Mea517 - Mihir Bora - Fea - All Exp

PILLAI COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING, NEW PANVEL
Dr. K. M. Vasudevan Pillai Campus

Plot No. 10, Sector 16, New Panvel – 410 206
Landline: 022 – 2745 6030
/ 1700 / 6100
Website: www.pce.ac.in
Department of Mechanical Engineering INDEX
Finite Element Analysis
Name: MIHIR BORA
Roll No: MEA517
Admission No: 2020PE0565
Signature:
Expt. Date of
Title Signature
No. Submission
1 Analysis of cantilever beam 24/10/21

2 Analysis of bar subjected to axial tension and
24/10/21
compression
3 Analysis of stepped bar 01/11/21
4 Thermal analysis of composite wall 01/11/21
5 Analysis of CST element (Plate and plate with
04/11/21
circular hole)
6 Analysis of truss 04/11/21
7 Free vibration analysis of bar element 04/11/21
Name: MIHIR BORA
Batch: 1
Roll No: MEA517
Experiment No: 1
FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS
EXPERIMENT NO: 1
ANALYSIS OF CANTILEVER BEAM.
PROBLEM SPECIFICATION:
Cantilever beam is subjected to 25 kN load at its free end. Assume any suitable cross-section
of the beam and carry out analysis to find out maximum deformation of the cantilever beam.
Validate results with analytical calculations.
DEFINE ELEMENT TYPE:

Element type > add > beam > beam 188
SPECIFY THE SECTION PROPERTIES

Section > beam > common section > …………………
DEFINE MATERIAL PROPERTIES:

Material model > Structural > Linear > Elastic > Isotropic
EX 2e7, PRXY 0.28.
2
DEPARTMENT OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING PCE, NEW PANVEL
BUILD GEOMETRY:
Model > Create > Key points > In active CS > 1(0, 0,0), 2 ( 20, 0,0)
> Line > Straight Line.
Figure 1 presents the CAD model developed in ANSYS APDL.
Figure 1: CAD model of cantilever beam.
3
GENERATE MESH:
Meshing > Mesh tool > Mesh attribute select LINES > Meshing.
After meshing, the generated finite element model is shown in Figure 2.
Figure 2: Discretized model of cantilever beam.
4
APPLY LOADS:
Loads > Define loads > Apply > Structural > Displacement > On Node 1.
Loads > Define loads > Apply > Structural > Force > On Node 2.
Figure 3 represents the point load at the free end and fixed boundary condition at another
end of cantilever beam.
Figure 3: Cantilever beam with boundary conditions.
5
PLOT RESULTS:
Solution > Solve > Current LS.
General Postprocessor > Plot Result > Deformed Shapes.
The deformed and undeformed shape of the beam is presented in Figure 4.
Figure 4: Solution of cantilever beam with maximum deformation at the free end.
6
ANALYTICAL SOLUTION:
CONCLUSION:
7
Name: MIHIR BORA
Batch: 1
Roll No: MEA517
Experiment No: 2
FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS PROF. DIGVIJAY G. BHOSALE
EXPERIMENT NO: 2
ANALYSIS OF ROD ELEMENT SUBJECTED TO TENSION AND COMPRESSION
Rod element is subjected to tension & another end is fixed. The tensile force is 250 kN,
Length=20 cm & dia. = 3 cm. (E=2.0 x 10 7N/cm2). Similarly, same rod element is subjected to
compressive force of 250 kN. Carry out analysis for both cases to find out maximum
deformation of rod element. Validate results with analytical calculations.


Section > beam > common section > …………………

EX 2e7, PRX Y0.28.
2
BUILD GEOMETRY:
Model > Create > Key points > In active CS > 1(0, 0,0), 2 ( 20, 0,0)
Figure 1: CAD model of rod.
3
GENERATE MESH:
Figure 2: Discretized model of rod.
4
APPLY LOADS:
Figure 3 represents the tensile load at the one end and fixed boundary condition at another
end of rod.
Figure 3: Rod with boundary conditions (Tensile Force).
5
PLOT RESULTS:
The deformed and undeformed shape of the rod is presented in Figure 4.
Figure 4: Solution of rod with tensile force at the free end.
6
7
FOR COMPRESSION FORCE:

Figure 5 represents the compressive load at the one end and fixed boundary condition at
another end of rod.
Figure 5: Rod with boundary conditions (Compressive Force).
Figure 6: Solution of rod with compressive force at the free end.
8
CONCLUSION:
9
Name: MIHIR BORA
Roll No: MEA517
Experiment No: 3
EXPERIMENT NO: 3
ANALYSIS OF STEPPED BAR SUBJECTED TO TENSILE LOAD.
Step bar is subjected to 15 kN load at its free end. Assume any suitable cross -section for each
step in step bar and carry out analysis to find out maximum deformation of the step bar.
Validate results with analytical calculations.
Material 1 (steel):-
EX 2e5, PRXY 0.26.
ADD MATERIAL
Material 2 (Aluminium):-
Material model > Structural > Linear > Elastic > Isotropic EX
7e4, PRXY 0.26

1ST STEP:-
Section > beam > common section > B=550mm, H=500mm
2ND STEP:-
3RD STEP:-
BUILD GEOMETRY:
Model > Create > Key points > In active CS > 1(0, 0,0), 2 ( 500, 0,0), 3(800,0,0), 4(900,0,0)
Figure 1: CAD model of stepped bar.

GENERATE MESH:
Figure 2: Discretized model of step bar.
APPLY LOADS:
Figure 3 represents the point load at the free end and fixed boundary condition at another
end of stepped bar.
Figure 3: Step bar with boundary conditions.
PLOT RESULTS:
The deformed and undeformed shape of the beam is presented in Figure 4.
Figure 4: Solution of step bar with maximum deformation at the free end.
CONCLUSION:
Name: MIHIR BORA
Roll No: MEA517
Experiment No: 4
Problem Taken From: Finite Element Analysis
Authors: Dr Vijaykumar S. Jatti
Prof. Mandar S. Sapre
Prof. Sachin M. Shinde
Tech-Neo Publications
EXPERIMENT NO. 4
THERMAL ANALYSIS OF COMPOSITE WALL
PROBLEM SPECIFICATION :
A composite wall consists of three materials as shown in Fig. P. 3.7.7. The outer temperature
To = 20°С. Convection heat transfer takes place on the inner surface of the wall with 2 To =
800°C and h = 30 W/m °C. Determine temperature distribution the wall. Ky = 25 W/m°C; K2
= 30 W/m°C; K3 = 70 W/m°C
SOLUTION :
BUILD GEOMETRY :
Model Create Key points In active CS
1(0,0,0), 2(220,0,0), 3(370,0,0), 4(420,0,0), 5(440,0,0), 6(440,500,0), 7(420,500,0),
8(370,500,0), 9(220,500,0), 10(0,500,0). Line St Line Area
Arbitrary Area By Lines
Figure 1: CAD model of composite wall.
2
DEFINE MATERIAL PROPERTIES :

Material model1,2,3,4 Thermal Conductivity Isotropic
K1=25,K2=30,K3=70
GENERATE MESH :
Meshing Mesh tool Mesh attribute select AREAS Meshing.
Figure 2: Discretized model of composite wall.
APPLY LOADS :
Loads Define loads Apply Thermal Temperature
On node
Extreme left line temperature = 1500° C
Extreme right line temperature = 90° C
3
Figure 3: Composite wall with boundary conditions.
Figure 3 represents the constant temperature boundary conditions on both edge of the wall.
PLOT RESULTS :
4
Figure 4: Solution of composite wall showing temperature distribution across the

thickness of the wall.
ANALYTICAL SOLUTION :
5
6
CONCLUSION :
7
Name: MIHIR BORA
Roll No: MEA517
Experiment No: 5
Title: Plane Stress Analysis Of Steel Plate
Sign:
EXPERIMENT NO:05
PLANE STRESS ANALYSIS OF PLATE
The analysis of Plate with & without hole which is fixed at one edge & another edge
subjected to tensile force of 300 N. Dimensions of plate are width 100 mm and height 80
mm. Radius of circular hole is 8 mm.

