Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Systems Thinking in Education For Sustainable Development
Systems Thinking in Education For Sustainable Development
Systems Thinking in Education For Sustainable Development
Utrecht University
Course: GEO4-2321
Author: Floor van den Elzen (5566533)
E-mail: Floor.vdElzen@gmail.com
Mobile: +31 6 166 446 03
Track: Environmental Governance
Supervisor: Dr. Bettina Bluemling
E-mail: B.Bluemling@uu.nl
Credits: 45 ECTS
Second reader: Dr. Carel Dieperink
E-mail: C.Dieperink@uu.nl
Internship at:
Centre for Environment Education
Thaltej Tekra Ahmedabad, 380 054
Gujarat, India
Contact: Bijoy Goswami
E-mail: Bijoy.Goswami@ceeindia.org
Word count: 38.840
Cover photo: Picture of students of Rachana School, taken while working on mystery exercise. Photos
throughout the report were taken at the schools that participated in the experiment.
SUMMARY
Over four decades after Indira Gandhi, then prime-minister of India, effectively coupled environment and
development issues by stating environmental problems of developing nations to reflect inadequacy of
development, rather than excessiveness of industrialisation, India is little closer to reaching a mode of
sustainable development.
There is an apparent need for young people to develop competences to cope with the world’s increasing
uncertainty connected to sustainability challenges present today and those yet to come. As policy does not
prove sufficient, policy-makers are calling upon education to help make society more sustainable.
Intergovernmental organisations have issued different programmes on education for sustainable development
(ESD) and education has been given an important role in the recently coined Sustainable Development Goals
(SDGs).
ESD practitioners and researchers, however, signal a lack of data on the way students develop sustainability
competences and experience a lack of methods to capture students’ ESD capacities in measurement.
Furthermore, although academics has produced multiple lists and categories of competences deemed
important for participation is sustainable development processes, there appears to be a lack of attention for
the relationship between sustainability competences.
This study set out to test and evaluate the impact of systems thinking on the development of sustainability
competences of secondary school students in Ahmedabad, India by designing an educational intervention,
testing it in an experiment using Solomon four group design, developing and using a measurement survey to
determine its impact, and triangulating the outcomes with qualitative data taken from document analysis,
literature review, (non-)participatory observation, and semi-structured interviews.
1. The experiment results confirm an influence of systems thinking on the development of other
sustainability competences, to the extent that experiencing a systems thinking process increases a
students’ ability to understand complex systems, including its spatial, temporal and disciplinary
components.
2. To increase sustainability competences through systems thinking, experiencing systems thinking is
crucial. In the experiment, results showed a positive impact of doing the measurement, which
consisted of systems thinking exercises.
3. In experiencing systems thinking processes, the importance of reflection, evaluation and (teacher)
guidance is emphasised. This is signalled as one of the main bottlenecks in the implementation of ESD
in Gujarat, India.
Other outcomes include a description of the current state of ESD in Ahmedabad and Gujarat, and a set of
recommendations concerning the future application of innovative methods of measuring sustainability
competences.
PREFACE
A little over a year before handing in this thesis, I was asked to travel to India for a conference on education as
a driver for the newly instated Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). At the time, I was a part of the board of
Morgen, a Dutch student-led volunteer organisation that works for the integration of sustainability into higher
education. In this role, we had been in contact with the sustainability education part of the Dutch Enterprise
Organisation (RVO), which in turn had links with the Centre for Environment Education (CEE) in Ahmedabad,
India. Our contact at RVO had been invited to attend the conference but found that – as the conference would
have an emphasis on the role of youth – it would be better for us to go. Within a week of first hearing about
Ahmedabad, I was on the plane to India and – upon arrival – was immediately impressed by the people I met
and the work they were doing.
In my work for Morgen and Green Office Utrecht, the sustainability hub of Utrecht University, I had been
working on sustainability education for longer, but it was only after my first visit to Ahmedabad that I got an
idea of the wealth of work that was being done on this topic worldwide. One of the remarks that made the
biggest impression on me on that occasion was the following made by Anil Gupta, profession at the Indian
Institute of Management:
Education can either learn to think and act freely, or teach a younger generation to conform.
Where I had previously seen education as a positive force that could be used for the goals of sustainable
development, this statement emphasised the urgency of transforming the education system. Education does
not only offer an opportunity when it comes to sustainable development, but inaction in this field also
continuously reinforces the (unsustainable) status quo.
In the first course of this master programme, I consciously experienced systems thinking for the first time. Since
then I have been trying to train myself to see systems in my surrounding and the complexity of processes
happening around us has since never seized to amaze me. I have found that it is this amazement that makes
me passionate about sustainability and its urgency. I am very thankful for this research project allowing me to
combine my interest in systems thinking with my involvement in sustainability education, while offering the
opportunity to get to know a new environment in the process.
I would like to express my sincere gratitude to all my colleagues at CEE. Special thanks to Rajeswari Gorana,
who was inspiring to speak to when it came to systems thinking, to Bijoy Goswami, who helped me get to know
the organisation and the people that I spoke to, to Harshal Korhale, for helping me arrange the schools and
transporting me around Ahmedabad on the back of his scooter, and to the director of CEE, Kartikeya Sarabhai,
for being incredibly inspirational.
From Utrecht, I would like to thank my supervisor Dr. Bettina Bluemling for her detailed feedback and valuable
support.
LIST OF ACRONYMS
CBSE Central Board of Secondary Education
EE Environmental Education
IB International Baccalaureate
TABLES, FIGURES AND TEXT BOXES
List of tables
List of figures
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Summary ....................................................................................................................................................... 5
Preface .......................................................................................................................................................... 6
1. Introduction .......................................................................................................................................................... 14
Experiment .................................................................................................................................................... 35
10
Linking SDGs .................................................................................................................................................. 42
Sequencing .................................................................................................................................................... 44
Self-reporting ................................................................................................................................................ 46
Reliability ....................................................................................................................................................... 48
Validity ........................................................................................................................................................... 48
Suitability ....................................................................................................................................................... 49
4. Results ................................................................................................................................................................... 51
Assessment .................................................................................................................................................... 56
Conclusion ..................................................................................................................................................... 59
Conclusion ..................................................................................................................................................... 62
Conclusion ..................................................................................................................................................... 65
4.4 The impact of increased systems thinking skills on sustainability competences ........................................ 66
11
Groups ........................................................................................................................................................... 66
5. Discussion ............................................................................................................................................................. 86
References ................................................................................................................................................... 93
Appendices ................................................................................................................................................... 98
12