This document provides a rubric for assessing a communication project lab report with criteria in five areas: introduction, materials and methods, data, conclusion, and report quality. Each criterion is scored on a scale of very poor to excellent. An introduction receives a higher score for including background research with citations and clearly stating the objective. Materials and methods are scored based on the level of experimental detail provided. Data is assessed on accuracy, benchmarking, and post-processing. Conclusions are evaluated on summarizing the experiment, citing data, and addressing objectives and errors. Report quality examines organization, spelling/grammar, and presentation.
Original Description:
Original Title
SEM 1b_Rubric of Communication Project Lab Report [70%] - V3 (Measurement System)
This document provides a rubric for assessing a communication project lab report with criteria in five areas: introduction, materials and methods, data, conclusion, and report quality. Each criterion is scored on a scale of very poor to excellent. An introduction receives a higher score for including background research with citations and clearly stating the objective. Materials and methods are scored based on the level of experimental detail provided. Data is assessed on accuracy, benchmarking, and post-processing. Conclusions are evaluated on summarizing the experiment, citing data, and addressing objectives and errors. Report quality examines organization, spelling/grammar, and presentation.
This document provides a rubric for assessing a communication project lab report with criteria in five areas: introduction, materials and methods, data, conclusion, and report quality. Each criterion is scored on a scale of very poor to excellent. An introduction receives a higher score for including background research with citations and clearly stating the objective. Materials and methods are scored based on the level of experimental detail provided. Data is assessed on accuracy, benchmarking, and post-processing. Conclusions are evaluated on summarizing the experiment, citing data, and addressing objectives and errors. Report quality examines organization, spelling/grammar, and presentation.
Background information is vague or brief. Background information is researched with good citation (i.e. reference is cited in text while Introduction No introduction is Background is vague or brief, objective is Objective is stated but no clear linkage with adequate citation. Objective is stated with the reference is given in the reference section). presented. vague, or background or objective is missing. the background. the clear linkage with the background. Objective is stated with the clear linkage with the background. Material and methods Provide detail and useful information to No materials or methods on Doesn’t provide enough information to Provide satisfactory information to represent Provide clear information to represent an represent an experimental set-up & step by on measurement measurement tool are represent an experimental set-up & procedure an experimental set-up & procedure for the experimental set-up & procedure for the step procedure (with the aids of figure) for the system described. for the proposed measurement system. proposed measurement system. proposed measurement system. proposed measurement system. Accurate data is obtained from the developed Accurate data is obtained from the measurement system and the accuracy of the Relevant data is obtained from the developed measurement system and the data is evaluated via benchmarking with other Data is brief and missing significant pieces of developed measurement system Data No data reported. accuracy of the data is evaluated via measurement system. Post-process of the data information. satisfactory. The accuracy of the measured benchmarking with other measurement such as statistic, data analysis, data data is uncertain. system. processing, etc to obtain important feature/ info from the acquired data. Two components of One component of conclusion missing: conclusion missing: Conclusion summarizes experiment, cites the ___Summary ___Summary significant data to support the important fact, to Conclusion is brief and is missing significant Conclusion No conclusion present. ___Significant Data to Support Fact ___Significant Data to Support Fact what extent the objective is addressed, and pieces of information. ___Addressing Objective or Not ___ Addressing Objective or Not discuss unavoidable sources of error for future ___Discuss Unavoidable Errors for Future ___ Discuss Unavoidable Errors for Future improvement. Improvement Improvement Report is well organized and cohesive but Report is well organized and cohesive and No attention to detail Report is somewhat organized with some Report quality Report contains many errors. contains some spelling or grammatical contains no mechanical errors. Presentation evident spelling or grammatical errors. errors. seems polished.