Final Flup

FOREST LAND USE PLAN 2022-2026
MUNICIPALITY OF SAN LORENZO RUIZ FOREST LAND USE PLAN

2022-2026
SUMMARY
The Forest Land Use Plan (FLUP) of San Lorenzo Ruiz is formulated to guide and give
directions on how the Local Government Unit (LGU) will manage and improve the Forests and
Forest Land (FFL) assets of the municipality based on the existing laws, rules and regulations of the
national government at the same time attain the set forth vision, mission, goals and objectives. At
the moment, the FFL assets of the municipality is suffering from various issues and problems
resulted to its rapid denudation such as illegal cutting, kaingin, massive conversion to agricultural
and residential purposes. In addition, Bicol Region is a typhoon prone region, therefore its
resources are also exposed to various disaster and risk due to flooding, and soil erosion during
rainy season.
The municipality has a total land area of 10,959.17 hectares of which 3,282.222 hectares is
classified as Timberland/Forestland while 7,668.333 hectares is classified as Alienable and
Disposable Land (A & D). The point of concentration of this plan is to close the open access areas in
the forest land through the facilitation of appropriate tenurial instrument and introduction of
management interventions geared toward a participatory approach decision making, planning and
program/project implementation. Per record of the DENR a total, 2,373.12 hec. Therefore, a total
open access area covered 909.102 hec.
Among the major strategies being included in the FLUP are categorized into biophysical, socio-
economic, and institutional development components. The municipality intends to solicit assistance
to all the concerns government agencies for convergence mechanism aiming to introduce and
develop different programs and projects for the improvement of FFL and to provide sustainable
livelihood activities and income to its constituents. The entry point of the municipality are the
implementation of various programs, projects and activities to include the rehabilitation and
restoration of the logged-over and denuded forest land. To divert the dependency of the community
in the forest land assets/resources that caused for its rapid depletion, various livelihood activities
and nature based eco-tourism projects shall be implemented through the help of concerned
agencies. Creation and strengthening of the institutional capability of the LGU is also identified as
1
one of the priority activities. The Project Management Office (PMO) and Municipal environment and
Natural Resources Office (MENRO) will be working hand in hand to implement the 5-Year Work
and Financial (WFP) and One-Year WFP stipulating different PPAs for the attainment of FLUP
objectives. Forest land areas occupied and issued with Certificate of Stewardship Contract (CSC)
shall be issued with Community Based Forest Management Agreement (CBFMA) wherein the
holders shall be organized and be registered to concerned agencies. The forest land area shall be
surveyed to delineate the production and protection zone. Other open access areas shall be
evaluated for the identification of the most suited interventions and appropriate tenurial
instrument shall be issued with approved comprehensive management and development plan.
Further the management of protected like the Bicol Natural Park (BNP) and Abasig-Matogdon-
Mananap Natural Biotic Area (AMMNBA) shall follow the approved Protected Area Management
Plan in accordance with the provision of the NIPAS Act and if possible, portion within the area of
jurisdiction which were already zonified shall be supported by the municipality through its
membership in Protected Area Management Board (PAMB). Whenever necessary, appropriate
project proposals for the management of the PAs shall be submitted by the municipality for
approval and funding.
Based on the prepared Work and Financial Plan covering CY 2022-2026, the budgetary
requirement for the five-year period entail a total of THREE HUNDRED TWELVE MILLION, THREE
HUNDRED NINETY FIVE THOUSAND AND TWO HUNDRED PESOS (Php312,395,200.00). Portion of
this amount shall be provided by the municipality through its National Tax Allocation while other
funding requirement shall be sourced out from all the concerned member agencies of the created
Project Management Office/FLUP Steering Council such as the DENR, DA, DAR, DOT, DTI, PCA and
others.
CHAPTER 1.0 INTRODUCTION
1.1. Importance of Forest and Forest Land
Forest and forest land is the most important ecosystem having the numerous benefits
that can be derived therefrom. The tangible benefits such as food, medicine, water,
clothing, minerals, and others plus its intangible values have been commonly used by
the community for its subsistence. It has been noted that continuous degradation and
destruction of the forest and its resources were experienced by the local community.
This can be attributed to the lack of permanent source of income, over dependent to
2
monocropping activities like coconut, engagement to illegal collection/extraction of

forest products, land conversion and many others. As a result, the sustainability aspect
of the benefits which can be derived to our forest resources is at stake while as a chain
reaction, other negative impact to the community like imbalance ecology, insufficient
food productivity, and loss of job and source of income followed.
The various issues and concerns being faced by our forest resources must be addressed.
The community and other stakeholders have to jointly exert the very effort to resolve
the problems in the upland and lowland areas. The participatory approach in planning
and program implementation played important roles to properly allocate and manage
the FFL with emphasis on the responsibility of the states through its various
government agencies.
The people have to start working solidly to stop the continuous destruction and loss of
our forest and forest land resources before its too late. Various experiences have
already marked in the history of disastrous weather events caused by the uncontrolled
use and destruction of the forest and its resources.
San Lorenzo Ruiz, Camarines Norte is one of the twelve (12) municipalities of
Camarines Norte having noted with various potentials in eco-based tourism, source of
potable water sources, potential site for hydro-electric power plant, source of major and
minor forest products, covered the portion of Bicol Natural Park (BNP) and Abasig-
Matogdon-Mananap Natural Biotic Area (AMMNBA), the legislated protected areas
under National Integrated Protected Area System (NIPAS) wherein biodiversity
conservation activities are being centralized. These numerous benefits and potentials of
the municipality are needed to be managed and developed considering despite of these
various opportunities, there were also noted threats. The LGU must identify the
currents issues and concerns and status of its FFL focusing on priority actions for
protection, conservation and development.
1.2. FLUP as Forest and Forest Land Management Tool
3
Forest Land Use Plan (FLUP) is a document developed through iterative, transparent,
accountable and participatory process to ensure sustainable management of forests and
forestlands providing environmental, social, and economic benefits to society. This is a
consolidation of different management strategies formulated through various
situational and current status analysis of the forest and forest land assets of San
Lorenzo Ruiz, Camarines Norte. The created FLUP team collected data and information
so as to analyze the threats, opportunities, trends and changes of the FFL assets. Such
information and data were being used as basis in projecting the intensity of
interventions to be introduced and implemented by the LGU in partnership with
different government agencies, private sectors and other funding agencies.
Among the relevant activities conducted were community profiling through sub-
watershed mapping, socio-economic and cultural data collection, collecting and
preparation of relevant thematic maps, validation and identification of on-site and off-
site stakeholders, field validation, reconnaissance surveys and community mapping
activities. This baseline information is very important in the conceptualization of
strategies and identification of priority programs/projects/activities for the FLUP.
FLUP guide the LGU and its stakeholders in managing the FFL in the concept of
sustainable forest management, biodiversity conservation, vulnerability
assessment/climate change adaptation, disaster risk reduction and management and
rehabilitation of degraded forest land. Using the ridge to reef approach, FLUP is a tool
for establishing accountabilities and promotion of responsible forest resources
management by ensuring the balance between forest protection and biodiversity
conservation.
1.3. FLUP and the Provincial and Regional Development Plans
In the formulation of FLUP, its purpose is to build consensus and develop

recommendation on the best uses of the forest lands, including the best steps in
identifying the open access areas and determining the management option to be
implemented by the resource managers for these open access areas.
4
As the prepared plan has completed, it is required that this will be presented in the local
municipal legislative body for legitimization and adoption. It shall consist of the
municipal’s formulated vision, mission and goals having a short term and medium term
plans to be implemented by the LGU in coordination with the on-site and off-site
stakeholders.
In complementing with the other plans within the provincial and regional development
plan, the formulated vision, mission goals and objectives, program/project and activities
must address the socio economic, cultural, and environmental issues of the community
geared towards the strong partnership and resources sharing through facilitation of co-
management, recognition of property rights, investments promotion, periodic
monitoring and assessment for the efficient and effective management of forest
resources.
Comprehensive land use plan and forest land use plans are very important tools to
provide a holistic approach wherein the different government agencies can participate
integrated approach to attain the optimum and balanced use of the resources to support
the local, regional and national growth and development.
CHAPTER 2.0 SCOPE AND LIMIT OF THE FLUP
2.1. Physical Boundaries
The Forest Land Use Plan covers the entire forestlands of San Lorenzo Ruiz, Camarines Norte. In
totality, San Lorenzo Ruiz has a total land area of 10,959.17 hectares of which 3,282.222
hectares is classified as Timberland while 7,668.333 hectares is classified as Alienable and
Disposable Land (A & D).
The municipality is contesting some portion from its adjacent municipalities to include
10,604.62 hectares in the municipality of Basud, Camarines Norte, 186.69 hectares in Barangay
Matacong also portion of Basud, and 148.65 hectares portion of Barangay San Vicente, Lupi,
5
Camarines Sur. These were not included in the allocation and identification of the workable
sub-watersheds of the municipality; however, the municipality will be raising the issue in the
proper forum with the evidences at hand to prove their claims. There are also some noted
boundary conflicts between barangays in the municipality such as Barangay Mampurog versus
Barangay Poblacion covering 30.96 hectares which shall be settled at the level of the LGU San
Lorenzo Ruiz (Figure____: Issue/Conflict Map of the Municipality of San Lorenzo Ruiz.
Although the FLUP uses the watershed as the planning unit, it gives importance to
boundaries of Barangays, existing allocation, and proclamations which are treated as
management unit in the context of the DENR and the LGU priority interventions. The key
rationale is that, FLUP is primarily formulated to “close open access forestlands” by allocating
them to groups who will be accountable and responsible for effective management of
forestlands and its resources for the interest of the general welfare.
Watershed as FLUP working unit emphasizes planning in the context of watershed for a number
of reasons: first, watershed is characteristically ecosystems where biophysical interrelations
are observable and bounded by an easily recognizable and distinct ridgeline; second,
ecosystem services can be clearly defined within watersheds and sub-watersheds; third, in
practical sense, watershed have natural boundaries that do not require artificial markers to
distinguish from other planning units; fourth, accounting for impacts of activities is readily
distinguished and attributed in the context of watershed.
Barangay as management unit in some cases coincide with watershed boundaries base on map
Analysis. The intent of FLUP in the context of municipality is to take advantage of on-site
familiarity by barangay local government unit in effective management of forestlands.
The implementation of FLUP will be a shared responsibility of the LGU, the DENR in
coordination with other concerned government agencies. Part of the financing will come from
the National Tax Allocation of the LGU and external sources. DENR will assist the LGU in seeking
external assistance from donor organizations, partnership with private business, NGOs and
academic institution; and seek external assistance from local and international organizations
with interest in management of forestlands of the municipality.
6
Map 1.1
2.2 Duration of the Plan
The plans has a duration of five (5) years and will require mid-term and annual revision
during the period. Before the 5-year period ends, a five-year implementation will be undertaken
with the end in view of renewing the plan for another five years. It is expected that the
institutional mechanism, policies and agreements will be put in place during the first year. The
7
full implementation of core activities shall commence on the last quarter of the first year. The
LGU and the DENR shall form an assessment team to regularly monitor progress of the FLUP.
At the moment, for failure of the LGU to facilitate the adoption and implementation of FLUP as
planned, the DENR deemed it necessary to extent its assistance for the full adoption of the plan
at the same time execute the priority programs/projects/activities in the formulated plan, thus
this output. Necessary updating of the plan was conducted including the inclusion of current
baseline data to fit with the priority interventions needed by the LGU of the municipality of San
Lorenzo Ruiz. As agreed, upon, the plan will be updated to cover a five-year period from CY
2022-2026.
2.3 Complementation with Other Plans
Forest Land Use Plan is primarily allocation of forestlands that will become the framework
for forest land use zoning. Through FLUP, the LGU will assists the DENR the closure of open
access forestlands comprising of more than 3,282.222 hectares. The appropriate and proper
allocation of the Municipalities Forest land areas is viewed as the first step leading towards
minimizing the recurrent problems brought by the open access situation. Additionally, the
allocation will also provide the LGU leverage for the protection and management of the forest
and forestlands, and to recognize local community’s participations through the recognition of
individual property rights. With the allocation in pace, the issue of accountability and tenure
problems will be settled.
The FLUP shall form part of the CLUP, the latter is the plan for the long-term management of
the local territory as per the DILG Circular of 2008 (Department of Interior and Local
Government). It is the framework of the territory’s physical development; it identifies areas
where development can and cannot be located and directs publics and private investments
accordingly.
The FLUP can be the framework for the preparation of the Comprehensive Development
Plan when it pertains to forestlands. The latter action plan utilized by every local administration
to develop implements priority sectoral and cross-sectoral programs and projects.
8
The strategies defined in the FLUP will be adopted in part by the Executive and Legislative
Agendas (ELA). The latter is a plan document, covering a 3-year period corresponding to the
term of local elective officials that is mutually developed and agreed upon by both the executive
and legislative departments of an LGU.
Thus, FLUP is not meant to duplicate pre-existing plans of the LGU. The FLUP once
legitimized by the Sangguniang Bayan remains in effect even after the incumbent officials have
been replaced. Likewise, once in place, the FLUP can no longer be claimed by, nor attributed to a
particular administration. It also becomes the framework plan for any forest development
activities within the municipal territory.
2.4 Data Limitation
Formulating this FLUP required collecting, gathering of generating data needed for various
types of analysis for prescribing and assigning of rights. Data consist of maps, socio-economic,
demographic information, historical data on logging, and other secondary information of San
Lorenzo Ruiz forestlands. Maps were obtained from different sources. Table list the information
were obtained from the community consultations and LGU documents such as the physical and
socio-economic profile and the CLUP. Other secondary data were obtained from electronic
sources and websites of various organizations. Projection on populations was obtained from
the Household profiling of Local Government Unit of San Lorenzo Ruiz in 2019 in as much as
the Philippines Statistics Authority (PSA) data was generated way back 2015.
CHAPTER 3.0 METHODOLOGY
The preparation of the Forest Land Use Plan was initiated in 2013, but the definite steps of
preparation had just started. A consultant was tasked to prepare FLUP proposal formulation.
This was followed by series of meetings with the LGU, in order to define how it can proceed,
taking into account before finally pursuing to prepare memorandum of agreement between the
LGU and DENR. The draft MOA was evaluated by the parties concerned for final review and
Approval.
9
An orientation and workshop on FLUP formulation was conducted in November 2014. It was
facilitated by the Technical Working Group (TWG) and participated concerned officials from
LGU of San Lorenzo Ruiz. The three-day workshop covered FLUP principles and processes, key
concepts, Legal Basis in Land Use Allocation, Data requirements in FLUP, Tools for Data
gathering, Community Mapping, Tenure holder assessment, and Gender development concerns.
The output was the simulation of Tenure assessment, Stakeholders Analysis Outputs, the
organizational set -up of the TWG, as well as action plans before the field data collection and
community consultation.
After the review and finalization, the MOA was signed and immediately the Technical
Assistance Team conducted action planning with the Technical Working Group (TWG) for the
completion of the FLUP.
The governance oriented FLUP process as shown in figure ____ demonstrate that forest land use
planning in anchored on multi-sectoral analysis of community situation to generate consensus
on FFL allocation. The analysis is not only based on technical data and maps but also on socio-
economic, cultural and institutional information.
Data & Map

Collection
Situational Participatory
Analysis Prioritization of Sub-
Watershed and Plan Preparation
Allocation of FFL
Implementation
Approval of the Plan Legitimization
of FLUP
by DENR Region
Figure 1 Forest Land Use Planning Process
Data Source
The source is the entity from which the indicator we obtained. Usually the organization that
conduct the data collection effort. In San Lorenzo Ruiz the source of data would include the
10
MENRO, MPDO, Tenure Holder, DENR, and Barangay Officials in line with the strategy of
joint LGU-DENR partnership and community-based participation in forest management.
Method of Data Collection
Data collection is a combination of secondary and primary data. Primary data collection can
be undertaken through focus group discussions, key informant interview. Secondary data
usually come from government agencies.
Frequency of Data Collection
Frequency will depend on the timeliness of decision making. The PMO shall ensure that
data collection frequency is cost effective and just in time for the decision making by the
FLUP Steering Committee.
Responsibility for Collection Data
Specific unit of the PMO or the committees of the FLUP Steering Committee may be
assigned to collect data.
Data Analysis
The PMO shall conduct the analysis of disaggregated data, compare with other indicators or
aggregated indicators and compare past and present performance.
3.1 MOA ( DENR and LGU) with Ordinance or Resolution from MDC and SB
The FLUP Team of the DENR 5 presented the proposed formulation of the Forest Land
Use Plan of the Municipality of San Lorenzo Ruiz, and during the 33 rd Regular Session
on March 6, 2017, the Sangguniang Bayan members approved a Resolution with no. 23
s. 2017 or “A Resolution Authorizing the Honorable Mayor Nelson P. Delos Santos, MD
11
to Sign and Enter into a Memorandum of Agreement with the Department of

Environment and Natural Resources (DENR) for the Preparation of Forest Land Use
Plan (FLUP) of the Municipality of San Lorenzo Ruiz, Camarines Norte” .
Subsequently, a Memorandum of Agreement entered into by and between the DENR

represented by the Regional Executive Director Crisanta Marlene P. Rodriguez and
Municipal Mayor of San Lorenzo Ruiz, Camarines Norte, Honorable Nelson P. Delos
Santos, M.D. The MOA stipulated the responsibilities and obligations of the DENR and
LGU as agreed upon to attain a common objective, implement collaborative efforts,
ensure timely delivery of technical assistance and support services in order to improve
the governance of the municipality’s forests and forestlands (FFL)
3.2 Community Profiling and Mapping
This phase of FLUP formulation consist of four key activities: a) secondary data
gathering, b) formal and informal interviews and meeting of the key officials, c)
community consultations, d) assessment of existing tenure allocations within forestland
of the municipalities. Reliable data and maps are important in forest land use planning
as basis for sound and informed decision making. Using community profiling methods,
thematic mapping and community mapping, the multisectoral municipal TWG collects
data and maps and maps relating to the status of the FFL assets and their uses, the users
of FFL or the stakeholders, institutional arrangements in managing FFL assets,
identified threats to resource assets, and opportunities for their development. These
information are important to establish the current condition of FFL assets and the
trends in its uses as influenced by activities of the different stakeholders and the way it
is managed by resource institutions. From these, problems, threats and opportunities
could be identified which form the basis in developing strategies for effective FFL
management. It should be emphasized that participation of key forest stakeholders in
necessary in data collection, mapping and in validating related data as it is relevant in
transparent decision making.
3.3 Updating the Thematic/Composite Map
12
This module on mapping consists of three stages, overlay map analysis; processing
of raw maps to generate thematic maps; and overlay analysis of thematic maps. The
FLUP thematic maps are as follows:
1. Administrative Map
2. Elevation Map
3. Slope Map
4. Land Cover (2010 and 2015) Map
5. Issues Map
6. Geologic Hazards Map
7. Production & Protection Forest Map
8. DENR Project Map
9. Landslide Map
10. Flooding Map
11. Sub-Watershed Map
12. Drainage/Road Map
13. Tenure Map
14. Land Classification Map
15. Allocated/Unallocated Forestland Map
16. Bicol Natural Park (BNP) Map
17. Abasig Matogdon Mananap Natural Biotic Area (AMMNBA) Map
3.4 Situational Analysis
These activities include several types of analysis; a) Analysis of bio-physical, socio-

economic and geospatial information; b) Stakeholder analysis, c) Analysis of issues in
forestlands management including causes and effect of forest degradation, d) Analysis
of problems, needs and opportunities.
This phase identifies issues and opportunities. It also generates preliminary

recommendations based on analyzed data. Through map overlay analysis, simplified
simulation techniques and other tools, the TWG evaluates the overall pictures of current
condition and recent trends in FFL and identifies conflicting/complementing interest,
13
claims and uses among stakeholders. It identifies the extent of open access forest lands,
improperly managed allocated areas and institutional gaps in the management of FFL.
Watersheds are used as the units of analysis to demonstrate the relationships of FFL
with respect to the other ecosystem following the ridge to reef framework. Results of
the analysis are used during the planning phase where stakeholders generate consensus
on zones, allocations, watershed prioritization and other technical, organizational and
financial stages.
3.5 Zoning and allocating the Open Access FFL
A significant part of this exercise was to identify and agree on quantitative and
qualitative criteria for allocating and prioritizing sub-watersheds.
The TWG focused on reviewing the forestland allocation and defining strategies and
management prescriptions that will serve as guides for allocated forestland.
Key finding in the situational analysis are discussed by the TWG highlighting on illegal
cutting, forestland conversion, boundary and resource use conflicts and trends in losses
of forest cover, among the other issues. Strategies are then developed which include
zoning the FFL to identify production and protection zones, allocation of the open
access areas and sub-watershed prioritization. The TWG initially agrees on a set of
criteria for zoning and allocating FFL and in prioritizing sub-watersheds. Based on these
agreed sets of criteria, preliminary zoning and allocation plan, prioritization of sub-
watershed are developed.
3.6 Review and Formulation of the Vision, Goals, Objectives and Strategies
The consultations were designed to provide opportunity for the stakeholders to

examine further and validate the recommended allocation and management options for
14
San Lorenzo Ruiz’ FFL. The TWG formulates the LGU’s vision, mission, goals and
objectives for the municipality. Zoning the FFL as to production and protection, this
activity includes review and revision of the management strategies per objectives of the
FLUP such as; Biophysical, Socio- Economic and Institutional.
3.7 Drafting the FLUP
Results of the previous steps of the FLUP process are consolidated by organizing the
writeshop with the suggested outline. The technical writers organized the presentation
of the output and discussed within the group of the series of discussion to be presented
in the plan. Upon agreement and validation of the different topics and subtopics based
on the given outline for the plan, the TWG started to organize the discussion, integrating
the collected data, suggestions, comment and recommendations. The consolidated draft
FLUP was then presented to different stakeholders to validate and generate consensus
on the visions, FFL allocation, prioritization of sub-watersheds and other
recommendations. The draft FLUP also include the work and financial plan covering 1-
year and 5-year implementation.
3.8 Consultation and Validation of the Draft FLUP
Upon completion and consolidation of comments in the level of the planning team or the
TWG, the drafted FLUP were presented to different on-site and off-site stakeholders for
validation and consultation. In this phase, sectoral comments and suggestion were
noted/evaluated and incorporated in the plan for final drafting.
3.9 Legitimization
This activity includes to review all chapters primarily to check its completeness and
refined the contents; then presentation of the draft to Municipal Development Council
that includes barangay captains. The council endorsed the document for presentation to
the Sangguniang Bayan after its finalization and consideration of the comments and
suggestions. The SB will be the one who will legitimize the plan to become a part of the
15
municipal investment plan. Hand in hand, the draft plan shall also endorse to the
Regional Executive Director. The SB then authorized the municipal mayor to sign the
joint FLUP implementation memorandum of agreement (MOA) with the DENR.
3.10 Preparation and signing of Joint FLUP Implementation
Upon the approval of the plan, both the LGU and DENR will proceed with the
implementation. Among the activities that may require immediate attention are
facilitating co-management of selected watersheds, issuance of tenure instrument,
resource management planning, recognition of individual property rights,
investment promotion, formation and training of the multi-sectoral forest
protection committee and regular monitoring of tenure holders.
CHAPTER 4.0 KEY FINDINGS
4.1. Profile of San Lorenzo Ruiz

 Geographic Location. The Municipality of San Lorenzo Ruiz is located in the
southern part of the province and bounded on the eastern part by the
municipalities of Basud and the capital town of Daet. In the west it is
bounded partly by San Vicente and Lupi which are municipalities of the
neighboring province of Camarines Sur. At the North by Daet and south by
Lupi again. The geographic position is 00’ 00” N 123 ° 00”E with a grid
coordinates of 0.000 easting 500,000,000. It lies between Latitude 13 °
56‘00” and 14° 06’ 00” and between longitude 122° 47’ 00” and 122° 57’
00”. It has an area of 10,959.17 hectares.
Map 1.2
16
 Climate. San Lorenzo Ruiz falls under the Second Type of climate consisting
of no distinct dry season, very pronounced maximum rain period from
November to January; the municipality is frequently visited by typhoons
causing damage to agricultural crops which is the main source of income in
the municipality.
Map 1.3
Topography
17
TOPOGRAPHY-Two (2) types of topographic relief, the flat lowlands and

mountainous, characterize the municipality. San Lorenzo Ruiz mostly has steep mountains,
and rugged, rolling hills with an elevation of 300 meters above sea level, that gradually
descend to the lowland areas where majority of the barangays are located. The municipality
of San Lorenzo Ruiz has six- (6) slope categories. The more dominant category experienced
in the municipality are moderately sloping to rolling. Areas with level to undulating slope
characteristics are limited to around 30% of the total land area of the municipality or
around 6,041 has. Barangays which are characterized as having level or nearly level slopes
(0-3%) are Daculangbolo, Laniton, Langga, portions of Mampurog, Manlimonsito, San
Antonio, portions of Salvacion and portions of San Ramon with a total land area of 3,160.58
hectares. Barangays with 3-5% slope are characterized by gently sloping areas, this includes
a portions of Mampurog, portions of Maisog, portions of Matacong and portions of San
Ramon with a total land area of 1,440.2641 hectares. Those barangays with 5-8% slope are
characterized as having gently undulating and rolling land, this includes portions of
Matacong, portions of Mampurog, portions of Maisog, portions of San Ramon and portions
of San Isidro with the total land area of 1,600.294 hectares. Barangays with 8-15% slope are
characterized by moderately undulating and rolling land that includes portions of Salvacion,
portions of San Antonio, portions of San Isidro and includes San Vicente, Lupi, Camarines
Sur as CASE-5 of Cadastral has a total land area of 1,496.0638 hectares. Those barangays
with 15-18% slope is characterized with steeply undulating rolling land that includes
portions of San Isidro, Mampurog, Matacong and Maisog. Lastly, those barangays with 18%
and above slope are characterized as very steeply sloping to hilly and mountainous areas
that includes portions of barangay Matacong, San Isidro and Maisog with a total land area of
1,954.042 hectares. The areas not included are located at Bicol National Park and portion of
adjacent province.
Map 1.4
18
Slope. Slope is the degree of inclination of a given area. It is the distance rise
divided by the distance run. In equation form,
Slope = Rise
Run
Thus, a slope of 3% means that there is an again of 3 units for every 100
units of horizontal or ground distance travelled.
Table 01 shows the various slope categories in San Lorenzo Ruiz together
with corresponding descriptions, land area in hectares and its percentage to
total area.
Map 1.5
19
Soil. There exists only one (1) type of soil in the municipality of San Lorenzo
Ruiz, which is San Manuel clay loam.
Map 1.6
20
Geology. Geology is the physical structure and substance, processes and the
physical history that can be observed in land. This includes the chemical and
biological changes that the physical characteristics of land within the
municipality has undergone and is continuously undertaking. Understanding
geology is necessary as this provides everyone a better understanding of
constraints and potentials of the spatial structure of the LGU.
Map 1.7 Geologic Map
Land Resources
With reference to the land classification of San Lorenzo Ruiz, around 9,816 has are
classified as alienable and disposable while the remaining 10,184 are classified as forest lands.
21
Though both have been considered as lands of public domain, A & D lands have been the subject of
present system of classification and declared as not needed for forest purposes. Forestlands, on the
other land, are those, which have been identified for use as permanent forest or forest reserves and
reforestation. As per the Assessor’s office, there are 7,968.6436 hectares classified as agricultural or
alienable and disposable area; while 40.1631 hectares are used for residential purposes. The
remaining areas are unclassified public forestland, Philippine National Oil Company (PNOC) sites
and watershed areas. As of the writing of this CLUP, exact data or records of titled and untitled
properties or lands in the municipality are to be completed.
Tenurial
Within the forestland there are no existing tenured areas.
Natural Forests
The Natural Forest are consisted of open canopy and Closed Canopy Broadleaves with an
area of roughly One thousand four hundred twelve hectares (1
Table 1.1.
SLOPE CLASSIFICATION
San Lorenzo Ruiz, Cam. Norte
SLOPE CATEGORY : LAND AREA (in has.) : TO TOTAL AREA
0-3 Level to nearby level land : 3160.5795 : 30.02

3-5 gently sloping areas : 1440.2641 : 13.68
5-8 gently undulating and rolling land : 1600.294 : 15.20
8-15 moderately undulating @ rolling land : 1496.063 : 14.21
15-18 steeply undulating @ rolling land : 877.0029 : 8.33

18 + Very steeply sloping to hilly and : 1954.042 : 18.56
Mountainous areas
______________________________________________________________________________ TOTAL
: 27,330.78 : 100.00 %
Source: MPDO-San Lorenzo Ruiz

Table1.2
22
TEXTURE OF SOIL SURFACE

Municipality of San Lorenzo Ruiz, Cam. Norte
SYMBOL OF SOIL TEXTURE : LAND AREA (ha.): PERCENT (%)
San Manuel clay loam : 27,330.78 : 100 %
TOTAL : 27,330.78 : 100%
CHARACTERISTICS:
DEPTH (cm)
0 - 20 : Surface Soil : Clay loam brown to dark brown, granular; friable Boundary with sub-
soil is smooth and diffused
20 – 75: Sub soil : Fine sandy loam; light brown to brown; coarse granular structure; loose.
Boundary with underlying layer is smooth.

75-120: Substratum : Sandy loam; light brown to yellowish brown; coarse granular structure;
Friable
120 and below : Light grayish to grayish brown coarse sand.
Table 1.3
LAND AREA PER BARANGAY
MUNICIPALITY OF SAN LORENZO RUIZ, CAMARINES NORTE
LAND AREA (Has.)

To be
BARANGAYS acquired/contes PERCENT (%)
Cad – 693-D Total
ted/ disputed
area
Daculangbolo 325.75 ___? 325.75 1.19
(DBvsDogongan
, Daet)
Dagotdotan 273.35 273.75 1.00
Langga 385.84 385.84 1.41
Laniton 583.71 583.71 2.14
Maisog 1,775.42 1,775.42 6.50
Mampurog 731.71 731.71 2.68
Manlimonsito 310.71 4,293.29 4,604.00 16.85
23
Matacong (Poblacion) 114.67 114.67 0.42

Matacong (Barangay) 2,583.39 2,583.39 9.45
Salvacion 252.70 4,982.30 5,235.00 19.15
San Antonio 265.23 5,198.77 5,464.00 19.99
San Isidro 1,579.42 2,328.58 3,908.00 14.30
San Ramon 1,195.00 1,195.00 4.37
*San Vicente (Case No. 5 of 150.54 150.54 0.55
Cadastral-693-D)
SAN LORENZO RUIZ 10,376.90 16,953.48 27,330.78 100.00
Table 1.4
DEVELOPMENT OPPORTUNITY
DESCRIPTION AREAS (HAS.) PERCENT (%)

Development Areas 9,672.00 35.39
Protection Areas 10,328.00 37.79
Others (unidentified) 7,330.78 26.82
TOTAL 27,330.78 100.00
Table 1.5
LAND SUITABILITY
DESCRIPTION AREA (Has.) PERCENT (%)

Suitable for cultivated annual crops 9,160 45.80
Suitable for rice 288 1.44
Suitable for forest 240 1.20

Suitable for perennial and vine crops 352 1.76
Forest reservation 9,840 49.20
Built-up areas 120 0.60
TOTAL 20,000 100.00
Sources: Department of Agriculture
 Rainfall
Rainfall is brought about by weather patterns such as different causes of

weather patterns such as air, streams, tropical cyclones, thunderstorms, the
ITCZ, frontal passage, etc. Its intensity or amount is influenced by latitude or
24
geographical setting, topography and exposure season. Under certain

conditions, surfeit or rainfall results in a potentially disastrous phenomenon
It has been shown in Table _____ that average annual rainfall in 1993 is 259.50
mm. in June (Province Record).
Table 1.6
ANNUAL RAINFALL DISTRIBUTION, MONTHLY AVERAGE, 1987-1993
SOURCE: PAG-ASA Daet Radar Station

Rainfall
Month Observed Baseline (1960- Differenc
1990) 2050 e
January 322.8161 332.882 10.0659
181.561
February 182.8908 8 -1.329
159.303
March 162.5 4 -3.1966
113.601
April 125.7989 1 -12.1978
140.376
May 136.4655 4 3.9109
187.589
June 176.7586 9 10.8313
226.129
July 216.2069 2 9.9223
August 232.7414 234.5 1.7586
Septembe 263.955
r 261.7874 1 2.1677
490.786
October 493.8448 5 -3.0583
571.089
November 567.1494 9 3.9405
618.932
December 591.4023 6 27.5303
Figure 1.2
25
Projected Rainfall in San Lorenzo Ruiz, Camarines Norte in 2050

