Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 11

kwb.35-variantology_2_inhalt 31.10.

2006 14:49 Uhr Seite 2

Kunstwissenschaftliche

Bibliothek

Series Editor Christian Posthofen

Volume 35

Verlag der Buchhandlung

Walther König, Köln


kwb.35-variantology_2_inhalt 31.10.2006 14:49 Uhr Seite 3

Variantology 2

On Deep Time Relations of Arts,


Sciences and Technologies

Edited by Siegfried Zielinski and David Link


in collaboration with Eckhard Fürlus
and Nadine Minkwitz

Text Editor: Gloria Custance


kwb.35-variantology_2_inhalt 31.10.2006 14:49 Uhr Seite 4

© 2006 Siegfried Zielinski, David Link, the authors and


Verlag der Buchhandlung Walther König, Köln

Text editor: Gloria Custance


Design: Silke Fahnert, Uwe Koch, Köln
Production: Printmanagement Plitt, Oberhausen

Cover illustrations: Peter Blegvad, Angel Traps (blue, sepia) –


from a line of experimental stationery designed to test and
contrast the influences exerted by colour, imagery and smell
(the sheets were impregnated with scents) on automatic writing.

Frontispiece: “WORLDPROCESSOR – Zones of Invention – Patterns of


Patents” by Ingo Günther, New York: “The Worldprocessor globe-based
image plots the total number of patents granted worldwide. Beginning in
1883 with just under 50,000, and in 2002 rapidly approaching one million,
the x-y parameters of the annually changing number of total patents granted
worldwide is plotted around a globe by a line graph. Although other carto-
graphic information is distorted as a result, by preserving the plotted line as an
uninterrupted constant an overview of this rapid escalation is derived through
reconstituting four different perspectives into a single image. Geographic
regions where countries offer environments conducive to innovation are
represented by topology. Additionally, nations where residents are granted
an average of 500 or more U.S. patents per year are highlighted in red by
their respective averages in the years after 2000. This research is supported
by the National Science Foundation and by Indiana University.
(Date of Image: December 2005)”

Die Deutsche Bibliothek – CIP-Einheitsaufnahme

Ein Titelsatz für diese Publikation ist


bei Der Deutschen Bibliothek erhältlich.

ISBN 10: 3-86560-050-6


ISBN 13: 978-3-86560-050-9

Research on archaeology/variantology of the media in 2006 has been


generously supported by the Ministry of Science of Northrhine-Westfalia
and the Academy of Arts and the Media Cologne.
kwb.35-variantology_2_inhalt 31.10.2006 14:49 Uhr Seite 5

Contents

siegfried zielinski (Berlin, Cologne)


1806/2006—A Miniature in lieu of a Preface 7

peter blegvad (London)


Bilder Variations (A Special Archaeology) *

david link (Cologne)


There Must Be an Angel:
On the Beginnings of the Arithmetics of Rays 15

amador vega (Barcelona)


Ramon Llull: A Logic of Invention 45

sebastian klotz (Leipzig)


Beyond Mimesis: Intelligent Musical Signs and
the Production of Variants in the Enlightenment 67

miklós peternák (Budapest)


Convention and Invention:
Notes on the Illustrations to Orbis Pictus 87

amir r. alexander (Los Angeles)


Through the Mathematical Looking Glass 117

arianna borrelli (Berlin, Rome)


The Flat Sphere 145

gábor á. zemplén (Budapest)


Auxiliary Images: Appropriations of Goethe’s
Theory of Colours 169

steven vanden broecke (Brussels)


God’s Rhetoric: A Therapeutical Tracing of Allegoria in Factis 205

* page nos. 13, 43, 65, 85, 115, 143, 167, 203, 227, 257, 279, 299, 333, 359, 377
kwb.35-variantology_2_inhalt 31.10.2006 14:49 Uhr Seite 6

mara mills (Cambridge, MA)


Hearing Things: Telephones and Auditory Theory 229

lioudmila voropai (Cologne, Moscow)


Iambic Tetrameter in the Service of Revolution:
Notes on the System of Art and Literary Education
in Post-Revolutionary Russia 259

andrea hacker (Dublin)


