. Able to ensure to propose cheap/alternative/recycle solution
    feasible and low-cost project is done. Able to ensure a feasible and low-
    performed. Non-feasible project. a feasible and low-cost project. and ensure a feasible and low-cost project.
    uncertain. cost project.
    Timeline:
    Timeline appears to meet less than half Timeline meets most of the activities Timeline may not be clearly presented but Timeline is clearly presented and is clearly
    SEM 1 (Measurement Timeline is not suitable for the
    of the activities proposed. Not clearly proposed. Timeline may not be clearly appears to be suitable for all the activities suitable for and meets all the activities
    System) & SEM 2 activities described.
    presented. presented. described. described.
    (Application)

    Comments (if any): ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

    ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

    You might also like