(CCSM4, RCP 4.5)
700
600
500
400
Millimeters (mm)
300
200
100
ne
st
ly
ch
ril
y
ry
ay
r
be
be
be
be
ar
Ju
gu
ua
Ap
M
ar
Ju
nu
em
m
to
Au
M
br
ce
ve
Oc
Ja
pt
Fe
De
No
Se
Observed Baseline (1960-1990) 2050
Table 1.7
PREVAILING WIND VELOCITY/DIRECTION AND SPEED IN KNOTS, 1987-1993
CAMARINES NORTE
AVERA
M O N T H S TOTAL
GE
YEARS
JAN FEB MAR APRIL MAY JUNE JULY AUG SEPT OCT NOV DEC
1987 7.8 7.8 5.8 3.9 3.9 3.9 5.8 5.8 3.9 3.9 5.8 7.8 66.1 5.5
1988 3.9 3.9 3.9 3.9 3.9 3.9 3.9 3.9 3.9 5.8 9.7 13.6 64.2 5.4
1989 11.7 9.7 5.8 3.9 3.9 3.9 5.8 5.8 5.8 7.8 11.7 9.7 85.5 7.1
1990 5.8 5.8 7.8 5.8 5.8 7.8 5.8 7.8 5.8 5.8 7.8 7.8 79.6 6.6
1991 5.8 5.8 3.9 3.9 5.8 5.8 5.8 3.9 5.8 5.8 7.8 7.8 67.9 5.7
1992 5.8 5.8 5.8 3.9 3.9 5.8 3.9 5.8 3.9 5.8 7.8 5.8 64.0 5.3
1993 7.8 5.8 7.8 3.9 3.9 3.9 5.8 3.9 3.9 5.8 7.8 11.7 72.0 6.0
TOTAL 48.6 44.6 40.8 29.2 31.1 35.0 36.8 36.9 33.0 40.7 58.4 64.2 499.3 41.6
26
YEARLY
6.9 6.4 5.8 4.2 4.4 5.0 5.3 5.3 4.7 5.8 8.3 9.2 71.3 5.9
AVERAGE
SOURCE: PAG-ASA, Daet Radar Station
Table 1.8
PREVAILING WIND VELOCITY/DIRECTION AND SPEED IN KNOTS, 1994-2000
CAMARINES NORTE
AVERAG
M O N T H S TOTAL
E
YEARS
1994 7.8 5.8 7.8 5.8 3.9 3.9 5.8 5.8 3.9 7.8 7.8 9.7 75.8 6.3
1995 7.8 5.8 5.8 5.8 3.9 3.9 3.9 3.9 5.8 5.8 7.8 11.7 71.9 6
1996 9.7 11.7 7.8 7.8 5.8 5.8 5.8 5.8 5.8 5.8 7.8 9.7 89.3 7.4
1997 7.8 7.8 7.8 5.8 5.8 5.8 3.9 5.8 3.9 5.8 7.8 7.8 75.8 6.3
1998 5.8 5.8 7.8 5.8 5.8 5.9 3.9 3.9 5.8 7.8 5.8 7.8 71.9 5.8
1999 7.8 9.7 5.8 5.8 3.9 3.9 5.8 5.8 5.8 5.8 7.8 7.8 75.7 6.3
2000 9.7 7.8 7.8 5.8 5.8 3.9 5.8 5.8 5.8 5.8 7.8 7.8 79.6 6.6
TOTAL 56.4 54.4 50.6 42.6 34.9 33.1 34.9 36.8 36.8 44.6 52.6 62.3 540 44.7
YEARLY
8.06 7.77 7.23 6.09 4.99 4.73 4.99 5.26 5.26 6.37 7.51 8.90 77.14 6.39
AVERAGE
Table 1.9
TEMPERATURE RANGES AND MONTHLY AVERAGE, 1988-1993
CAMARINES NORTE
Minimum Temperature
Month Observed Baseline (1960- Differenc
1990) 2050 e
22.5988
January 21.533908 8 1.064972
22.6544
February 21.437931 9 1.216559
23.0848
March 21.8643678 3 1.2204622
April 22.7591954 23.9764 1.2172046
24.6325
May 23.3132184 8 1.3193616
June 23.4603448 24.7764 1.3160552
24.6286
July 23.3097701 5 1.3188799
24.6893
August 23.4747126 3 1.2146174
Septembe 23.0505747 24.2674 1.2168453
27
r 2
24.0724
October 22.8545977 7 1.2178723
November 22.8183908 24.0382 1.2198092
23.5561
December 22.3561798 8 1.2000002
Projected Minimum Temperature in San Lorenzo Ruiz, Camarines

Norte in 2050 (CCSM4, RCP 4.5)
30
29
28
27
26
Degrees Celcius (°C)
25
24
23
22
21
20
ar
y
ar
y ch ril ay ne Ju
ly st be
r
be
r
be
r
be
r
nu r u ar Ap M Ju ugu m to m m
Ja b M A e Oc ve ce
Fe pt De
Se No
Observed Baseline (1960-1990) 2050
Figure 1.3
Table 2.0
TEMPERATURE (C) RANGES AND MONTHLY AVERAGE, 1994-2000
CAMARINES NORTE
AVERA
M O N T H S TOTAL
GE
YEARS
1994 25.8 25.9 26.9 27.9 28.6 27.9 27.0 27.7 26.6 27.1 26.6 26.1 324.1 27.00
1995 25.7 25.3 26.1 27.8 28.1 28.8 27.5 27.6 27.3 27.4 27.2 25.5 324.3 27.00
1996 25.6 25.4 26.5 27.2 28.4 28.2 27.8 28.1 28.0 27.8 27.1 26.3 326.4 27.00
1997 24.4 25.8 26.0 27.9 28.7 27.4 27.5 28.4 26.9 27.0 27.3 26.6 325.8 27.20
1998 26.6 26.5 27.4 28.5 29.4 29.1 29.0 28.3 27.9 28.1 28.0 26.9 335.4 28.00
1999 26.5 26.2 27.1 27.9 28.0 27.6 28.2 27.5 27.2 27.5 27.0 26.4 327.1 27.30
28
2000 26.3 25.8 26.5 28.3 28.5 28.3 27.5 27.7 27.7 27.2 27.4 26.7 327.9 27.30
TOTAL 180.9 180.9 186.5 195.5 199.7 197.3 194.5 195.3 191.6 192.1 190.6 184.5 2291.0 190.8
YEARLY
25.84 25.84 26.50 27.94 28.46 28.19 27.78 27.90 27.37 27.44 27.22 26.36 327.28 27.26
AVERAGE
Table 2.1
RELATIVE HUMIDITY, 1987 – 1993
CAMARINES NORTE
AVER
M O N T H S TOTAL
AGE
YEARS
1987 79 80 80 78 77 85 82 80 85 83 85 87 981 81.75
1988 86 82 78 81 78 86 84 81 84 85 62 79 966 80.50
1989 84 84 94 81 83 81 81 80 71 70 85 84 978 81.50
29
1990 84 82 80 78 81 86 86 80 84 92 87 87 1,007 83.92
1991 83 82 80 82 79 84 83 84 82 83 90 86 998 83.17
1992 87 82 83 82 81 81 85 86 87 88 86 87 1,015 84.58
1993 87 87 85 84 80 81 85 84 88 88 90 92 1,031 85.91
581.3
TOTAL 590 579 580 566 559 584 586 575 581 589 585 602 6,976
3
YEARLY
84.3 82.7 82.9 80.9 79.9 83.4 83.7 82.1 83.0 84.1 83.6 86.0 996.6 83.05
AVERAGE
Table 2.2
RELATIVE HUMIDITY (%)
CAMARINES NORTE
AVERA
M O N T H S TOTAL
GE
YEARS
1994 88 87 84 84 84 87 88 84 89 84 86 86 1031 85.91
1995 84 86 84 82 85 85 88 87 87 87 87 90 1032 86
30
1996 84 83 86 86 84 85 85 79 84 86 86 79 1007 83.91
1997 82 83 81 79 81 89 88 81 89 85 84 83 1005 83.75
1998 82 86 79 80 79 81 86 89 90 89 91 92 1024 85.33
1999 88 83 91 90 90 91 88 85 89 91 91 93 1070 89.16
2000 88 92 92 87 85 87 84 87 89 92 91 92 1066 88.83
TOTAL 596 600 597 588 588 605 607 592 617 614 616 615 7235 602.89
YEARLY
84.1 85.7 85.3 84.0 84.0 86.4 86.7 84.6 88.1 87.7 88.0 87.8 1033.6 86.12
AVERAGE
 Wind Velocity/Direction (Provincial Wide)
Wind is measured in terms of velocity and its speed is usually expressed in meters per
second (mps) and/or kilometer per hour (kph). The prevailing wind direction at most
station conform with the highest wind speed observed in the province is 11.7 which
occurs in the month of December and the lowest recorded is 3.9 which occurs in the
month of April, May, June, August and September.
 Temperature
San Lorenzo Ruiz has a relatively cold than the average temperature recorded in the
Province of Camarines Norte due to its elevation. Since, the province has an average of
26.9 O C recorded in 1993. The hottest month is June and the coldest is February (Table
14).
 Humidity
31
The average annual relative humidity for the province is 83%. For 1993, almost all
monthly values of relative humidity is greater than 80% except for November and
December which posted more than 90%.
 Weather Disturbances
All regions over the country are exposed to typhoons, since the divisions are mainly
longitudinal in character and the frequency is latitudinal type.
Of the weather disturbance, tropical cyclones are the most destructive because aside from
heavy rains, which they release, they are accompanied by strong winds.
From 1985 to 1993 a number of tropical disturbances hit the province but the worst was
in 1993 where “Typhoon Monang” brought a great number of losses with a frequency of
173 kilometer per hour (kph), 51 pints higher from tropical storm “Saling” in 1989 with a
frequency of only about 122 kph (Table 16).
Table____
TROPICAL DISTURBANCES, 1989-2020 Camarines Norte
Maximum Wind
Year Date Name
(Kph)
2020 November 2 Super Typhoon Rolly (Goni) 315
2019 December 3 Typhoon Tisoy (Kammuri) 185
2018 September 2013 Typhoon Ompong (Mangkhut) 185
32
September 17 Typhoon Ramil (Damrey) 165

2017
September 12 Typhoon Maring 45
October 18 Typhoon Lawin (Haima) 230
2016
December 25 Typhoon Nina (Nock-Ten) 225
2015 October 1 Typhoon Kabayan (Mujiagae) 120
2014 July 14 Typhoon Glenda (Rammasun) 160
2013 June 5 Typhoon Ambo (Mawar)
2012 December 3 Typhoon Pablo (Bopha) 238
September 26 Typhoon Pedring (Nesat) 150

2011
July 26 Typhoon Juaning 120
2010 July 12 Typhoon Basyang (Conson) 120
2009 September 28 Typhoon Ondoy (Ketsana) 130
Table 2.3
2007 November 28 Typhoon Lando (Hagibis) 55

October 29 Typhoon Paeng 185
November 26 – December Super Typhoon Reming
2006
1 (Durian) 320
July 12 Tropical Storm Gloring 55
October 27 Typhoon Reming 105
2000
November 02 Typhoon Senyang 130
December 07 Tropical Storm Olpiang 55
April 09 Tropical Storm Karing 55
April 21 Typhoon Diding 65
1999 June 02 Typhoon Etang 65
October 15 Tropical Storm Renong 45
November 08 Typhoon Sendang 75
October 12-13 Typhoon Iliang 79
33
1998
October 22 Typhoon Loleng 180
1995 November 01 Typhoon Rosing 248
November 1 Tropical Storm Jusing 54

November 5 Typhoon Monang 173
December 7 Typhoon Naning 36
1993 December 10 Typhoon Naning 22
December 15 Tropical Depression Oning 47
December 27 Tropical Storm Puring 54
October 11 Tropical Depression Ningning 43
1992 October 25 Typhoon Paring
65
November 16 Tropical Storm Yayang 72
1991 July 9 – 10 Tropical Depression Etang 65
June 13 – 14 Typhoon Diding 65
November 12 Typhoon Ruping 58
1990 November 26 Typhoon Tering
65
May 17 Tropical Storm Bining 94
June 5, 6, 7 Tropical Storm Kuring 35
1989
October 10 Tropical Storm Saling 122
November 21 Typhoon Unsing 27
SOURCE: PAG-ASA Radar Station, Daet, Camarines Norte
Map 1.8 Map and Location of San Lorenzo Ruiz
34
35
Population and Demographic Profile
 Based on the 2019 Household Profiling of the Local Government Unit of San Lorenzo
Ruiz, the population of the municipality in the 12 barangays is 15, 193 or 2.45 % of
the total population of the Province of Camarines Norte. A total of 3,964 or 24.51%
live in the one urban barangay of Matacong while the remaining 74.59% or 10,338
live in the 11 rural barangays. Barangay Matacong has the highest population of
3,964 while Barangay Langga has the lowest population of 342.
Total Population by Province, City, Municipality and Barangay

as of April 29, 2019
SAN LORENZO RUIZ (IMELDA) 15,193

Daculang Bolo 1,724
Dagotdotan 1,107
Langga 342
Laniton 913
Maisog 529
Mampurog 2,744
Manlimonsito 653
Matacong (Pob.) 3,964
Salvacion 495
San Antonio 509
San Isidro 1,489
San Ramon 724
Table 2.4
 Based on PSA data, at 52 residents per sq km, it is less densely populated
municipality in Camarines Norte, using the land area of 273.65 sq km as base.
Projection of San Lorenzo Ruiz Population (10-year).
In preparing a Forest Land Use Plan, demographic changes through time must also be considered.
The increase of population has a strong effect in the environmental aspects of the Locality. The
historical growth of population in San Lorenzo Ruiz is shown in 2028
36
Year Projected
Population
This data will be used in the calculation of the
2019 15,194
solid waste generation of the LGU for the
2020 15,499
specific period of time. It will important for the
2021 15,811
required capacity building and Information and
2022 16,129
Education Campaign (IEC) in the community.
2023 16,456
2024 16,784
2025 17,121
2026 17,465  Economic and Financial Profile
2027 17,816
2028 18,174 The NSCB classified San Lorenzo Ruiz
Table 2.5
as a 5th class municipality. As probably
the poorest in the province, it is very much dependent on the national government or its
existence and operation. Records from the Bureau of Local Government Finance (BLGF)
have shown that San Lorenzo Ruiz received the lowest IRA from the national government
compared with other municipalities of Camarines Norte in 2008.
San Lorenzo Ruiz is considered an agricultural municipality as majority of its land is

devoted to agricultural activities. The major agricultural products are coconut,
pineapple, Tiger Grass, banana, fruits, rice, vegetables, and root crops. The
municipal profile is shown below:
Agriculture
Crop production
Total Land area devoted to agriculture: 2,580.79 (92.5%)
Total CARP able are: None
Number of farmers: 115 (Rice farmers)
Forestry
Total area of production forests: 667.6388 has. (6.09%)
Mining
Regulated Quarying Activities in the Municipalities
 Labor Force
Labor force members comprise the 50.37% of inhabitants which is more than half of the
total population or working age group belonging to 15-64 age bracket 0-14 years and 65
and over comprised 47.38% and 2.23% respectively. This goes to show that there are 47
persons (in the 0-14 age bracket 0 for every 100 persons in the working age group.
37
Likewise, there is 2 persons (in the 65 and over age group) for every 100 persons in the
working group age bracket.
 Trade, Commerce and Services
Primary economic activities refer to natural resource extractive industries, such as

agriculture, fishery, mining and quarrying. These poultry, quail egg production and piggery.
Secondary economic activities include manufacturing, construction, electricity, gas, and
water supply. Tertiary economic activities refer to services, such as wholesale and retail
trade, hotels, and restaurants, medical and educational services, housing.
The municipality has two (2) types of commercial establishments namely Retail Trade and
Services with total of 126 establishments and 31,976 sq.m. total commercial areas. This is
about 4.00% of the total built-up area of the municipality.
 Agriculture
In terms of land use, San Lorenzo remains primarily an agricultural municipality. Of the
municipality’s total land area of 273. 65 sq.km,5,045hectares (54%) are allocated to
agriculture.
Agriculture is the major economic activity in San Lorenzo Ruiz. The total existing
agricultural land is composed of 5,045 hectares. Major crops include pineapple, coconut,
rice, and vegetables such as ampalaya, eggplant, tomato, okra and pole sitao. Among the
major crops, coconut dominates the agricultural croplands, occupying about 4,499 hectares.
Rice occupies the next most dominant crop with irrigated rice and non-irrigated occupying
about 136 hectares. Pineapple was abundantly grows in the locality occupying a total area
of 128.75 hectares and there is also 26.45 hectares devoted for growing vegetables like
ampalaya, eggplant, tomato, okra and pole sitao.
 Aquaculture and Fisheries
The Municipality of San Lorenzo Ruiz abounds with inland natural water bodies ideal as
fishing grounds. In addition, fish ponds are established to increase fish supply for livelihood
38
and economic gain. Fishing activities can be found in the entire municipality where tilapia
fish are being produced. Total area devoted to fishing activity is about 12.414 hectares
 Industry
Industry has not made significant contribution to the economic development of the
Municipality of San Lorenzo Ruiz. It would appear therefore that the municipality remained
primarily dependent on Agriculture as its main economic source.
 Tourism
There are various potential and developing tourism sites in the municipality both man-
made and natural which are now rising as tourism destinations for all kinds of eco-tourism
activities in the Province of Camarines Norte. These tourism sites have many activities
which can be offered to visitors depending on the choice of the tourists. These may include
activities like trekking, mountain climbing, bird watching, camping and all kinds of nature
adventure.
 The Municipality of San Lorenzo Ruiz notwithstanding its rural-setting as a Small Town
boasts of existing tourism-related recreational areas; As of Year 2001, there are existing
tourist spots or attractions within the municipality particularly Resorts at 1) Barangays
Mampurog, Matacong, Dagotdotan along Mampurog River where facilities consist of shed
houses and generates significant number of tourist visitors as well as revenues; 2) Barangay
San Isidro along Botan River although there are no established facilities therein for frequent
number of visitors; and 3) Barangay Maisog where there is Nacali Falls visited by significant
number of visitors despite
 absence of facilities.
SAN LORENZO RUIZ NATURE BASED ATTRACTION
Tourist Short Description Type Classific Activities Location Remarks

Attraction of ation
attracti
on
Mampurog Bicol Region’s multi-awarded and Nature- Key Swimming Mampur Nipa cottages
River 2005 national finalist for the cleanest Based og, SLR, available
in-land bodies of water. Popularly CN
known as the bathing escapade and
39
the summer destination of the

province of Camarines Norte.
Highlands It always fascinates every visitor with Nature- Potential Viewing, Ressetle Ideal during
and its breathtaking and panoramic view Based Camping, ment, the months of
Environme of municipalities of Vinzons, Talisay, bird Brgy. January-
ntal Park Daet, Basud and Mercedes. From this watching Matacon February for
Vantage point, one can see as far as g- Brgy. a “Baguio
Bagasbas Beach and San Miguel Bay. San like” weather
Isidro, experience
SLR, CN
Dagotdota Privately owned. One of the most Nature- emergin Swimming Dagotdot Entrance
n Spring visited resorts in SLR. Based g an, SLR, Fee-2Php
Resort CN Cottages Fees
ranging from
350-1200Php
depending on
the size
Athena’s Privately owned. Newly opened. Nature- Potential Swimming Dagotdot Cottages fees
Nature Based an, SLR, range from
Park and CN 500-600Php
Resort
Club Noah Privately owned. An Instagram worthy Nature- emergin Swimming Mampur
Eco-Resort place. They have open cabanas where Based g og, SLR,
visitors can relax and enjoy the beauty CN
and serenity of nature.
Nacali Located in the mountainous area of the Nature- Potential Swimming, Maisog, To reach the
Falls municipality. It reveals the wonders of Based hiking, SLR, CN falls, one has
nature through its voluminous crystal- trekking to ride the
clear watercourse from springs of 379meter
inner forest of the Bicol peninsula. It is tramline.
the best for nature lovers, hiking and Tramline fee-
trekking enthusiasts. 50Php back
and forth.
Rafflesia Rafflesia is the world’s largest flower. Nature- Potential Viewing, Mt.Guina Rafflesia
Viewing Several types of Rafflesia varieties can Based, Trekking, tungan, blooms
Site be found in the lower sloped of Mt. Educati hiking, SLR, CN during the
Guinatungan. During June or July, onal trekking months of
there is a week or two when the June-July.
rafflesias are in bloom, making them a
seasonal but very rewarding
destination for hikers who have an
intertest in our unique tropical flora
and fauna.
Pineapple San Lorenzo Ruiz is dubbed as the Nature- Potential Viewing, Different
Plantation home of the sweetest pineapple which Based pineapple Brgy. Of
is the Queen Formosa. picking, the
peeling municipa
and eating lity
Ibatan Located in the mountainous area of the Nature- Potential Trekking, San
Falls municipality. It reveals the wonder of Based Camping’ Isidro,
nature through its voluminous crystal- Viewing, SLR, CN
clear watercourse from springs of hiking,
40
inner forest of the Bicol peninsula. It is swimming

best for nature lovers, hiking and
trekking enthusiasts.
Angelina A worthy sidetrip if visitors are Nature- Potential Trekking, San Days
Falls hiking/trekking to mount Labo. This Based Camping’ Isidro, required/
majestic waterfall was name after the Viewing, SLR, CN Hour to
local tourist guide named Angeles hiking, summit 2-3
“Tiyong Ani” Malate. swimming days/ 8-10
hours
Nabangko Located in the mountainous area of the Nature- Potential Trekking, San Days
Falls municipality. It reveals the wonder of Based Camping’ Isidro, required/
nature through its voluminous crystal- Viewing, SLR, CN Hour to
clear watercourse from springs of hiking, summit 2-3
inner forest of the Bicol peninsula. It is swimming days/ 8-10
best for nature lovers, hiking and hours
trekking enthusiasts.
Mt. Labo Perfect for hiking and trekking Nature- Potential Trekking, San
enthusiasts. Mount Labo, is a Based Camping’ Isidro,
potentially active strato volcano in the Viewing, SLR, CN
province of Camarines Norte. Rising to hiking, (Jump-
an impressive height of 1544meters off point)
above sea level, Mt. Labo in Camarines
Norte is a haven of biodiversity whose
roster of species include the rafflesia
(Rafflesia Manillana) as well as the
rufous hornbill (Buceros hydrocorax).
Hikers, for their part, can take delight
in the challenging trails of the
mountain system (it is too big to called
just a single mountain). Straddling
three different municipalities, the
possibilities for traverse trail are
many.
(http://www.pinoymountaineer.com/
2013/09/mt-labo-camarines-norte-
1544.html)
Table 2.6
 Infrastructure
Road and Bridges
Inventory of roads as of year 2012 within the municipality shows that there are a total of 85
kilometers of road networks made up of provincial, municipal and barangay roads. By type
of road pavements: a) 11 kilometers or 12.95% are concrete paved; b) 23 kilometers or
27.05% are asphalt paved; c) 24 kilometers or 28.23% are gravel paved; and d) 27
kilometers or 31.76% are of earth surface conditions. All barangays within the municipality
are currently interlinked by road networks.
41
There are 8 existing bridges within the municipality. The Colgante Bridge, Kabilang Sapa,
Matacong Footbridge and Tulay-ng-Pangulo sa Barangay in Barangay Maisog; Laniton
Footbridge at Barangay Laniton; Hanging Bridge at Barangay Mampurog; Panodan Bridge at
Barangay Maisog and the Mampurog-Langga Bridge connecting barangay Langga and
Mampurog.
Land Transport
Current transportation facility within the municipality is limited to a Public Utility Jeepney
Terminal situated at the Urban Barangay of Matacong as of Year 2012. It can accommodate
only limited number of vehicles and is usable but needs improvement of facilities including
parking facilities. There is also a terminal facility for buses, tricycles and multicabs which is
only occupying a space along the streets of Matacong, Mampurog and Daculangbolo.
Being a land-locked municipality, marine transportation is not applicable. Likewise, the

municipality’s proximity to the capital town of Daet makes the services of air transportation
negligible. there is also no railways stations and terminals within the locality.
Communication
Landline telephone service, internet service and Broadcast media are available within the
municipality. Cell site facilities were also available within the locality thus makes a strong
signal of cellular phones.
Water
The San Lorenzo Ruiz Water Supply System is supplying and serving water about 815
households with an average consumption of 16.5 cu.m/month per H/H.
Power
In terms of household electricity supply as of Year 2012 there are 2,030 or 71.80% of the
total households within the municipality are served by electricity
Electricity service is provided by the Camarines Norte Electric Cooperative (CANORECO)

from electric power supplied by the NAPOCOR. Facilities of CANORECO within the
42
municipality consist of electric posts, streetlights and a metering station effectively serving
only 6 barangays particularly Daculangbolo, Dagotdotan, Mampurog, Matacong, San Isidro
and Manlimonsito.
Land Use
Based on the existing land use, almost all of the 12 barangays engage agricultural farming,
except barangay east and west Poblacion. The proposed plan identified areas that are
suitable for agricultural practices. This includes the prime agricultural lands and those that
are presently planted with tree crops. These areas which are suitable for agricultural
practices have been classified based on the Land Capability and Soil Suitability Analysis. The
map for land use is shown in Figure 4.
Education
Current level of school facilities for year 2013 within the Municipality of San Lorenzo Ruiz
indicates that: 1) different elementary schools are situated at Barangays Daculangbolo,
Dagotdotan, Laniton, Maisog, Mampurog, Manlimonsito, Matacong, Salvacion, San Antonio,
San Isidro and San Ramon and 2) secondary schools are available at Barangays Mampurog
and San Isidro namely the San Lorenzo Ruiz National High School and its extension high
school named Alcantara High School respectively. These elementary and secondary schools
are all public in nature and in fair condition. There is no tertiary school within the
municipality at present which can be attributed to its proximity to the Capital town of Daet
and the dominant rural-setting.
Health
Municipal Health Center located at Barangay Mampurog offered services for Maternal and
Child Health Care, and programs for National TB Control, Environmental Sanitation, Malaria
Control, Medicine/Medical, Dental Care, Dispensary Health, and Public Health program.
The Office of the Social Worker and Development at Barangay Matacong provides social
welfare services such as family life education and counseling and family planning
assistance.
43
There is also seventeen (17) Day Care Centers with seventeen (17) Day Care Workers
distributed to twelve (12) barangays of the municipality with 522-day care children
enrolled who are also beneficiaries of supplemental feeding.
Health & Nutrition
Malnutrition Rate (0-5 years old): below 10% (CBMS Data: 4.73%)
Morbidity Rate for leading illnesses: within acceptable condition per national standards
(Source: Municipal Health Office/Local Civil Registrar)
Maternal Mortality Rate: 0.1% or below per 1,000 live births (CBMS Data: 2009)
Housing
At present, there is only one existing resettlement area in San Lorenzo Ruiz. It is located on
Purok 7 Barangay Matacong and it has 44 housing units with power and water connection.
 Protective Services
Present protective services and facilities are confined only to: 1) the Municipal Police
Headquarter within the Municipal building compound at Barangay Matacong; and 2)
Civilian volunteers consisting of tanod brigades in all barangays. Police facilities are very
much limited given its 22 police personnel or at police to population of 1:572. The
municipality is wanting also in terms of fire and jail services. Other protective services such
as security or detective agencies and military facilities are not available.
 Environment
Solid Waste Management
As to solid waste disposal, the municipality identified methods such as collection and
disposal, composting, recycling.
44
Residential SOURCE kg/day

(base on WACS)
COMPOSITION Waste (KG/day) %

Biodegradable 54.20 52.04
Recyclable 21.38 20.53
Residual 26.43 25.38
Special Waste 2.43 2.33
Table 2.7
FIGURE 1.2
Chart Title
2%
25%
Biodegradable
Recyclable
52% Residual
Special Waste
20%
45
TABLE 2.8
WASTE COMPOSITION TOTAL %PERCENTAGE

Biodegradable
2 Food/Kitchen Wastes 15.50

3 Animal Carcases 5.02
SUB-TOTAL 54.20 52.04
Recyclable
1. Colored Papers (printouts, broadsheets, 1.10
magazines
2. Cardboards (corrugated carton, eggs trays) 1.50
3. Composition Packing (cartoons with plastic .6
lining, foil-lined terra pack)
4. PET (soft drink, water bottles, detergent, 1.65
vegetable oil containers)
5. HDPE (shampoo bottles, detergents and 2.73
household
Cleaners bottles
6. Clear Glass 4.45
7. Colored Glass 2.60
8. Broken Glass (Bubog) .75
9. Ferrous (iron, steel, tin cans) 2.50
10. Non-Ferrous (copper, aluminum) 1.30
11. Texttiles (Discarded clothes, uncontaminated 2.2
textiles
SUB-TOTAL 21.38 20.53
Residual
1. Sanitary Composition (Napkin, diapers, tissue, 9.35
papers
2. Worn shoes, slippers, Bags 3.20
3. LDPE (Sando Bags, Shopping Bags, Thin film 1.56
plastics)
4. Food Wrappers, Candy and Biscuit Wrappers, 2.60
etc.
5. Shampoo sachet & Laundry Sachet 3.45
6. Inert (stone, Rocks, Demolition debris 6.27
SUB-TOTAL 26.43 25.38
Special Waste
1. Containers of Paints & Thinner & Other Solvents 1.25
2. Container of Grease and Oil .25

3. Containers of Roof Cement .73
4. Spent Dry and Wet Cell Batteries .20
SUB-TOTAL 2.43 2.33
TOTAL 104.16 100
46
Waste Composition from Commercial Source

TABLE 2.9
COMPOSITION Waste (KG/day) % Composition

Residual 1.43 13.08
Special Waste 0 0
TOTAL 10.933 100%
FIGURE 1.3
Waste from commercial sector
Residual
Biodegradable
Recyclable
47
Waste Composition from Institutional Sector

TABLE 3.0

Composition
Residual 1.2 23.23
Special Waste .066 1.28
TOTAL 5.166 100%
Chart Title
1%
23%
Biodegradable
49% Recyclable
Residual
Special Waste
27%
FIGURE 1.4
48
Waste Composition from Public Market

Sector
TABLE 3.1

Composition
Biodegradable .26 21.67
Recyclable .367 30.58
Residual .57 47.50
Special Waste 0 0
TOTAL 1.2 100%
FIGURE 1.5
Chart Title
22%
Biodegradable
Recyclable
48%
Residual
Special Waste
31%
49
SUMMARY OF WASTE GENERATED/SECTOR
SECTOR TOTAL % Biodegradab % Recyclab % Residu % Speci

WASTE le le al al
generati waste
on (kg)
Residentia 104.16 51.7 53.92 20.5 21.38 25.3 26.43 2.3 2.43
l 7 3 8 3
Commerci 10.93 29.5 3.23 57.3 6.27 13.0 1.43 0 0
al 4 5 8
Institution 5.17 48.9 2.53 26.5 1.37 23.2 1.2 1.2 .066
al 7 2 3 8
Public 1.2 21.6 .26 30.5 .367 47.5 .57 0 0
Market 7 8 0
Total 121.48 49.3 59.94 24.2 29.39 24.3 29.63 2.0 2.50
4 0 9 5
FIGURE 3.2
Hence: the waste generated from 56 households within 3 days =312.48 kg
Therefore: 312.48/3 days = 104.16 kg/day/366 household members=.28kg/person/day
For Commercial: 10.93 kg/day/6 commercial sampling station=1.82kg/day
For Institution: 5.17kg/day/3 sampling station=1.72kg/day
For Public Market: 1.2kg/day sampling station=1.2kg/day
Waste Generation Contribution at Source

TABLE 3.3
Waste source Daily Waste No. of Frequency Rate %
Category Generation Respondent Generation Contribution
Residential 104.156 366 .28KG/Cap 85.50
Commercial 10.933 6 1.82 9.00
Institutional 5.166 3 1.72 4.20
Public Market 1.2 1 1.2 .988
TOTAL 121.455
Waste Generation Contribution at Source

50
Diverted Wastes
Recyclables such as dry cardboards, aluminums, papers, metals, tincans,

plastic bags, aluminum and such other recyclables items are to be sold directly to
the junkshop. The biodegradable conversion to compost is mostly from kitchen,
backyard and only a fraction of about 1.2 kilos every market day. While diverted
non-biodegradable or recyclable items could not be determined as it directly
handled by household junk buyers.
Generated Wastes
Kitchen food wastes, yard waste and all other biodegradable wastes
generated mostly by household shall be used in the composition facility.
Hazardous wastes are to be brought to the Municipal MRF for treatment
and final disposal with close coordination with DENR-EMB.
 Institutional Machinery
Component Barangays
The municipality of San Lorenzo Ruiz is composed of Barangays: Daculang Bolo,

Dagotdotan, Langga, Laniton, Maisog, Mampurog, Manlimonsito, Matacong, Salvacion, San
Antonio, San Isidro and San Ramon. The capital barangay is Matacong where the municipal
building was built and where the Urban area is located.
San Lorenzo has a total of 12 barangays of varying sizes. In terms of population, Langga is
the smallest with 290 inhabitants as of 2015 while Matacong is the largest with 3725. In
terms of land area, Dagotdotan is the smallest with 2.73 sq. km while San Antonio is the
biggest with 54.64 sq. km. Daculangbolo is also the most dense at 474 persons per sq. km
while San Antonio and Salvacion are the least dense at only 9 persons per sq. km.
 Organizational Structure
51
Local government of San Lorenzo Ruiz has 205 employees, broken into 11 elective (5.37%),
32 permanent (15%) and 162 job orders (79.02). This translates to roughly one employee
per 69 population.
Disaster Risk Reduction/ Climate Change

Hazards Assessments
The municipality is vulnerable to landslides especially in barangay as evaluated.
Anecdotal accounts also suggest that springs are still a good source of water even on
dry months. The study also suggest that shallow ground water can be designated as
a reserve in times of need but water quality is an issue it is to be used as sourced of
potable water.
Flooding is also a problem especially in low lying barangays and those that are
located near rivers and streams. The coast of the municipality also shows signs of
changes and is prone to tsunami and storm surges hence, occupation of beach and
construction of structure there need to be minimized.
Climate Variability and Change within the locality
The effect of climate change was investigated by looking at indicators that may show
changes in the local climate of the municipality. Historical analysis of temperature
data reveals that temperature date reveals that temperatures have been increasing
with the hot season getting warmer since 1980s. More specifically, it is the
minimum temperature at night that is getting warmer more than the maximum
temperature at daytime. Analysis also shows that the number of days with heavy
rainfall maybe increasing. The number of typhoons that affect the area is shown to
be generally increasing as well.
A regional Climate model was used to show possible future climate scenarios on the
study area. Temperature is expected to increase further by as much as 2.5⁰C on the
average: summer months are specially going to be hotter. Rainfall, on the other
hand, is projected to decrease by about 20 percent in 2050 during the month of
January to May.
52
This will also cut the risk and expenses of evacuation every time a typhoon arrives.
Rainfall
The highest annual rainfall observed within the Bicol River Basin (BRB) is in San Lorenzo Ruiz,
Camarines Norte with a mean annual rainfall of 6,610 mm for the period 2000‐2012.
Map 1.9
Map 2.0
53
Figure 1.6 Average Annual Volume of Precipitation, San Lorenzo Ruiz
Temperature
Due to the elevation of the municipality, it has relatively lower temperatures compared to the
average temperature recorded in the Province of Camarines Norte. The municipality has a
54
minimum of 22oC and a maximum of 30oC during the months of March to May. During the rainy
months of June to November the municipality experiences a minimum of 24 oC and a maximum of
28oC during the months December to February, the minimum temperature stands at 21 oC to 26oC.
Figure 1.7 Average Temperatures and Precipitation, San Lorenzo Ruiz
1.8 Average Maximum Temperatures, San Lorenzo Ruiz
Relative Humidity
The average annual relative humidity for the province is 83%. The most humid month in the
province is May with a dew point of 29 O, which is extremely humid and uncomfortable. The least
humid month is January with a dew point of 24 O which is also very uncomfortable.
55
Prevailing Wind
The general direction of the prevailing winds in the municipality is from the North East to South
West at an average wind velocity of 8 knots.
Wind speeds exceeding 28 kms/hr are experienced in more days during the 1st and 4th quarter of
every year. While from the months of April to September, wind speeds of 5kms/hr to m27 kms/hr
are experienced.
Figure 1.9 Wind Rose, San Lorenzo Ruiz
56
2.0 Tropical Cyclone Frequency

All regions over the country are exposed to typhoons, since the divisions are mainly longitudinal in
character and the frequency is latitudinal type.
Of the weather disturbance, tropical cyclones are the most destructive because aside from heavy
rains, which they release, they are accompanied by strong winds.
In recent years, a number of tropical disturbances hit the province but the worst was in 2006, with
the most notable being Typhoons Rolly in 2020, Typhoon Nina in 2016, Typhonn Pablo in 2012,
Reming in 2006. It should be noted that the frequency of typhoons as well as the average 10-minute
sustained winds and 1-minute sustained gust speeds have increased since the 1980s.
57
Maximum
Year Date Name
Wind (Kph)
2020 November 2 Super Typhoon Rolly (Goni) 315
2019 December 3 Typhoon Tisoy (Kammuri) 185
2018 September 2013 Typhoon Ompong (Mangkhut) 185
September 17 Typhoon Ramil (Damrey) 165

2017
September 12 Typhoon Maring 45
October 18 Typhoon Lawin (Haima) 230
2016
December 25 Typhoon Nina (Nock-Ten) 225
2015 October 1 Typhoon Kabayan (Mujiagae) 120
2014 July 14 Typhoon Glenda (Rammasun) 160
2013 June 5 Typhoon Ambo (Mawar)
2012 December 3 Typhoon Pablo (Bopha) 238
September 26 Typhoon Pedring (Nesat) 150

2011
July 26 Typhoon Juaning 120
2010 July 12 Typhoon Basyang (Conson) 120
2009 September 28 Typhoon Ondoy (Ketsana) 130
Table 3.4
58
2007 November 28 Typhoon Lando (Hagibis) 55
October 29 Typhoon Paeng 185
2006 November 26 – December 1 Super Typhoon Reming (Durian)

320
July 12 Tropical Storm Gloring 55
October 27 Typhoon Reming 105
2000
November 02 Typhoon Senyang 130
December 07 Tropical Storm Olpiang 55
April 09 Tropical Storm Karing 55
April 21 Typhoon Diding 65
1999 June 02 Typhoon Etang 65
October 15 Tropical Storm Renong 45
November 08 Typhoon Sendang 75
October 12-13 Typhoon Iliang 79
1998
October 22 Typhoon Loleng 180
1995 November 01 Typhoon Rosing 248
59
November 1 Tropical Storm Jusing 54

November 5 Typhoon Monang 173
1993 December 10 Typhoon Naning 22
December 27 Tropical Storm Puring 54
October 11 Tropical Depression Ningning 43
1992 October 25 Typhoon Paring
65
November 16 Tropical Storm Yayang 72
1991 July 9 – 10 Tropical Depression Etang 65
June 13 – 14 Typhoon Diding 65
November 12 Typhoon Ruping 58
1990 November 26 Typhoon Tering
65
May 17 Tropical Storm Bining 94
June 5, 6, 7 Tropical Storm Kuring 35
1989
October 10 Tropical Storm Saling 122
November 21 Typhoon Unsing 27
June 21 Tropical Storm Ditang 18
1988 November 7 Tropical Storm Yoning 58

December 23 Tropical Storm Apiang 58
August 12 Typhoon Herming 94
1987 November 25 Typhoon Sisang

104
October 11 Tropical Storm Pasing 62
1986 October 19 Tropical Storm Ruping

58
October 18 Typhoon Saling 65
1985 December 18 Typhoon Unsing

22
60
Climate Change Projections

A study conducted by PAGASA in 2011 reported the projected seasonal temperature increase and
seasonal rainfall change in 2020 and 2050 under the medium- range emission scenario at a
provincial-level.
Based on the observed baseline data from 1971 to 2000, there is a projected seasonal temperature
increase in the Province of Camarines Norte ranging from 0.9°C to 1.1°C or a high of 29.3°C during
the years 2006-2035 (centered at 2020), and about 1.8°C to 2.2°C or a high of 30.4°C during the
2036-2065 period (centered at 2050). The projected scenario indicates warmer temperatures all
throughout the year, especially during summer or the months of March, April and May. This is
presented in Table 1.20.
Table 3.5 Seasonal Temperature Increases (in CO) in 2020 and 2050 Under Medium-
Range Emission Scenario in Camarines Norte
Observed Baseline Change in 2020 (2006- Change in 2050 (2036-

(1971-2000) 2035) 2065)
25. 27. 28. 27.