Khlebnikovian Time: Between H.G. Wells and Kalachakra 281

oksana bulgakowa (Berlin)


Theory as a Gesamtkunstwerk 301

koen vermeir (Leuven)


The Reality of Failure: On the Interpretation of Success and
Failure in (the History and Philosophy of) Science and Technology 335

eckhard fürlus (Berlin)


“To point out the potential of the individual”:
Some Reflections on Christology and Crucifixion Typology 361

alla mitrofanova (St. Petersburg)


From Enlightenment to the Divine Darkness:
The Apophatic Return 379

The Authors and Editors 408

Bibliography 413

Index of Names 443


Index of Places 447
Index of Subjects 449

peter weibel (Karlsruhe)


Political Ontology and Ontological Relativity:
Pro Variantology—A Footnote 457
kwb.35-variantology_2_inhalt 31.10.2006 14:49 Uhr Seite 7

siegfried zielinski

1806/2006—A Miniature
in lieu of a Preface

Tableau magique

The physico-chemist Johann Wilhelm Ritter (1776–1810) appeared for the last
time in front of an academic audience in Munich. Ritter was just thirty years old.
On the 28th of March 1806 he delivered a lecture to the assembled members of
the Bavarian Academy of Science with the title “Physics as Art”.1 In the lecture’s
sub-title, Ritter states the aim of his lecture: “An attempt to interpret the future
direction of physics in the light of its history”. In his typically ardent fashion Rit-
ter sees the ultimate goal of all thought and action as “re-unification with nature,
[the] return to the former state of harmony”, and within the space of one printed
page boldly sketches the history of the arts to date as an especially positive an-
thropology. Ritter distinguishes four different qualitative stages in this anthro-
pology; for him, the most important aspect in the scaling is human activity:
Architecture/the town in its four-dimensionality (space and time) attempts to
shape and preserve human deeds in monumental form for posterity. In three-

1 Reprinted in the new edition of Ritters’ Fragmente aus dem Nachlasse eines jungen Physikers [1810]
(Hanau, 1984), pp. 288 –320, quotation p. 310.

7
kwb.35-variantology_2_inhalt 31.10.2006 14:49 Uhr Seite 8

dimensional sculpture, the creator seeks to embody himself directly as an indi-


vidual. Painting has partially re-delegated and given back to humans the neces-
sity of an active role, because the observer is compelled to fill up the image space
of a painting, which Ritter refers to as “half-space”, with the aid of the imagina-
tion. Thus far, all art forms have addressed the eye. They show what has been,
live off the past, and thus are arts of memory. Taking an idea from Lucretius’
poem on the world of atoms, De rerum natura, Ritter summarises these first
three stages: “Purpose of art: to render present what is absent [...], monument.
The beloved, however, is more than her image.”2 With music, history takes a dif-
ferent turn. Sounds draw human actors into the very act of artistic creation; in
music, the act is directly present. Whatever comes after this will be accom-
plished by physics: the (re-)establishment of consonance between nature, which
is external to humans, and their inner nature; the identity of nature and action, of
life and enjoyment of living. This is the highest form of art and Ritter believes
that the physics of the future will be capable of realising it; indeed, he sees this as
imperative, if physics is not to forfeit its deeper meaning.3
Stimulated by these 200-year-old thoughts, I have begun to work with an an-
thropology, which, like Ritter’s, is conceived as operational.4 Through studying
the history of the specific tensions between the arts, sciences, and technology,
this anthropology attempts to keep options open for possibilities of action in
years to come, both for scientists and artists, who are committed to experiment
in the broad sense of the term
The relations between the autonomous epistemological and work areas of art,
science, and technology are strongly reduced in their complexity and compre-
hended as varying historical qualities in relation to art and media. The art re-
ferred to here is art affected by media in the sense of experimental aesthetic
praxis that engages with science and technology. For only then are the relational
qualities meaningful, which are the focus here.
I differentiate between four qualities: art before media, art with media, art via
media, and art after media. As in Ritter, these qualities should not be understood
as a chronological succession, but as differently weighted priorities within the

2 Ritter, Fragmente, p. 256.


3 Ritter, Fragmente, p. 317f; on this aspect, see also the dissertation by Wolfgang Hartwig, Physik als
Kunst (Freiburg, 1955), particularly pp. 70– 83, and for further details my recent book: Zielinski, Deep
Time of the Media (Cambridge, MA, 2006), pp. 177–182.
4 I had the opportunity to present and discuss this anthropology for the first time in 2003 in Barce-
lona at Claudia Gianetti’s Institute for Art and Design, for which I am most grateful.

