EARTH AND LIFE SCIENCE GROUP MEMBERS’ EVALUATION RUBRIC
GROUP NUMBER:
GRADE LEVEL & SECTION:
Dimension
1. Contribution to the team
project/work
2. Taking responsibility
3. Valuing other team members
and quality of interactions
Total:
20-25
  Does not collect any relevant information
 No useful suggestions to address team's
needs
 Does not perform assigned tasks
  Often misses meetings and, when present,
does not have anything constructive to say
 Relies on others to do the work
 Often argues with team mates
 Doesn't let anyone else talk
 Occasional personal attacks and "put-downs"
 Wants to have things done his/her way
and/or does not listen to alternate
approaches
45-50 70-75 95-100
   Collects basic, useful    Collects and presents to the team a great deal
 Collects information when prodded
information related to the project of relevant information
 Tries to offer some ideas, but not well developed
   Occasionally offers useful ideas    Offers well-developed and clearly expressed
and/or clearly expressed to meet team's needs
to meet the team's needs ideas directly related to the group's purpose
   Performs all assigned tasks
   Attends meetings regularly
 Performs assigned tasks but needs many
   Performs all tasks very effectively
reminders
and usually participates    Attends all meetings and participates
 Attends meetings regularly but generally does
enthusiastically
not say anything constructive
effectively    Very reliable.
 Sometimes expects others to do his/her work
   Generally reliable
   Generally listens to others'
   Usually does much of the talking
points of view    Always listens to others and their ideas
   Does not pay much attention when others talk
   Always uses appropriate and    Helps them develop their ideas while giving
   Often assumes others’ ideas will not work
respectful language them full credit
   No personal attacks and put- downs but
   Tries to make a definite effort    Always helps the team reach a fair decision
sometimes patronizing
to understand others' ideas
SUMMARY

Group Members SCORE

1.(Leader’s name)

2. (Member)
3. (Member)
4. (Member)
5. (Member)
6. (Member)
7. (Member)