0.9 1.1 1 0.9 1.8 2.2 2.1 1.8
7 6 3 3
26. 28. 29. 28. 27. 29. 30. 29.

6 7 3 2 5 8 4 1
Source: PAGASA 2011 and 2020 CLUP TWG Computations

Table 1.21 shows the seasonal rainfall changes. It can be observed that there is a decrease in rainfall
amount during the months of summer, from March to May, and significant increase in rainfall
amount from June to August during the Southwest monsoon.
Table 1.21 Seasonal Rainfall Change (in %) in 2020 and 2050 Under Medium-Range Emission
Scenario in Camarines Norte
61
Observed Baseline (in Change in 2020 Change in 2050

mm) (1971-2000) (2006-2035) (2036-2065)
10 39 56 128 0.0 5.20 7.8 5.6 8.9 1.5

30 8.5 5.6 5.7 0% 17.8 % 0% 0% 31.0 0% 0%
0% 0%
102 327. 595. 138 108 274. 615 130

9.6 7.3 .94
567 011 6 965 5
Source: PAGASA
It is projected that there will be an increase in the number of days with very hot temperatures
above 35OC which stands at around 1141 for the years 2006 – 2035, and 1981 for the years 2036-
2065. There is also a significant decrease in the number of dry days for medium-range scenario
which stands at around 4288 for the years 2006 – 2035 and 4412 for the years 2036-2065. Further,
projections also show changes in the number of days with severe and heavy rainfall (>300mm),
which stands at 18 for the years 2006 – 2035 and 16 for the years 2036-2065 as presented in Table
3.6.
Table 3.7 Frequency of Extreme Events (in %) in 2020 and 2050 Under Medium- Range
Emission Scenario in Camarines Norte
No of Days with T max No of Dry Days No of Days w/
>35OC Rainfall > 300mm
OBS* 2020 2050 OBS* 2020 2050 OBS* 2020 2050
Camarines
Norte 118 1141 1981 6675 4288 4412 1 18 16
OBS – Observed
Baseline; Source: PAGASA, 2011
62
Agriculture
Agriculture is the primary source of income for the significant portion of San Lorenzo Ruiz.
Agricultural productivity is seen to be adversely impacted through disruption in crop productivity,
emergence of new pests and diseases among crops as well as resistance of crops to traditionally
effective agricultural inputs.
It has been observed that per one (1) degree Celsius increase in temperature there has been a
reduction of 5% in crop production. This is further worsened by the lack of irrigation systems and
the reduced capacity of watersheds to provide the necessary water supply to crop lands as well as
the non-tolerance of crops to prolonged dry spells and droughts.
Similarly, the annual rainfall brought about by the wet-season also adversely impacts productivity
in some areas as some crops cannot sustain life when submerged in water for prolonged periods.
Likewise crop production done in slopes have been prone to erosion and landslide due to
saturation of the soil. It has been observed in recent years that the volume of rainfall or
precipitation has relatively been larger and spread in a much shorter time span, causing flooding in
low lying agricultural areas.
As response to this however, the rate in which farmers have adapted climate change resilient crops
and practices have remained slow in recent years, thereby affecting agricultural productivity.
Primary attention should be given to addressing food security and ensuring the adoption of
agricultural practices that promote resiliency.
Forest
The forest ecosystem of San Lorenzo Ruiz is generally comprised of Mt. Labo. This however has
been generally weakened due to various external disturbances such as invasive species, pest
outbreaks, illegal logging, and storms.
2.9.7. Climate Change Vulnerability Assessment

With climate change, water retention in watersheds are reduced and droughts and dry spells are
prolonged leading to losses in biodiversity of flora and fauna. Focus must be provided to ensuring
the conservation, protection and regrowth of these forest lands to improve resilience of the
municipality. Especially given the fact that a core resource of the LGU is its environmental
biodiversity.
Urban
The increasing weather disturbances, prolonged dry spells and droughts, and extreme weather
disturbances expose and magnify the vulnerability of those living in urban areas. Sea level rise, heat
waves, issues with water and sanitation all have adverse effects to urban communities especially to
the marginalized sectors who may not be able to cope easily with these changes. Primary focus
must be provided to strengthen the adaptive capacity of these sectors as well as ensure mitigating
measures that will address the impacts of climate change.
63
Table 3.8 Frequency of Extreme Events (in %) in 2020 and 2050 Under Medium- Range Emission
Scenario in Camarines Norte
No of Days with T max No of Dry Days No of Days w/

>35OC Rainfall > 300mm
OBS* 2020 2050 OBS* 2020 2050 OBS* 2020 2050
Camarines
Norte 118 1141 1981 6675 4288 4412 1 18 16
OBS – Observed
Natural Hazards in the Municipality
Flood
There is no recorded occurrence of flooding in San Lorenzo Ruiz, even with heavy rains.
However, based on the Project Nationwide Operational Assessment of Hazards (NOAH), there exists
threats of flooding in Barangays Dagotgotan, Daculangbolo and Mampurog, with Daculangbolo
projected to have the most severe incidence given its elevation in comparison with the upland
barangays. The projected flood is closely related to the river basin stretching from Mt. Labo. And
draining towards Daet and other tributaries.
Landslide
A landslide refers to several forms of mass wasting that includes a wide range of ground
movements, such as rockfalls, deep-seated slope failures, mudflows, and debris flows. These can
occur in a variety of environments, characterized by either steep or gentle slope gradients, from
mountain ranges to coastal cliffs or even underwater. Gravity is the primary driving force for
landslides to occur but other factors affecting slope stability that produce specific conditions that
make a slope prone to failure. In most cases, landslides are triggered by a specific event such as
heavy rainfall or an earthquake. It should be noted that soil type and forest cover is also a factor
that would determine whether a specific area would be prone to landslides
With 45.07% (9,014 has) of the 20,000 has land area of the municipality having a slope
category of steep hills and mountains to very steep hills and mountains, the local government of
San Lorenzo Ruiz is susceptible to landslides. This is observed mostly in the landslide hazards maps
which reflect the landslide potential of the upland barangays with jurisdiction over portions of
Mr.Labo. These being the upland portions of Maisog, Matacong and San Isidro, especially those with
rolling to rugged terrain. It is these mountainous areas which have high susceptibility to both rain
and earthquake-induced landslides as the rocks are fractured and moderately weathered while
thick soil development has also been observed.
With regards earthquake induced landslides, the Project NOAH hazard maps have also
identified Barangays Maisog, Matacong and San Isidro as having unstable slopes that would be
susceptible to landslides once ground shaking would occur. Most of the barangays were not
considered as being under threat of earthquake induced landslides.
It should be noted that the municipality has an estimated land area of 6,201.1371 has which
are not susceptible to erosion conditions, while the remaining portions are highly susceptible to
erosion.
64
Map 2.1
Map 2.2
65
Rain- Earthqu Lique Grou Grou Volca

Induc Drou ake factio nd nd Tsun nic
Barangay Flood
ed ght induc n / shaki Rupt ami Erupt
Lands ed Sinkh ng ure ion
landsl
A B C E G H I J K L
San Antonio
Salvacion
Manlimonsito
San Isidro
San Ramon
Daculang Bolo
Dagotdotan
Mampurog
Langga
Laniton
Maisog
Matacong
Table 3.9 Identified Hazards in Barangays, San Lorenzo Ruiz
Source: San Lorenzo Ruiz, MPDO
66
Ground Shaking
Ground shaking is the shaking of the earth's surface, due to the sudden release of energy
from the earth's lithosphere or tectonic plates such as the rupture of geologic faults, volcanic
activity, and landslides.
With the country being located in the Pacific Ring of Fire, the threats of groundshaking remain
significant. PHIVOLCS historical data shows San Lorenzo Ruiz as free from being the epicenter of
any earthquakes. The nearest recorded as reflected in Project NOAH was in Basud.
Liquefaction
Liquefaction is a phenomenon in which a saturated mass of land loses a large percentage of
its resistance and flows in a liquefied manner. This is in response to an applied stress such as
shaking during an earthquake, sudden changes in stress conditions, and reduced bearing capacity.
This condition is mostly observed in areas where the soil is sandy, low density and saturated. Hence
the importance of maintaining the integrity of watersheds to further support the soil structure and
ensure its strength especially during heavy sustained and heavy volume rainfall.
As per the PHIVOLCS Liquefaction Hazard Map for the province of Camarines Norte, the
municipality of San Lorenzo Ruiz is not susceptible to any form of liquefaction.
Volcanic Activity and Eruptions
Volcanic activity and eruptions often occur with related geologic and hydrologic hazards
including the release of gases, non-explosive lava emissions to extremely violent explosive bursts.
Large volcanic eruptions can greatly endanger the populations living within a large diameter from
the source of the eruption. Similarly, volcanic eruptions have a lasting effect as they affect global
climate. The PHIVOLCS classifies volcanoes according to their last recorded activity. Active
volcanoes are those which were recorded to have erupted within the last 600 years,
The province of Camarines Norte continuous to face threats of volcanic activities, albeit
from active volcanoes from neighboring provinces, namely Mt.Isarog and Mt.Iriga from Camarines
Sur, Mt.Mayon from Albay, and Mt.Bulusan from Sorsogon. Nearest to the municipality however, is
Mt Labo, which is the northernmost component of a volcanic chain that dots the Bicol Region in the
Philippines, it is a potentially active plio-pleistocene stratovolcano composed of dacitic and
andesitic domes, lava flows and a prominent central cone. The latest eruption from Mt.Labo was
recorded about 27,000 years ago, and no eruption has been observed since.
67
Disaster Risk Assessment Results

A Disaster Risk Assessment is a process that determines the level of risks of the
municipality to climate-related hazards, and allows the local government to better identify,
understand, and prioritize areas at risk to natural disasters. UNDP defines risk as the probability of
harmful consequences—casualties, damaged property, lost livelihoods, disrupted economic
activity, and damage to the environment— resulting from interactions between natural or human-
induced hazards and vulnerable conditions.
An assessment was conducted for the Municipality of San Lorenzo Ruiz to provide a better
understanding on natural hazards that may potentially affect the area, as well as how these are
aggravated by changing climate conditions. Together with different stakeholders (local government
offices and barangays), data were collected and validated through a series of workshops to expound
on the exposure, sensitivity, and adaptive capacity indicators of various systems of interests such as
population, critical facilities, natural-resource based production areas, lifeline utilities (i.e. roads),
and urban uses in the municipality. Through the indicators, risks were recognized providing entry
points for identifying priority decision areas and for exploring interventions to risk management,
may it be land use management options or specific programs/projects.
Hazard Magnitude Scores
Hazards for each system of interests were scored through their susceptibility and intensity.
The following hazards were subjected to the detailed assessment: flood, rain- induced landslide,
liquefaction, storm surge, and tsunami hazard. The scoring parameters are presented in the
ensuing table. It should be noted, however, that for storm surge and tsunami hazard, there are no
susceptibility levels hence a magnitude score of 1 was used.
Table 4.0 Hazard Magnitude Scores
Hazard
Susceptibility Intensity Magnitude Description
Score
High 1.5m and above 1 Highest possible intensity
Hazard has 66% intensity
Moderate 0.5-1.5m 0.66 compared to the highest
possible intensity
Hazard has 33% intensity
Low 0.5m and below 0.33 compared to the highest
possible intensity
For the
Flood Hazard map in Map _____ , areas with high susceptibility to flooding are mostly
evident along rivers and waterways. In the eastern upland portion of the municipality are areas
with steep slopes which are moderately to very highly susceptible to rain-induced landslide
hazards, as illustrated in Map __.
68
In terms of flood susceptibility, the Mines and Geosciences Bureau (MGB) geohazard assessment
reports that all barangays are susceptible to varying degrees of flooding. These barangays were
presented with a Geohazard Threat Advisory informing their susceptibility to flooding and the
corresponding recommendations particular to the barangay (MGB-RV). Based on the MGB rating,
flood level parameters are as follows:
a. Low – 0 - 0.5 meter depth of floodwaters
b. Moderate – 0.51 – 1 meter depth of flood waters
c. High - >1 meter depth of floodwaters
With regards to landslide susceptibility, the barangays assessed include areas that are
located on and/or near slopes and riverbanks and have the potential for landslide occurrence. The
rating of each barangay presented herein particularly refers to the barangay proper since majority
of the population is located there. It should be noted, however, that the rating does not necessarily
reflect those of the sitios. These barangays were presented with a Landslide Threat Advisory
informing their susceptibility to landslides and the corresponding recommendations particular to
the barangay. Based on MGB rating, landslide level parameters are as follows:
A. High –
• Presence of active and/ or recent landslides • Presence of numerous and large tension cracks
along slope adjacent to the community and that would directly affect the community • Areas with
drainages that are prone to landslides damming • Steep/Unstable slopes consisting of loose
materials
B. Moderate –
• Areas with indicative and/or old landslides • Presence of small tension cracks along slope and
are located away from the community • Moderate slopes
C. Low –
• Low to gently sloping • No presence of tension cracks
As per the Fault Finder of the PHIVOLCS, the Municipality of San Lorenzo Ruiz is not transected
by any fault line, the nearest of which is located to the South East, in Libmanan, Camarines Sur.
Ground shaking is the main cause of casualties and damages to structures when earthquakes
occur. It is the effect of ground motion and movement of the earth's surface by seismic activities.
This hazard may also trigger other hazards such as liquefaction and earthquake-induced landslides.
The strength of an earthquake is usually measured in terms of magnitude or intensity. Magnitude
refers to the total energy released at the earthquake's point of origin based on information derived
from a seismograph, while intensity is the perceived strength of an earthquake based on relative
effects to people and structures on the earth's surface. The intensity scale consists of a series of
certain key responses such as people awakening, movement of furniture, and finally, destruction.
69
Table 4.1 Philippine Earthquake Intensity Scale

Ground shaking % share of PHIVOLCS Earthquake Intensity Scale (PEIS)
Intensity Scale total area Description
Intensity VII Destructive
 Heavy objects and furniture overturn or
topple. standing on upper floors.
 Difficulty
Old or poorly-built structures suffer

considerable damage.
 Some well-built structures are slightly
damaged.
Some cracks may appear on dikes, fishponds,

road surface, or concrete hollow block walls.
 Limited liquefaction, lateral spreading and
landslides are observed.
 Trees shake noticeably.
Intensity VIII Very Destructive
People will find it difficult to even stand

outdoors.
Many well-built buildings are considerably

damaged.
Concrete dikes and the foundations of bridges

are destroyed by ground settling or toppling.
 Railway tracks are bent or broken.
 Utility posts, towers, and monuments may tilt
or topple.
 Water and sewer pipes may be bent, twisted,
or broken.
 Liquefaction and lateral spreading cause
manmade structures to sink, tilt, or topple.
Numerous landslides and rockfalls occur in

mountainous and hilly areas.
 Boulders are thrown out from their positions
particularly near the epicenter.
 Fissures and faults rupture.
 Trees shake violently.
 Water splashes over dikes or the banks of rivers.
Ground rupture refers to the deformation on the ground that marks the intersection of the
fault with the earth's surface. Effects include fissuring or displacement of the ground due to
movement of the fault.
The effect of an eruption of a volcano causes primary and secondary hazards such as lahar
flows, debris-flows, lava flows, pyroclastic surges, tephra fall and ballistic projectiles.
70
Exposure Scores
Exposure refers to people, property, systems, or other elements present in hazard zones
that are thereby subject to potential losses. Exposure database of different systems of interests such
as population, urban use, natural resource production areas, critical facilities, and lifeline utilities
were formulated and validated through a Climate and Disaster Risk Assessment Workshop and
consultations with local stakeholders. Exposure scores were based on the percentage of parameters
or benchmarks presented in Table 1.28 below.
Table 4.2 Exposure Score Parameters
4
System of Parameter 1 2 3 (Very
Interest (Low) (Moderate) (High) High)
Affected
Population Population ≤5% 5.01 - 10% 10.01 - 20% >20%
Critical Affected 100%
Facilities Facility 0 (no) - - (yes)
Affected
Urban Area Area ≤10% 10.01 - 20% 20.01 - 40% >40%
Natural
Resource-based Affected
≤10% 10.01 - 20% 20.01 - 40% >40%
Production Area
Areas
Lifeline Affected 0.01 - above
Utilities Roads 30% 30.01 - 50% 50.01 - 70% 70%
In the absence of household spatial data, the built-up residential areas identified through a
land use mapping workshop was used to estimate the households/housing density per barangay.
Based on the parameters presented, barangays with affected population reaching more than 20% of
its total indicates a very high exposure score, while barangays with less than 5% affected
population indicates low exposure scores.
In the case of critical facilities, scores were based on whether a facility is potentially
exposed or not. Similarly, for lifeline utilities, although affected area percentage may serve as a
parameter for exposure, important factors such as mobility and circulation should also be
considered, as in the case of unpassable roads during landslides which may limit passage from one
point to another.
For natural resource-based production areas and urban areas, exposure scores were based
on percentage of area affected by hazards; wherein areas/uses with more than 40% are affected
indicating a very high exposure score, while those with less than 10% reflects a low exposure score.
71
Sensitivity and Vulnerability Assessment

Sensitivity represents the intrinsic characteristics of the exposed elements to withstand the
damaging effects of the expected climate stimulus (e.g., changes in seasonal temperature and
precipitation, sea level rise). An analysis of the various sensitivity indicators of the exposed
elements will give an indication of the potential degree of impact; meaning the higher the exposure
and sensitivity of the system, the higher the expected impacts (Supplemental Guidelines on
Mainstreaming Climate and Disaster Risks in the Comprehensive Land Use Plan, 2015).
Population Sensitivity Indicators
For population system of interest, sensitivity can be defined by the socioeconomic context
of the systems that are exposed. The sensitivity indicators were based on the 2020 Household Data
Management Systems initiated by the municipal government. Indicators used were Percentage of
Informal Settlers; Percentage living in dwelling units made from light materials or salvageable
materials; Percentage of young dependents 0-5; and Percentage of old dependents 65 and above.
The scoring matrix is presented in the table below.
Table 4.3 Population Sensitivity Indicators
4
Sensitivity Indicators 1 2 3 (Very
(Low) (Moderate) (High) High)
Percentage of Informal Settlers ≤5% 5.01 - 10% 10.01 - 20% >20%
Percentage living in dwelling
units made from light ≤5% 5.01 - 10% 10.01 - 20% >20%
materials or salvageable
materials of young
Percentage
dependents 0-5 ≤5% 5.01 - 10% 10.01 - 20% >20%
Percentage of old dependents
≤5% 5.01 - 10% 10.01 - 20% >20%
65+
The scoring parameters for sensitivity indicators varies from less than 5% of barangay
population for low sensitivity score to more than 20% of barangay population for very high
sensitivity scores. It must be pointed out that sensitivity scores for all barangays have the same
scores given that the data availability were at municipal level only. A better assessment can be
further conducted by improving collection of demographic data at the barangay level, and include
other indicators such as percentage of persons with disabilities, percentage below the poverty/food
threshold, unemployment, etc.
Critical Facilities Sensitivity Indicators
UNISDR defines critical facilities or critical infrastructure as the physical structures,
facilities, networks and other assets which provide services that are essential to the social and
economic functioning of a community or society. The following sensitivity indicators for critical
facilities were identified: existing condition; proportion of the structure in dilapidated/condemned
condition; year of construction; and if the structure employs hazard-resistant design.
72
4.4 Critical Facilities Sensitivity Indicators
Sensitivity 1 2 3 4
Indicators (Low) (Moderate) (High) (Very High)
Existing condition of Excellent Good Fair Poor
the facility
Proportion of the >10-20% ≥20% of structure is

≤5% of >5 to10% of
structure in of in dilapidated/
structure structure
dilapidated/ structure condemned
condemned condition condition
Year of Construction Before Between Between
1972 1972-1992 1992-2012 2012 and above
Employing Resilient
Building Design Yes - - No
While indicators such as condition of the facility can be physically observed, the presence of
a public buildings database is recommended particularly containing year of construction and or
instances of renovation. Additionally, resilient building design standards need to be classified to
make stakeholders aware of such innovations and if these are applied to the critical facilities in the
area.
Natural Resource-based Production Areas
Sensitivity indicators for natural resource-based production areas or agricultural croplands
and forest production areas are the following: Areas without irrigation facilities or water-
impounding (for agricultural and croplands); and percentage of owners/areas not employing
sustainable production techniques. A more comprehensive assessment may be undertaken using
barangay-level data.
Table 4.5 Natural Resource-based Production Areas Sensitivity Indicators
4
Sensitivity Indicators 1 2 3 (Very
(Low) (Moderate) (High) High)
Percentage of Areas without irrigation >20-
≤10% >10-20% ≥30%
facilities 30%
Percentage of Areas without water- >20-
≤10% >10-20% ≥30%
impounding 30%
percentage of owners/areas not
employing sustainable production ≤10% >10-20% >20- ≥30%
techniques 30%
Lifeline Utilities (Roads)

Sensitivity indicators for roads used in the assessment were the following: construction
materials used; existing condition of the utility; and if it employs hazard- resistant design, as shown
73
in the table below. It should be noted that there are roads which are not included in the data
inventory and needs to be updated.
1 2 3 4 Table 4.5 Roads

Sensitivity Indicators (Low) (Moderate (High) (Very High) Sensitivity
Construction Materials Used Concrete ) Asphalt Gravel Earth/ Dirt
Indicators
Existing Condition Good Fair Bad Poor
Employing hazard-resistant Yes - - No
design
2.11.3.5 Urban Uses Sensitivity Indicators

The following sensitivity indicators for urban uses were identified: proportion of
structures/buildings in dilapidated or condemned condition; proportion of buildings/structures
made of light materials; and proportion of structures not employing resilient building design. Since
these uses are clustered based on the uses, indicators were assessed through general visual
observation, although a more extensive assessment can be made by building a database for urban
uses. It is recommended that the database be generated and updated through tax/property
mapping, permit renewals, building inspections, and other innovative approaches to data collection
and management.
Table 4.7 Urban Uses Sensitivity Indicators
1 2 3 4
Sensitivity Indicators (Low) (Moderate) (High) (Very High)
Proportion of the
structure in >10-20% ≥20% of structure
≤5% of >5 to10% of
dilapidated/ of is in dilapidated/
structure structure
condemned structure condemned
condition condition
Proportion of >10-20% ≥20% of structure
≤5% of >5 to10% of
structure made of of is made of light
structure structure
light materials structure materials
Employing Resilient
Building Design Yes - - No
74
Adaptive Capacity Scores

Adaptive capacity refers to the ability of a system to adjust to climate change (including
climate variability and extremes) to moderate potential damages, to take advantage of
opportunities, or to cope with the consequences. This may be in the form of wealth/financial
resources; information; technology; institution and governance; social capital; and/or
infrastructure.
For population, adaptive capacity indicators used in the assessment are: Percentage of
households with access to infrastructure-related mitigation measures; Percentage of households
with access to financial assistance; Percentage of households with access to information;
Percentage of households with capacity and willingness to retrofit or relocate; and capacity of
government to make investments in CCA-DRR.
For critical facilities, adaptive capacity indicators considered for assessment are the
following: Percentage of structures with no access/area coverage to infrastructure- related
mitigation measures; Capacity and willingness to retrofit or relocate; Insurance Coverage;
Government Investments; Available Alternative Sites/Structures; and Government Regulations on
hazard mitigation zoning and structural design standards. However, the lack of public buildings
database allowed for subjective scoring based on the respondents' experiences and awareness
level.
For natural resource-based production areas, adaptive capacity includes: Percentage of
dependent HHs with access to alternative livelihood; Percentage of affected areas covered or
protected by hazard mitigation measures/structures; Percentage of production areas covered by
post-disaster economic protection; Percentage of areas with access to information; Government
Extension Programs related to CCAM-DRR; and Government Infrastructure Projects related to
CCAM-DRR.
For urban uses, indicators included Percentage of structures with no access/area coverage
to infrastructure related mitigation measures; Local Awareness; Capacity and willingness to retrofit
or relocate; Insurance Coverage; Government Investments;
Available Alternative Sites/Structures; and Government Regulations on hazard mitigation
zoning and structural design standards. Likewise, the risk assessment can be more elaborate by
developing building databases from building/occupancy permits, business permit/monitoring, and
general plans submitted to the local government. Special areas in the municipality, such as coastal
tourism areas may be subject to a more specialized assessment for resort and other tourism-related
establishments.
Based on the workshop conducted, some barangays are not aware of the hazards within
their areas. Additionally, there are varying degrees of awareness and familiarity with local
government regulations regarding zoning and design/structural standards, which is manifested in
answers ranging from presence existing policies and implementation to having no policy at all.
75
Risk Assessment
Following HLURB guidelines, the risk scores for the different systems of interests were
computed wherein risk is the combination of the probability (represented as the likelihood of
occurrence) of an event and its potential negative consequences (severity of consequence) for a
given area and reference period. The likelihood of occurrence of hazards is the estimated period of
time (expressed in years), or when a hazard event is likely to repeat itself. The table below shows
the likelihood of occurrence for the hazards. Severity of Consequence is the function of exposure
and vulnerability and measures the potential direct and indirect damages/impacts and the
interplay of exposure and the vulnerability relative to the expected intensity of the hazard (HLURB,
CCC, UNDP and DFAT-AusAid, 2015).
Table 4.8 Likelihood of Occurrence Score Matrix
Measures of Likelihood Return Period in Years Likelihood Score

Frequent Every 1-3 years 6
Moderate Every >3-10 years 5
Occasional Every >10-30 years 4
Improbable Every >30-100 years 3
Rare event Every >100-200 years 2
Very rare event Every >200 years 1
Source: Reference Manual on Mainstreaming Disaster Risk Reduction and Climate Change
Adaptation in the Comprehensive Land Use Plans Report, NEDA-HLURB- UNDP, 2012
Results of Risk Assessment are summarized in the ensuing tables. It should be noted that
these areas were identified through mapping activities and could be further improved by data
gathering through actual survey, use of GPS devices, and other methodologies.
Population Risk Categories
76
Table 4.9 Flood Risk Categories for Population per Barangay
HAZARD EXPOSURE
Likeliho
od Baran Exposu Expo
Barangay Flood Magnit Affecte Affected
of Flood gay Number re re
Susceptibilit ude d Populat
Occurre depth Populati of HH Percen Sc
y Score HH ion
nce on tage e
Score
Magnitude
scores are Affected
relative to Fr Pop'n
Thru Total Number
≤1m for the CBMS, from CBMS divided by
Low, Populati Expos
Anecdotal moderate magnitude of HH of correspo corresponds Total
on of the
Moderate, Account and Low of the the brgy nds to to the Pop;n of e
brgy
High (Score ≥1m for highest (PSA, the No. Family the Scor
(PSA,
range 16) high level of CBMS) of HH Members barangay
CBMS)
hazard Heads multiply by
category 100
(see
Low 6 ≥1m 0.33 1,819 513 7 30 1.65% 1
1 Daculangbolo Moderate 6 ≥1m 0.66 1819 513 40 160 8.80% 2
High 6 ≥1m 1 1819 513 120 480 26.39% 4
Low 6 ≥1m 0.33 1178 271 3 4 0.34% 1
2 Dagotdotan Moderate 6
High 6
Low 6 ≥1m 0.33 2890 646 57 284 9.83% 2
3 Mampurog Moderate 6
High 6
Low 6 ≤1m 0.33 606 131 4 15 2.48% 1
4 Maisog Moderate 6
High 6
Low 6 ≥1m 0.33 525 63 3 23 4.38% 1
5 Salvacion Moderate 6
High 6
Low 6 ≤1m 0.33 4,022 979 31 100 2.49% 1
Matacong
6 Moderate 6 ≤1m 0.66 4,022 979 1 5 0.12% 1
7 Langga High 6 ≥1m 0.33 545 135 2 7 1.28% 1

Low 6
77
Moderate 6
High 6
Low 6 ≥1m 0.33 1011 222 36 199 19.68% 3
8 Laniton Moderate 6 ≥1m
High 6 ≥1m
Low 6 ≥1m 0.33 653 144 36 199 30.47% 4
9 Manlimonsito Moderate 6 ≥1m
High 6 ≥1m
Low 6 ≥1m 0.33 1982 440 10 27 1.36% 1
10 San Ramon Moderate 6 ≥1m 0.66
High 6 ≥1m 1
Low 6 ≥1m 0.33 1319 332 0 0 0.00% 0
11 San Isidro Moderate 6 ≥1m 0.66
High 6 ≥1m 1
Low 6
12 San Antonio Moderate 6
High 6 ≥2m 1 520 112 1 7 1.35% 1
Barangay HAZARD EXPOSURE
78
Likelihoo Bara Exposur

Landslide Magnit Affec Affected Expo
d of ngay Numbe e
Susceptibili ude ted Popul sure
Occurren Popul r of HH Perce
ty Score HH ation Score
ce Score ation ntage
Magnitude
scores are Affected
relative to Fr
Pop'n
Thru the Total Number
CBMS, from
divided by
Populatio corres CBMS
Low, Anecdotal magnitude of HH of Total Expos
of the n of the ponds correspon
Moderate, Account the brgy Pop;n of ure
highest brgy to the ds to the
High (Score (PSA, the Score
level of (PSA, No. of Family
range 1-6) CBMS) barangay
hazard CBMS) HH Members multiply by
category Heads
100
(see Scoring
tab)
Low 6 0.33 2890 646 8 41 1.42% 1
1 Mampurog Moderate 6 0.66
High 6 1
Low 6 0.33 1178 271 0 0 0.00% 0
2 Dagotdotan Moderate 6 0.66
High 6 1
Low 6 0.33 545 135 5 17 3.12% 1
3 Langga Moderate 6 0.66
High 6 1
Low 6 0.33 1011 222 0 0 0.00% 0
4 Laniton Moderate
High
Low 6 0.33 606 131 17 89 14.69% 3
5 Maisog Moderate 6
High 6 1 606 131 6 24 3.96% 1
Low 6 0.33 1819 513 3 6 0.33% 1
6 Daculang Bolo Moderate 6 0.66
High 6 1
Table 5.0 Rain-induced Landslide Risk Categories for population, per barangay:
7 San Isidro Low 6 0.33 1319 0 0 0 0.00% 0
79
Moderate 6 0.66
High 6 1
Low 6 0.33 723 169 28 185 25.59% 4
8 San Ramon Moderate 6
High 6
Low 6 0.66 653 144 3 20 3.06% 1
9 Manlimonsito Moderate 6 0.66
High 6 1
Low 6 0.33 525 63 0 0 0.00% 0
1
Salvacion Moderate 6 0.66
0
High 6 1
Low 6 0.33 520 112 1 7 1.35% 1
1
San Antonio Moderate 6 0.66
1
High 6 1
Low 6 0.33 4022 979 842 3460 86.03% 4
1
Matacong Moderate 6 0.66 4022 979 38 156 3.88% 1
2
High 6 1 4022 979 99 406 10.09% 3
Natural Resource-based Production Areas Risk Categories

Natural resource-based production areas were based on the mapping activities identifying
agriculture lands, crop lands, and forest production areas. Risks were identified using percentage of
areas exposed to the hazard, sensitivity scores (such as areas employing sustainable production
techniques such as climate proofing, use of climate-resistant crop varieties, among others), and
adaptive capacities.
80
Table 5.1 Flood Risk Categories for Production Areas
HAZARD EXPOSURE
Barangay Classification
General
classification or
use of the area
(fisheries,
agriculture,
livestock, forest
plantation, etc.)
Low >1m 0.33 Bangus, Tilapia 5.00%

3 100 200000 5 1000000 1 1 1 10
Fishery Moderate
4
>1m 0.66
100
Bangus, Tilapia
200000 10 2000000 1
10.00%
2
1.5
20
High >1m Bangus, Tilapia 3.00%

5 1 100 200000 3 600000 1 1 1 6
Salvacion Low 3 >1m 0.33 50000 Rice 125000 40 5000000 1 0.08% 1 1 20
Agriculture Moderate 4 >1m 0.66 200 Rice 125000 20 2500000 1 10.00% 2 1.5 10
High >1m Rice 5.00%

5 1 200 125000 10 1250000 1 1 1 5
#DIV
Low >1m 0.33 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
3 0 0 /0!
Livestock #DIV
Moderate >1m 0.66 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
4 0 0 /0!
#DIV
High >1m #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
5 1 0 0 /0!
#DIV #DIV
Low >1m 0.33 #DIV/0!
3 0 0 /0! /0!
81
Forest #DIV
Moderate 4 >1m 0.66 0 0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0! /0!
plantation #DIV
5 1 0 0 /0!
Low >1m 0.33 Bangus, Tilapia 5.00%

3 100 200000 5 1000000 1 1 1 10
Moderate >1m 0.66 Bangus, Tilapia 10.00% 1.5

Fishery 4 100 200000 10 2000000 1 2 20
High >1m Tilapia 0.01%

6 1 20000 200000 2 400000 1 1 1 6
Low 5 >1m 0.33 50000 Rice 125000 40 5000000 1 0.08% 1 1 20
Moderate >1m 0.66 Rice 10.00% 1.5

Agriculture 4 200 125000 20 2500000 1 2 10
High >1m Rice 5.00%

Manlimonsit 5 1 200 125000 10 1250000 1 1 1 5
o Low >1m 0.33 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
#DIV
/0!
3 0 0
#DIV #DIV
Moderate >1m 0.66 #DIV/0!
Livestock 4 0 0 /0! /0!
#DIV
High 5 >1m 1 0 0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0! /0!
#DIV
Low >1m 0.33 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
3 0 0 /0!
Forest Moderate >1m 0.66 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!