8
kwb.35-variantology_2_inhalt 31.10.2006 14:49 Uhr Seite 9

deep time structures that we are interested in. They overlap historically and in
part run parallel. The two relational qualities in the middle, art with media and
art via media, are the easiest to grasp.
Art with media concerns the artistic utilisation of findings in mathematics,
arithmetic, and geometry and their application in mechanics and optics, as well
as the thrust of this utilisation toward the creation of artefacts and technical sys-
tems for understanding, instruction, illusionisation, shocking, amusement, and
missionising. Art with media implies an instrumental relationship. In this rela-
tional quality flat or curved mirrors, pipes, funnels, drums, magnetic tele-writ-
ing, or combination systems serve as prostheses for art, but are not essential pre-
requisites for art’s existence. These artefacts expand artistic praxis, may possibly
make it more effective, but do not renew it. In a narrow historical perspective
this quality developed at the latest since the geometrisation of seeing and of the
image during the Renaissance, it flourished in the innumerable models for cryp-
tography and steganography as well as the refined spaces for the mise-en-scène
of technical images in the sixteenth century, and achieved its first high points in
the seventeenth century with concepts for the automatisation of musical compo-
sitions, the sequencing of harmonic series of notes, and the invention of numer-
ous visual special effects. All of the mechanical, optical, as well as acoustic inno-
vations and inventions that followed in the eighteenth and nineteenth cen-
turies—the founding epoch of the new media—essentially serve this instrumen-
tal relational quality.
Art via media means that the artistic process or the artistic work is essentially
realised through a technical medium or via a constellation of technical media.
This has been the case at the latest since the advent of the artificial production of
electricity. The age of Enlightenment saw the taming of forces of nature, light-
ning and thunder. Discovery of the physical and chemical bases of electricity led
to the growth of a rich culture of experimentation between London, Paris, and
St. Petersburg. Applied science was demonstrated at spectacular performances,
where the heavy bodies of monks, or the light bodies of boys and girls suspended
in the air, were electrified with weak current. Experiments performed in salons,
like those of the German physicist Georg Matthias Bose (1710–1761), who, to
welcome evening guest speakers, electrified a young lady standing on an insu-
lated stool so that his visitors could experience the sensational feeling of an elec-
tric kiss from Venus, were demonstrations that issued the first invitations to par-
ticipate physically in an experiment—the prerequisite for the realisation of any
performative installation. In addition to various models of the tableau magique
upon which electric sparks inscribed awe-inspiring figures, devices came into
being for instruction and for entertainment that generated images in a new

9
kwb.35-variantology_2_inhalt 31.10.2006 14:49 Uhr Seite 10

mode, namely, in time.5 These figures were only visible (and some could even be
felt) when electric current flowed. And with the electrical treatments for illness
of Franz Anton Mesmer (1734 –1815) and other medico-electropractioners there
arose in the eighteenth century archaic forms of a psychopathia medialis which we
also experienced among our contemporaries at the end of the second millen-
nium.
With his idea of a constantly vibrating, oscillating cosmos, both macro and
micro, Johann Wilhelm Ritter should be regarded as the first not only to formu-
late the relational quality of an experimental art through media at a very early
stage, but also as someone who lived it, by declaring his body a laboratory and
his organs and extremities conductors and display units of electrical current.
Ritter’s last book project, which he never realised, was a theory of glowing.
At the beginning of the third millennium the mechanical, electrical, and elec-
tronic media with and through which the production, distribution, and reception
of art and sciences are effected have become utterly familiar, a matter of course.
They are part of everyday experience, like the water taps we turn on and off as
required without thinking much about where the water comes from, what its
composition is, or how it is disposed of after we have used it.6 In the industri-
alised parts of the globe the infrastructure is geared to technical media systems
and dependent upon them. The generations of scientists, artists, and engineers,
who are currently learning, studying, trying things out, setting things up, and
directing have been more or less intensely socialised by their experience with
technical media. For these people, technical media are no longer anything spe-
cial or attractive. By art after media I do not mean a type of experimental praxis
without technical media; this is no longer an option in applied culture or science.
The relational quality of art after media draws attention to our search for an art
of experimentation that does not require the application of media as legitimation
or to create a sensation, but does not close its eyes, ears, and thinking tools to
it either. How art after media will develop in the future is foreseeable at the
beginning of the third millennium, but by no means a foregone conclusion. My