EX2e5, PRXY0.28.
BUILD GEOMETRY WITHOUT CIRCULAR HOLE:

Model > Create > Key points > in active CS > 1(0, 0,0), 2 ( 100, 0,0), 3(100,50,0),
4(50,0,0) Line > Straight Line.
Area > Area by lines
Figure 1: CAD model of solid plate.
2
GENERATE MESH:
Meshing > Mesh tool > Mesh attribute select AREAS > Meshing .
Figure 2: Discretized model of plate.
APPLY LOADS:
Loads > Define loads > Apply > Structural > Displacement > On Node.
Loads > Define loads > Apply > Structural > Force > On Node .
3
Figure 3: Plate with boundary conditions.
Figure 3 represents the load at the free edge and fixed boundary condition at another edge
of plate.
PLOT RESULTS:
General Postprocessor > Plot Result > counter plot > stress > von mieses stresses.
Figure 4: Solution of plate with maximum stresses at the free end.
BUILD GEOMETRY FOR PLATE WITH CIRCULAR HOLE:

Model > Create > Key points > in active CS > 1(0, 0,0), 2 ( 100, 0,0), 3(100,50,0),
4(50,0,0). Line > St Line.
TO CREATE HOLE:
Preprocessor > Modeling > create > circle > Solid Circle > create > Operate > Boolean
> Substrate > Area.
GENERATE MESH:
Meshing > Mesh tool > Mesh attribute select AREA > Meshing.
4
Figure 5: CAD model of solid plate with circular hole.
APPLY LOADS:
Loads > Define loads > Apply > Structural > Displacement > On Node.
Loads > Define loads > Apply > Structural > Force > On Node
5
Figure 6: Discretized model of plate with circular hole.
PLOT RESULTS:
General Postprocessor > Plot Result > counter plot > stress > von mieses stresses .
6
Figure 7: Solution of plate with maximum stresses at the free end.
CONCLUSION:
Stress in Solid plate:
SMN: 2.36 N/mm2
SMX: 5.95 N/mm2
Stress in plate with circular hole:
SMN: -0.326 N/mm2
SMX: 11.78 N/mm2
7
FINITE ELEMENT PROF. DIGVIJAY G. BHOSALE
Name: MIHIR BORA

Roll No: MEA517
Experiment No: 6
Title: Analysis of Truss subjected to load
Sign:
Problem Link: https://mathalino.com/reviewer/engineering-mechanics/problem-
409-howe-roof-truss-method-joints
EXPERIMENT NO: 6
Analysis of Truss subjected to load

A truss is subjected to the load at different points. Assume any suitable

crosssection for the truss and carry out analysis to find out maximum deformation
of the truss .
ASSUMPTIONS :
Cross-section area of truss = 100mm2
Young’s Modulus : 200 GPa DEFINE
ELEMENT TYPE:
Element type > add >link > 3D finitstn 180 ( Link 180 )

Section > link >add >cs id :1 > section name and area of section > Tension and
compression

Material model 1 > Structural > Linear > Elastic >Isotropic
2e5, PRXY 0.3.
BUILD GEOMETRY:
Figure 1 presents the Finite element model developed in ANSYS APDL
Figure 1: Finite element model of truss
APPLY LOADS:
Loads > Define loads > Apply > Structural > Displacement > On keypoint 1 >
all DOF = 0
Loads > Define loads > Apply > Structural > Displacement > On keypoint 4> UY= 0
Loads > Define loads > Apply > Structural > Force > On Node 1,4 > 1.5e3.
Loads > Define loads > Apply > Structural > Force > On Node5,6,7 > 3e5
Figure 3represents the finite element after applying boundary condition to truss
Figure2.Finite element model after applying boundary condition.
PLOT RESULTS:

The deformed and unreformed shape of the truss is presented in Figure 3
CONCLUSION:
The deformed and undeformed shapes of given truss under various loading conditions are
found using ANSYS APDL software. And hence experiment performed successfully.
Name: MIHIR BORA
Roll No: MEA17
Experiment No: 7
Title: Free vibration analysis of bar element
Sign:
EXPERIMENT 07
Free vibration analysis of bar element
Assume any suitable cross-section (RECT, B=100mm, H=120mm) of the beam with
length of beam(L=1500mm) and carry out analysis to find out maximum deformation
of the beam under vibration. Validate results and thus finding deformed and
undeformed shape.Also find maximum and minimum frequency