#DIV
/0!
4 0 0
plantation #DIV
5 1 0 0 /0!
Low 6 ≤1m 0.33 10,000 Karpa, Tilapia & Talaba 200000 0.25 50000 1 0.00% 1 1 7
#DIV
Moderate #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
Fishery 0 0 /0!
#DIV #DIV
High #DIV/0!
0 0 /0! /0!
Low ≤1m 0.33 rice 1.25 0.01%

6 15000 125000 156250 1 1 1 2
#DIV #DIV
Moderate #DIV/0!
Agriculture 0 0 /0! /0!
#DIV
High #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
0 0 /0!
San Isidro
Low ≤1m 0.33 piggery 0.25 0.00%
6 30000 1000000 250000 1 1 1 1
#DIV
Livestock 0 0 /0!
#DIV
0 0 /0!
Low 6 ≤1m 0.33 10000 1 0.00% 1 1

10000 citronella, cinnamon 500,000 0.02 1
Forest Moderate #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
#DIV
/0!
0 0
plantation #DIV
0 0 /0!
Daculang Low 6 ≤1m 0.33 Karpa, Tilapia & Talaba 200000 0.25 50000 1 0.06% 1 1 7
Bolo Fishery
Moderate 6 0.66 200000 0 0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV

/0!
82
High Tilapia 0.04 0.01%

6 1 400 200000 8000 1 1 1 2
Low 6 ≤1m 0.33 rice 125000 1.25 156250 1 0.01% 1 1 2
Long beans, petchay,

Agriculture Moderate 6 >1m 0.66 20000
eggplant
100000 2 200000 1 0.01% 1 1 15
High 0.00%
6 0 0 0 0
Low 6 ≤1m 0.33 20000 Carabao,Cow, Chicken 500000 2 1000000 1 0.01% 1 1 12
Livestock #DIV
Moderate 6 0 0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0! /0!
#DIV
6 0 0 /0!
Low ≤1m 0.33 0.00%

6 20000 citronella, cinnamon 500,000 0 0 0 0 0 0
Forest #DIV
plantation 0 0 /0!
#DIV
0 0 /0!
Low ≤1m 0.33 Tilapia 0.047 0.01%

6 470 200000 9400 1 1 1 6
Fishery Moderate 0 0 0.00% 0 0 7

#DIV
0 0 /0! 7
Pinya,coconut,vegetables,
Low 6 ≤1m 0.33 200000 2 400000 1 0.35% 1 1 3
palay
573
Agriculture Moderate 0.00%
0 0 0 0 7
#DIV
High 0 0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0! /0! 7
Laniton
500,000.0
Low 6 ≤1m 0.33 Kambing,Baka, kalabaw 0 0 0 0.00% 0 0 67
0
174.9
Livestock Moderate #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
#DIV
0 0 /0! 7
#DIV #DIV
High #DIV/0!
0 0 /0! /0! 7
#DIV
Low 6 ≤1m 0.33 0 0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0! /0! 7
#DIV
/0!
plantation 0 0 7
#DIV
High 0 0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0! /0! 7
Low ≤1m 0.33 Tilapia, Shell Fish 0.75 0.01%

6 10000 200000 150000 1 1 1 6
Fishery Moderate
0 0
0.00%
0 0 7
Dagotdotan #DIV
0 0 /0! 7
Low ≤1m 0.33 Rice 1.25 0.01%

Agriculture 6 20000 200000 250000 1 1 1 3
83
Moderate 0.00%
0 0 0 0 7
#DIV #DIV
High #DIV/0!
/0! /0!
0 0 7
500,000.0
0
50000
Livestock Moderate 0.00%
0 0 0 0 7
#DIV
/0!
0 0 7
Low ≤1m 0.33 Mahogany 0.00%

6 2730000 200000 0 0 0 0 0 7
Forest #DIV
plantation Moderate 0 0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0! /0! 7
#DIV
/0!
0 0 7
Low 6 ≤1m 0.33 259000 Tilapia 200000 0.08 16000 1 0.00% 1 1 6
Fishery Moderate
0 0
0.00%
0 0 7
#DIV
/0!
0 0 7
Low ≤1m 0.33 Pineapple, Coconut 0.00%

6 300000 200000 0 0 0 0 0 3
Agriculture Moderate 0.00%

0 0 0 0 7
#DIV
/0!
0 0 7
Langga
500,000.0
0
200000
Livestock
Moderate 0 0 0.00% 0 0 7
#DIV
/0!
0 0 7

6 2730000 200000 0 0 0 0 0 7
#DIV
/0!
plantation 0 0 7
#DIV
/0!
0 0 7
Low ≤1m 0.33 Tilapia 0.00%

6 40000 200000 0 0 0 0 0 6
Fishery Moderate
0 0
0.00%
0 0 7
#DIV
/0!
0 0 7
Low ≤1m 0.33 Pineapple, Coconut 0.00%

6 300000 200000 0 0 0 0 0 3
Mampurog Agriculture Moderate 0.00%
0 0 0 0 7
#DIV
/0!
0 0 7
500,000.0
0
Livestock 200000
Moderate 0.00%
0 0 0 0 7
84
#DIV
0 0 /0! 7

6 30000 200000 2 400000 1 1 1 7
Forest #DIV
plantation Moderate 0 0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0! /0! 7
#DIV
0 0 /0! 7
Low 6 ≤1m 0.33 800 Tilapia 200000 0.03 6000 1 0.00% 1 1 2
Fishery Moderate 0.66 0 0 0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!

#DIV
/0! 0
High Tilapia 0.00%

1 200 200000 0 0 0 0 0 0
Coconut,
Low 6 ≤1m 0.33 300000 2 600000 1 0.00% 1 1 3
pineapple,tambo
200000
Agriculture
Moderate 0.66
High
Matacong 1
Low 6 ≤1m 0.33
Livestock Moderate
High
Low ≤1m 0.33

6
Forest Moderate
plantation
High
#DIV
Low ≤1m 0.33 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
6 0 0 0 /0! 6
#DIV
Fishery Moderate
0 0 0
#DIV/0! #DIV/0!
/0! 6
#DIV
0 0 0 /0! 6
Pineapple,
Low 6 ≤1m 0.33 Coconut,Cassava,Banana, 200000 0 0 0 0.00% 0 0 91
Tiger Grass
#######
Agriculture ##
#DIV
0 0 0 /0! 6
#DIV
Maisog High
0 0 0
#DIV/0! #DIV/0!
/0! 6
Itik,Baboy,Baka,Kalabaw,
Low 6 ≤1m 0.33 500000 0 0 0 0.00% 0 0 50
quail
10000
Livestock Moderate #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
#DIV
0 0 0 /0! 6
#DIV
0 0 0 /0! 6

6 30000 200000 0 0 0 0 0 0
Forest #DIV
plantation Moderate 0 0 0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0! /0! 6
#DIV
0 0 0 /0! 6
85
Critical Facilities Risk Categories

Critical facilities in the Municipality of San Lorenzo Ruiz are moderately at risk to flood and
liquefaction hazards, except for very few facilities which are at high risk. This risk can be attributed
to its location in moderate to high-susceptibility areas, its physical condition and design, and
limited adaptive capacities such as capacities to retrofit or investments related to CCA-DRR
mitigation/adaptation. In terms of tsunami and storm surge hazard, facilities are at low to
moderate risk due to low likelihood of occurrence of hazards. Moreover, only two (2) facilities are
located in areas prone to rain-induced landslide (note: based on mapping workshops; other
facilities may not have been identified).
Table 5.2 Critical Facilities by Flood Risk
Barangay Name of Facility Type HAZARD EXPOSURE
of
Facili
ty
Dagotdotan Dagotdotan Brgy Governm low ≤1m 0.33 0.00% #REF #REF #REF!
Hall ent 6 98 0 0 ! !
San Roque Day Office
School low
6
≤1m 0.33
28 0
0.00%
0
#REF #REF #REF!
Care Center I ! !
San Roque Day School low 6
≤1m 0.33
72 0
0.00%
0
#REF #REF #REF!
Care Center II ! !
Dagotdotan health low ≤1m 0.33 0.00% #REF #REF #REF!
center 6 12 0 0 ! !
Health Center
86
Evacuation Evacuati low 6 ≤1m 0.33 200 0 0.00% 0 #REF #REF #REF
Center on ! !
S. Delos Santos School low 6 ≤1m 0.33 5000 0 0.00% 0 #REF #REF #REF
E.S ! !
Dagotdotan Brgy governm low ≤1m 0.33 0.00% #REF #REF #REF
6 28 0 0
Outpost ent ! !
Dagotdotan Covered low ≤1m 0.33 0.00% #REF #REF #REF

6 350 0 0
Covered Court ! !
Court
Langga Brgy. Hall governm low ≤1m 0.33 0.00% #REF #REF #REF
6 112 0 0
ent ! !
Brgy Outpost governm low ≤1m 0.33 0.00% #REF #REF #REF
6 85 0 0
ent ! !
Langga Covered amuseme low ≤1m 0.33 0.00% #REF #REF #REF
6 630 0 0
Court nt ! !
San Roque Day School low ≤1m 0.33 0.00% #REF #REF #REF
6 165 0 0
Care Center ! !
health center health low 6 ≤1m 0.33 35 0 0.00% 0 #REF #REF #REF
center ! !
Laniton Barangay Hall Governm low ≥1m 0.33 0.00% #REF #REF #REF
6 85 0 0
ent ! !
Covered Court amuseme low ≥1m 0.33 20.33 #REF #REF #REF
6 492 100 4
nt % ! !
San Miguel Ar. School low 6 ≥1m 0.33 39 0 0.00% 0 #REF #REF #REF
DCC ! !
Annex Salvacion School low 6 ≥1m 0.33 5000 0 0.00% 0 #REF #REF #REF
B ES ! !
Covered Court amuseme low ≥1m 0.33 0.00% #REF #REF #REF
6 151 0 0
Kalinga nt ! !
Brgy. Outpost Governm low ≥1m 0.33 0.00% #REF #REF #REF
6 11 0 0
ent ! !
health center health low 6 ≥1m 0.33 36 0 0.00% 0 #REF #REF #REF
center ! !
Daculang Bolo Daculang Bolo governm low ≤1m 0.33 0.00% #REF
6 60 0 0 0 0
Brgy Hall ent !
health center health low 6 ≤1m 0.33 100 0 0.00% 0 #REF 0 0

center !
Salvacion (B) ES School low 6 ≤1m 0.33 1050 0 0.00% 0 #REF 0 0
0 !
Holy Rosary Day School low ≤1m 0.33 0.00% #REF
6 40 0 0 0 0
Care Center II !
Holy Rosary Day School high ≥1m 100.0 #REF

6 1 80 80 4 4 4
Care Center I 0% !
87
SK Hall governm low ≤1m 0.33 0.00% #REF

ent 6 30 0 0 ! 0 0
office
Senior Citizen governm low ≤1m 0.33 0.00% #REF
Building ent 6 100 0 0 ! 0 0
office
Brgy. Outpost governm low ≤1m 0.33 50.00 #REF
ent 6 48 24 % 4 ! 4 4
office
amusem high ≥1m 100.0 #REF
Covered Court ent 6 1 250 250 0% 4 ! 4 4
Core Shelter area
Covered Court amusem low ≤1m 0.33 0.00% #REF
ent 6 270 0 0 ! 0 0
area
San Isidro San isidro Brgy governm low ≥1m 0.33 0.00% #REF
Hall ent 6 258 0 0 ! 0 0
office
San Isidro Elem. 13,46 #REF
School School low 6 ≥1m 0.33 0 0 0.00% 0 ! 0 0
Alcantara High 10,00 #REF
School School low 6 ≥1m 0.33 0 0 0.00% 0 ! 0 0
NASA Day Care #REF
Center School low 6 ≥1m 0.33 250 0 0.00% 0 ! 0 0
San Isidro Health health #REF
Center center low 6 ≥1m 0.33 250 0 0.00% 0 ! 0 0
SK Hall governm low ≥1m 0.33 0.00% #REF
ent 6 20 0 0 ! 0 0
office
San Isidro amusem low ≥1m 0.33 0.00% #REF
Covered Court ent 6 238 0 0 ! 0 0
area
Brgy. Outpost governm low ≥1m 0.33 0.00% #REF
ent 6 20 0 0 ! 0 0
office
Senior Citizen governm low ≥1m 0.33 0.00% #REF
Building ent 6 300 0 0 ! 0 0
office
Centro Day Care #REF #REF #REF
Center school low 6 ≥1m 0.33 432 0 0.00% 0 ! ! !
San Ramon Barangay Hall Governm low ≤1m 0.33 0.00% #REF
ent 6 200 0 0 ! 0 0
Office
Evacuation evac. #REF
Center Center low 6 ≤1m 0.33 200 0 0.00% 0 ! 0 0
health #REF
health center center low 6 ≤1m 0.33 150 0 0.00% 0 ! 0 0
Covered Court low ≤1m 0.33 0.00% #REF
Covered 6 800 0 0 ! 0 0
Court
Day Care Center #REF
1 School low 6 ≤1m 0.33 150 0 0.00% 0 ! 0 0
Day Care Center #REF
2 School low 6 ≤1m 0.33 200 0 0.00% 0 ! 0 0
88
Senior Citizen Hall Governm low ≤1m 0.33 0.00% #REF!

ent 6 50 0 0 0 0
Office
SK Hall Governm low ≤1m 0.33 0.00% #REF!
ent 6 50 0 0 0 0
Office
58,00
San Ramon ES School low 6 ≤1m 0.33 0 0 0.00% 0 #REF! #REF! #REF!
Salvacion Salvacion Brgy governm low ≥1m 0.33 0.00% #REF!
Hall ent 5 890 0 0 0 0
office
Salvacion Elem. 3000
School School low 5 ≥1m 0.33 0 0 0.00% 0 #REF! 0 0
School low ≥1m 0.33 0.00% #REF!
Salvacion Day 5 50 0 0 0 0
Care Center
Salvacion Health health
low 5 ≥1m 0.33 50 0 0.00% 0 #REF! #REF! #REF!
Center center
Manlimonsito School low ≥1m 0.33 0.00% #REF!
Virgin Mary Day 6 150 0 0 0 0
Care Center
School low ≥1m 0.33 1000 5.00% #REF!
Manlimonsito 6 500 1 0 0
Elem. School 0
Manlimonsito Governm low ≥1m 0.33 76.92 #REF!
Brgy. Hall ent 6 1300 1000 % 4 1 0
Office
health low ≥1m 0.33 0.00% #REF!
Manlimonsito center 6 150 0 0 0 0
Health Center
San Antonio San Antonio Brgy governm Low ≥1m 0.33 20.00 #REF! #REF! #REF!
Hall ent 4 200 40 % 4
office
Pulantuna Elem. 1000 10.00
School School Low 4 ≥1m 0.33 0 10 % 2 #REF! #REF! #REF!
School Low ≥1m 0.33 25.00 #REF! #REF! #REF!
San Antonio 4 200 50 % 4
Daycare Center
Matacong Barangay Hall governm low ≤1m 0.33 0.00% #REF! #REF! #REF!
ent 6 84 0 0
office
Day Center centro School low 6 ≤1m 0.33 220 0 0.00% 0 #REF! #REF! #REF!
Day Center Nasa School low 6 ≤1m 0.33 120 0 0.00% 0 #REF! #REF! #REF!
Day Care
Ressettlement School low 6 ≤1m 0.33 120 0 0.00% 0 #REF! #REF! #REF!
Evacuation Center low 6 ≤1m 0.33 200 0 0.00% 0 #REF! #REF! #REF!
health center low 6 ≤1m 0.33 114 0 0.00% 0 #REF! #REF! #REF!
SK Hall low 6 ≤1m 0.33 80 0 0.00% 0 #REF! #REF! #REF!
Imelda E.s School low 6 ≤1m 0.33 9800 0 0.00% 0 #REF! #REF! #REF!
Brgy. Outpost low 6 ≤1m 0.33 29 0 0.00% 0 #REF! #REF! #REF!
89
#REF #REF
Covered Court ES School low 6 ≤1m 0.33 200 0 0.00% 0 #REF!
! !
Covered Court #REF #REF
low 6 ≤1m 0.33 400 0 0.00% 0 #REF!
Res ! !
Mun. Covered 41.67 #REF #REF
low 6 ≤1m 0.33 480 200 4 #REF!
Court % ! !
Covered Court #REF #REF
low 6 ≤1m 0.33 420 0 0.00% 0 #REF!
Centro ! !
#REF #REF
Fire Station low 6 ≤1m 0.33 412 0 0.00% 0 #REF!
! !
#REF #REF
Police Station low 6 ≤1m 0.33 400 0 0.00% 0 #REF!
! !
#REF #REF
Balai Silangan low 6 ≤1m 0.33 400 0 0.00% 0 #REF!
! !
#REF #REF
Mun. Hall low 6 ≤1m 0.33 480 8 1.67% 1 #REF!
! !
#REF #REF
Senior Cit. Bldg low 6 ≤1m 0.33 50 0 0.00% 0 #REF!
! !
#REF #REF
E Center low 6 ≤1m 0.33 50 0 0.00% 0 #REF!
! !
#REF #REF
Zipline low 6 ≤1m 0.33 700 0 0.00% 0 #REF!
! !
#REF #REF
Tramline low 6 ≤1m 0.33 600 0 0.00% 0 #REF!
! !
#REF #REF
Zipline Bldg. low 6 ≤1m 0.33 40 0 0.00% 0 #REF!
! !
#REF #REF
ECCD Bldg. School low 6 ≤1m 0.33 80 0 0.00% 0 #REF!
! !
#REF #REF
MRF low 6 ≤1m 0.33 40 0 0.00% 0 #REF!
! !
2700 #REF #REF
Civil Cemetery low 6 ≤1m 0.33 0 0.00% 0 #REF!
0 ! !
Catholic 1500 #REF #REF
low 6 ≤1m 0.33 0 0 0.00% 0 #REF!
Cemetery ! !
low ≤1m 0.33 0.00% #REF #REF #REF!
Imelda Integrated 6 60 0 0 ! !
Terminal
1500 #REF #REF
Ressettlement E.s School low 6 ≤1m 0.33 0 0.00% 0 #REF!
0 ! !
Mampurog Mampurog Brgy. health #REF #REF
low 6 ≤1m 0.33 50 0 0.00% 0 #REF!
Hall center ! !
School low ≤1m 0.33 0.00% #REF #REF #REF!
Saint Joseph Day 6 65 0 0 ! !
Care Center
Mampurog Elem. 1000 #REF #REF
School low 6 ≤1m 0.33 0 0.00% 0 #REF!
School 0 ! !
School low ≤1m 0.33 0.00% #REF #REF #REF!
Core Shelter Day 6 150 0 0 ! !
Care Center
SLRNHS High 1000 #REF #REF
School low 6 ≤1m 0.33 0 0.00% 0 #REF!
School 0 ! !
SK hall governm low ≤1m 0.33 0.00% #REF #REF #REF!
ent 6 23 0 0 ! !
office
Rural Health health #REF #REF
low 6 ≤1m 0.33 725 0 0.00% 0 #REF!
Center center ! !
Mun. Agriculture governm low ≤1m 0.33 1000 0.00% #REF #REF #REF!
Office ent 6 0 0 ! !
0
office
90
Covered Court low ≤1m 0.33 0.00% #REF #REF #REF

amusem ! ! !
ent 6 590 0 0
area
Evacuation evac. #REF #REF #REF
Center Center low 6 ≤1m 0.33 80 0 0.00% 0 ! ! !
Maisog Brgy. Hall Low ≤1m 0.33 0.00% #REF #REF #REF
governm ! ! !
ent 6 54 0 0
office
Brgy Outpost Low ≤1m 0.33 0.00% #REF #REF #REF
governm ! ! !
ent 6 10 0 0
office
2000 #REF #REF #REF
Maisog ES School Low 6 ≤1m 0.33 0 0 0.00% 0 ! ! !
School Low ≤1m 0.33 0.00% #REF #REF #REF
6 18 0 0 ! ! !
Day Care Center
1 San Roqu
Day Care Center #REF #REF #REF
2 School Low 6 ≤1m 0.33 54 0 0.00% 0 ! ! !
Covered Court Low ≤1m 0.33 0.00% #REF #REF #REF
centro amusem ! ! !
ent 6 400 0 0
area
Covered Court ES Low ≤1m 0.33 0.00% #REF #REF #REF
amusem ! ! !
ent 6 350 0 0
area
91
Table 5.3 Critical Facilities by Landslide Risk

Barangay Name of
Facility HAZARD EXPOSURE
Mampurog health center low 0.33 0.00 10,0

Mampurog 6 2 50 84 % 0 0 0 0 0
Brgy. Hall 0
Saint Joseph School low 0.33 0.00 10,0
Day Care 6 1 65 0 % 0 0 0 0 0
Center 0
School low 0.33 100 0.00 10,0
Mampurog 6 1 0 % 0 0 0 0 0
Elem. School 00
0
Core Shelter School low 0.33 0.00 10,0
Day Care 6 1 150 0 % 0 0 0 0 0
Center 0
School low 0.33 100 0.00 10,0
SLRNHS High 6 1 0 % 0 0 0 0 0
School 00
0
SK hall government low 0.33 0.00 10,0
office 6 1 23 0 % 0 0 0 0 0
0
Rural Health health center low 0.33 0.00 10,0
Center 6 1 725 0 % 0 0 0 0 0
0
Mun. government low 0.33 100 0.00 10,0
Agriculture office 6 1 0 % 0 0 0 0 0
00
Office 0
Covered Court amusement low 0.33 0.00% 10,0

area 6 1 590 0 0 0 0 0 0
0
Evacuation 5,00
Center evac. Center low 6 0.66 1 80 0 0.00% 0 0 0 0 0
San Isidro San isidro government low 0.33 0.00% 10,0
Brgy Hall office 6 2 400 0 0 0 0 0 0
0
92
San Isidro School low 6 0.33 13,4 0 0.00% 0 10,0 0 0 0

Elem. School 1 6 0
to 0 0
2
Alcantara School moder 6 0.66 10,0 200 2.00% 1 10,0 2000 4 2.5
High School at 1 0 0
to 0 00
e 0 0
3
School low 0.33 0.00% 10,0
NASA Day 6 1 250 0 0 0 0 0 0
Care Center 0
health center low 0.33 0.00% 10,0
San Isidro 6 1 250 0 0 0 0 0
0
Health Center 0
SK Hall government low 0.33 0.00% 10,0
office 6 1 20 0 0 0 0 0 0
0
amusement low 0.33 0.00% 10,0
San Isidro area 6 1 238 0 0 0 0 0 0
Covered Court 0
Brgy. Outpost government low 0.33 0.00% 10,0
office 6 1 20 0 0 0 0 0 0
0
government low 0.33 0.00% 10,0
Senior Citizen office 6 1 300 0 0 0 0 0
0
Building 0
school low 0.33 0.00% 10,0
Centro Day 6 1 432 0 0 0 0 0 0
Care Center 0
Salvacion school low 0.33 0.00% 5,00
Salvacion (S) 6 1 890 0 0 0 0 0 0
Elem. School
Salvacion government 3000 5,00
low 6 0.33 1 0 0.00% 0 0 0 0
Brgy. Hall office 0 0
Salvacion 6 1 50 0 0 0 0 0 0
Health Center
school low 0.33 0.00% 5,00
Godwin Day 6 1 50 0 0 0 0 0 0
Care Center
Manlimonsit Virgin Mary School low 0.33 3.33% 10,0 50,00
o Day Care 6 1 150 5 1 0 0 1 1
Center 0
Manlimonsito School low 0.33 1000 0.00% 10,0

6 1 0 0 0 0 0 0
Elem. School 0
0
Manlimonsito government low 6 0.33 1 1300 0 0.00% 0 10,0 0 0 0
Brgy. Hall office 0
0
93
health center low 0.33 0.00%

Manlimonsito 6 1 150 0 0 1000 0 0 0
Health Center
San Antonio Pulantuna school low 0.33 10,0 0.00% 10,0
6 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Elem School
0 0
San Antonio government low
6
0.33
1 200 0
0.00%
0
10,0
0 0 0
office 0
Brgy. Hall
0
San Antonio health center low
6
0.33
1 200 0
0.00%
0
10,0
0 0 0
0
Health Station
0
San Ramon Barangay Hall government low 0.33 0.00% 10,0
office 6 1 200 0 0 0 0 0 0
0
Evacuation Multi- Purpose low 0.33 0.00% 10,0
Center Hall 6 1 200 0 0 0 0 0 0
0
health center health center low 0.33 0.00% 10,0
6 1 150 0 0 0 0 0 0
0
Covered Court MPP low 0.33 0.00% 10,0
6 1 800 0 0 0 0 0 0
0
Day Care School low 0.33 0.00% 10,0
Center 1 6 1 150 0 0 0 0 0 0
0
Day Care School low 0.33 0.00% 10,0
Center 2 6 1 200 0 0 0 0 0 0
0
Senior Citizen Social estab. low 0.33 0.00% 10,0
Hall 6 1 50 0 0 0 0 0 0
0
office 6 1 50 0 0 0 0 0 0
0
San Ramon ES School low 0.33 58,0 0.00% 10,0
6 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0
Daculang Daculang Bolo government low 0.33 0.00% 10,0
Bolo office 6 1 60 0 0 0 0 0 0
Brgy Hall
0
6 1 100 0 0 0 0 0 0
0
Salvacion (B) School low 0.33 1050 0.00% 10,0
ES 6 1 0 0 0 0 0 0
0
0
Holy Rosary School low 6 0.33 1 40 0 0.00% 0 10,0 0 0 0

Day Care 0
Center II 0
94
Holy Rosary School low 0.33 0.00% 10,0

Day Care 6 1 80 0 0 0 0 0 0
Center I 0
office 6 1 30 0 0 0 0 0 0
0
Senior Citizen 6 1 100 0 0 0 0 0
office 0
Building
0
office 6 2 48 0 0 0 0 0 0
0
Covered Court 6 1 250 0 0 0 0 0
area 0
Core Shelter
0
Covered Court amusement low 0.33 0.00% 10,0
area 6 1 270 0 0 0 0 0 0
0
Dagotdotan government low 0.33 0.00% 10,0
Dagotdotan 6 2 98 0 0 0 0 0
office 0
Brgy Hall
0
San Roque School low 0.33 0.00% 10,0
Day Care 6 1 28 0 0 0 0 0 0
Center I 0
San Roque School low 0.33 0.00% 10,0
Day Care 6 1 72 0 0 0 0 0 0
Center II 0
Dagotdotan 6 1 12 0 0 0 0 0
0
Health Center
0
Evacuation evac. Center low 0.33 0.00% 10,0
Center 6 1 200 0 0 0 0 0 0
0
S. Delos Santos School low 0.33 0.00% 10,0
E.S 6 1 5000 0 0 0 0 0 0
0
Dagotdotan 6 1 28 0 0 0 0 0
office 0
Brgy Outpost
0
Dagotdotan 6 1 350 0 0 0 0
area 0
Covered Court
0
Langga Brgy. Hall government high 100.0 10,0 77000 3.5
office 6 1 1 77 077 4 0 3
0
% 0
Brgy Outpost government high 100.0 10,0 85000 3.5
office 6 1 1 85 85 0 4 0 3
0
% 0
amusement high 100.0 10,0 65000
Langga 6 1 1 650 650 0 4 4 4
area 0 0
Covered Court
% 0 0
95
Day Care School high 100.0 10,0 1650 3.5

Center 6 1 1 165 165 0 4 0 00 3
% 0 0
health center health center high 100.0 10,0 3500
6 1 1 35 35 0 4 0 2 3
00
% 0
Maisog Brgy. Hall government low 0.33 0.00 10,0
office 6 1 54 0 % 0 0 0 0 0
0
Brgy Outpost government low 0.33 0.00 10,0
office 6 1 10 0 % 0 0 0 0 0
0
Maisog ES School low 0.33 2000 0.00 10,0
6 1 0 % 0 0 0 0 0
0
0
Day Care School low 0.33 0.00 10,0
Center 1 San 6 1 18 0 % 0 0 0 0 0
Roqu 0
Day Care School low 0.33 0.00 10,0
Center 2 6 1 54 0 % 0 0 0 0 0
0
amusement low 0.33 0.00 10,0
Covered Court 6 1 400 0 0 0 0 0
area % 0
centro
0
Covered Court amusement low 0.33 0.00 10,0
ES area 6 1 350 0 % 0 0 0 0 0
0
Matacong Barangay Hall government low 0.33 0.00 10,0
office 6 1 84 0 % 0 0 0 0 0
0
Day Center School low 0.33 0.00 10,0
centro 6 1 220 0 % 0 0 0 0 0
0
Day Center School low 0.33 0.00 10,0
Nasa 6 1 120 0 % 0 0 0 0 0
0
School high 100.0 10,0 1200 3.5
Day Care 6 1 1 120 120 0 4 3
0 00
Ressettlement
% 0 0
Evacuation evac. Center low 0.33 0.00 10,0
Center 6 1 200 0 % 0 0 0 0 0
0
health center health center low 0.33 0.00 10,0
6 1 114 0 % 0 0 0 0 0
0
SK Hall government low 0.33 0.00 10,0
office 6 1 80 0 % 0 0 0 0 0
0
Imelda E.s School low 0.33 0.00 10,0
6 2 9800 0 % 0 0 0 0 0
0
Brgy. Outpost government low 0.33 0.00 10,0
office 6 1 29 0 % 0 0 0 0 0
0
96
Covered amusement low 0.33 0.00 10,0

Court ES area 6 1 200 0 % 0 0 0 0 0
Covered amusement high 100.0 0
10,0 4000
Court Res area 6 1 1 400 400 0 4 0 00 4 4
Mun. Covered amusement low 0.33 %
0.00 0
10,0 0
Court area/Evacuatio 6 2 480 0 % 0 0 0 0 0
n Center
Amusement low 0.33 0.00 0
10,0
Covered 6 1 420 0 0 0 0 0
Court Centro area % 0
Fire Station government low 0.33 0.00 0
10,0
office 6 1 412 0 % 0 0 0 0 0
Police Station government low 0.33 0.00 0
10,0
office 6 3 400 0 % 0 0 0 0 0
Balai Silangan Rehab. Center high 100.0 0
10,0 4000
6 1 1 400 400 0 4 0 00 4 4
Mun. Hall government low 0.33 %
0.00 0
10,0 0
office 6 2 480 0 % 0 0 0 0 0
Senior Cit. government low 0.33 0.00 0
10,0
Bldg office 6 1 50 0 % 0 0 0 0 0
E Center Tourism low 0.33 0.00 0
10,0
Facility 6 1 50 0 % 0 0 0 0 0
Zipline Tourism high 100.0 0
10,0 7000
Facility 6 1 1 700 700 0 4 0 00 4 4
Tramline Tourism high %
100.0 0
10,0 0
6000
Facility 6 1 1 600 600 0 4 0 00 4 4
Zipline Bldg. Tourism high %
100.0 0
10,0 0
4000
Facility 6 1 1 40 40 0 4 0 2 3
00
ECCD Bldg. School low 0.33 %
0.00 0
10,0
6 1 80 0 % 0 0 0 0 0
MRF MRF low 0.33 0.00 0
10,0
6 1 40 0 % 0 0 0 0 0
Civil Cemetery low 0.33 0.00 0
10,0
2700
Cemetery 6 1 0 % 0 0 0 0 0
0
Catholic Cemetery low 0.33 0.00 0
10,0
1500
Cemetery 6 1 0 % 0 0 0 0 0
0
Imelda Terminal low 0.33 0.00 0
10,0
Integrated 6 1 60 0 % 0 0 0 0 0
Terminal 0
97
Ressettlement School high 100.0 10,0 1.5E+

1500 1500
E.s 6 1 1 0 4 0 0 4 4
0 0 % 0 8
Laniton Barangay Hall government low 0.33 0.00% 10,0
office 6 1 85 0 0 0 0 0 0
0
Covered Court Amusement low 0.33 0.00% 10,0
Area 6 1 492 0 0 0 0 0 0
0
San Miguel Ar. School low 0.33 0.00% 10,0
DCC 6 1 39 0 0 0 0 0 0
0
School low 0.33 0.00% 10,0
Annex 6 1 5000 0 0 0 0 0 0
Salvacion B ES 0
Amusement low 0.33 0.00% 10,0
Covered Court Area 6 1 151 0 0 0 0 0 0
Kalinga 0
office 6 1 11 0 0 0 0 0 0
0
6 1 36 0 0 0 0 0 0
0
Lifeline Utilities Risk Categories