5 Such tableaux magiques (see the illustration at the beginning of this preface) were used in the early
physics cabinets as a popular way of visualising the effects of electricity in darkened rooms. See the lav-
ishly illustrated and detailed description: Figuier, La machine électrique, le paratonnerre, la pile de Volta,
L’électromagnetisme (Paris, 1870), pp. 485– 486, image: p. 486.
6 Günther Anders made this comparison already in 1956 in his book Die Antiquiertheit des Menschen,
vol. 1: Über die Seele im Zeitalter der zweiten industriellen Revolution; see particularly the section entitled
“Die Welt als Phantom und Matrize” (The World as a Phantom and a Matrix), pp. 97–211 (Munich,
1980).

10
kwb.35-variantology_2_inhalt 31.10.2006 14:49 Uhr Seite 11

anthropology, too, is a modest attempt to think of the future direction of art proceed-
ing from its history, as Ritter did for physics (as the broad science of life).
Art did not do without media before certain notions, concepts, and ideas came
into existence that were generalised under the heading “media” as a specific area
of theory and praxis. Instruments for encoding and decoding secret languages
and the optical devices proposed by Giovan Battista della Porta (1535–1615), the
monochord that Robert Fludd (1574 –1637) wanted to use to tune the seven-
teenth century harmoniously, or the opulent portable boxes that allowed one to
combine various things at home made by Athanasius Kircher (1601–1680) at the
Jesuit college in Rome were all culminations of research, speculation, recogni-
tion, and model construction conducted over the preceding centuries, but they
did not necessarily have to result in the actual inventions of the modern age. In
two and a half thousand years (between 1000 B.C. and 1500 A.D.) a great diver-
sity of optical, acoustic, magnetic and combinatorial sensations were developed,
which can only be assembled under the collective term “media” through the
force exercised by the context of our contemporary perspective. In their own
time there was no trend toward such generalisation, nor did these phenomena
need it. The modular grids and strings which ancient Egyptians used to model
the ideal body proportions for sculptures of their gods,7 which were in turn
probably used by the Pythagoreans to derive their concepts of harmony based on
geometry, the shadow optics of the Chinese Mohists 2,300 years ago, Heron of
Alexandria’s theatre of automatons from the first century (A.D.), which corre-
sponds wonderfully with the mechanical and hydraulic jewels of the engineer
Ibn al-Razzāz al-Jazarī from Mesopotamia in the early thirteenth century, the
optical experiments of the Chinese astronomer Shen Kua with projections of
birds on the wing and moving clouds in darkened chambers in the eleventh cen-
tury—such individual and occasional sensations from the deep time of history I
term phenomena of art before media. For an archaeology that is greatly interested
in the origination and developments of hearing, seeing, and combining using
technical means, this dazzling diversity is among the most exciting of the histor-
ical relational qualities.
With curiosity, respect, and admiration, in the Variantology project we follow
how researchers from various parts of the world and very different disciplines—
theology, philosophy, musicology, philology, history of mathematics, science,
and technology—study and describe, each from their own perspective, these

7 See Presas i Puig, Numbers, Proportions, Harmonies, and Practical Geometry in Ancient Art (Berlin,
2004).

11
kwb.35-variantology_2_inhalt 31.10.2006 14:49 Uhr Seite 12

relations of tension that are our common interest. At the beginning of the
twenty-first century these researchers fruitfully re-open our pre-assembled con-
ceptions (trained by the media age of the twentieth century) on art and the
media. Through these temporary linkages between the heterogeneous positions
and depictions in this series of books we hope to give something back to the
authors and to you, the readers, that will surprise, maybe even astonish.

Translated from German by Gloria Custance

12

You might also like