Section > beam > common section > Rectangle

Material model > Structural > Linear > Elastic > Isotropic EX
2.1e5, PRXY0.27.
Material model > Structural > DENSITY>0.000007850.
BUILD GEOMETRY:
Model > Create > Key points > In active CS > 1(0, 0,0), 2 (1300, 0,0)

Figure 1: CAD model of rod.
GENERATE MESH:
Meshing > size contrls > manual size > lines > by picked lines > no of total divisions (10)
After meshing, the generated finite element model is shown in Figure 2 and 3.
Figure 3: Discretized model of rod.
APPLY LOADS:
SOLUTION : New analysis > modal >
analysis option > no .of modes to extract i.e 6
PLOT RESULTS:
General Postprocessor > Read results > by pick >Plot Result > Deformed Shapes.
All 6 modes solution:
1
2
3
4
5
6
CONCLUSION:
Analysis of Cantilever beam for free vibration is done and frequency of vibration of the
beam is studied for 6 modes. Experiment was performed successfully and natural
frequency of cantilever beam was studied.
Frequencies for cantilever beam for 6 modes of vibration :
1) 1.14293 minimum
2) 1.36941
3) 7.1626
4) 8.50609
5) 15.0388
6) 20.2093 maximum

Mea517 - Mihir Bora - Fea - All Exp

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

You might also like

Mea517 - Mihir Bora - Fea - All Exp

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Mea517 - Mihir Bora - Fea - All Exp

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

PILLAI COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING, NEW PANVEL

Dr. K. M. Vasudevan Pillai Campus

Department of Mechanical Engineering INDEX

Finite Element Analysis

Name: MIHIR BORA

Roll No: MEA517

Admission No: 2020PE0565

1 Analysis of cantilever beam 24/10/21

DEFINE ELEMENT TYPE:

SPECIFY THE SECTION PROPERTIES

DEFINE MATERIAL PROPERTIES:

EX 2e7, PRXY 0.28.

> Line > Straight Line.

Figure 1 presents the CAD model developed in ANSYS APDL.

Figure 1: CAD model of cantilever beam.

After meshing, the generated finite element model is shown in Figure 2.

Figure 2: Discretized model of cantilever beam.

Figure 3: Cantilever beam with boundary conditions.

General Postprocessor > Plot Result > Deformed Shapes.

The deformed and undeformed shape of the beam is presented in Figure 4.

ANALYSIS OF ROD ELEMENT SUBJECTED TO TENSION AND COMPRESSION

DEFINE ELEMENT TYPE:

SPECIFY THE SECTION PROPERTIES

DEFINE MATERIAL PROPERTIES:

EX 2e7, PRX Y0.28.

> Line > Straight Line.

Figure 1 presents the CAD model developed in ANSYS APDL.

Figure 1: CAD model of rod.

After meshing, the generated finite element model is shown in Figure 2.

Figure 2: Discretized model of rod.

Figure 3: Rod with boundary conditions (Tensile Force).

General Postprocessor > Plot Result > Deformed Shapes.

The deformed and undeformed shape of the rod is presented in Figure 4.

Figure 4: Solution of rod with tensile force at the free end.

FOR COMPRESSION FORCE:

Figure 5: Rod with boundary conditions (Compressive Force).

The deformed and undeformed shape of the rod is presented in Figure 6.

Figure 6: Solution of rod with compressive force at the free end.

ANALYSIS OF STEPPED BAR SUBJECTED TO TENSILE LOAD.

Element type > add > beam > beam 188

DEFINE MATERIAL PROPERTIES:

EX 2e5, PRXY 0.26.

7e4, PRXY 0.26

Section > beam > common section > B=550mm, H=500mm

Section > beam > common section > B=450mm, H=400mm

Section > beam > common section > B=350mm, H=300mm

> Line > Straight Line.

Figure 1 presents the CAD model developed in ANSYS APDL.

Figure 1: CAD model of stepped bar.

After meshing, the generated finite element model is shown in Figure 2.

Figure 2: Discretized model of step bar.

Solution > Solve > Current LS.

General Postprocessor > Plot Result > Deformed Shapes.

The deformed and undeformed shape of the beam is presented in Figure 4.

Authors: Dr Vijaykumar S. Jatti

Prof. Mandar S. Sapre

Prof. Sachin M. Shinde