Disaster risks in urban areas were based on exposure, sensitivities, and adaptive capacities
in agri-industrial, commercial, industrial, parks and recreation, cemetery, ecotourism, and utilities
land uses. These were identified based on mapping activities.
98
Table 5.4 Flood Risk Categories for Urban Uses

Barangay IDENTIFICATIO HAZARD EXPOSURE
Name N
San Isidro Provin P-2 Low 6 ≤1 0. 75 0.0 0.0 0 10 0 1 0.

ialc m 33 0.0 0 0% ,0 5
0 00
Provin P-3 Low 6 ≤1 0. 75 0.0 0.0 0 10 0 1 0.
ialc m 33 0.0 0 0% ,0 5
0 00
Provin P-1 Low 6 ≤1 0. 10 0.0 0.0 0 10 0 1 0.
ialc m 33 00. 0 0% ,0 5
00 00
Provin P-4 Mo 6 ≥2 0. 15 20. 1.3 1 10 200,0 1 1
ialc dera m 66 00. 00 3% ,0 00
te 00 00
Barang P-2 Low 6 ≤1 0. 35 0.0 0.0 0 10 0 1 0.
ay m 33 00. 0 0% ,0 5
00 00
99
Barang P-1 Low 6 ≤1 0. 15 0.0 0.0 0 10 0 1 0.

ay m 33 0.0 0 0% ,0 5
Barang P-3 Low 6 ≤1 0. 15 0.0 0.0 0 10 0 1 0.

ay m 33 0.0 0 0% ,0 5
0 00
Barang NASA rd low 6 ≤1 0. 16 0.0 0.0 0 10 0 1 0.
ay m 33 0.0 0 0% ,0 5
0 00
Barang Mampili Low 6 ≤1 0. 40 60 15. 2 10 6,000 1 1.
ay rd m 33 00. 0.0 00 ,0 ,000 5
00 0 % 00
Nationa Padilla low 6 ≤1 0. 20 0.0 0.0 0 12 0 1 0.
l m 33 00. 0 0% ,0 5
00 00
Laniton Barang P2 to 5 low 6 ≤1 1 10 14 14. 2 10 1,450 1 1.
ay m 00. 5.0 50 ,0 ,000 5
00 0 % 00
Barang Laniton low 6 ≤1 1 50 5.0 1.0 1 10 50,00 1 1
ay to
laniton m 0.0 0 0% ,0 0
Basud 0 00
Barang Purok 5 low 6 ≤1 1 30 30 100 4 10 3,000 1 2.
ay m 0.0 0.0 .00 ,0 ,000 5
0 0 % 00
Barang Kalahi P5 low 6 ≤1 1 60 0.0 0.0 0 10 0 1 0.
ay to P3 m 0.0 0 0% ,0 5
0 00
Maisog Munici P1 to p2 low 6 ≤1 0. 26 0.0 0.0 0 12 0 1 0.
pal m 33 00. 0 0% ,0 5
00 00
Barang P1 low 6 ≤1 0. 65 0.0 0.0 0 10 0 1 0.
ay m 33 0.0 0 0% ,0 5
0 00
Barang P1,P2,P3 low 6 ≤1 0. 50 0.0 0.0 0 10 0 1 0.
ay Tourism m 33 00. 0 0% ,0 5
rd 00 00
100
Barang P-1 Low 6 ≤1 0. 15 0.0 0.0 0 10 0 1 0.

ay m 33 0.0 0 0% ,0 5
Barang P-3 Low 6 ≤1 0. 15 0.0 0.0 0 10 0 1 0.

ay m 33 0.0 0 0% ,0 5
0 00
Barang NASA rd low 6 ≤1 0. 16 0.0 0.0 0 10 0 1 0.
ay m 33 0.0 0 0% ,0 5
0 00
Barang Mampili Low 6 ≤1 0. 40 60 15. 2 10 6,000 1 1.
ay rd m 33 00. 0.0 00 ,0 ,000 5
00 0 % 00
Nationa Padilla low 6 ≤1 0. 20 0.0 0.0 0 12 0 1 0.
l m 33 00. 0 0% ,0 5
00 00
Laniton Barang P2 to 5 low 6 ≤1 1 10 14 14. 2 10 1,450 1 1.
ay m 00. 5.0 50 ,0 ,000 5
00 0 % 00
Barang Laniton low 6 ≤1 1 50 5.0 1.0 1 10 50,00 1 1
ay to
laniton m 0.0 0 0% ,0 0
Basud 0 00
Barang Purok 5 low 6 ≤1 1 30 30 100 4 10 3,000 1 2.
ay m 0.0 0.0 .00 ,0 ,000 5
0 0 % 00
Barang Kalahi P5 low 6 ≤1 1 60 0.0 0.0 0 10 0 1 0.
ay to P3 m 0.0 0 0% ,0 5
0 00
Maisog Munici P1 to p2 low 6 ≤1 0. 26 0.0 0.0 0 12 0 1 0.
pal m 33 00. 0 0% ,0 5
00 00
Barang P1 low 6 ≤1 0. 65 0.0 0.0 0 10 0 1 0.
ay m 33 0.0 0 0% ,0 5
0 00
Barang P1,P2,P3 low 6 ≤1 0. 50 0.0 0.0 0 10 0 1 0.
ay Tourism m 33 00. 0 0% ,0 5
rd 00 00
101
Barang P2 low 6 ≤1 0. 0.0 0.0 0 0 1 0.

35 10
ay m 33 0 0% 5
0.0 ,0
San Ramon Provinc Purok 2 low 6 ≤1 0. 17 0.0 0.0 0 10 0 1 0.
ial to
3 m 33 50. 0 0% ,0 5
00 00
Munici Purok 2 low 6 ≤1 0. 13 0.0 0.0 0 10 0 1 0.
pal to
1 m 33 00. 0 0% ,0 5
00 00
Barang Purok 2 low 6 ≤1 0. 19 0.0 0.0 0 10 0 1 0.
ay to
1 m 33 00. 0 0% ,0 5
00 00
Salvacion Provinc P-1 Hig 5 ≥5 1 30 15 50. 4 10 1,500 1 2.
ial h m 0.0 0.0 00 ,0 ,000 5
0 0 % 00
Barang Balares low 6 ≤1 0. 10 0.0 0.0 0 10 0 0 0
ay m 33 0.0 0 0% ,0
0 00
baranga Morada Low 6 ≤1 0. 12 0.0 0.0 0 10 0 0 0
y m 33 00. 0 0% ,0
00 00
Barang Ayen Low 6 ≤1 0. 10 0.0 0.0 0 10 0 0 0
ay m 33 0.0 0 0% ,0
0 00
Manlimonsit Barang Azucena low 6 ≤1 0. 16 0.0 0.0 0 10 0 0 0
o ay m 33 0.0 0 0% ,0
0 00
Barang Ronteraz low 6 ≤1 0. 50. 0.0 0.0 0 10 0 0 0
ay o m 33 00 0 0% ,0
00
Barang Badiao low 6 ≤1 0. 80. 0.0 0.0 0 10 0 0 0
ay m 33 00 0 0% ,0
00
Barang Laad low 6 ≤1 0. 10 10 100 4 10 1,000 1 2.
ay m 33 0.0 0.0 .00 ,0 ,000 5
0 0 % 00
102
Provinc P-2 mod 6 ≤1 0. 10 80. 80. 4 10 800,0 1 2.

ial Road
erat m 33 0.0 00 00 ,0 00 5
Barang Capistran low 6 ≤1 0. 28 0.0 0.0 0 10 0 0 0

ay o m 33 0.0 0 0% ,0
0 00
Barang Avancena low 6 ≤1 0. 18 0.0 0.0 0 10 0 0 0
ay m 33 0.0 0 0% ,0
0 00
San Antonio Provinc P-3 Hig 6 ≥1 1 20 10. 5.0 1 10 100,0 1 1
ial h m 0.0 00 0% ,0 00
0 00
Provinc P-1 Hig 6 ≥1 1 15 30. 20. 2 10 300,0 1 1.
ial h m 0.0 00 00 ,0 00 5
0 % 00
Barang Pandakak low 6 ≤1 0. 12 0.0 0.0 0 10 0 0 0
ay i St. m 33 3.0 0 0% ,0
0 00
Barang Sampagui low 6 ≤1 0. 57. 0.0 0.0 0 10 0 0 0
ay ta St. m 33 00 0 0% ,0
00
Barang Santan St. low 6 ≤1 0. 69. 0.0 0.0 0 10 0 0 0
ay m 33 00 0 0% ,0
00
Barang Daisy St. low 6 ≤1 0. 74. 0.0 0.0 0 10 0 0 0
ay m 33 00 0 0% ,0
00
Barang Sunflowe low 6 ≤1 0. 65. 0.0 0.0 0 10 0 0 0
ay r
St. m 33 00 0 0% ,0
00
Barang Boungabi low 6 ≤1 0. 13 0.0 0.0 0 10 0 0 0
ay lya m 33 4.0 0 0% ,0
0 00
Daculang Provinc P- low 6 ≤1 0. 13 10 7.6 1 10 1,000 1 1
bolo ial Road 1,2,3,5,6 m 66 00. 0.0 9% ,0 ,000
00 0 00
103
Barang Salvacion low 6 ≤1 0. 80 10. 1.2 1 10 100,0 1 1

ay St m 33 0.0 00 5% ,0 00
Barang Carrancej low 6 ≤1 0. 12 80. 6.6 1 10 800,0 1 1

ay a m 33 00. 00 7% ,0 00
00 00
Barang Pabico high 6 ≥1 1 22 18 8.1 1 10 1,800 2 1.
ay m 00. 0.0 8% ,0 ,000 5
00 0 00
Barang Core high 6 ≥1 1 10 10 100 4 10 1,000 1 2.
ay Shelter m 0.0 0.0 .00 ,0 ,000 5
Rd. 0 0 % 00
Barang Fuentebe low 6 ≤1 0. 60. 60. 100 4 10 600,0 1 2.
ay lla Rd. m 33 00 00 .00 ,0 00 5
% 00
Barang Rosario low 6 ≤1 0. 80 10 12. 2 10 1,000 1 1.
ay St. m 33 0.0 0.0 50 ,0 ,000 5
0 0 % 00
Barang Sitio high 6 ≥1 1 80. 80. 100 4 10 800,0 1 2.
ay Maligaya m 00 00 .00 ,0 00 5
% 00
Dagotdotan Provinc P 1-7 Low 6 ≤1 0. 20 0.0 0.0 0 10 0 0 0
ial Road m 33 00. 0 0% ,0
00 00
Barang S. Delos Low 6 ≤1 0. 80 0.0 0.0 0 10 0 0 0
ay Road Santos m 33 0.0 0 0% ,0
0 00
Barang A. Delos Low 6 ≤1 0. 15 10. 0.6 1 10 100,0 1 1
ay Road Santos m 33 00. 00 7% ,0 00
00 00
Barang F. Low 6 ≤1 0. 10 0.0 0.0 0 10 0 0 0
ay Road Pimentel m 33 00. 0 0% ,0
00 00
Barang N. Low 6 ≤1 0. 30 0.0 0.0 0 10 0 0 0
Sagono
ay Road St. m 33 0.0 0 0% ,0
0 00
104
Barang J. Sevilla Low 6 ≤1 0. 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0

50 10
ay Road
m 33 0 0%
0.0 ,0
Langga Munici Langga Low 6 ≤1 0. 30 7.0 0.2 1 10 70,00 1 1
pal Road m 33 00. 0 3% ,0 0
Road 00 00
Barang rose st Low 6 ≤1 0. 80. 0.0 0.0 0 10 0 0 0
ay Road m 33 00 0 0% ,0
00
Barang Santan Low 6 ≤1 0. 80. 0.0 0.0 0 10 0 0 0
ay Road m 33 00 0 0% ,0
00
Barang Daisy St. Low 6 ≤1 0. 80. 0.0 0.0 0 10 0 0 0
ay Road m 33 00 0 0% ,0
00
Barang Ilang- Low 6 ≤1 0. 80. 0.0 0.0 0 10 0 0 0
ay Road Ilang m 33 00 0 0% ,0
00
Barang Kalahi Low 6 ≤1 0. 80. 0.0 0.0 0 10 0 0 0
ay Road Road m 33 00 0 0% ,0
00
Barang Rosal St Low 6 ≤1 0. 45. 0.0 0.0 0 10 0 0 0
ay Road m 33 00 0 0% ,0
00
Barang Sampagui 0. 45. 0.0 0.0 0 10 0 0 0
ay Road a St. 33 00 0 0% ,0
00
Barang Gumamel Low 6 ≤1 0. 80. 0.0 0.0 0 10 0 0 0
ay Road a St m 33 00 0 0% ,0
00
Matacong Provinc P-1-7 low 6 ≤1 0. 80 10 13. 2 16 17,20 3 2.
ial Road m 33 00. 75. 44 ,0 0,000 5
00 00 % 00
Barang Ladea st low 6 ≤1 0. 25 10. 4.0 1 10 100,0 1 1
ay Road m 33 0.0 00 0% ,0 00
0 00
105
Barang BOYUB low 6 ≤1 0. 50. 0.0 0.0 0 10 0 0 0

ay Road OY ST. 1
m 33 00 0 0% ,0
Barang RANCH low 6 ≤1 0. 10 0.0 0.0 0 10 0 0 0

ay Road O El m 33 0.0 0 0% ,0
gwapo 0 00
Barang BOYUB low 6 ≤1 0. 50. 0.0 0.0 0 10 0 0 0
ay Road OY ST. 2 m 33 00 0 0% ,0
00
Barang Velez low 6 ≤1 0. 20 0.0 0.0 0 10 0 0 0
ay Road m 33 0.0 0 0% ,0
0 00
Barang Pakai 1 low 6 ≤1 0. 15 0.0 0.0 0 10 0 0 0
ay Road m 33 0.0 0 0% ,0
0 00
Barang Pakai 2 low 6 ≤1 0. 17 0.0 0.0 0 10 0 0 0
ay Road m 33 0.0 0 0% ,0
0 00
Barang pakai 3 low 6 ≤1 0. 70 0.0 0.0 0 10 0 0 0
ay Road m 33 0.0 0 0% ,0
0 00
Barang V. Rada low 6 ≤1 0. 70. 0.0 0.0 0 10 0 0 0
ay Road St m 33 00 0 0% ,0
00
Barang L. Racho low 6 ≤1 0. 35 5.0 1.4 1 10 50,00 1 1
ay Road St m 33 0.0 0 3% ,0 0
0 00
Barang Abordo low 6 ≤1 0. 22 0.0 0.0 0 10 0 0 0
ay Road St. m 33 0.0 0 0% ,0
0 00
Barang Racho St. low 6 ≤1 0. 75. 0.0 0.0 0 10 0 0 0
ay Road II m 33 00 0 0% ,0
00
Barang M. low 6 ≤1 0. 12 0.0 0.0 0 10 0 0 0
ay Road Racasa m 33 0.0 0 0% ,0
0 00
106
Barang Dayon St. low 6 ≤1 0. 10 0.0 0.0 0 10 0 0 0

ay Road
m 33 0.0 0 0% ,0
Barang Valentin low 6 ≤1 0. 25 0.0 0.0 0 10 0 0 0
ay Road Racho St m 33 0.0 0 0% ,0
107
0 00
Barang J. low 6 ≤1 0. 30 0.0 0.0 0 10 0 0 0
ay Road Salvador m 33 0.0 0 0% ,0
st. 0 00
Barang S. Echano low 6 ≤1 0. 15 0.0 0.0 0 10 0 0 0
ay Road St. m 33 0.0 0 0% ,0
0 00
Barang L. low 6 ≤1 0. 19 0.0 0.0 0 10 0 0 0
ay Road Sacrame m 33 0.0 0 0% ,0
n St.
to 0 00
Barang G. low 6 ≤1 0. 15 0.0 0.0 0 10 0 0 0
ay Road Salagoste m 33 0.0 0 0% ,0
St 0 00
Barang Nasa St 1 low 6 ≤1 0. 15 5.0 3.3 1 10 50,00 1 1
ay Road m 33 0.0 0 3% ,0 0
0 00
Barang Nasa st. low 6 ≤1 0. 15 5.0 3.3 1 10 50,00 1 1
ay Road II m 33 0.0 0 3% ,0 0
0 00
Barang Nasa III low 6 ≤1 0. 15 5.0 3.3 1 10 50,00 1 1
ay Road m 33 0.0 0 3% ,0 0
0 00
Munici SLR low 6 ≤1 0. 50 0.0 0.0 0 12 0 0 0
pal Diversio m 33 00. 0 0% ,0
Road Rd.n 00 00
Barang J. low 6 ≤1 0. 35 15 42. 4 10 1,500 2 3
ay Road st
Rosento m 33 0.0 0.0 86 ,0 ,000
0 0 % 00
Barang Formosa low 6 ≤1 0. 17 0.0 0.0 0 10 0 0 0
ay Road m 33 0.0 0 0% ,0
0 00
Barang GK St. low 6 ≤1 0. 10 0.0 0.0 0 10 0 0 0

ay Road
m 33 0.0 0 0% ,0
Barang J. Sergio low 6 ≤1 0. 20 0.0 0.0 0 10 0 0 0

ay Road St. m 33 0.0 0 0% ,0
108
0 00
Barang Conda St. low 6 ≤1 0. 20 0.0 0.0 0 10 0 0 0
ay Road m 33 0.0 0 0% ,0
0 00
Barang T. Aloc low 6 ≤1 0. 15 0.0 0.0 0 10 0 0 0
ay Road St. m 33 0.0 0 0% ,0
0 00
Barang Fernande low 6 ≤1 0. 15 0.0 0.0 0 10 0 0 0
ay Road z st m 33 0.0 0 0% ,0
0 00
Barang U. Ibias low 6 ≤1 0. 10 0.0 0.0 0 10 0 0 0
ay Road m 33 0.0 0 0% ,0
0 00
Mampurog Provinc P-1,2,3,6 Low 6 ≤1 0. 20 35. 1.7 1 10 350,0 1 1
ial Road m 33 00. 00 5% ,0 00
00 00
Brgy Carnatio Low 6 ≤1 0. 15. 0.0 0.0 0 10 0 0 0
Road n m 33 00 0 0% ,0
00
Brgy lily Low 6 ≤1 0. 10. 0.0 0.0 0 10 0 0 0
Road m 33 00 0 0% ,0
00
Brgy rose Low 6 ≤1 0. 15. 0.0 0.0 0 10 0 0 0
Road m 33 00 0 0% ,0
00
Brgy morning Low 6 ≤1 0. 50. 10. 20. 2 10 100,0 1 1.
Road glory m 33 00 00 00 ,0 00 5
% 00
Brgy mary Low 6 ≤1 0. 30. 0.0 0.0 0 10 0 0 0
Road gold m 33 00 0 0% ,0
00
Brgy dahlia Low 6 ≤1 0. 10. 0.0 0.0 0 10 0 0 0

Road m 33 00 0 0% ,0
Brgy cena Low 6 ≤1 0. 10. 0.0 0.0 0 10 0 0 0
109
Road m 33 00 0 0% ,0
00
Brgy Santan St. Low 6 ≤1 0. 20. 0.0 0.0 0 10 0 0 0
Road m 33 00 0 0% ,0
00
Brgy aster Low 6 ≤1 0. 30. 0.0 0.0 0 10 0 0 0
Road m 33 00 0 0% ,0
00
Brgy yascent Low 6 ≤1 0. 30. 0.0 0.0 0 10 0 0 0
Road m 33 00 0 0% ,0
00
Brgy tulips Low 6 ≤1 0. 80. 0.0 0.0 0 10 0 0 0
Road m 33 00 0 0% ,0
00
Brgy anturium Low 6 ≤1 0. 10. 0.0 0.0 0 10 0 0 0
Road m 33 00 0 0% ,0
00
Brgy camia Low 6 ≤1 0. 10. 0.0 0.0 0 10 0 0 0
Road m 33 00 0 0% ,0
00
Brgy camella Low 6 ≤1 0. 15. 3.0 20. 2 10 30,00 1 1.
Road m 33 00 0 00 ,0 0 5
% 00
Brgy lavender Low 6 ≤1 0. 10. 0.0 0.0 0 10 0 0 0
Road m 33 00 0 0% ,0
00
Brgy Rosal St Low 6 ≤1 0. 10. 0.0 0.0 0 10 0 0 0
Road m 33 00 0 0% ,0
00
Brgy jasmin Low 6 ≤1 0. 10. 0.0 0.0 0 10 0 0 0
Road m 33 00 0 0% ,0
00
Brgy mayana Low 6 ≤1 0. 15. 0.0 0.0 0 10 0 0 0

Road m 33 00 0 0% ,0
Brgy Ilang- Low 6 ≤1 0. 40. 0.0 0.0 0 10 40 0 0
110
Road Ilang m 33 00 0 0% ,0
00
Brgy Sunflowe Low 6 ≤1 0. 40. 0.0 0.0 0 10 0 0 0
Road rSt. m 33 00 0 0% ,0
00
Brgy blue bell Low 6 ≤1 0. 90. 0.0 0.0 0 10 0 0 0
Road m 33 00 0 0% ,0
00
Brgy iris Low 6 ≤1 0. 70. 0.0 0.0 0 10 0 0 0
Road m 33 00 0 0% ,0
00
Brgy magnolia Low 6 ≤1 0. 20. 0.0 0.0 0 10 0 0 0
Road m 33 00 0 0% ,0
00
Brgy everlasti Low 6 ≤1 0. 30. 0.0 0.0 0 10 0 0 0
Road ng m 33 00 0 0% ,0
00
Brgy cypres Low 6 ≤1 0. 70. 0.0 0.0 0 10 0 0 0
Road m 33 00 0 0% ,0
00
Brgy flonny Low 6 ≤1 0. 50. 50. 100 4 10 500,0 1 2.
Road m 33 00 00 .00 ,0 00 5
% 00
Brgy Calachuc low 6 ≤1 0. 50. 50. 100 4 10 500,0 1 2.
Road hi m 33 00 00 .00 ,0 00 5
% 00
Brgy Daisy St. low 6 ≤1 0. 60 30. 5.0 1 10 300,0 1 1
Road m 33 0.0 00 0% ,0 00
0 00
Brgy Gumamel Low 6 ≤1 0. 15 0.0 0.0 0 10 0 0 0
Road a m 33 0.0 0 0% ,0
0 00
Brgy Boungabi Low 6 ≤1 0. 15 0.0 0.0 0 10 0 0 0

l
Road m 33 0.0 0 0% ,0
ya
Brgy Blossom Low 6 ≤1 0. 50. 0.0 0.0 0 10 0 0 0
111
Road m 33 00 0 0% ,0
00
Brgy Sampagui Low 6 ≤1 0. 50. 0.0 0.0 0 10 0 0 0
Road at St. m 33 00 0 0% ,0
00
Brgy buttercu Low 6 ≤1 0. 10 0.0 0.0 0 10 0 0 0
Road p m 33 0.0 0 0% ,0
0 00
Brgy Florenne Low 6 ≤1 0. 75. 0.0 0.0 0 10 0 0 0
Road m 33 00 0 0% ,0
00
Brgy Lotus Low 6 ≤1 0. 50. 0.0 0.0 0 10 0 0 0
Road m 33 00 0 0% ,0
00
Brgy Flora Low 6 ≤1 0. 50. 0.0 0.0 0 10 0 0 0
Road m 33 00 0 0% ,0
00
Table 5.5 Landslide Risk Categories for Urban Uses
IDENTIFICATION HAZARD EXPOSURE
112
Barangay Classifica Name of

Name t Street (if
any)
ion
National,
Provincial
Municipal
or
Barangay
1 San Isidro Provincia P-2 Low 6 0. 750.00 0.00 0.00% 0 10,0 0 0 0

33 00
Provincia P-3 Low 6 0. 750.00 0.00 0.00% 0 10,0 0 0 0
33 00
2 Provincia P-1 Low 6 0. 1000.0 0.00 0.00% 0 10,0 0 0 0
33 0 00
Provincia P-4 Moder 6 0. 1500.0 400.0 26.67 3 10,0 4,000,00 3 3
ate 66 0 0 % 00 0
Barangay P-2 Low 6 0. 3500.0 0.00 0.00% 0 10,0 0 0 0
33 0 00
3 Barangay P-1 Low 6 0. 150.00 0.00 0.00% 0 10,0 0 0 0
33 00
Barangay P-3 Low 6 0. 150.00 0.00 0.00% 0 16,0 0 0 0

33 00
Barangay NASA rd low 6 0. 160.00 0.00 0.00% 0 10,0 0 0 0
113
33 00
Barangay Mampili Low 6 0. 4000.0 0.00 0.00% 0 10,0 0 0 0
rd 33 0 00
National Padilla Moder 6 0. 2000.0 100.0 5.00% 1 12,0 1,200,00 2 1.
ate 66 0 0 00 0 5
San Provincial P-3 low 6 0. 200.00 5.00 2.50% 1 10,0 50,000 1 1
Antonio 33 00
Provincial P-1 low 6 0. 150.00 5.00 3.33% 1 10,0 50,000 1 1
33 00
Barangay Pandakak low 6 0. 123.00 0.00 0.00% 0 10,0 0 0 0
i St. 33 00
Barangay Sampagui low 6 0. 57.00 0.00 0.00% 0 10,0 0 0 0
ta St. 33 00
Barangay Santan St. low 6 0. 69.00 0.00 0.00% 0 10,0 0 0 0
33 00
Barangay Daisy St. low 6 0. 74.00 0.00 0.00% 0 10,0 0 0 0
33 00
Barangay Sunflowe low 6 0. 65.00 0.00 0.00% 0 10,0 0 0 0
r
St. 33 00
Barangay Boungabi low 6 0. 134.00 0.00 0.00% 0 10,0 0 0 0
lya 33 00
San Provincial Purok 2 Moder 6 0. 1750.0 300.0 17.14 2 10,0 3,000,00 3 2.
Ramon to 3 ate 66 0 0 % 00 0 5
Municipal Purok 2 low 6 0. 1300.0 0.00 0.00% 0 10,0 0 0 0
to 1 33 0 00
Barangay Purok 2 Low 6 0. 1900.0 50.00 2.63% 1 10,0 500,000 1 1
to 1 33 0 00
Daculang Provincial P- low 6 0. 1300.0 0.00 0.00% 0 12,0 0 0 0
Bolo Road 1,2,3,5,6 33 0 00
Barangay Salvacion low 6 0. 800.00 0.00 0.00% 0 10,0 0 0 0
St 33 00
Barangay Carrancej low 6 0. 1200.0 0.00 0.00% 0 10,0 0 0 0
a 33 0 00
Barangay Pabico Moder 6 0. 2200.0 20.00 0.91% 1 10,0 200,000 1 1

ate 66 0 00
114
Barangay Core low 6 0. 100.00 0.00 0.00% 0 10,0 0 0 0

Shelter 33 00
Rd.
Barangay Fuentebe low 6 0. 60.00 0.00 0.00% 0 10,0 0 0 0
l Rd.
la 33 00
Barangay Rosario low 6 0. 800.00 0.00 0.00% 0 10,0 0 0 0
St. 33 00
Barangay Sitio low 6 0. 80.00 0.00 0.00% 0 10,0 0 0 0
Maligaya 33 00
Langga Municipa Langga High 6 1 3000.0 200.0 6.67% 1 10,0 2,000,00 2 1.
l
Road Road 0 0 00 0 5
Barangay rose st low 6 0. 80.00 0.00 0.00% 0 10,0 0 0 0
Road 33 00
Barangay Santan low 6 0. 80.00 0.00 0.00% 0 10,0 0 0 0
Road 33 00
Barangay Daisy St. low 6 0. 80.00 0.00 0.00% 0 10,0 0 0 0
Road 33 00
Barangay Ilang- low 6 0. 80.00 0.00 0.00% 0 10,0 0 0 0
Road Ilang 33 00
Barangay Kalahi low 6 0. 80.00 0.00 0.00% 0 10,0 0 0 0
Road Road 33 00
Barangay Rosal St low 6 0. 45.00 0.00 0.00% 0 10,0 0 0 0
Road 33 00
Barangay Sampagu low 6 0. 45.00 0.00 0.00% 0 10,0 0 0 0
Road i St.
ta 33 00
Barangay Gumamel low 6 0. 80.00 0.00 0.00% 0 10,0 0 0 0
Road a St 33 00
Mampurog Provincia P-1,2,3,6 High 6 1 10000. 132.2 1.32% 1 10,0 1,322,40 2 1.
l
Road 00 4 00 0 5
Brgy Carnatio Moder 6 0. 10000. 37.45 0.37% 1 10,0 374,500 1 1
Road n ate 66 00 00
Brgy lily low 6 0. 80.00 0.00 0.00% 0 10,0 0 0 0
Road 33 00
Brgy rose low 6 0. 80.00 0.00 0.00% 0 10,0 0 0 0

Road
115
Brgy morning low 6 0. 80.00 0.00 0.00% 0 10,0 0 0 0

Road glory 33 00
Brgy mary low 6 0. 80.00 0.00 0.00% 0 10,0 0 0 0
Road gold 33 00
Brgy dahlia low 6 0. 80.00 0.00 0.00% 0 10,0 0 0 0
Road 33 00
Brgy cena low 6 0. 80.00 0.00 0.00% 0 10,0 0 0 0
Road 33 00
Brgy Santan low 6 0. 80.00 0.00 0.00% 0 10,0 0 0 0
Road St. 33 00
Brgy aster low 6 0. 80.00 0.00 0.00% 0 10,0 0 0 0
Road 33 00
Brgy yascent low 6 0. 80.00 0.00 0.00% 0 10,0 0 0 0
Road 33 00
Brgy tulips low 6 0. 80.00 0.00 0.00% 0 10,0 0 0 0
Road 33 00
Brgy anturium low 6 0. 80.00 0.00 0.00% 0 10,0 0 0 0
Road 33 00
Brgy camia low 6 0. 80.00 0.00 0.00% 0 10,0 0 0 0
Road 33 00
Brgy camella low 6 0. 80.00 0.00 0.00% 0 10,0 0 0 0
Road 33 00
Brgy lavender low 6 0. 80.00 0.00 0.00% 0 10,0 0 0 0
Road 33 00
Brgy Rosal St low 6 0. 80.00 0.00 0.00% 0 10,0 0 0 0
Road 33 00
Brgy jasmin low 6 0. 80.00 0.00 0.00% 0 10,0 0 0 0
Road 33 00
Brgy mayana low 6 0. 80.00 0.00 0.00% 0 10,0 0 0 0
Road 33 00
Brgy Ilang- low 6 0. 80.00 0.00 0.00% 0 10,0 0 0 0
Road Ilang 33 00
Brgy Sunflowe low 6 0. 80.00 0.00 0.00% 0 10,0 0 0 0
Road r St. 33 00
Brgy blue bell low 6 0. 80.00 0.00 0.00% 0 10,0 0 0 0

Road
Brgy iris low 6 0. 80.00 0.00 0.00% 0 10,0 0 0 0
Road
116
33 00
Brgy magnoli low 6 0. 80.00 0.00 0.00% 0 10,0 0 0 0
Road a 33 00
Brgy everlasti low 6 0. 80.00 0.00 0.00% 0 10,0 0 0 0
Road gn 33 00
Brgy cypres low 6 0. 80.00 0.00 0.00% 0 10,0 0 0 0
Road 33 00
Brgy flonny low 6 0. 80.00 0.00 0.00% 0 10,0 0 0 0
Road 33 00
Brgy Daisy St. low 6 0. 80.00 0.00 0.00% 0 10,0 0 0 0
Road 33 00
Brgy Gumame low 6 0. 80.00 0.00 0.00% 0 10,0 0 0 0
Road al 33 00
Brgy Boungab low 6 0. 80.00 0.00 0.00% 0 10,0 0 0 0
Road lya
i 33 00
Brgy Blossom low 6 0. 80.00 0.00 0.00% 0 10,0 0 0 0
Road 33 00
Brgy Sampag low 6 0. 80.00 0.00 0.00% 0 10,0 0 0 0
Road ta
ui St. 33 00
Brgy buttercu low 6 0. 80.00 0.00 0.00% 0 10,0 0 0 0
Road p 33 00
Brgy Florenn low 6 0. 80.00 0.00 0.00% 0 10,0 0 0 0
Road e 33 00
Brgy Lotus low 6 0. 80.00 0.00 0.00% 0 10,0 0 0 0
Road 33 00
Brgy Flora low 6 0. 80.00 0.00 0.00% 0 10,0 0 0 0
Road 33 00
Maisog Municip P1 to p2 Low 6 0. 2600.0 50.00 1.92% 1 12,0 600,00 1 1
al 33 0 00 0
Baranga P1 Low 6 0. 650.00 200.0 30.77 3 10,0 2,000,0 2 2.
y 33 0 % 00 0 5
Baranga P1,P2,P3 Low 6 0. 5000.0 0.00 0.00% 0 10,0 0 0 0

y
Tourism 33 0 00
117
Baranga P2 Low 6 0. 350.00 20.00 5.71% 1 10,0 200,000 1 1

y
33 00
Matacong Provinci P-1-7 High 6 1 8000.0 3000. 37.50 3 16,0 48,000, 4 3.
al
Road 0 00 % 00 0
00 5
Baranga Ladea st Low 6 0. 250.00 0.00 0.00% 0 10,0 0 0 0
y
Road 33 00
Baranga BOYUB Low 6 0. 50.00 0.00 0.00% 0 10,0 0 0 0
y
Road OY ST. 1 33 00
Baranga RANCH high 6 1 100.00 20.00 20.00 2 10,0 200,000 1 1.
y
Road O El % 00 5
gwapo
Baranga BOYUB Low 6 0. 50.00 0.00 0.00% 0 10,0 0 0 0
y
Road OY ST. 2 33 00
Baranga Velez Low 6 0. 200.00 0.00 0.00% 0 10,0 0 0 0
y
Road 33 00
Baranga Pakai 1 Low 6 0. 150.00 0.00 0.00% 0 10,0 0 0 0
y
Road 33 00
Baranga Pakai 2 Low 6 0. 170.00 0.00 0.00% 0 10,0 0 0 0
y
Road 33 00
Baranga pakai 3 high 6 0. 700.00 0.00 0.00% 0 10,0 0 0 0
y
Road 33 00
Baranga V. Rada Low 6 0. 70.00 0.00 0.00% 0 10,0 0 0 0
y
Road St 33 00
Baranga L. Racho High 6 1 350.00 120.0 34.29 3 10,0 1,200,0 2 2.
y
Road St 0 % 00 0 5
Baranga Abordo Low 6 0. 220.00 0.00 0.00% 0 10,0 0 0 0
y
Road St. 33 00
Baranga Racho St. Low 6 0. 75.00 0.00 0.00% 0 10,0 0 0 0
y
Road II 33 00
Baranga M. Low 6 0. 120.00 0.00 0.00% 0 10,0 0 0 0
y
Road Racasa 33 00
Baranga Molar St. Low 6 0. 50.00 0.00 0.00% 0 10,0 0 0 0
y
Road 33 00
Barangay Bulawan Low 6 0. 300.00 0.00 0.00% 0 10,0 0 0 0

Road St. 33 00
118
Barangay S. Low 6 0. 100.00 0.00 0.00% 0 10,0 0 0 0

Road Panotes 33 00
St.
Barangay Salva St. Low 6 0. 200.00 0.00 0.00% 0 10,0 0 0 0
Road 33 00
Barangay M. Low 6 0. 50.00 0.00 0.00% 0 10,0 0 0 0
Road Salamero 33 00
St.
Barangay L. Low 6 0. 140.00 0.00 0.00% 0 10,0 0 0 0
Road Sacramen 33 00
to St.
Barangay Ermita St. Low 6 0. 200.00 0.00 0.00% 0 10,0 0 0 0
Road 33 00
Barangay V Racho. Low 6 0. 250.00 0.00 0.00% 0 10,0 0 0 0
Road St. 33 00
Barangay Iglesia St. Low 6 0. 100.00 0.00 0.00% 0 10,0 0 0 0
Road 33 00
Barangay Quibral Low 6 0. 100.00 0.00 0.00% 0 10,0 0 0 0
Road St. 33 00
Barangay L. Low 6 0. 300.00 0.00 0.00% 0 10,0 0 0 0
Road Echano 33 00
St.
Barangay Iglesia St. Low 6 0. 100.00 0.00 0.00% 0 10,0 0 0 0
Road 2 33 00
Barangay Dayon St. Low 6 0. 100.00 0.00 0.00% 0 10,0 0 0 0
Road 33 00
Barangay Valentin Low 6 0. 250.00 0.00 0.00% 0 10,0 0 0 0
Road Racho St 33 00
Barangay J. Low 6 0. 300.00 0.00 0.00% 0 10,0 0 0 0
Road Salvador 33 00
st.
Barangay S. Echano Low 6 0. 150.00 0.00 0.00% 0 10,0 0 0 0
Road St. 33 00
119
Barangay Laniton low 6 0. 500.00 0.00 0.00% 0 10,0 0 0 0

to laniton 33 00
Barangay Purok 5 low 6 0. 300.00 0.00 0.00% 0 10,0 0 0 0
33 00
Barangay Kalahi P5 low 6 0. 600.00 0.00 0.00% 0 10,0 0 0 0
to P3 33 00
Manlimon Barangay Azucena low 6 0. 160.00 0.00 0.00% 0 10,0 0 0 0
120
sito 33 00
Barangay Ronteraz low 6 0. 50.00 0.00 0.00% 0 10,0 0 0 0
o 33 00
Barangay Badiao low 6 0. 80.00 0.00 0.00% 0 10,0 0 0 0
33 00
Barangay Laad low 6 0. 100.00 0.00 0.00% 0 10,0 0 0 0
33 00
Provincia P-2 low 6 0. 100.00 0.00 0.00% 0 10,0 0 0 0
Road
l 33 00
Barangay Capistran low 6 0. 280.00 0.00 0.00% 0 10,0 0 0 0
o 33 00
Barangay Avancen low 6 0. 180.00 0.00 0.00% 0 10,0 0 0 0
a 33 00
Dagotdot Provincia P 1-7 low 6 0. 2000.0 0.00 0.00% 0 10,0 0 0 0
n
a Road
l 33 0 00
Barangay S. Delos low 6 0. 800.00 0.00 0.00% 0 10,0 0 0 0
Road Santos 33 00
Barangay A. Delos low 6 0. 1500.0 0.00 0.00% 0 10,0 0 0 0
Road Santos 33 0 00
Barangay F. low 6 0. 1000.0 0.00 0.00% 0 10,0 0 0 0
Road Pimentel 33 0 00
Barangay N. low 6 0. 300.00 0.00 0.00% 0 10,0 0 0 0
Road Sagono 33 00
St.
Barangay J. Sevilla low 6 0. 500.00 0.00 0.00% 0 10,0 0 0 0
Road 33 00
Salvacion Provincia P-1 low 6 0. 300.00 0.00 0.00% 0 10,0 0 0 0
l 33 00
Barang Balares low 0. 100.0 0.00 0.00 10,0

6 0 0 0 0
ay 33 0 % 00
barang Morada low 6 0. 1200. 0.00 0.00 0 10,0 0 0 0
33 0 00
Barang Ayen low 6 0. 100.0 0.00 0.00 0 10,0 0 0 0
33 00
Table 5.6 Electrical Posts at Risk to Flooding
Barangay Name HAZARD EXPOSURE
121
Flood Likelihoo Expected Total Number of % of EP % with

d Number of EP Affected transforme
Susceptib Flood Affected
EP by Hazard r
il of by
Depth
ity Occurren Hazard
low, refer to ≤1m for
LO Table moderate
moderate
and Low
,
≤1m for
high high
San Isidro low 6 ≤1m 69 0 0 5.8
San Ramon low 6 ≤1m n 0 0 4/n
Laniton low 6 ≤1m 67 6 8.95 8.95
Daculang Bolo High 6 ≥1m 91 20 21.97 6.59
Langga Low 6 ≤1m 32 0 0 6.25
Mampurog low 6 ≤1m 104 1 0.96 6.73
Dagotdotan low 6 ≤1m 73 0 0 7
Matacong Low ≤1m 2.53
6 198 5 1
moderate ≤1m 1.01

6 198 2 0
High ≤1m
6 198 0 0 0
Maisog low ≤1m 0% 7.89%

6 38 0
HAZARD EXPOSURE
122
Barangay Name Landslide Likelihoo Number of EP % of EP

d of Total Number % with
Susceptibi Occurrenc of EP Affected by Affected by
transformer
lity Hazard Hazard
e Score
low,
refer to LO
moderate,
Table
high
San Isidro low 6 69 0 0 5.8
San Ramon low 6 n 0 0 4/n
Langga high 6 32 4 12.5 2
Daculang Bolo Low 6 91 7 7.69 6.59
low 6 198 163 83.32 7.97
Matacong moderate 6 198 11 5.56 9.1
high 6 198 24 12.12 4.16
Maisog low 6 38 2 5.26 7.89%

Table 5.7 Electrical Posts at Risk to Landslides
Table 5.8 Adaptive Capacity to Hazards of Population in San Lorenzo Ruiz
123
Access To
Capacity And
Infrastructure Access To Access To Willingness To Government
Brgy Hh Popn Related Financial
Information Retrofit Or Investments
Mitigation Assistance
Relocate
Measures
Daculang 10% (Damaged

5% 6% 2% Moderate
Bolo Spillway)
Dagotdotan 5% 70% 40% 50% Moderate
Langga 5% 50% 5% 5%
25% (Flood
65% 50% 35% High
Mampurog Control)
San Antonio 3% 5% 10% 30%
Table 5.9 Critical Facilities Hazards Sensitivity
124
Proportio Employ Access to

n of the ing
infrastructu
structure Year
Existing Resilie re related
in Construc
condition nt mitigation
Hazard dilapidate ted
measures
and d/ Buildin
(% of
Type of Likeliho condemne g
Brgy NAME OF FACILITY structures
Facility od of d
A - less A - Before with no
Occurre than 5%,. B 1972, B - access to
nce (EXCELLEN - 5-10%, C - 1972- infrastructu
more than 1992, C - (YES or
T, GOOD, re related
10-20%, D - 1992- NO)
FAIR, POOR) mitigation
more than 2012, D -
measures,
20%, of 2012-
structure is above i.e. sea
made of walls, flood
Daculan School Salvacion (B) School 6 Excellent D C Yes 90%
g
Covered Court (Dac. Gov't Excellent D C Yes 50%
Bolo) Fac
Multipurpose Hall Gov't Excellent D C Yes 50%
Fac
Health Station Health Excellent B C No 50%
Fac
Chapel Religiou Excellent B B No 30%
s
Dagotdo Brgy Hall Gov't 6 Fair B D Yes 0%
tan Fac
Brgy Outpost Gov't 6 Good B D Yes 0%
Fac
Day Care Center I 6 Fair C C Yes 0%
Day Care Center II Gov't 6 Fair C D Yes 0%

Fac
Chapel Religiou 6 Fair C B Yes 0%
s
125
Proportion Employ Access to

of the ing
infrastructu
structure Year
Existing Resilien re related
in Construct t
condition mitigation
Hazard dilapidate ed
measures
and d/ Buildin
(% of
Facility od of d
A - less than A - Before with no
Occurre 5%,. B - 5- 1972, B - access to
nce (EXCELLENT 10%, C - 1972- infrastructu
(YES or
, GOOD, FAIR, more than 1992, C - re related
10-20%, D - 1992- NO)
POOR) mitigation
more than 2012, D -
20%, of 2012- measures,
structure is above i.e. sea walls,
Excellent made
A of D Yes flood
Evacuation Center Gov't 6 0%
Fac
School (S.Delos) School 6 Good B B Yes 0%
Water District Utilities 6 Excellent A D Yes 0%
Multipurpose Hall Gov't 6 Good B D Yes 0%

Fac
Health Station Health 6 Poor C C No 0%
Fac
Langga Brgy Hall Gov't Fair C C Yes 50%
Fac
Abandoned School Bldg School Fair C C No 100%
Mampur Brgy Hall Purok 3 Gov't Good B Yes

og Fac
Catholic Church Religiou Good D Yes
s
Saint Joseph DD Gov't Good D No
Fac
126

of the ing
Year infrastructu
Existing structure
Resilien re related
condition in Construct
t mitigation
Hazard dilapidate ed
and measures
d/ Buildin
Type of Likeliho (% of
Brgy NAME OF FACILITY condemne g
Facility od of structures
d
A - less than A - Before
Occurre 5%,. B - 5- 1972, B - with no
nce (EXCELLENT, 10%, C - 1972- access to
(YES or infrastructu
GOOD, FAIR, more than 1992, C -
NO) re related
POOR) 10-20%, D - 1992-
more than 2012, D - mitigation
structure is above i.e. sea walls,
School School Good A Yes
CSAP DCC Gov't Good

Fac
San Brgy Boundaries Gov't Poor C B No 20%
Fac
Brgy Hall Gov't Poor C B No 20%
Fac
Brgy Outpost Gov't Poor C B No 20%
Fac
Chapel Church Religiou Poor C B No 20%
s
Covered Court Gov't Poor C B No 20%
Fac
Day Care Center Gov't Poor C B No 20%
Fac
School Utilities Poor C B No 20%
Water Tank Utilities Poor C B No 20%
127

of the ing
infrastructu
structure Year
Existing Resilien re related
in Construc
condition t mitigation
Hazard dilapidate ted
measures
and d/ Buildin
(% of
Facility od of d
A - less than A - Before with no
Occurre 5%,. B - 5- 1972, B - access to
nce (EXCELLENT 10%, C - 1972-
more than 1992, C - (YES or infrastructu
, GOOD, re related
NO)
FAIR, POOR) 10-20%, D - 1992- mitigation
more than 2012, D -
structure is above i.e. sea
San SIWASA Utilities 6 Poor made
D of C No walls,
5% flood
Isidro
San Isidro Alcantara HS School 6 Good B C Yes 10%
128
Table 6.0 Hazard Sensitivity of Critical Facilities in San Lorenzo Ruiz
Capacity
and Government Available Government
willingness Insurance investments Alternative Regulations
to retrofit Coverage (Capacity of Sites/Struct on hazard
(Est.
Type of or relocate government ures mitigation
Brgy NAME OF FACILITY percentage
Facility (Willing and to make (Availability zoning and
have of property
investments of structural
existing covered by
in CCA- land/alterna design
capacities insurance) DRR) tive sites) standards
to retrofit
or relocate)
Daculan School Salvacion (B) School B 30% High Low B
g
Covered Court (Dac. Gov't B
Bolo Bolo) Fac
Multipurpose Hall Gov't B
Fac
Health Station Health B
Fac
Chapel Religiou C
s
Dagotdo Brgy Hall Gov't B 2% Moderate Moderate C
tan Fac
Brgy Outpost Gov't B 2% Moderate Moderate C
Fac
Day Care Center I B 2% Moderate Moderate C
Day Care Center II Gov't B 2% Moderate Moderate C

Fac
Chapel Religiou B 2% Moderate Moderate C
s
Gov't
Evacuation Center B 2% Moderate Moderate C
Fac
School (S.Delos) School B 2% Moderate Moderate C
Water District Utilities B 2% Moderate Moderate C

Gov't
Multipurpose Hall B 2% Moderate Moderate C
Fac
Health
Health Station B 2% Moderate Moderate C
Fac
Langga Brgy Hall Gov't D 0% High Low D
Fac
129
Capacity
and
Available Government
willingness Insurance Government
Alternative Regulations
to retrofit or Coverage investments
Sites/Structu on hazard
relocate (Est. (Capacity of
Type of res mitigation
Brgy NAME OF FACILITY (Willing and percentage government
Facility (Availability zoning and
have of property to make
of structural
existing covered by investments
land/alterna design
capacities to insurance) in CCA-DRR)
tive sites) standards
retrofit or
relocate)
Abandoned School School B 0% High Moderate
Bldg
Mampur Brgy Hall Purok 3 Gov't D 0% High High D
og Fac
Catholic Church Religiou D D
s
Saint Joseph DD Gov't D D
Fac
School School D D
CSAP DCC Gov't D D

Fac
San Gov't
Brgy Boundaries 10% 10% 5% 3% D
Antonio Fac
Brgy Hall Gov't 10% 10% 5% 3% D
Fac
Gov't
Brgy Outpost 10% 10% 5% 3% D
Fac
Religiou
Chapel Church 10% 10% 5% 3% D
s
Gov't
Covered Court 10% 10% 5% 3% D
Fac
Gov't
Day Care Center 10% 10% 5% 3% D
Fac
School Utilities 10% 10% 5% 3% D
Water Tank Utilities 10% 10% 5% 3% D

San
SIWASA Utilities D 0% High Moderate D
Isidro
San Isidro Alcantara
School D 0% High Low D
HS
130
Table 6.1 Hazards in Natural Resource Production Areas in San Lorenzo Ruiz
Varieties Likelihood
Classification Produced / Flood Depth Likelihood of Landslide of
Brgy Products Occurrence Occurrence
Daculang Coconut,
Bolo Agriculture Pineapple, 1-3 years None
Cassava
Chicken,
Carabao,
Livestock
Cow, Goats
Dagotdotan Coconut,
Agriculture .5M to 1M .5M to 1M
Pineapple 5 5
Langga Agriculture Coconut NA NA .5M 0.5

Mampurog Coconut,
Agriculture Pineapple, .5M None
Corn 6 6
San Antonio
Agriculture Coconut .5M NA
1
San Isidro
Agriculture Cassava, Corn, .5M Yes
Rice, Pineapple 6 6
131
Table 6.2 Sensitivity Indicators of Natural Resource Production Areas, San Lorenzo Ruiz
PERCENTAGE OF
OWNERS/AREAS
PERCENTAGE OF EMPLOYING
Brgy IRRIGATION FACILITIES
AFFECTED AREAS SUSTAINABLE
PRODUCTION
TECHNIQUES
Daculang Bolo None 0% 0% 100%
Dagotdotan 100% 100% 100%
Langga 100% 100% 100%
Mampurog 100% 100% 100% Sustainable
San Antonio 100% 100% 100%
San Isidro 100% 95% 100%
Table 6.3 Adaptive Capacity of Natural Resource Production Areas, San Lorenzo Ruiz
GOVERNMENT GOVERNMENT
ACCESS TO
EXTENSION INFRA
AREAS TO ALTERNATIVE EARLY
Brgy PROGRAMS PROJECTS
FINANCING LIVELIHOOD WARNING
RELATED TO RELATED TO
SYSTEM
CCAM / DRR CCAM / DRR
Daculang Bolo
Coconut 40% 60% 5% Moderate Moderate
Livestock 40%
Dagotdotan 90% 40% 0% Moderate Low
Langga 50% 50% 80% High Moderate
Mampurog 100% 50% 50% Moderate High
San Antonio 10% 1% 50% Moderate Moderate
San Isidro 50% 5% 50% Moderate Moderate
132
2.11.9. Decision Areas and Risk Management Options

The following tables show the decision areas for population, critical facilities, and urban uses based
on the hazards potentially affecting these systems. Implications are also listed as well as
recommended policy interventions to reduce risks and losses.
To manage disaster risks, these options are identified and best implemented in alignment with or
mainstreamed into local deve lopment plans such as the Comprehensive Land Use Plan and Zoning
Ordinance, Comprehensive Development Plan, Local Climate Change Action Plan, and Disaster Risk
Reduction and Management Plan. Additionally, proper resource allocation and program activities
are needed to address the different systems, areas, or sectors. Like most plans, the time frame and
persons/offices responsible should be duly identified as well as funding sources and legislative
levers.
Decision Area/s Technical Findings Impacts/Implications Policy Options

Population at Population at LOW risk to  Policy ensuring the formulation
Risk to Flooding flooding are those in of an LGU infrastructure
Barangays:  Potential disruption masterplan that shall be
to daily activities such responsive to existing flooding
1. Mampurog
as livelihood and conditions in the municipality,
Population at MODERATE employment, taking into consideration the
risk to flooding are those in availment of education barangays with an observed
Barangays: and health services density of populations at risk
from flooding as well the drainage
1. Daculang Bolo (Puroks 2,  Extreme and conditions of common areas
6 and 7) prolonged flooding where common economic
may lead to closure of activities converge.
2. Dagotdotan businesses and lay off
The occurrence of flooding of employees.  Policy seeking convergence
in these barangays are with national government
 Potential damages to agencies that can provide ample
usually every 1-3 years residential structures support in the implementation of
Barnagays Langga, San  May result to the necessary infrastructure
Antonio and San Isidro did displacement of programs.
not report any likelihood of affected population 
flooding in their respective Potential increase in  Policy ensuring the strict
barangays water borne diseases  enforcement of Water Code
Long-term impacts easements
*Not all barangays may include
participated in the CDRA  Policy seeking for the regular
compromised public
workshops updating and conduct of the
services due to
Community Based Monitoring
reallocation to
System (CBMS)/Household Data
Management System (HDMS) and
mapping to enhance
133
Population at Population at risk to rain- immediate relief, household data such as

Risk to
Landslides induced
those landslides are
in Barangays: rehabilitation and location and of population
characteristics
1. Dagotdotan recovery
efforts.  and housing
Policy seeking to limit future
2. Langga densification
residential of (Land Use
uses
3. San Isidro Management)
highly in areas and
susceptible
identify safer areas for future
The occurrence of rain  growthmandating all new
Policy
induced
these landslides
barangays areinusually construction,
additional to enforce
structural
every 1-3 years,
except for Langga which requirements to adapt
flooding conditions andto
reported theevery 4-6 years.
occurrence other potential
Policy mandating hazards
the

formulation and
*Not all barangays dissemination
communities and of contingency
barangays
participated in the CDRA
workshops with identified
hazards
Policy mandating the regular

conduct of Information,
Education and
Communication (IEC)
 campaigns to increase
Policy establishing a
watershed rehabilitation
program to minimize surface
 water
Policy run-off
ensuringinthe
lowclearing
lying
natural and built waterways
and channels. With a
mechanism to identify
priority areas for dredging
 Policy encourage greening
programs in private lands to
serve as temporary
catchment areas to delay
flow
Policyofrequiring
surface rainwater
post

disaster assistance for
 affected families/individuals
Policy seeking convergence
partnerships with relevant
national agencies to
strengthen the general LGU
capacity in managing and
134
Table 6.4 Decision Areas for Natural Resource-based Production Areas
DecisionAreas Technical Findings Impacts/Implications
Natural Natural Resources at  May potentially Policy Options

Resource lands MODERATE risk to flooding affect  Policy to
in all are those in Barangays: livelihoods and converge with
barangays 1. Dagotdotan income of relevant
affected by 2. Mampurog families who government
flooding 3. San Antonio are dependent agencies to
4. San Isidro on agriculture explore
and agro- opportunities
forestry and adopt best
practices on
climate-
resilient crops
and equipment
Barangays without any concerns  Potential  Policy to
of their natural resource damage to crops increase
production areas being affected by and forest participation
flooding include Langga products which in climate field
poses threat to schools and
food security other trainings
Negative
economic
implication
Majority of the flooding adversely Natural Resources at  Policy to

affect the production of cassava, HIGH risk to optimize
coconut, corn and pineapple LANDSLIDES are those production by
in Barangays 1. San preserving
Isidro prime
agricultural
lands
Natural  Significant  Policy to

resource lands government engage in
in barangays resources will partnerships
affected by be allocated to with provincial
landslides farming- government
dependent and relevant
families to national
recover for government
losses and agencies for
resume the strict
normalcy monitoring of
protection and
production
forest uses
135
The frequency of occurrence of  Policy for the

landslides stand at every 1-3 conduct of
years. IECs to
increase
awareness and
capacity of
farming
families
Explore
Alternative
Livelihood
Programs for
communities
whose
production are
adversely
affected by
landslides
Policy
encouraging
the
undertaking of
risk insurance
Policy
adopting
smart farming
systems which
shall provide
digitized
assistance to
farmers
Table 6.5 The frequency of occurrence of landslides stand at every 1-3 years.
Impacts/Implication
Decision Areas Technical Findings s Policy Options
136
Roads traversing o Access and mobility

urban areas o will be limited due to
Barangay Roads o the closure of these
to upland areas road segments o o Improve Road
Potentially lead to Inventory and
isolation of monitoring for more
communities in these comprehensive
barangays o Potential assessment o Retrofit
damage to structures structures to employ
leading to additional hazard-resistant
government resource designs and
allocation for repair construction materials o
and reconstruction Risk Insurance
o Formulation of
disaster
contingency plans
and identification/
construction of
alternative
evacuation routes
for redundancy
purposes
o Consider database
creation and
maintenance for
other lifeline
utilities such as
power lines,
communication
lines, and
drainage/water
systems
Table 6.7 Decision Areas for Urban Areas

Impacts/Implicatio
Decision Areas Technical Findings ns Policy Options
137
o Urban Areas o Low lying barangays, with a relatively high o Potential damages to
exposed to densification rate, proximity to water ways commercial, tourism,
hazards and without sufficient protection from flood and recreational o Policy ensuring a
protection infrastructure are those known to structures o Economic forward planning
be prone to flooding. o Commercial buildings losses o Government approach to
such as those specializing in services and retail resources will be drainage design
as well as institutional facilities similarly allocated for rescue
especially in the
situated or central to residential areas which and relief operations, poblacion and low
are likewise located in hazardous areas are as well as recovery o
lying areas.
equally exposed to hazards. Available livelihood
o Review and strict
opportunities will be
enforcement of Water
needed to
Code easements to
accommodate affected
ensure protection of
families
waterways o Policy
limiting future
densification of urban
uses (Land Use
Management) in high
susceptibility areas
o Policy incentivizing
“green businesses”
especially those with
reduced reliance on
natural resources, using
recycled products,
patronizing fair trade
products, invest in
sustainable packaging,
practicing fair labor
practices, and in has
reduced carbon foot
prints. o Policy ensuring
compliance to Solid and
Waste Water
Management o Policy
creating a spatial
database for permitting
and monitoring
purposes for adherence
to the National Building
Code and other
regulations for resilient
building design
4.2. Condition of Forest and Forest Land Assets
138
The logging period in the municipal forest lands started in the late 1950’s and
continues until the late 1970’s.
Interviews with local communities within the municipality revealed the logging
companies that operated in the area. After Logging patches of log over areas created
opportunities for kaingin apart from small Patches earlier opened through
traditional practices by indigenous communities.
Adding to the pressure is the population that is projected to increase to more than
50% in 2010. There were migrants from other provinces such as Albay and
Camarines Norte. Increasing population means increasing demand for areas for
cultivation. A brief review of population distribution shows that 87% of the
municipal population lives in rural area. Base on the 2007 survey, the population of
the municipality is around 17, 020 or 3, 370 total household (average family size of)
the bulk of which is in barangay.
With such growth the ratio of A & B or agricultural lands to a household is only 5,
902.1690 hectares per capital.
The Forestlands of the municipality have a vast role in sustaining agriculture and for
basic services particularly water and livelihood. The FLUP should lessen the
dependency of some residents on timber extraction and shift alternative source of
livelihood.
The identification of water production areas within forestland will provide support
to development of community water systems. Only the interior residents has no
service of water systems in the locality. The construction water system funded out
of SALINTUBIG of DILG Program in 5 South Sector Barangay has completely
increase the service of the potable water for domestic consumption.
Table 6.8. Conditions of Forest and Forest lands Assets
No./Area per SW & Bgy.

FFL Assets Covered TOTAL Maps for overlaying
SW1 SW2 SW3 AREA
Total Land Area Land Classification + SW map
3119.612 4351.8 3479.047 10950.55
Forest Land 4 9 5 5 Land Classification + SW map
1511.835 939.43 3282.221
A&D Lands 4 9 830.9475 9
139
Water bodies and SW

3412.4 7668.332
Rivers and Creeks (km) 1607.777 6 2648.1 8 Drainage and SW Map
4351.8
Area of SW (has.) 3119.61 9 3479.08 10950.58 SW map
Inland Water 12.5667 69.3224 81.8891
Natural Forest 0
1216.014
Closed Canopy broadleaves 848.2782 367.7365 7 Vegetative Cover + SW map
Open Canopy broadleaves 196.3289 196.3289 Vegetative Cover + SW map
Marginal Forest 0 Vegetative Cover + SW map
Plantation 0 Vegetative Cover + SW map
305.35
NGP 485.877 9 179.0452 970.2816
MMFN 100 100
Bgy. Forest Projects 20 20
50.081
CARP 4 7.8676 57.949
Water Prodn. Catchment (ha.) 0
Irrigation (no.) 0 Water Infra + SW map
Domesting Water Reservation (no.) 0 Water Infra + SW map
Hydro-power (no.) 0 Water Infra + SW map
Biodiversity assets 0
Proclaimed PA (has) 1306.000 146.76 1875.161 Tenure+Vegetative
(AMMNBA/BNP) 9 5 422.3959 5 Cover+Habitat map
Known Habitats of Endangered Spp.
(area/no) 0 Habitat map+ SW map
Closed Canopy 0 Vegetative Cover + SW map
Identified Endangered spps Local account or scientific
(no./names) 0 study
Nature based Tourism Assets 0
No. of caves 0 Nature based tourist map
no. of waterfalls 0 Nature based tourist map
no. of lakes 0 Nature based tourist map
other assets 0
Grasslands and Brushlands 0 Vegetative cover + SW map
59.539
Other land, Built up area 142.1446 1 1.6296 203.3133 Vegetative cover + SW map
1143.625 2258.3 2638.209 6040.184
Other land, Cultivated/annual crop 3 5 3 9 Mineral map + SW map
Other land, natural, barren land 13.1291 13.1291
2034.0 3202.148
Other wooded land, shrubs 959.8684 1 208.2748 5
Tenure
CSC (Matacong) 132.68 132.68
140
 Current Problems, Issues, Needs and Opportunities (PINOs) in Forest and

Forestlands Management within the LGU:
Forest lands in San Lorenzo remains under threat, uncontrolled mining,

unsustainable extraction of non-timber forest products, the expansion of
agriculture and conversion to other uses. The communities consider poverty as
the root issue, which forces settlers and migrants to exploit open-access
resources, support the resource extraction activities like mining or other illegal
and unsustainable extraction of forest resources themselves. Traditional
regulatory schemes such as enforcement fail because lack of adequate budgets
and qualified personnel. The synthesis and list below summaries problems,
issues, needs and opportunities expressed during barangay consultations
conducted for the formulation of this FLUP.
The FLUP-TWG conducted a series of workshop to analyze existing data and

synthesize results of community discussions. Part of analysis and synthesis were
to determine, problems, issues needs and opportunities to forest lands.
 Subwatershed Data of San Lorenzo Ruiz
During the TWG workshop, it was identified that the municipality of San Lorenzo Ruiz has
three major subwatersheds. Subwatershed 1 (SW1) or San Lorenzo Ruiz River
Subwatershed comprising the barangays of Daculang Bolo, Dagotdotan , Mampurog,
Matacong, Poblacion, Maisog and San Isidro containing a total land area of 3,119.79
hectares. Subwatershed 2 (SW2) or Lumanti River Subwatershed includes the barangays
of Daculang Bolo, Dagotdotan, Mampurog, Matacong, Poblacion, Laniton, Langga, San
Ramon, Salvacion, Manlimonsito, and San Isidro covering a total area od 4,125.47 hectares.
Lastly Subwatershed 3 (SW3) or Too River Subwatershed covered the Barangays of
Matacong, Maisog, San Ramon, Salvacion, Manlomonsito , San Isidro and San Antonio
having a total land area of 3,347.61 hectares. Map presentation of the different
subwatershed divide is shown in Figure____. Subwatershed Map of San Lorenzo Ruiz.
141
Table 6.9. Sub-watershed Data of San Lorenzo Ruiz

SW D.Bolo Dogotdo Mampur Matacon Poblacio Maisog Laniton Langga S. Salvacio Manlimo S. Isidro S. Total
tan og g n Ramon n nsito Antonio
SW1 234.19 128.49 87.45 801.29 53.35 1766.2 48.77 3119.79
5
SW2 80.91 144.85 616.98 1560.7 61.38 587.39 391.26 209.28 27.07 445.65 4125.47
SW3 38.54 9.81 991.72 255.93 279.72 1465 306.34 3347.61
total 315.1 273.34 704.43 2400.5 114.73 1776.0 587.39 391.26 1201 255.93 306.79 1959.4 306.34 10592.87
3 6
Source: NAMRIA Topographic Map, DENR-FMB Land Classification Map and Municipal Base map of San Lorenzo Ruiz
It was noted during the identification of issues and concerns in the land area covered by the
municipality, the TWG has raised the boundary conflicts or land claim of the San Lorenzo Ruiz over
the municipality of Basud. This has an approximate area of 10,604.62 hectares per Cadastal Map
Cad-532, Basud Cadastre. This shall be addressed separately in the proper venue. On the other
hand, there is also boundary conflict or land claim from the municipality of Lupi, Camarines Sur
having a total area of 148.65 hectares in SW3, while conflicts between barangays of Matacaong
versus Basud having an area of 186.69 hectares and Mampurog versus Poblacion with 30.96
hectares are also additional issues to be tackled in the Sangguniang Bayan for possible settlement
or for filing of appropriate case base on the evidences at hand by the municipality as shown in the
table_____ below.
Table 7.0. Conflict Areas in San Lorenzo Ruiz
SW Matacong vs. Basud Mampurog vs. San Vicente, Subtotal Total

Poblacion Lupi vs SLR
SW1 3119.79
SW2 186.69 30.96 217.65 4343.12
SW3 148.65 148.65 3496.26
Total 366.30 10959.17
 Forest and Forestlands Assets of San Lorenzo Ruiz
Overlaying the presented maps for the FLUP, the total land area of San Lorenzo Ruiz is 10,
950.55 hectares wherein the forest land area covered 3,282.222 hectares
Table 7.1 Forest and Forestland Assets
FFL Assets SW1 SW2 SW3 Area Maps

Overlaying
Total Land Area 3119.6124 4351.8948 3479.0475 10950.55 LC+SW map
Forest Land 1511.8354 939.439 830.9475 3282.222
A&D Land 1607.777 3412.4558 2648.1 7668.333
Water bodies & SW
River & Creeks (km.) 26901.91 6783.35 5903.88 39589.14 Drainage +SW
142
map
Area of SW (has.) 3119.61 4351.89 3479.08 10950.58
Inland Water 12.5667 69.3224 81.8891
Natural Forest
Closed Forest, broadleaves 848.2782 367.7365 1216.015
Open Forest, broadleaves 196.3289 196.3289
Plantations
National Greening Project (NGP) 485.877 305.3594 179.052 970.2816
Mechanized Forest Nursery (MMFN) 100 100
Bottom-Up Budgeting (BUB) 57.1179 57.1179
Barangay Forest Project (BFP) 20 20
CARP Fund 50.0814 7.8676 57.949
Water Production Catchment (ha.)
Irrigation (no.)
Domestic Water Reservation (no.)
Hydro-power plant (no.) 2.954603 2.95603 On-going
Biodiversity Assets
Proclaimed PA 1306.0009 146.7647 422.3959 1875.162
Known habitats of endangered spp.
Tenure
Certificate of Stewardship Contract 132.68 132.68
(CSC)
Nature based Tourism Assets
No. of Caves
No. of waterfalls (Nacali falls)
No. of lakes
Other assets
-Inland bodies of water 1
-Rafflesia Viewing sites 1
-Matacong and Maisog Tramline 1
San Lorenzo Ruiz Highlands and 1
Environment Park
Grasslands and brushlands
Other land, built-up area 142.1446 59.5391 1.6296 203.3133
Other land, cultivated, annual crop 1143.6253 2258.3503 2638.2093 6040.185
Other land, natural barren land 13.1291 13.1291
Other wooded land, shrubs 959.8684 2034.0053 208.2748 3202.149
Table 7.2 Forest Cover Changes of SW1 (2010-2015)
SW1 Inc/Dec
2010 2015
Natural Forest
Closed Canopy
Closed Canopy, broadleaved 943.2962 1005.158 61.8618
Other wooded land 853.5735 431.0996 -422.4739
Other land, cultivated, perennial crop 934.498 1076.6152 142.1172
143
Other land,cultivated, annual crop 42.566 4.081 -38.485

Other land, built-up area 83.9563 35.0146 -48.9417
Open Canopy
Open forest, broadleaved 496.5959 496.5959
Other wooded land, wooded grassland 140.9408 -140.9408
Other land, natural grassland 78.0076 15.3703 -62.6373
Other land, natural, barren land 28.8455 8.3054 -20.5401
Inland water 13.9284 47.3724 33.444
Marginal Forest
Plantation
NGP
Closed forest, broadleaved 126.2188 158.0427 31.8239
Other wooded land, shrubs 356.4957 41.5266 -314.9691
Other wooded land, wooded grassland
Other land, natural, barren land 0.8005 0.2778 -0.5227
Other land, cultivated, annual crop
Other land, cultivated, perennial crop 2.211 1.6961 -0.5149
Other land, built-up area
Inland water 0.151 1.1887 1.0377
CARP
Closed forest, broadleaved
Open forest, broadleaved
Other wooded land, shrubs
Other land, natural, barren land
Other land, cultivated, perennial crop
BUB
Bgy. Forest Projects
Other wooded land, wooded grassland 0.9698 0.9698
Other land, , built up area 1.3785 0.7043 -0.6742
Forest Cover in Water Production
Area 1.3832 3.7545 2.3713
Cultivated Lands
Forest Land
Other land, natural grassland
144

A&D Lands
Closed forest, broadleaved 106.7126 106.7126
Open forest, broadleaved 285.0343 314.3056 29.2713
Other wooded land, shrubs 140.9408 -140.9408
Other wooded land, wooded grassland 78.0076 15.3703 -62.6373
Other land, cultivated, annual crop 42.566 4.081 -38.485
Inland water 13.9284 47.3724 33.444
Grasslands and Brushlands 853.5735 431.0996 -422.4739
Natural Forest in Biodiversity Area
Table 7.3. Status of Forest Cover of SW2 (2010-2015)
SW2 Inc/Dec
2010 2015
Natural Forest
Closed Canopy
Closed Canopy, broadleaved 5.6761 0.4249 -5.2512
1481.687
Other wooded land 362.6868
1844.3743 5
Other land, cultivated, perennial crop 2075.625
2079.7281 4.1031
Other land,cultivated, annual crop 229.7581 58.5433 -171.2148
Open Canopy
-
Other wooded land, wooded 1573.631
grassland 1573.6316 6
Other land, natural grassland 11.1347 11.1347
Inland water
Marginal Forest
Plantation
NGP
Closed forest, broadleaved 1.5264 -1.5264
Other wooded land, wooded
grassland 22.2607 -22.2607
145
Other land, cultivated, annual crop 0.04 2.7545 7.0896

Inland water
CARP
Closed forest, broadleaved
Other wooded land, shrubs 7.7939 41.1685 33.3746
grassland 32.4146 -32.4146
Other land, natural, barren land 1.1972 -1.1972
BUB
grassland
Other land, , built up area
Area
Cultivated Lands
Forest Land
Closed forest, broadleaved 5.6761 0.4249 -5.2512
Other wooded land, shrubs 325.2218 478.1377 152.9159
grassland 354.2255 -354.2255
A&D Lands
Closed forest, broadleaved 0.9087 0.9087
1328.771
Open forest, broadleaved 37.4651 1366.2366 5
grassland 9.1344 9.1344
Inland water
146
1481.687
Grasslands and Brushlands 362.6868 1844.3743 5
Table 7.4 Forest Cover Changes of SW3 (2010-2015)

FFL Assets SW3 Inc/dec
2010 2015
Natural Forest
Closed Canopy
Closed Canopy, broadleaved 397.3961 -397.3961
Other wooded land 116.9631 -116.9631
Other land, cultivated, perennial crop 2612.828 -2612.828
Other land,cultivated, annual crop 76.896 -76.896
Other land, built-up area 2.4953 -2.4953
Open Canopy
Open forest, broadleaved 206.6239 -206.6239
Inland water 65.2098 -65.2098
Marginal Forest
Plantation
NGP
Inland water
CARP
Closed forest, broadleaved 7.8676 7.8676 0
Open forest, broadleaved
BUB
147

Other land, , built up area
Area
Cultivated Lands
Forest Land
Closed forest, broadleaved 397.3962 385.2537 -12.1425
Other land, natural grassland 1.2451 1.7503 0.5052
Other land, cultivated, annual crop 136.4038 205.5899 69.1861
Other land, cultivated, perennial crop 0.0332 -0.0332
A&D Lands
Closed forest, broadleaved 45.2794 -45.2794
Other wooded land, wooded grassland 24.5745 24.5745
Other land, built-up area 2.4621 16.2374 13.7753
Inland water 47.1716 57.3739 10.2023
Grasslands and Brushlands 116.9631 92.0636 -24.8995
Table 7.5 Criteria/Indicators for Prioritizing

Subwatersheds
WTS.
Cretiria/Indicator % SW1 SW2 SW3
Subwatershed Area
A. Biodiversity Value 16.3 3 1 2
1. Total natural forest within 10.8333
protection zone 16.25 5.41667 3
Closed Canopy
Open Canopy
Submarginal
2. Presence of endangered spp of wildlife
B, Water Production Value 21.3 3 1 2
7.08333 14.1666
1. Irrigation service area 21.25 3 7
148
Within the LGU

Outside the LGU
2. No. of households benefited
By irrigation facilities
BY domestic Water infra
3. Number of Irrigation, power and &
domestic water Infra
C. Economic Production Value 20 3 1 2
6.66666 13.3333
1. Total A&D lands 20 7 3
2. Total production area within forest
land
3. Residual forest in A&D lands and
production zone
4. Plantation in A&D lands and
production zone
5. Cultivated area within forest lands
D. Natural based tourism value 12.5 3 1 2
29.1666 58.3333
1. No. of nature based tourism sites 87.5 7 3
Existing
Potential
E. Protection to lives and properties 15 3 1 2
1. Frequently flooded area 15 5 10
2. Landslide prone area
3. Estimatedpopulation affected by
flooding and landslide
4. Total population
5. Settlement density
F. Protection to infrastructure 15 3 1 2
1. No. of bridges which may be damaged
by flooding or landslide 15 5 10
2. Road density
3. Other infrastructure which may be
damaged
G. Other criteria
4.3. Key Stakeholders
The on-site stakeholders were identified and analyzed based on the interest/stakes in the forest,
the issues and problems encountered by the concerned group with recommendation on the
management options to address the foreseen problems/issues. Though there are issues which are
dependent in the cultures and values on individual, the TWG deemed it necessary to identify
149
possible action to be taken to at least minimize the impact or effects of certain problems. This
analysis will greatly contribute to the identification of management strategies on how the FFL
assets be improved and became sustainable.
Table 7.6 On Site Stakeholders

MANAGEMENT
ACTION/RECOMMENDATI
STAKE HOLDER'S NAME INTEREST/STAKES IN THE FOREST ISSUES/PROBLEMS/INTEREST ON
Internal Stakeholder
Barangay and Municipal Protection and management of the Low income class municipalities Assist in the planning and
Local Government Units forest areas, revenue generation from proposal preparation, IEC,
taxes, formulate ordinances, Access the funding agencies
monitoring of illegal activities, assist
national government agencies in the
implementation of
program/projects/activities, provide
funding in different developmental
activities
Protected Area Management Policy formulation for the Composition with different mandates Strengthen management
Board management of protected area and focus, difficult to convene capabilities and focus,
(AMMNBA & BNP) designation of permanent
and alternate membership
Federation of Senior Citizen Provide livelihood activities, aesthetic Funding requirements, policies to Involvement in planning,
benefits, source of alternative strengthen their involvement in decision making and
medicines forest protection and rehabilitation, implementation of
fitness and capabilities developmental activities
4Ps members Provide income generating projects, Lack of interest to participate in Involvement in planning,
consumers of forest products, forestry programs, not consulted in decision making and
involvement in forest rehabilitation the planning and decision making implementation of
and protection activities relative to forestry matters developmental activities
Cooperative Provide income generating projects, Absence of MCO Institutionalization of MCO

consumers of forest products,
involvement in forest rehabilitation
and protection activities
Coconut planter’s association Convert forest areas into coconut Monocropping, illegal cultivation of Provide training, IEC in
plantation forest lands, contributes in forest Agroforestry and multi-
denudation cropping system,
Coordination with the PCA
Barangay Irrigators Source of water in the rice lands Inactive Irrigator’s Association Reorganization
Association
Barangay Water System Source of water, generate revenues Involvement of the association in Involvement in planning,
Association from using water from the forest FLUP Implementation decision making and
implementation of
developmental activities
Wildlife Enforcement Officers Assist the DENR in law enforcement Harassment in the performance of Provision of insurance and
and protection of the PA their duties, lack of financial and additional honorarium,
logistic assistance provision field supplies and
150
protective equipment
MSWD Provide food for work assistance to Limited or lack of available funds Involvement in planning,
WEOs and other volunteers decision making and
implementation of
Municipal Health Office Provide medical assistance in WEOs Limited or lack of available funds Involvement in planning,
and other volunteers decision making and
implementation of
Municipal Police Station Assist the DENR in law enforcement Numerous cases in law enforcement Additional manpower in the
and protection of the PA and forest activities municipal level, creation of
lands, assist in the rehabilitation and joint task force of uniformed
tree planting activities personnel
Parish Pastoral Council Assist in values formation and IEC various religious groups in the Involvement in planning,
activities locality with conflicting interest decision making and
implementation of
Resorts Owner (River based) Use rivers/water bodies in their Encroachment within the legal Involvement in planning,
business easement. decision making and
implementation of
developmental activities,
strict monitoring of their
compliance activities,
imposition of penalties
whenever necessary
CSC Holders occupying the forest lands, source of Devolved function of the DENR, Conversion into CBFMA, IEC
their livelihood, majority of the CSC were already and strengthen the
expired, existing violations in the organizational and capacity
terms and condition in the agreement building, provision of
livelihood projects,
priorities in rehabilitation
projects like NGP.
Pineapple planters Convert forest areas into pineapple contribute in forest destruction and Involvement in planning,
plantation soil erosion decision making and
implementation of
MARO Assist in the livelihood program for Inventory of beneficiaries Assist in the planning and
upland tillers proposal preparation, IEC,
Access the funding agencies
MAO Provide training and farm implements Monitoring of distributed farm inputs Assist in the planning and
to upland farmers proposal preparation, IEC,
Access the funding agencies
DEPED Managed Schools Assist in IEC and training program on Management of school waste Involvement in planning,
livelihood decision making and
implementation of
Quarry operators Source of minerals, mining areas contribute in soil erosion and Involved in the
landslide, over extraction of minerals. rehabilitation and
protection of river banks
and other source of quarry
Hardware owners source of lumber materials and other Management of solid waste regular monitoring of
wood products existing hardware in the
municipality
151
Furniture makers source of raw materials/wood Monitoring of raw materials to be Introduction of alternative
products used in their business raw materials(bamboo)
Housing Developers use wood product in housing projects Conversion of land to housing Compliance to zoning
ordinance
Transport Group (Jeepney & provide transport facilities for hauling contribute in air pollution strict enforcement of Clean
Tricycle operators and of forest and agricultural products air act
drivers)
Market vendors source of agricultural supplies from contribute in improper waste IEC, involvement in
the forest areas disposal planning and decision
making
Livestock raisers use forestland for pasture Policy on stray animals Ordinances on stray
animals, strict
Implementation
Mountaineers Association Assist in the promotion of local tourist contribute in waste existence in the Strict implementation of
spots in the forest area forest Solid waste management
Policies
Forest occupants source of livelihood and residential conduct illegal forestry activities such strict enforcement of the
area as kaingin, cutting and charcoal forestry laws, relocation,
making IEC, provision of other
livelihood activities
On the other hand, institutional stakeholders were also identified, assess and evaluated through
their mandates/interest, the past and current activities in the municipality and the experienced
conflicts with other stakeholders. The purpose of the analysis is to make the necessary adjustments,
consultations and dialogues on how the programs and projects introduced and to be introduced
shall complement with the FLUP of San Lorenzo Ruiz for sustainable and balance management of
FFL assets. The table below shows the result of institutional analysis conducted by the TWG during
its workshop for FLUP formulation.
Table 7.7: Institutional Stakeholders

Conflicts
with other
Stakeholders/Institution Past and Current stakeholder
s Mandates/Interest FFM Activities s Remarks
Provincial Local Government Unit To protect, manage their Provides Training and Lack of monitoring
resources and serve the honorarium to WEOs, of quarrying
people Tree planting activities activities
for charcoal
manufacturing, create
Provincial Task Force
against illegal cutting,
support the ecotourism
program of the tourist
operators, membership in
PAMB
DENR To protect and conserve the NGP, CSC issuance, Monocropping of
country's natural resources Contract Reforestation coconut in forest
Project, Barangay Forest, land, construction
monitoring of illegal of road network
forestry activities, filed within timberland
152
cases for violation of PD without

705, provide training for permit/ECC
upland farmers, IEC
DILG Monitoring and directing the Assist in the preparation Low-income class,
elected officials of Ordinances, plans and
program for forest
protection and
rehabilitation.
DSWD Provide social works and Provide food for work to Due to limited
assistance to the indigent volunteers of funds.
families tree/bamboo planting,
provide livelihood
training, infrastructure
support.
DOT Assist the local communities Promotion of the nature Limited Provisions
in developing and promotion base tourist attraction of technical
of tourism industry within the municipalities assistance
through media coverage,
funding of the festivals,
provide infrastructural
support, technical
assistance
DPWH Development, construction of Survey of the Road Lack of
all the needed infrastructural opening in the timberland coordination with
support to community areas the proper
agencies in road
opening projects,
improper disposal
of cut trees within
road widening
projects, delayed
compliance in the
tree replacement
programs, ECC
Compliance
DEPED Provision of formal and Assisted in the NGP per Instructions on the
informal education of the EO 26 of the President, modular and
Filipino people educate the people on virtual system of
forest conservation, solid education due to
waste management, etc. COVID 19
pandemic, lack of
maintenance of
existing school
buildings,
Immobilization
BIR Tax collection and revenue Imposition of tax to Difficulties in
generation wood-based industry online income tax
filing, influx of tax
payor in their
office, imposition
of various and
duplication of
taxes
DTI Provide technical assistance Provide training and Registration of
in improving, promotion, financial assistance in business without
packaging of local produce of Walis Tambo making, any legal sources
the community, Registration bamboo furniture
of business and trade making, food processing
industry owners
DA Provide assistance to Provide farm implement Massive cultivation
agricultural farmers and planting materials to of forest land areas
CSC holder for agricultural
products
CNWD-Prime Waters Provides potable water to Rehabilitation projects imposition of high-
local communities within watershed area, water bill, lack of
provide honorarium to maintenance of
WEOs, employ forest water pipes
rangers to patrol in AOR, resulted to system
153
membership in PAMB loss impose to

consumers,
privatization of
water district
NIA Irrigation of agricultural Use the river as water Cutting of trees
lands sources along irrigation
canal
CANORECO Electrification of the local involvement in NGP fluctuation of
communities through tree replacement electric powers,
system loss and
other fees impose
to consumers
DAR Land for the landless Funding support to Inventory of
upland farmers through Beneficiaries
CARP funds
DOJ/MTC/RTC Social Justice Prosecution of violators delayed trial and
against illegal cutting, prolong hearing
wildlife collection and
others
BFP Fire protection, prevention Provide training on forest Lack of access
and control Program fire control roads
AFP Provide peace and order in assist in the Insurgency
the local community apprehension of illegal
forest products, provide
hauling truck,
CNSC Formal education NGP support To offer courses in
eco-tourism
development
PCA Coconut industry provide financial lack of monitoring
assistance and planting of the planting
materials to coconut activities by
planters coconut planters
PNP Peace and Order Assisted in the assistance in
apprehension and filing apprehension and
of case filing of case in
court
4.5 Key Issues and Conflicts
As a compendium of multi-sectoral development scheme, this Forest Land Use Plan

discloses issues and gaps which shall be addressed through inter-sectoral and cross-
sectoral discussions and consultations to formulate holistic approach of development
strategies and solutions requiring interweaving participation and contribution from the
concerned sectors.
Some development issues are confined within the conceptual boundaries of a particular
sector. Other issues however, are common to two or more sectors and such issues can be
addressed jointly by the sectors concerned. The compound and complex development
issues of the municipality are discovered in the course of the planning process. These
special issues are the following: poverty, education, disaster risk reduction and
management, climate change adaptation, public utilities and facilities, unemployment,
154
agricultural support, absence or lack of needed legislations and laxity in the enforcement of
laws, lack of funds, health and medical services.
As a result of the various consultations and planning workshops conducted, the following
issues and concerns in accordance with their development sectors were identified and now
forms part of the 2022-2026 Forest Land Use Plan of San Lorenzo Ruiz:
Economic Development:
o Not fully-developed tourism sites
o Not fully-developed agri-tourism sites
o Not fully established pineapple processing center
o Presence of unaccredited farmers' association
o Not yet established manufacturing facilities for agri-cultural products

o Insufficient application of new technological advances in agriculture and
farming
o Inadequate road networks and concrete bridges
o Low local revenue collection
o Absence of lending institution/micro-finance

o Not established renewable energy source
o Absence of LGU-owned website
o Low family income
o Inadequate employment opportunities
o Absence of Level 3 LGU operated water works
o Not fully-developed tourism sites
o Not fully-developed agri-tourism sites
o Not fully established pineapple processing center
o Presence of unaccredited farmers' association
o Not yet established manufacturing facilities for agri-cultural products

o Insufficient application of new technological advances in agriculture and
farming
o Inadequate road networks and concrete bridges
155
o Low local revenue collection
o Absence of lending institution/micro-finance
 Social Development:
o 9% of children are not fully immunized
o 71% availment of family planning services
o 46% of pregnant women did not satisfy 4 Antenatal Care
o 20% of 0-6 months babies are not exclusively breastfeed
o No breastfeeding corner in the workplace
o 8% of pregnant women delivered at home
o Lack of manpower (health care staff) to man the health care facility 24/7
o Non-Philhealth membership of pregnant women
o Decrease number of indigent enrolled to PHIC
o 1 Still birth case
o No case of maternal mortality
o Four blood units per 1,000 population
o 12% Gap in Tuberculosis treatment success rate
o 10% of Municipal budget is allocated for health
o Prevalence of malnourished children in schools

o 8% children did not meet the desired learning outcomes for the year to be
promoted for the next level
o There’s still 5% of children at school age who are not in school.
o The school still need to work for the 1.76% gap to attained the National
Standard target
o For 2016 records all schools attained the national standard zero drop out
o Unemployment Rate
o Unequal access and opportunity to manpower development (GAD)(OSY)
o Lack of CSO Participation
o Absence of functional rescue vehicle
o Lack of rescue equipment
156
o Lack of SRR volunteers
o Non-observance of LISTO protocol at the barangay level
o Presence light injuries during disaster or calamity
o Lack of Community Based Warning System
o All household have emergency balde

o Needs for revision of Local Climate Change Adaptation Plan, Contingency Plan
(Brgy. Contingency Plan)
o Absence of ECCD (Early Childhood Care and Development)
o Inadequate access of senior citizens and PWDs to social services
o Increase number of unregistered birth and illegitimate children
o There are incidence of bullying
o Minor crime incidents (gambling, alarm and scandal, physical injury)
o 7 out of 12 brgys are ready to be considered as drug cleared
o Presence of CICL
 Environmental Management
 Fund allocation for the implementation of RA 9003
 10-year Solid Waste Management Plan was submitted (for revision)
 Access to potable water
 Non-implementation of environment code
 Incidence of violation of environmental laws
 Poor forestry monitoring
 Infrastructure Development
 Poorly maintained Municipal and Barangay Roads
 Non-functional/ Deteriorated irrigation Structure
 Inadequacy of post-harvest facilities and technical support to rice farmers
 access to electricity
 Inadequacy of potable water supply
 access to sanitary toilet
157
 Limited access to telecommunication services
 Socialized Housing Projects of the LGU
 A number of informal settlers occupying other people's lot
 Inadequacy of Lying-in facilities and equipment
 Support to Senior Citizens
 damaged Municipal Building 1
 Poor condition of Municipal Building 2
 Insufficient facilities for tramline and zipline
 Not fully functional Public market
 Not all barangays have fully constructed covered courts

 Low compliance to National Building Code
 Governance and Administration (Institutional Development)
 Not updated organizational structure of the LGU
 Inadequate number of employees to cater public needs for services
 Insufficient Capacity Development interventions for LGU employees
 LGU Compliance to RA 9485 ARTA (Anti-Red Tape Act)
 Compliance of BAC to RA 9184
 Absence of LGU Internal Control Unit
 Compliance of the LGU to FDP Policy
 Not maximized Local Revenue Potential of the LGU
 Delayed implementation of projects/services
 Absence updated CLUP, CDP and other NGAs prescribed plans
 Not fully institutionalized enabling mechanism on Gender-responsiveness

 Lack of commitment of some LGU officials and employees to improve governance
 Boundary conflicts between municipalities/barangays not yet settled
These issues shall be prioritized and be anticipated by the municipal government because of
its impact and implications on ecological balance, disaster risk reduction and climate
158
change adaptation. These will affect the people, institution, facilities and structures. Thus,
this plan presents mitigating and preventive measures to protect the environment and
maintain its balance.
It is identified in the environmental development plan that environmental laws shall be

strictly implemented and the LGU shall instill awareness on the care of the environment
through the implementation of Republic Act 9003 otherwise known as the Ecological Solid
Waste Management Act of 2000.
CHAPTER 5.0 VISION, GOALS AND OBJECTIVES
5.1. Vision
Sustainable management to the municipality’s forest resources, based on sound science and
stakeholders needs, which balances the ecological and economic values of San Lorenzo Ruiz’
natural resources.
5.2. Mission
To restore, manage and sustain San Lorenzo Ruiz’ forest resources, including the ecological,
biological, economic and aesthetic values therein.
5.3. Goals and Objectives
Considering the availability of prospective resources and the interest of various

stakeholders to support FLUP implementation goals and objectives:
Institutional
 Capacitate the municipal and barangay LGU and the local communities and
stakeholders to enable them to meet the challenges in the implementation of FLUP
 Enact legislations and ordinance supportive of forest protection and improve forest
management strategies;
 Generate and allocate sufficient budget for the implementation of FLUP;
159
 Support the formulation and implementation of ADSDPP using FLUP as a

framework;
 Determine and assess the management effectiveness process in program and
project development within the forestlands;
 Harmonize efforts management among institutions at all level of governance.
Biophysical
 Restoration of denuded forestland and brushland using rain forestation;
 Develop forest lands of San Lorenzo Ruiz as a center for biodiversity and
environmental research and development;
 Sustainably develop, manage and protect the five watersheds of San Lorenzo Ruiz
starting with those identified as priority; and
 Ensure the implementation of appropriate forest management zones and
prescription in the FLUP
Socio-economic
 Promote and adopt sustainable agro-forestry technologies as primary or alternative

source of livelihoods of communities within forestlands;
 Develop and support community based, environment friendly and gender sensitive
alternative and supplemental livelihoods;
 Recognize the forest occupants and prevent the entry of new migrant; and
 Develop and manage community-based infrastructure for basis services.
Cultural
 Promote indigenous knowledge systems and practices and customary laws for the
sustainable management of forest and forestland resources of San Lorenzo Ruiz;
 Values transformation and massive information education campaign for effective
plan implementation
160
CHAPTER 6.0 RECOMMENDED STRATEGIES
Free access to forestlands, limited assets for sustainable livelihood, population pressure,
increased migration to forestland and an institution unable to fully fulfill its mandate of
resource constraints are the primary cause of forest degradation. The secondary causes are
inappropriate land uses, inadequate agriculture production, conversion of forestlands to
other uses, ineffective on-site management of tenured allocated areas, excessive logging
without accountability to restore opened areas, illegal and appropriate extraction of forest
products, and weak law enforcement. The persistence of these issues continues to threaten
the remaining forest and its sustainability thereby feeding the cycle of poverty and
environment deterioration.
The situational analysis points to institution weakened by limited financial and manpower
resources, thus limiting the performance of their mandates for forest management. Though
it has allocated forestlands to supposedly responsible tenures and allocation holders, a
large part or 35% of forestlands under the DENR management notably areas under NIPAS.
The holders of tenure or allocation are not able to consistently perform its responsibility
due largely to lack of resources and technical capability, CBFMAs, CADC and Civil
Reservation and Military of Reservation.
These weaknesses of institution and tenure holders virtually placed all forestlands in
opened-access condition. These are evidence by continued illegal logging, existing of small-
scale mining, continued and unregulated entry of migrants into forestlands and expansion
of kaingin even within NIPAS areas in San Lorenzo Ruiz especially the area in Bicol Natural
Park. Many settlers within and those adjacent to forestlands have vowed the same concern,
because the impact of forest degradation already affect their livelihood.
The challenge to the DENR and to the LGU is how to reverse the trend of forest degradation,
and how the open access condition could be remedy in terms of management is sharing of
responsibility by on-site stakeholders such as the community and the mandated agencies. In
LGU shares responsibility with the DENR in managing forestlands within its boundaries. For
161
areas where DENR remain the primary manager such as NIPA areas, the LGU becomes the
co- manager with the community providing on-site management. Outside of NIPAS the
primary responsibility for management of forestlands in tenured or allocated areas,
including individual property rights within a tenure or allocation.
In terms of resource generation, the LGU and DENR shall device alternative financing
mechanism such as users’ fees, payment for environmental services, and possible market-
based instruments. In undertaken these schemes, management costs will not be solely
sourced from line-item budget of the DENR, but from beneficiaries of services provided by
the forestlands of San Lorenzo Ruiz. In the interest of feasibility of zones shall be
contiguous.
Details of the above strategies are presented below; in large measure, recommendations
were drawn from community consultations and from key findings of situational analysis
conducted by the Technical Working Group. The latter takes into account recommendations
from communities, analysis of geospatial information, socio-economic profile, secondary
data, problems, issues, needs and opportunities.
6.1 General Strategies
Generally, the forest land of the municipality of San Lorenzo Ruiz shall be zonified into
Production Forest to cover 667.6388 hectares and production forest to cover 2,190.9847
hectares (Figure_____. Production and Protection Forest Map) The remaining area within the
BNP and AMMNBA shall be handled by the Protected Area Office based on the approved
Protected Area Management Plan.
The allocation of the open access based on the proposed zoning recommended by the
TWG for the introduction of appropriate management strategies and sub-watershed
prioritization. In the prioritization of SW, the municipality gave priority to the Hydrologic
value of the FFL assets, next is the economic values, third in the bio-diversity value, fourth is
the protection of infrastructure, lives and properties and lastly the aesthetic values/for
ecotourism value.
Table 7.8 Criteria/Indicators for Prioritizing Sub
162
watersheds
Cretiria/Indicator WTS. % SW1 SW2 SW3

Subwatershed Area
A. Biodiversity Value 16.3 3 1 2
1. Total natural forest within protection 16.25 5.41667 10.8333

zone
Closed Canopy
Open Canopy
Submarginal
2. Presence of endangered spp of wildlife
B, Water Production Value 21.3 3 1 2
1. Irrigation service area 21.25 7.08333 14.1667
Within the LGU
Outside the LGU
2. No. of households benefited
By irrigation facilities
BY domestic Water infra
3. Number of Irrigation, power and &
domestic water Infra
C. Economic Production Value 20 3 1 2
1. Total A&D lands 20 6.66667 13.3333
2. Total production area within forest land
3. Residual forest in A&D lands and
production zone
4. Plantation in A&D lands and production
zone
5. Cultivated area within forest lands
D. Natural based tourism value 12.5 3 1 2
1. No. of nature based tourism sites 87.5 29.1667 58.3333
Existing
Potential
E. Protection to lives and properties 15 3 1 2
1. Frequently flooded area 15 5 10
2. Landslide prone area
3. Estimatedpopulation affected by flooding
and landslide
4. Total population
5. Settlement density
F. Protection to infrastructure 15 3 1 2
1. No. of bridges which may be damaged by
flooding or landslide 15 5 10
2. Road density
3. Other infrastructure which may be
163
damaged
G. Other criteria
Table 7.9 Production and Protection Forest of San Lorenzo Ruiz
Category Area (has)

Production Forest 667.6388
Protection Forest 2190.9847
A&D 8092.8912
Total 10951.5147
Source: NAMRIA Topgraphic Map, DENR FMB, Land Classification Map and Municipal Base Map of San Lorenzo Ruiz.
Allocated and Un-allocated Forest Land of San Lorenzo Ruiz
Allocation Zone Area (has.) Remarks

Allocated Forestland 1875.16 AMMNBA
Un-allocated Forestland 1410.96
Allocated Forestland 3181.40 BNP/Clain of SLR
Figure____Allocation and Un-allocated Forest Map stipulated that out of the total area of
Forest land in the municipality of San Lorenzo Ruiz, 592.60 hectares covered the BNP,
1,045.13 hectares covering the AMMNBA while 132.68 hectares were issued with the
Certificate of Stewardship Contracts (CSC by the DENR-PENRO Camarines Norte. This CSC
issued will be issued with Community Based Forest Management Agreement (CBFMA) for
the management of the area for 25 years and renewable for another 25 years. About 1,410
hectares are therefore classified as open access areas will be subjected to appropriate co-
management agreement or other tenurial instrument between the DENR, MLGU and in
partnership with the POs/NGOs through a tripartite agreement, if applicable. The existing
Matacong Resettlement Sites shall also be recommended for issuance of CBFMA enlisting
the qualified members of registered people’s organization within the area.
6.2 Specific Technical Strategies
A part of the specific recommendations and intervention to the allocated and unallocated
areas, the TWG defined management prescriptions that will guide allocation and property
right holders in the formulation of land use zones within their jurisdiction and for
management planning purposes. These management prescription forests are as follows:
164
Registration of settlers and claimed or cultivated areas within forestlands and organize
registration committee in coordination with the BLGU. Eventually this accredited People’s
Organization shall become partners of the DENR and LGU in the following activities for the
proper allocation of the open access forest lands, to wit:
 Issuance of appropriate tenurial instrument with well-defined rights and obligation

over the allocated forest lands (i.e. CBFMA, FLAG, FLAGt, SLUP, SAPA, SIFMA/IFMA
and other).
 Established and sustain linkages with Ecosystem Research and Development Bureau
(ERDB) of the DENR.
 Restore open and degraded areas using indigenous and suitable species.
 Established communal forest or woodlots in each barangay with available areas for
woodlots establishments.
 Forest protection and law enforcement shall be a joint responsibility of the LGU,
DENR and the community.
 Regular updating, evaluation/assessment or review of the management plans and
its implementation;
 On-site management committee shall be created to coordinate community
implementation of watershed management plan;
 Introduce climate change adaptation (CCA) measures.
 Conduct bio-diversity conservation and management within the protected area
(BNP and AMMNBA.
In the interest of providing guidance to tenure or allocation holders, the FLUP TWG
recommended delineating two major zones within the forestlands of San Lorenzo Ruiz
namely protection and productions zones.
 Strict Protection Zone, as defined in DENR Adm. Order 2008-26 Section 5.23, pertains
to the management of protected areas consisting of natural areas with high biodiversity
values.
165
 Multiple Use Zone, as defined in DENR Adm. Order 2008-26 section 5.10, pertains to
the management of protected areas where settlement, traditional and/or sustainable
land use including agriculture, agroforestry, and other income generating or livelihood
activities may be allowed consist with the Management Plan.
The allowable activities and uses within Multiple Use Zone are as follows:
 These shall be limits to expansion of settlements within protection zone;

 Customary and cultural practices of IPs by law are allowed, but not for commercial
purposes;
 Settlement shall not be expanded, and large infrastructure shall not be allowed;
 Traditional and/or sustainable land-use such as agroforestry, and other income
generating or livelihood activities;
 Allow harvesting of non-timber forest products;
 Rehabilitation of open brush lands and grasslands area;
 Existing kaingin in these area be appropriately managed through organization of upland
occupants and possible issuance of appropriate tenurial instrument.
Production Zones
 Local Water Production

 Community woodlots and Tree Plantation Adjacent to Existing Settlements
 Agroforestry Farms
 Forest Nurseries
 Seed Production Areas
 Areas for National Greening Program of the government shall be allocated
 Nature based ecotourism
6.4. Climate Change Adaptation Strategies
To implement the different programs and projects relative to climate change adaptation, the
municipality shall identify the acceptable and tested cross cutting activities such as
166
information, education campaign of mitigating the climate change impact and effects to
community. The forest rehabilitation and restoration program of the government shall be
prioritized in the municipality and formulate policy support and ordinances so as the
identified activities in the FLUP shall be religiously implemented in due time with
appropriate funding supports.
49 hectares of open access areas will be subjected to a co-management agreement between
the DENR, MLGU and in partnership with the IPs through a tripartite agreement. This is an
uncommon agreement for management of unallocated forestlands by the LGU.
CHAPTER 7.0 ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE AND OPERATIONS OF FLUP IMPLEMENTATION
The oversight for the implementation of the FLUP is a just undertaking between the DENR
and the LGU. However, the issues and problems forestlands are multifaceted involving
many stakeholders with varying interests. Thus, the FLUP-TWG recommends creating FLUP
Steering Committee chaired and co-chaired by the mayor and DENR-V Regional Director
and composed of representatives from stakeholders groups.
Figure____. FLUP Organizational Chart
FLUP PROJECT MANAGEMENT OFFICE/STEERING COMMITTEE
CHAIRPERSON- LOCAL CHIEF EXECUTIVE (LCE)
VICE CHAIRPERSON- DENR
MULTI- CONFLICT TENURE LIVELIHOOD AND MONITORING &

SECTORAL RESOLUTION MANAGEMENT COMMUNITY EVALUATION
FOREST COM. COM. DEVELOPMENT COM. COM.
PROTECTION
COM.
MENRO
167
FOREST MANAGEMENT ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT MINES AND GEO-SCIENCES

SECTION SECTION MANAGEMENT SECTION
7.1. Institutionalization and Strengthening of the MENRO
Based on the provision of DENR-LGU_DILG joint Memorandum Circular No. 98-01

(Department of Environmental and Natural Resources, 1998) and the DENR-LGU-DILG joint
Memorandum Circular No. 2003-01 (Department of Environment and Natural Resources,
2003), the LGU takes active role in implementing the FLUP with technical assistance from
the DENR. As much as possible, the MENR Office of the LGU takes greater role in the
oversight of forestlands management. At present the MENRO has two major functions
related to environment namely upland environment, urban environment. Accordingly, since
the MENRO is responsible for forest management, solid waste management, mineral
resources management, the corresponding proposed divisions within the MENRO are
Forest Management Division, Environmental Management Division and Mine and Geo-
Science and Management Section.
Strengthening capacities of MLGU, BLGU for Forest Management, MLGU and BLGU
officials will have forest protection, law enforcement and forest management training per
cluster, such trainings are needful since the officials will actual roles part in the
implementation of FLUP along with its variety of activities.
GIS training of municipal staff and partner organizations. Selected staff from the MENRO,
MPDC, Assessors, MIO, MAO and DENR will have training on GIS.
Training on Environment Law, Enforcement (ELE). The DENR shall regularly conduct
trainings on environmental law enforcement in collaboration with national government
agencies mandated to undertake such functions.
Cross Visit and Study Tours. The Steering Committee and the expanded MENRO personnel
shall be exposed successful projects in other parts of the country to stir up fresh insight and
be able to face new challenges in the implementation of the FLUP.
Participation in Technical Conferences. Holding of seminars. For the same reason

participation to technical conferences, and shall be encouraged and supported by the LGU of
San Lorenzo Ruiz and partner institutions.
168
Conventional and innovative mechanism to provide financing for forestlands management

and adequate capacity for forest protection and law enforcement of open access forest lands
to qualified holder and effective management of allocated forestlands.
Organizational Structure of the FLUP Steering Committee
The FLUP Steering Committee shall have two layers of committees. The Executive PUSU,
Civil Society Organization, NGOs, Academe, Private Business, DILG. The second layer will be
composed of five sub-committees whose functions shall be distinct from each other to avoid
duplication of tasks.
 The Monitoring and Evaluation Committee

 The Livelihood and Community Development Committee
 The Multi-Sectoral Forest Protection Committee
 The Tenure Management Committee
 The Conflict Resolution Committee
7.2. Forging the Partnership Agreements or Arrangement
Upon inception the Project Management Office, the Steering Committee shall define specific
indicators that are clearly defined, with specific measure that can be collected repeatedly
with consistency of data collected. For instance, on restoration of forest cover the specific
indicators would include of bare lands defined in hectares, and the corresponding number
of hectares achieved for the particular year, adequate capacity of forest protection and law
enforcement indicators would include number of deputized barangay teams trained on
enforcement.
Budgets for ProMP and PerMP
The FLUP Steering Committee should dedicate a budget for monitoring and evaluation that
will include both personnel and direct or operation costs.
The latest emphasis on gender and development is an opportunity to correct and error of
past inequity between men and women while making them a partner in conserving nature
and reaping the ensuing benefits.
169
Two global opportunities to be given by the municipality with high priorities devoted to
biodiversity conservation and climate change adaptation. This turn of events has opened a
window for funding and technical support that can be tapped by the LGU;
Then, finally under linkages, the opportunity offered by increasing number of funding
institution for sustainable forest management can be tapped. This is matched at the
technical side by the increasing number of the organizations offering technical assistance
along planning and implementation of programs.
Looking back, the tragedy or calamity of extreme flooding and landslides that struck with
the onslaught of typhoons has brought in continuing support for rehabilitation and
restoration of the damaged areas.
CHAPTER 8.0 FINANCIAL REQUIREMENT AND SOURCE OF FUNDS
8.1. Total Estimated Financial Requirements for Implementing the FLUP and Sources
of Funds.
Total 5 years Costs of Personnel Requirements, Maintenance and Operating

Expenses, Capital Outlays.
Presented below are the identified programs, projects and activities (PPAs). The Matrices
show the expected results or target outputs, target implementation schedule, estimated
costs and counter -parting strategies.
The Work and Financial Plan was divided into protection and production areas. The total
requirement for the implementation of the Forest Land Use Plan for the entire stretch of five (5)
years is one hundred five million, three hundred forty-five thousand two hundred PESOS
(Php105,345,200.00), which is within the LGU’s cap for development fund.
It can be noted that there are programs, projects, and activities which require counter parting
between the LGU and NGA’s or external sources. Most of the partner NGA’s identified the plan are
170
the Department of Environment and Natural Resources (DENR, Department of Agriculture (DA) and
possible Department of Tourism (DOT) and Department of Labor and Employment (DOLE).
171
5 year Consolidated Targets

PROGRAM/ RESP.
PROJECT/ UWM AGENCIES FINANCIAL
ACTIVITIES UNIT PHYSICAL TARGET / REQUIRE-
COST OFFICE MENT
2022 2023 202 2025 202 TOTAL 2022 202 202 20 20 TOTAL
4 6 3 4 25 26
BIOPHYSICAL
Survey and
Delineation of 2, 2,
forest production 625 625, 5,251,
and Protection DENR, 600 600 200
area. has. 1600 1641 1641 3282 LGU
Rehabilitation of
open forest, 6, 6, 6, 6, 6,
grassland and 000, 000, 000, 000 00
brushland areas 30,000 DENR, 000 000 000 ,00 0,0 30,000
has. 200 200 200 200 200 1,000 LGU 0 00 00
Rehabilitation of 6, 6, 6, 6,
Protected area 6, 000, 000, 000 00
(AMMNBA/BNP) 30,000 DENR, 000, 000 000 , 0,
has. 200 200 200 200 200 1,000 LGU 000 000 00 30,000
0 00
River bank
rehabilitation/
stabilization 46, 46, 46, 46, 234,
through 30,000 DENR, 46, 800 800 800 80 000
vegetative Kms. 1.56 1.56 1.56 1.56 1.56 7.8 LGU 800 0
measures
Establishment of 5,000,000 1, 1, 1, 1,
Sanitary Landfill Is LGU 500, 500, 000 00 5000,0
000 000 ,00 0,0
0 00
SOCIO-
ECONOMIC
Establishment of has. 25, 50 50 50 50 50 250 DENR, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1,
Fast-growing Spp. 000 LGU 250, 250, 250, 250 25 6,250,
Plantation of 000 000 000 , 0, 000
firewood 000 00
production 0
Establishment of has. 35, 100 100 100 100 100 500 MAO, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3,
Agroforestry 000 DENR, 500,0 500, 500, 500 50 17,500
Plantations LGU/CPA/ 00 000 000 ,00 0,0 000
DAR 0 00
Preparation of 50 100, 50,0 50, 50,
Livelihood project DA, ,000 000 00 000 00 300,00
proposal for 50, LGU, 0
implementation no. 000 1 1 1 1 1 5 MAO, DTI
Goat raising
Native chicken
production
Tiger grass
production
Mushroom
Production
Food processing
Identification and 100, 100, 100 10
SMP of potential DENR/ 100,0 000 000 ,00 0,0 500,00
nature based eco- 100,000 LGU/DOT 00 0 00
tourism projects no. 1 1 1 1 1 5
Improvement of 10,000 40, 80, 40, 40, 40,
172
Access Roads and 1 2 1 1 1 6 FS, LGU, 000,0 000, 000, 000 00 200,
Connectivity DA 00 000 000 ,00 0,0 000,00
0 00
Development Of 1,000,000 DENR/LG 1,000, 1,00 1,00 1,0 1,0
Nature based eco- U/DOT 000 0,00 0,00 00, 00, 5,000,
tourism no. 1 1 1 1 1 5 0 0 000 00 000
0
Bamboo l.s 2,000,000 1 EMB/LGU 1,00 1,00 2,000,0
Development 0,00 0,00 0
Projects 0 0
INSTITUTIONAL
Information,
education
Campaign (IEC), 5, LGU, 20, 20,0 20,0 20, 20, 100,00
Meetings and no. 000 4 4 4 4 4 20 DENR 000 00 00 000 00
Dialogues 0
Training of Value 35, 1 1 1 1 1 5 LGU, 35,00 35,0 35,0 35, 35,
Formation and no. 000 Academe 0 00 00 000 00 175,00
Leadership 0
Training on 35, 1 1 1 1 1 5 LGU, 35,00 35,0 35,0 35, 35,
Financial no. 000 Academe 0 00 00 000 00 175,00
Management 0
Training on 35, 1 1 1 1 1 5 LGU, 35,00 35,0 35,0 35, 35,
different no. 000 MAO, DTI 0 00 00 000 00 175,00
livelihood projects 0
Training on 70,0 70,0 70, 70,
different no. 35, 2 2 2 2 2 10 DENR, 70, 00 00 000 00 350,00
Environmental 000 LGU 000 0
Policies
Training on
Gender and no. 35, 1 1 1 1 1 5 LGU 35,00 35,0 35,0 35, 35, 175,00
Development 000 0 00 00 000 00
related programs 0
Training on
WEO/SDENRO no. 35, 1 1 1 1 1 5 LGU/DEN 35,00 35,0 35,0 35, 35, 175,00
000 R 0 00 00 000 00
0
GIS Training
no. 35, 1 1 1 1 1 5 35,00 35,0 35,0 35, 35, 175,00
000 0 00 00 000 00
0
Cross Site Visit 100, 100, 100, 100 10
no. 100, 1 1 1 1 1 5 000 000 000 , 0, 500,00
000 000 00
0
INSTITUTIONAL
Institutionalizatio 1,500,000 1,500, 1,50 1,50 1,5 1,5

n and no. 1 1 1 1 1 5 LGU 000 0,00 0,00 00, 00, 7,500,
Strengthening of 0 0 000 00 000
the MENRO 0
Creation And 20, 20, 20, 20, 20,
Operationalization no. 20, 1 1 1 1 1 5 LGU, 000 000 000 000 00 100,00
of the Project 000 DENR 0
Management
Office/ Steering
Committee
Identification of
the Management no. 1 1 1 1 1 5 LGU,
zone for Tenurial DENR
Instrument
Issuance (CBFMA,
FLAG, FLAGT,
SIFMA, IFMA,
SAPA)
173
Inventory of 50, 1 50,000 LGU, 500,0 500,00

Forest Occupants no. 000 DENR/PSA 00
Recruitment and 1, 12 12 12 12 12 60 LGU/DEN 12,00 12,0 12,0 12, 12, 60,000
deputation of no. 000 R 0 00 00 000 00
SDENRO/WEO 0
Monitoring and no. 10,000 4 4 4 4 4 20 LGU/DEN 40,00 40,0 40,0 40, 40, 200,00
evaluation R 0 00 00 000 00
0
TOTAL 63,04 104, 61,4 60, 60, 312,39
4,400 094, 18,8 918 91 200
400 00 ,80 8,8
0 00
5-Year Financial Requirement
8.2. Source of Funds
8.3. Work and Financial Plan for Year 1

Table 8.1 ONE-YEAR FOREST LAND USE WORK AND FINANCIAL PLAN
CY 2022
PROGRAM/PROJEC PHYSICAL FINANCIAL
T/ACTIVITIES UWM UNIT TARGET RESPONSIB REQUIREMENT
COST Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 TOTAL LE Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 TOTAL
AGENCIES/
OFFICE
BIOPHYSICAL
Survey and
Delineation of
forest production
and Protection area 410. 410. 410. 410. 656, 656, 656, 656,
has. 1600 25 25 25 25 1641 DENR, LGU 400 400 400 400 2,625,600
Rehabilitation of
open forest,
grassland and 3,00 3,00
brushland areas. 0,00 0,00
has. 30,000 100 100 200 DENR, LGU 0 0 6,000,000
Rehabilitation of
Protected area 3,00 3,00
(AMMMNBA/BNP) 0,00 0,00
has. 30,000 100 100 200 DENR, LGU 0 0 6,000,000
Riverbank
rehabilitation/stabil
ization through
vegetative
measures 23,4 23,4
Kms. 30,000 0.78 0.78 1.56 DENR, LGU 00 00 46,800
SOCIO-ECONOMIC
Establishment of
Fast Growing Spp.
Plantation of
firewood
production 625, 625,
has. 25,000 25 25 50 DENR, LGU 000 000 1,250,000
Establishment of
Agroforestry 1,75 1,75
plantations MAO, DEN, 0,00 0,00
has. 35,000 50 50 100 LGU 0 0 3,500,000
Preparation of
Livelihood project DA, LGU,
proposal of MAO, DTI, 50,0
implementation no. 50,000 1 1 DAR, PCA 00 50,000
174
Goat raising
Native chicken
production
Tiger grass
production
Food processing
Identification and
SMP of potential
nature based eco-
tourism projects DENR/LGU/ 100,
no. 100,000 1 1 DOT 000 1,000,000
Development of 1,00
nature based eco- 1,000,00 DENR/LGU/ 0,00
tourism projects no. 0 1 1 DOT 0 10,000,000
Bamboo
Development l.s
Projects
CAPACITY
BUILDING
Information,
Education
Campaign (IEC),
Meeting and 5,00 5,00 5,00 5,00 20,000
Dialogues no. 5,000 1 1 1 1 4 LGU, DENR 0 0 0 0
Training of Value
Formation and
Leadership no. 35,000 LGU, 35,0 35,000
1 1 Academe 00
Training on
Financial 35,000
Management no. LGU, 35,0 35,000
1 1 Academe 00
Training on
different livelihood
projects no. 35,000 LGU, MAO, 35,0 35,000
1 1 DTI 00
Training on
different
Environmental 35,0 35,0 70,000
Policies no. 35,000 1 1 2 DENR, LGU 00 00
Training on Gender
and Development 35,0 35,000
related programs no. 35,000 1 1 LGU 00
Training on 1 35,0 35,000
WEO/SDENRO no. 35,000 1 LGU, DENR 00
Training on GIS 35,000 1 1 LGU, DENR 35,0 35,000
no. 00
Cross Site Visits 100,000 1 1 LGU, DENR 100, 100,000
no. 000
INSTITUTIONAL
Institutionalization 1,50
and Strengthening 1,500,00 0,00
of the MENRO no. 0 1 1 LGU 0 1,500,000
Creation
Operationalization
of the Project 20,0
Management no. 20,000 1 1 LGU, DENR 00 20,000
Identification of the
Management zone
for Tenurial
Instrument Issuance
(CBFMA, FLAG,
FLAGT, SIFMA,
175
IFMA, SAPA) no. 1 1 LGU, DENR

Inventory of Forest
Occupants LGU, 500,
no. 50,000 1 1 DENR/ PSA 000 500,000
Recruitment and
Deputation of 12,0
SDENROs/WEO no. 1,000 12 12 LGU, DENR 00 12,000
MONITORING AND
EVALUATION no. 10,000 10,0 10,0 10,0 10,0
1 1 1 1 4 LGU, DENR 00 00 00 00 40,000
TOTAL 3,14 706, 9,06 10,1
8,40 400 9,80 19,8
0 0 00 23,044,400
CHAPTER 9.0 PERIODIC MONITORING AND EVALUATION
9.1. Baseline and Performance Indicator

Performance Management Framework
At the onset, the FLUP Steering Committee must agree on monitoring and evaluation
systems for FLUP. The two components of the monitoring and evaluation system are the
progress monitoring and the performance monitoring.
9.1 Progress Monitoring Plan (ProMP)
Progress Monitoring is necessary for assessing performance on a regular basis to a

(determine whether the implementing institution is meeting its management objectives)
build more effective programs for FLUP implementation and c) estimate rates of or
allocation holder management
against implementation schedules of a sequence of improvement based on outcome

variable agreed upon. Progress will assist the FLUP Steering Committee in making decisions
about appropriate levels of intervention when expected FLUP progress is not being met.
 Responsibility for Progress Monitoring Plan
A FLUP Progress Monitoring Team shall be created and composed of representations

from relevant sector and shall be considered as a sub-committee of the FLUP Steering
Committee.
Reporting to the FLUP Progress Committee shall be both written and oral in order that
specific problems.
176
The chair of the FLUP Progress Monitoring Team should summaries each periodic
report and transmit the findings and recommendation to the LGU and the DENR or the
FLUP Steering committee prior to the regular meeting.
 Reporting Frequency
The frequency of reporting should be related to the nature of the topic or issue being
reported on. The FLUP Steering Committee shall determine the reporting whether it will
be monthly, weekly or even daily.
 Reporting Formats
Reporting will be a combination of descriptive, tabular or graphical forms that

summarizes objectives and strategies and operational achievements.
 Maintaining Permanent Records (MENRO Database system)
The preparation and maintenance of permanent records of FLUP operations is an

essential feature of an effective forest land management. Permanent records and
cost of what activities took place when and where provide valuable information for
planning in the future.
 Quarterly, Semi Annual and Annual Review of FLUP Implementation
The FLUP Steering Committee shall set periodic reviews of FLUP implementation.
Quarterly review will focus on progress of specific activities at the community,
tenure ofr allocation holder level. Semi-annual review will cover progress review of
targets identified in the annual work plan.
 Mid-Term Review of the FLUP
The FLUP shall be reviewed towards the middle of the 3 rd year of

implementation. Its is an exercise in making value- Judgments on the progress of
the FLUP implementation based on desired outcomes. It should examine the
effectiveness of community, tenure activities.
Where changes in the implementation of specific strategies appear to be both

significant over the last two years it is important that the FLUP Steering
177
Committee should examine the reasons for these. Strategies and corresponding
activities and timing schedule may need to be revised If the approved program
appears to be unrealistic.
 Final Management Review
At the end of the 5 th year of FLUP, more comprehensive review should be

undertaken. The final management review should be conducted in the same way
for a mid-term review but covering the full period of a plan. It should be
examined the effectiveness of management performance against the objectives,
prescription implementation schedule and budgets.
 Targets for the next five years
The FLUP- TWG prepared a 10-year LFUP but has defined targets for certain
period. In the next three years the LGU and DENR will focus on capacity building
, strengthening institutions, external linkages, advocacy, IEC and law
enforcement and conflicts resolution, and view of limited financial resources.
9.2 Performance Monitoring Plan (PerMP)
The FLUP has four major objectives namely biophysical, socio-economic, cultural and
institutional. Each of these major objectives has desired targets and outcome that will
be assessed by the FLUP Steering Committee. Such desired outcomes should lead to
attainment of the vision and mission of the DENR and LGU. The Biophysical targets are
restoration of forest cover in bare, brush land, and grassland areas, conservation of
biodiversity, sustained management of watershed for water supply, appropriate or
sustainable land use in various zones of forestlands. The socio-economic targets are
improved income of the settlers from alternative livelihood not dependent on
traditional extractive practices, provision of basic services to communities to minimize
morbidity and loss of income.
178
9.2. Multi-sectoral and Inter-agency Periodic Assessment
The PMO shall create a multi-sectoral monitoring committee who shall be

responsible in the validation/inspection and report on the progress of the implementation
of the specific targets for the required timeline.
9.3. Periodic Assessment of Key FLUP Indicators
The created Monitoring Team shall schedule the field validation/inspection of the
accomplishment on a monthly and quarterly basis. The status of implementation of FLUP
PPAs shall pe report in prescribed matrix and presented with photo documentation and
maps.
9.4. Annual Tenure Holders Assessment
The DENR Compliance Monitoring Team shall lead the team in the assessment of all the
tenurial instruments issued by the office. This shall be done annually to verify the
compliance in the terms and condition stipulated in the license agreement/permit.
Compliance to ECC conditions shall also be considered in the annual assessment.
GLOSSARY OF TERMS
Agroforestry- sustainable management of land, which increases their productivity by

properly combining agricultural crops with forest simultaneously or sequentially over
time through application of management practices which are compatible with the local
climate, topography and slope.
Alienable and Disposable Lands - land of the public domain, which has been classified
and declared as such and available for disposition.
Biodiversity (from “biological diversity”) refers to the variety of life on Earth at all its
levels, from genes to ecosystems, and can encompass the evolutionary, ecological, and
cultural processes that sustain life. Biodiversity includes not only species we consider
179
rare, threatened, or endangered but also every living thing – from humans to
organisms we know little about, such as microbes, fungi, and invertebrates.
Bio-intensive Gardening is a method of growing as much organic food as possible in

the smallest amount of space. The method draws upon a variety of intensive agricultural
methods practiced thousands of years ago in China, Greece and Latin America.
Brush Lands an area of land characterized by shrubs and bushes.
Buffer Zones is a tract of between two differently zoned areas to segregate the two area
like alienable and disposable to forestland. Areas peripheral to a specific protected area
where restrictions on resource use and a special development measures are undertaken
in order to enhance the conservation value of the protected area.
Built-up areas a term used primarily in urban planning, real estate

development, building design and the construction industry. It encompasses the
following: a developed area, i.e. any land on which buildings and/or nonbuilding
structures are present, normally as part of a larger developed environment such as:
developed land lot, rural area, urban area
Carbon trading is an approach used to control carbon dioxide (CO2) pollution by

providing economic incentives for achieving emissions reductions. It is sometimes
called cap and trade or carbon emissions trading.
Civil Reservation a unilateral statement, however phrased or named, made by a State,

when signing, ratifying, accepting, approving or acceding to a treaty, whereby it
purports to exclude or to modify the legal effect of certain provisions of the treaty in
their application to that State. In effect, a reservation allows the state to be a party to the
treaty, while excluding the legal effect of that specific provision in the treaty to which it
objects. States cannot take reservations after they have accepted the treaty; a
reservation must be made at the time that the treaty affects the State. The Vienna
Convention did not create the concept of reservations but codified existing customary
law. Thus, even States that have not formally acceded to the Vienna Convention act as if
180
they had. As reservations are defined under the Vienna Convention and interpretative
declarations are not, the two are sometimes difficult to discern from each other. Unlike
a reservation, a declaration is not meant to affect the State's legal obligations but is
attached to State's consent to a treaty to explain or interpret what the State deems
unclear.
Climate change is a change in the statistical distribution of weather patterns when that

change lasts for an extended period of time (i.e., decades to millions of years). Climate
change may refer to a change in average weather conditions, or in the time variation of
weather within the context of longer-term average conditions, defined by the World
Meteorological Organization as a 30 years or longer term. Climate change is caused by
factors such as biotic processes, variations in solar radiation received by Earth, plate
tectonics, and volcanic eruptions. Certain human activities have been identified as
primary causes of ongoing climate change, often referred to as global warming. There is
no general agreement in scientific, media or policy documents as to the precise term to
be used to refer to anthropogenic forced change; either "global warming" or "climate
change" may be used.
Co-management is a tool uses for effective environment and renewable resource

management by involving groups in community-based recommendations, based on
consensus. Inclusiveness is a principle of co-management; full representation of all
resource interests must be at the co-management table. The co-management model is
not a means of sharing jurisdiction or control with a local co-management committee.
Communal forest is a forest governed by local communities in a way compatible

with sustainable development. Such forests are typically called community forests,
reflecting the fact that the administration and resource use of the forest occurs at the
community. Such community forests are usually administered by a locally elected body,
usually called the Forest Protection Committee, but protection may be enforced by the
local communities or the government depending on local legislation.
Cretaceous - period in geological history representing the end of the Mesozoic Era. The
end of
the Cretaceous is marked by the extinction of dinosaurs.
181
Cultivated lands is an arable land that is worked by plowing and sowing and raising
crops.
Deforestation is the permanent destruction of forests in order to make the land

available for other uses.
Ecosystem is a community of living organisms in conjunction with the non-living

components of their environment, interacting as a system. These biotic and abiotic
components are linked together through nutrient cycles and energy flows. Energy
enters the system through photosynthesis and is incorporated into plant tissue. By
feeding on plants and on one-another, animals play an important role in the movement
of matter and energy through the system. They also influence the quantity of plant
and microbial biomass present. By breaking down dead organic
matter, decomposers release carbon back to the atmosphere and facilitate nutrient
cycling by converting nutrients stored in dead biomass back to a form that can be
readily used by plants and other microbes.
Ecotourism is a tourism to places having unspoiled natural resources, with minimal

impact on the environment being a primary concern.
Tourism that is designed to contribute to the protection of the environment or
at least minimize damage to it, often involving travel to area of natural interest in
developing countries or participation in environmental projects.
Endangered species is a species which has been categorized as very likely to

become extinct. Endangered (EN), as categorized by the International Union for
Conservation of Nature (IUCN) Red List, is the second most severe conservation
status for wild populations in the IUCN's schema after Critically Endangered (CR).
Fauna is all of the animal life present in a particular region or time.
Flora is the plant life occurring in a particular region or time, generally the naturally

occurring or indigenous—native plant life.
182
Forest is a large area dominated by trees.
Forest Charges are fees based on 1999 FOB Market Price survey on timber and other
forest products as submitted by the Regional Offices the following new rates of forest
charges shall be collected by major geographical regions.
Forest Products is any material derived from forestry for direct consumption or

commercial use, such as lumber, paper, or forage for livestock. Wood, by far the
dominant product of forests, is used for many purposes, such as wood fuel (e.g. in form
of firewood or charcoal) or the finished structural materials used for
the construction of buildings, or as a raw material, in the form of wood pulp, that is used
in the production of paper. All other non-wood products derived from forest resources,
comprising a broad variety of other forest products, are collectively described as non-
timber forest products.
Forestland is land covered with forest or reserved for the growth of forests.
Fragmentation is in multicellular organisms is a form of asexual reproduction in which

an organism is split into fragments. Each of these fragments develop into matured, fully
grown individuals that are identical to their parents. Fragmentation, also known as
splitting, as a method of reproduction is seen in many organisms such as
filamentous cyanobacteria, molds, lichens, many plants, and animals such
as sponges, acoel flatworms, some annelid worms and sea stars.
Game Refuge is to shelter or protection from danger or distress the forests land and
the environment thru games.
Geohazard is a geological state that may lead to widespread damage or risk.

[1]
Geohazards are geological and environmental conditions and involve long-term or
short-term geological processes. Geohazards can be relatively small features, but they
can also attain huge dimensions (e.g., submarine or surface landslide) and affect local
and regional socio-economy to a large extent (e.g., tsunamis).
183
Geospatial is a technology used to acquire, manipulate, and store geographic

information. GIS is one form of geospatial technology. GPS, remote sensing,
and geofencing are other examples of geospatial technology.
Grasslands are areas where the vegetation is dominated by grasses (Poaceae);

however, sedge (Cyperaceae) and rush (Juncaceae) families can also be found along
with variable proportions of legumes, like clover, and other herbs.
Green Tourism is a study found that many hotels ultimately made little to no effort to
actually conserve resources or reduce waste; they just wanted to appear to be
environmentally friendly, or “green.” The most environmentally-friendly hotels have
information on their websites about their green initiatives that make it easier to learn
about the concrete measures they are taking to conserve natural resources, protect
plants and wildlife, and contribute to the well-being of local communities.
Indigenous Cultural Community is the indigenous peoples of the Philippines, it has a

historical phenomenon whose development dates back to the Spanish colonial
government, they are concentrated in major mountain rages from Batanes in the north
to the Jollof in the south.
Indigenous Species is native to a given region or ecosystem if its presence in that

region is the result of only natural processes, with no human intervention.
Indigenous People is also called the Indigenous Cultural Communities member.
Individual Property Rights is usually considered to be ownership (rights to the

proceeds generated by the property) and control over a resource or good. Many
economists effectively argue that property rights need to be fixed and need to portray
the relationships among other parties in order to be more effective.
184
Inland Waters also known as internal waters, are subject to the total sovereignty of the
country as much as if they were an actual part of its land territory. A coastal nation has
the right to exclude foreign vessels, subject to the right of entry in times of distress.
Kaingin is a slash-and-burn agriculture, or fire–fallow cultivation, is a farming method

that involves the cutting and burning of plants in a forest or woodland to create a field
called a swidden. (Preparing fields by deforestation is called assarting.)
Key Biodiversity Area (KBA) is an identify and designate areas of international

importance in terms of biodiversity conservation using globally standardized criteria. It
extend the Important Bird Area (IBA) concept to other taxonomic groups and are now
being identified in many parts of the world, by a range of organisations. Examples
include Important Plant Areas (IPAs), Ecologically and Biologically Significant Areas
(EBSAs) in the High Seas, Alliance for Zero Extinction (AZE) sites, Prime Butterfly Areas,
Important Mammal Areas and Important Sites for Freshwater Biodiversity, with
prototype criteria developed for freshwater mollusks and fish and for marine systems.
[1]
The determination of KBAs often brings sites onto the conservation agenda that
hadn't previously been identified as needing protection due to the nature of the two
non-exclusive criteria used to determine them; vulnerability; and irreplaceability.
Land Allocation means the allocation of agricultural land parcels to individuals or

organizations in the village agricultural land use zone.
Land Classification refers to land categories, reflecting quality classes, capability

classes or grade, depending upon the characteristics of the land and/or its potential for
agricultural use.
Land Cover is the physical material at the surface of the earth. Land covers
include grass, asphalt, trees, bare ground, water, etc. or/and the vegetation of the earth.
Land Use involves the management and modification of natural

environment or wilderness into built environment such as settlements and semi-natural
habitats such as arable fields, pastures, and managed woods. It also has been defined as
185
"the total of arrangements, activities, and inputs that people undertake in a certain land
cover type."
License agreement is a legal contract between two parties, known as the licensor
(DENR) and the licensee. In a typical licensing agreement, the licensor grants the
licensee the right to produce and sell goods, apply a brand name or trademark, or use
patented technology owned by the licensor. In exchange, the licensee usually submits to
a series of conditions regarding the use of the licensor's property and agrees to make
payments known as royalties.
License, Special Timber is a special permit given by the DENR with an allowed
trees/timber to be cut and transact or use to construction and office equipment.
Log a thick piece of tree trunk or branch
Lumber or called as timber (used in the rest of the English-speaking world) is a type

of wood that has been processed into beams and planks, a stage in the process of wood
production. Lumber is mainly used for structural purposes but has many other uses as
well.
Mangrove Forest is a shrub or small tree that grows in coastal saline or brackish water.
Metadata is "data [information] that provides information about other data". Many

distinct types of metadata exist, among these descriptive metadata, structural
metadata, administrative metadata, reference metadata and statistical metadata.
Metamorphic rocks are rocks arise from the transformation of existing rock types, in a

process called metamorphism, which means "change in form". [1] The original rock
(protolith) is subjected to heat (temperatures greater than 150 to 200 °C) and pressure
(100 megapascals (1,000 bar) or more), causing profound physical or chemical change.
The protolith may be a sedimentary, igneous, or existing metamorphic rock. It is make
up of large part of the Earth’s crust and form 12 % of the Earth’s land surface. They are
186
classified by texture and by chemical and mineral assemblage (metamorphic facies).

Some examples of metamorphic rocks are gneiss, slate, marble, schist, and quartzite.
Military Reservation is property that the government has exclusive jurisdiction over to
be used by the Military or Armed Forces of the Philippines.
Tree farm is a small- or large-scale plantation of trees for commercial purposes of

various species of trees whether fruit or forests trees.
Tree plantation is area planted by trees either natural or fast growing in a large area
for construction, industrial and commercial use of trees.
Unclassified Public Forest are forest land which is not classified to any uses nor a
protected area but still a mountainous forest area publicly or government owned
parcel/tract of land
Upland or high land especially at some distance from the sea and/or ground elevated
above the lowlands along rivers or between hills.
Watershed a region or area bounded peripherally by a divide and draining ultimately

to a particular watercourse body of water
Watershed, forest reserve is an area where the coverage of the forest land is in
between the watercourse or between rivers traversing the whole area.
Watershed Reservation is a protected area that preserves the only major watershed

in a specific area that can also serve as source of water and water reservoir, thus it is
proclaim by the President of the country.
Wilderness Area is a region where the land is in a natural state; where impacts from
human activities are minimal—that is, as a wilderness. It might also be called
a wild or natural area. Especially in wealthier, industrialized nations, it has a specific
legal meaning as well: as land where development is prohibited by law.
187
Woody Perennials Is the shrub, trees or vines plants that grow woody stems and
are evergreen in areas where they are hardy.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
188
 To the Mayor Nelson P. Delos Santos who provided with the both
resources and moral support, and in approving the FLUP preparation
activity.
 To the Support of our Vice-Mayor Arnulfo DL. Bacuño and the

Sangguniang Bayan Member, viz:
Hon. Julio F. Estravez

Hon. Restituta B. Nagera
Hon. Rey Mar T. Macale
Hon. Allan M. Quibral
Hon. Amiel Z. Guinto
Hon. Felix A. Quibral
Hon. Roderick A. Jovelo
Hon. Santy S. Patricio
Hon. Alvin Factor, LNB President
Hon. Christine Joy Canaria
 The Support of All Head of Offices and Department,
Engr. Rico C. Brizo, MPDC/MENRO

Mr. Ramon A. Placido, MBO
Mr. Justo Z. Racho, Municipal Accounting Office
Mrs. Vilma Barra, MTO
Mr. Glenn D. Florendo, Mun. Assessor’s Office
Mr. Manuel S. Racho, MCR
Engr. Rodel G. Chavez, MEO
Mr. Eddie P. Cañamero
Dra, Doris C. Navarro, MHO
Mrs. Mila Jean A. Cabase SB Secretary
Mr. Normanuelle Eboña, MSWDO
Mr. Rommel M. Abejero, MDRRMO
Mrs. Virginia Estravez, HRMO
Ms. Joara P. Sureta, Mun. Tourism Office
Mr. Amiel Z. Guinto, Private Secretary II
 To the Municipal Development Council, who supported the thrust for

balance development without compromising the forestland of the locality.
 To the DENR Provincial and Regional Office for their Technical

Assistance, especially to MAM CONYA ROMERO and MAM MARIZON
VEGA.
 To the Sectoral Representatives;
189
Mr. Eric B. Flores, CSO

Mrs. Imelda O. Encinas, Principal I, Educational Sector
 To the MPDO and other Office Staff who assists on Secretariat work:
And lastly, to all the people behind that make this Forest Land Use Plan be
realized.
RICO C. BRIZO
MPDC/MENRO
190

Final Flup

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

You might also like

Final Flup

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Final Flup

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

FOREST LAND USE PLAN 2022-2026

MUNICIPALITY OF SAN LORENZO RUIZ FOREST LAND USE PLAN

CHAPTER 1.0 INTRODUCTION

1.1. Importance of Forest and Forest Land

monocropping activities like coconut, engagement to illegal collection/extraction of

1.2. FLUP as Forest and Forest Land Management Tool

1.3. FLUP and the Provincial and Regional Development Plans

In the formulation of FLUP, its purpose is to build consensus and develop

CHAPTER 2.0 SCOPE AND LIMIT OF THE FLUP

2.1. Physical Boundaries

2.2 Duration of the Plan

2.3 Complementation with Other Plans

2.4 Data Limitation

CHAPTER 3.0 METHODOLOGY

Data & Map

Figure 1 Forest Land Use Planning Process

Method of Data Collection

Frequency of Data Collection

Responsibility for Collection Data

to Sign and Enter into a Memorandum of Agreement with the Department of

Subsequently, a Memorandum of Agreement entered into by and between the DENR

3.2 Community Profiling and Mapping

3.3 Updating the Thematic/Composite Map

3.4 Situational Analysis

These activities include several types of analysis; a) Analysis of bio-physical, socio-

This phase identifies issues and opportunities. It also generates preliminary

3.5 Zoning and allocating the Open Access FFL

The consultations were designed to provide opportunity for the stakeholders to

3.7 Drafting the FLUP

3.8 Consultation and Validation of the Draft FLUP

3.10 Preparation and signing of Joint FLUP Implementation

CHAPTER 4.0 KEY FINDINGS

4.1. Profile of San Lorenzo Ruiz

TOPOGRAPHY-Two (2) types of topographic relief, the flat lowlands and

Map 1.7 Geologic Map

Within the forestland there are no existing tenured areas.

0-3 Level to nearby level land : 3160.5795 : 30.02

8-15 moderately undulating @ rolling land : 1496.063 : 14.21

15-18 steeply undulating @ rolling land : 877.0029 : 8.33

Source: MPDO-San Lorenzo Ruiz

TEXTURE OF SOIL SURFACE

TOTAL : 27,330.78 : 100%

Boundary with underlying layer is smooth.

Source: MPDO-San Lorenzo Ruiz

LAND AREA (Has.)

Matacong (Poblacion) 114.67 114.67 0.42

DESCRIPTION AREAS (HAS.) PERCENT (%)

DESCRIPTION AREA (Has.) PERCENT (%)

Suitable for forest 240 1.20

Rainfall is brought about by weather patterns such as different causes of

geographical setting, topography and exposure season. Under certain

SOURCE: PAG-ASA Daet Radar Station

Projected Rainfall in San Lorenzo Ruiz, Camarines Norte in 2050

SOURCE: PAG-ASA, Daet Radar Station

Projected Minimum Temperature in San Lorenzo Ruiz, Camarines

1987 79 80 80 78 77 85 82 80 85 83 85 87 981 81.75

1988 86 82 78 81 78 86 84 81 84 85 62 79 966 80.50

1989 84 84 94 81 83 81 81 80 71 70 85 84 978 81.50